Back to Authors

Sparano, JA

Mayo Clinic

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Citations 5

Abstract GS1-08: Multimodal artificial intelligence (AI) models integrating image, clinical, and molecular data for predicting early and late breast cancer recurrence in TAILORx
Sparano, J. A., Wang, V., Gray, R. J., Makower, D. F., Albain, K. S., Hayes, D. F., Geyer, C. E., Dees, E. C., Goetz, M. P., Olson, J. A., Badve, S. S., Saphner, T. J., Whelan, T. J., Radovich, Milan M., Kaklamani, V. G., Sledge, G. W., Whelan, Timothy J. , Sparano, JA, Hayes, D. F., Geyer, C. E., Goetz, Matthew P. , Saphner, Thomas J. , Radovich, Milan , Kaklamani, VG

Clinical Cancer Research | February 17, 2026 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: GS1-08-GS1-08

10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-gs1-08 Get It

Abstract Background: TheTAILORx trial established that adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) is non-inferiorto chemotherapy plus ET (CET) in T1-2N0 HR+/HER2-negative early breast cancer(EBC) with an Oncotype DX (ODX) 21-gene recurrence score (RS) of 11-25, RS 0-10is associated with low distant recurrence (DR) rates with ET alone, and RS26-100 is associated with higher DR rates despite CET. Although ODX isprognostic for 10-year DR, it has limited value for late DR >5 years. Inorder to develop improved DR risk prognostication, we developed multimodal AImodels integrating clinical, molecular, and histopathology features to provideprognostic information for early (<5years), late (>5 years), and overall DR at 15 years using primary tumorsamples and clinical data from volunteers who participated in TAILORx. Methods: DigitizedH&E slides were generated and nucleic acids extracted and sequenced from∼5000 primary tumor samples using Caris MI Tumor Seek-Hybrid, of which 2,808(56%) were used for model training and 5-fold nested cross validation (60/20/20split). Models included single-modality (clinical [C], image [I], molecular [M:ODX genes]), dual-modality (CM, IC), and multimodal (ICM). An expandedmolecular model (M+) model was also derived from expanded molecular inputsderived from whole transcriptome sequencing (WTS) data, including 5 commercialgene signatures (ODX, MammaPrint, Prosigna, EndoPredict, BCI) and 57 high-variancegenes; only EndoPredict, BCI, and ODX gene signatures were retained for model M+.Model-CM+ combined clinical plus expanded molecular features, while ICM/ICM+integrated image, clinical, and (expanded) molecular inputs. Risk scores were dichotomized into high vs. low risk groups usingthresholds chosen to yield risk group proportions closely matching thosedefined by the ODX RS cutoff of 25 for distinguishing high vs. low genomicrisk. Theprimary endpoint was distant recurrence (DR). Prognostic performance wasassessed using truncated concordance index (C-index, 90th percentile of eventtimes), hazard ratios (HRs), and log-rank tests. DNA-level whole exomesequencing (WES) features were also tested but did not provide additionalprognostic information and thus excluded from final models. Results: Theactual ODX continuous RS achieved a C-index of 0.625 for overall DR and 0.743early DR, but no prognostic value for late DR (0.52). Similar results for theC-index were observed for ODX+C for overall DR (0.619), early DR (0.724), andlate DR (0.514). Of all modelsevaluated, model-ICM+ gave the best overall prognostic accuracy for overall DR (C-index0.713; hazard ratio [HR] 3.56 for comparison of high vs. low risk, p<0.001)and late DR (C-index 0.655; HR 2.36, p<0.001), and ranked second for earlyDR (C-index 0.772; HR 6.59, p<0.001) behind the CM+ model (C-index 0.782). Amongsingle-modality models, Model-M+ improved early DR prognostication comparedwith a molecular model including only ODX genes(C-index 0.767 vs 0.744 for M),whereas Model-I was strongest for late DR prognostication (C-index 0.635). Conclusions: Molecularfeatures primarily drove prognostic accuracy for early DR within 5 years,whereas histopathology features strengthened the prognostic accuracy for lateDR after 5 years. Multimodal models captured these complementary signals, withICM+ giving the best overall accuracy for individualized prognostic assessment.Additional validation of the optimized ICM+ model and other models is beingperformed in an intendent validation sample of 2000 TAILORx volunteers, withresults to be presented at the meeting.Supported by the Breast CancerResearch Foundation and the U.S. NIH/NCI U10CA180820 and 5U24CA196172, and theU.S. Postal Service Breast Cancer Stamp Fund. Citation Format: J. A. Sparano, V. Wang, R. J. Gray, D. F. Makower, K. S. Albain, D. F. Hayes, C. E. Geyer, E. C. Dees, M. P. Goetz, J. A. Olson, S. S. Badve, T. J. Saphner, T. J. Whelan, M. Radovich, V. G. Kaklamani, G. W. Sledge. Multimodal artificial intelligence (AI) models integrating image, clinical, and molecular data for predicting early and late breast cancer recurrence in TAILORx [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS1-08.
E2197: Phase III AT (doxorubicin/docetaxel) vs. AC (doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) in the adjuvant treatment of node positive and high risk node negative breast cancer
Goldstein, Lori J. , O’Neill, Anne, Sparano, JA, Perez, EA, Shulman, L.P., Martino, Silvana, Davidson, N.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 23, 2017 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: 512-512

10.1200/jco.2005.23.16_suppl.512 Get It

Abstract P2-08-01: Prospective trial of endocrine therapy alone in patients with estrogen receptor positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer: Results of the TAILORx low risk registry
Sparano, JA, Gray, RJ, Makower, DF, Albain, KS, Hayes, DF, Geyer, CE, Dees, EC, Perez, EA, Olson, JA, Zujweski, J, Keane, MM, Moreno, HL Gomez, Reddi, RP, Goggins, TF, Mayer, IA , Brufsky, Adam , Toppmeyer, D., Kaklamani, VG, Atkins, JN , Berenberg, JL, Sledge, GW, Makower, D., Pritchard, Kathleen I. , Brufsky, Adam M

Cancer Research | May 20, 2016 | Volume: 76 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: P2-08-01-P2-08-01

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p2-08-01 Get It

Abstract Background: The Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx) is a prospective trial evaluating the role of endocrine therapy or chemoendocrine therapy in patients 18-75 years of age with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, a primary tumor between 0.6-5.0 cm, and negative axillary nodes, a population for whom chemotherapy is typically recommended or least considered based on National Comprehensive Cancer Center Network (NCCN) guidelines. Methods: The trial was designed to demonstrate non-inferiority of endocrine therapy compared with chemoendocrine therapy in the randomized group with an Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS) of 11-25. Patients with a low RS < 11 were assigned to endocrine therapy alone and with a high RS > 25 assigned to chemoendocrine therapy, and both groups were followed in a prospective registry. The definition of an intermediate RS differed in this trial (RS 11-25) from the original reports (RS 18-30) in order to reduce the risk of chemotherapy undertreatment in patients with a mid-range or low RS (Sparano & Paik. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:721-728). Results: The trial enrolled 10,273 patients between April 2006 and October 2010, of whom 6907 patients (67.2%) had a mid-range RS of 11-25, 1737 (16.9%) had a high RS > 25, and 1639 (15.9%) had a low RS of < 11. At the fourth planned interim analysis, the ECOG-ACRIN data monitoring committee recommended that the study continue as planned for the randomized group with a RS 11-25, and that the results be released to the investigators for the low risk group with a RS <11. The characteristics of the low risk registry population are as follows: age 50 or less (27%), 51-60 (35%), > 60 (39%); tumor size < 1 cm (8%), 1-2 cm (61%), > 2 cm (31%); histologic grade low (34%), intermediate (59%), high (7%); breast conservation (68%) or mastectomy (32%). Initial endocrine therapy included tamoxifen in 35%, aromatase inhibitors in 59%, ovarian function suppression in 3%, and unspecified therapy in 3%; 5 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (1 of whom relapsed). Five-year rates (and 95% confidence intervals [CI]) for low RS group were 99.2% (98.5, 99.6%) for distant relapse free interval, 98.5% (97.7, 99.1%) for relapse-free interval, 93.7% (92.2, 94.9%) for invasive disease free survival, and 98.2% (97.3, 98.7%) for overall survival. Information regarding ER, PR, and HER2 RNA expression will be presented. Conclusions: Despite meeting guidelines for recommending or at least considering adjuvant chemotherapy based on classical clinicopathologic features, the risk of recurrence was very low at 5 years in patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative, axillary node-negative breast cancer and a low RS of < 11 treated with endocrine therapy alone without chemotherapy. Citation Format: Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, Hayes DF, Geyer Jr CE, Dees EC, Perez EA, Olson Jr JA, Zujweski J, Keane MM, Gomez Moreno HL, Reddi RP, Goggins TF, Mayer IA, Brufsky AM, Toppmeyer DL, Kaklamani VG, Atkins JN, Berenberg JL, Sledge Jr GW. Prospective trial of endocrine therapy alone in patients with estrogen receptor positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer: Results of the TAILORx low risk registry. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-08-01.
A prospective characterization of the resolution of ixabepilone induced peripheral neuropathy: data from a large registrational program in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Perez, Edith A. , Vrdoljak, Eduard , Sparano, JA, Vogel, Charles L., Peck, R., Mukhopadhyay, Pabak, Pivot, Xavier B. , Vahdat, Linda T.

Cancer Research | December 30, 2010 | Volume: 69 | Issue: 2_Supplement | Pages: 6140

10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs-6140 Get It

Abstract Abstract #6140 Background:
 Ixabepilone (ixa), the first in a new class of antineoplastic agents, showed clinical benefit in combination with capecitabine (C) in 2 large clinical trials in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) pts whose tumors were resistant to (study 046, JCO, 2007) or pretreated with anthracycline (A) and taxanes (T) (study 048). In 048, ixa + C, compared to C alone, demonstrated significant increases in PFS (HR 0.79 [0.69-0.90]) and ORR (43% vs 29%). A trend toward increased OS was seen both in 048 (HR 0.90 [0.78-1.03]) and in 046 (HR 0.90 [0.77-1.05]), which did not reach statistical significance. Similar to taxanes, dose-limiting peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a side effect associated with ixa treatment. Here we present the incidence rates, management of ixa-induced PN from 3 registrational studies in pts with MBC and an analysis of resolution time. Also, data on potential risk factors for PN are presented.
 Methods:
 Incidence of PN is summarized from a 2000 pt program from 3 multi-center clinical trials. In this program, almost 1100 pts with MBC received ixa either as a monotherapy (40 mg/m2 IV over 3h Q3w, N=126) in a phase II study, or in combination with C (1000 mg/m2 PO BID x14d Q3w) in 2 large phase III studies (N = 369 and N = 595). PN was evaluated every 4 weeks after completion of treatment until toxicity was resolved. Resolution of PN was defined as the time from onset of worst grade to baseline or grade 1. A Cox regression analysis was also performed on a dataset of 945 pts with different tumor types across multiple studies, receiving ixa as a monotherapy or in combination with C, to identify the potential risk factors for grade 3/4 PN.
 Results:
 Incidence rates of grade 3/4 PN and resolution time observed in 1 phase III study (046) and the phase II (081) have been published before (081: JCO, 25; 3407). Here we present the data from the final confirmatory phase III study (048).
 
 PN was effectively managed with dose reduction. After dose reduction, symptoms improved or did not worsen in the majority of pts, and a median of 2-3 additional treatment cycles were delivered. Pts with diabetes were at a higher risk of grade 3/4 PN (HR: 1.67 [1.00-2.78], p-value = 0.049).
 Conclusions:
 Incidence of ixa-associated PN was similar to that observed in trials of other T based regiments. Ixa-induced PN has a predictable median time to resolution of 5-6 weeks over 3 large studies. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 6140.
Phase I-II study of the histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) vorinostat plus paclitaxel and bevacizumab in metastatic breast cancer (MBC): New York Cancer Consortium trial P7703.
Ramaswamy, B, Cohen, Brian E., Pellegrino, C., Hershman, DL, Chuang, Emil , Somlo, George, Swaby, Ramona F., Hopkins, Una, Christos, PJ, Espinoza‐Delgado, Igor, Sparano, JA, Bhalla, Kapil N. , Goetz, Matthew Bidwell

Cancer Research | December 30, 2010 | Volume: 69 | Issue: 2_Supplement | Pages: 404

10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs-404 Get It

Abstract Abstract #404 Background: The oral HDACi vorinostat (V) sensitizes breast cancer cells to tubulin polymerizing agents and anti-VEGF directed therapies in vitro. We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of V plus paclitaxel (P) and bevacizumab (B) as first-line therapy for MBC.
 Methods: Eligible patients (pts) with measurable disease, ECOG PS 0 or 1, and no prior chemotherapy for MBC, received P (90mg/m2) on days 1, 8, 15 and B (10mg/kg) on days 1,15 every 28 days, plus V 200 mg (N=3) or 300 mg (N=28) BID orally for 3 days given the day before, day of, and day after each P dose. Response was assessed after every 3 cycles (RECIST). The trial was designed to distinguish between a response rate of < 40% vs. > 60% (alpha=0.10, beta=0.10) using Simon's optimal 2-stage design. At least 12 responses were required in the first 28 evaluable pts in the 1st stage and 21 of 41 in the 2nd stage.
 Results: There were no dose-limiting toxicities among the first 6 pts treated at the 1st (200 mg BID; N=3) and 2nd (300 mg BID; N=3) dose levels. Among the 26 evaluable pts treated at the recommended phase II dose of 300mg bid in the 1st stage, 14 patients had a partial response (PR-54%; 90% confidence interval [C.I.] 36%-71%), 6 had stable disease (SD) at 3 months and remain on treatment, 2 had SD as the best response with progressive disease (PD) at 11.8 and 15 months, and 4 had PD as their best response. Additionally, 2 of 3 pts treated at the first V dose level had a PR, indicating PR in 16 of 29 overall (55%, 90% C.I 38%-71%). Only 11 of 29 evaluable pts (38%) have progressed after a median followup of 10.5 months (R-2.3-14.9). Two pts had tumor biopsies and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) collected before and 4 hours after the 3rd V dose (300 mg BID) which showed increased acetylation of K69 lysine residue of the chaperone protein Hsp 90, upregulation of Hsp70, and downregulation of AKT by Western Blot, providing evidence of Hsp90 inhibition in tumor and PBMC.
 
 Gr 3-4 toxicities included neutropenia (26%), neuropathy (23%), fatigue (16%), thrombosis (10%), vomiting (6%), hypertension (3%), and diarrhea (3%).
 Conclusions: Our preliminary findings indicate that the HDACi V inhibits Hsp90 and downregulates AKT in breast cancer in vivo, and enhances the effectiveness of P plus B in MBC. Accrual is nearly complete and the final efficacy analysis will be presented. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 404.