O’Neill, Vincent

100 Background: Combining BEV with CT significantly improved progression-free survival (primary endpoint) in the E2100, AVADO, and RIBBON-1 trials in the 1st-line setting and the RIBBON-2 trial in the 2nd-line setting. Primary efficacy and safety results from RIBBON-2 have been published; here we present final OS results. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had MBC that had progressed on 1st-line CT without BEV. 2nd-line CT (taxane, gemcitabine, capecitabine, or vinorelbine) was chosen before 2:1 randomization to CT with either BEV (10 mg/kg q2w or 15 mg/kg q3w) or PL continued until progression. Stratification factors were 2nd-line CT, hormone receptor status, and time from MBC diagnosis to 1st progression. All pts could receive BEV at progression. The primary endpoint was PFS. Final analysis of OS, a secondary endpoint, in the intent-to-treat population was planned after 557 events and provided 80% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.77 (median OS increased from 14.0 to 18.2 months) at α=0.04. Results: At the time of data cutoff (Oct. 31, 2011), 184 (82%) of 225 pts in the CT/PL arm and 376 (82%) of 459 pts in the CT/BEV arm had died. BEV was administered in subsequent treatment lines in 12% vs 6% of pts, respectively. There was no difference in OS between treatment arms: HR 1.013 (95% CI 0.845–1.215), log-rank p=0.8843. Median OS was 17.8 months with CT/PL vs 18.6 months with CT/BEV. The 1-year OS rates were 69% vs 71%, respectively. Subgroup analyses by CT cohort showed HRs ranging from 0.86 (95% CI 0.58–1.29) in the capecitabine cohort (n=144) to 1.44 (95% CI 0.82–2.53) in the vinorelbine cohort (n=76). HRs were close to 1 for the two largest CT cohorts (taxane and gemcitabine). Exploratory analysis in the subgroup of patients with triple-negative MBC showed a HR of 0.85 (95% CI 0.58–1.26). Updated safety results were similar to those previously reported from the primary analysis. There were fewer fatal adverse events in the CT/BEV arm (1.5%) than in the CT/PL arm (3.2%). Conclusions: Final OS results from RIBBON-2 reveal no difference between treatment arms. No new safety signals were observed.

Purpose This phase III study compared the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab combined with standard chemotherapy regimens versus chemotherapy alone as second-line treatment of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –negative metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to chemotherapy + bevacizumab or to chemotherapy + placebo. Before random assignment, investigators chose capecitabine, a taxane (paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, or docetaxel), gemcitabine, or vinorelbine. Dosing for bevacizumab or placebo was 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks or 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks, depending on chemotherapy regimen. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival, PFS by chemotherapy cohort, objective response rate (ORR), duration of objective response, 1-year survival rate, and safety. Results RIBBON-2 enrolled 684 patients (225, chemotherapy + placebo; 459, chemotherapy + bevacizumab). The combination of bevacizumab with chemotherapy demonstrated a statistically significant benefit. Median PFS increased from 5.1 to 7.2 months (stratified hazard ratio for PFS, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.93; P = .0072). The 10% improvement in ORR between the placebo- and bevacizumab-containing arms (39.5% v 29.6%; P = .0193), although not statistically significant, was consistent with previous trials. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) related to bevacizumab treatment were hypertension (9.0%) and proteinuria (3.1%). There was an increased number of AEs leading to study discontinuation in the chemotherapy + bevacizumab arm compared with the chemotherapy + placebo arm (13.3% v 7.2%). Conclusion The combination of bevacizumab with commonly used chemotherapies improved PFS in the second-line treatment of patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, with a safety profile comparable with that in prior phase III studies.