Sledge, G. W.

Abstract Background: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are increasingly used in the treatment of breast cancer due to their superior efficacy compared to conventional chemotherapy. The management of male breast cancer is largely extrapolated from clinical data in females and evidence regarding the efficacy of ADCs in men remains limited. This study aimed to compare survival outcomes between male and female breast cancer patients treated with ADCs across the spectrum of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression. Methods: We included total of 2,954 (Male: 34, Female: 2,920 breast cancer samples) from patients who underwent treatment with ADCs. We excluded patients with triple-negative breast cancer status due to the rarity of this subtype in males and the worse prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer, so that the cohorts would be more homogeneous without overrepresentation of triple-negative breast cancer in females. We categorized patients by HER2 status as: HER2-null (if there was 0% stain on HER2 IHC), HER2-ultra low (if HER2 IHC was 0 but with stain 1-10%), HER2-low (if HER2 IHC was 1+ or 2+ with a negative chromogenic in situ hybridization [CISH] assay), and HER2-positive (if HER2 IHC was 3+ or 2+ with a positive CISH assay). Real-world median overall survival was derived from insurance claims and calculated from the start of first ADC with either trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) or trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) or sacituzumab govitecan (SG) to last contact using Kaplan-Meier. Statistical significance was assessed using chi-square and Mann-Whitney U. Results: The distribution of sex by HER2 expression group was: HER2-null: 8 males vs 612 females; HER2-ultra low 6 males vs 467 females; HER2-low 11 males vs 903 females; HER2-positive 9 males vs 938 females. Median survival from treatment initiation with either T-DXd or SG in the HER2-null cohort was 21.31 months in males vs 15.72 months in females (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.33 - 2.01, p=0.67); in the HER2-ultra low cohort was 17.73 months in males vs 14.47 months in females (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.26 - 2.63, p=0.76); in the HER2-low cohort was 11.08 months in males vs 18.62 months in females (HR 1.53, 95% CI 0.63 - 3.7; p=0.34). In the HER2-positive cohort, 5/9 males (55.5%) and 544/938 females (58%) were treated with T-DXd. Median survival from treatment initiation with either T-DXd or T-DM1 in the HER2-positive cohort was 36.55 months in males vs 46.52 months in females (HR 1.77, 95% CI 0.84 - 3.74, p=0.12). Conclusions: In this study, survival appears to be comparable between males and females with breast cancer across the spectrum of HER2 expression when both are treated with ADCs, although the survival in the HER2-positive cohort appears numerically lower in males, consistent with data on HER2-positive MaBC. An important limitation is the small sample size of the male breast cancer cohorts, and the lack of a categorization of HER2 in HR+ vs HR-, for the small MaBC sample size. However, to our knowledge this is the first analysis evaluating outcomes of men treated with ADCs across the spectrum of HER2 expression. Citation Format: D. Trapani, S. Deshmukh, S. Wu, J. Xiu, N. Lin, G. Curigliano, P. Spanheimer, S. Gandhi, S. Chumsri, S. Graff, M. Lustberg, G. Sledge Jr, S. Tolaney, J. Leone. Comparative efficacy of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) in male versus female breast cancer across the spectrum of HER2 expression [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS4-01-13.

Abstract Background: Hispanic/Latinx (HL) and African American (AA) breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) have increased prevalence of high-risk features such as incidence of BC at age <50 and estrogen receptor negativity. We previously showed that AA and HL had a lower fraction of neutrophils and M2 macrophages (Mɸ) despite higher percentage of PD-L1 positive cases. This study aims to further characterize differences in the tumor immune microenvironment between racial and ethnic groups, with a focus on how these differences vary by site of biopsy. Methods: We analyzed 19,459 BC samples tested by NGS (592, NextSeq; WES, NovaSeq) and WTS (NovaSeq; Caris Life Sciences). Race/ethnicity data were self-reported by pts. Immune cell proportions were estimated using WTS deconvolution (Quantiseq). Gene expression was analyzed for T-cell inflammed score (TIS), MAPK Activation Score (MPAS) and interferon-gamma (IFNy) score. Real-world overall survival (OS) data were derived from insurance claims, calculated from tissue collection or treatment initiation to last contact, and analyzed using Kaplan-Meier. Statistical significance was assessed by chi-square and Mann-Whitney U test with p-values adjusted for multiple comparisons (q<0.05). Results: There were 9674 Non-Hispanic Whites (NHW) (primary BC, defined as biopsy (bx) from breast) pBC: n=3,537, 36.6%; (metastatic BC, defined as biopsy outside of the breast) mBC: n=6,137 63.4%, 1800 AA (pBC: n=750, 42%, mBC: n=1,050, 58%), and 1795 HL (pBC: n=842, 47%; mBC n=953, 53%) samples. There were 2364 TNBC (66% NHW, 19% NHB, 15% HL), 4318 HR+/HER2- (76% NHW, 11.6% NHB, 12.4% HL), and 893 HER2+ (68% NHW, 15% NHB, 17% HL). In pBC overall, AA had lower median cell fraction (%) of B cells (4.8% vs 5.3%), M2 Mɸ (3.4% vs 4.4%), but higher median cell fraction of dendritic cells (DC) (2.8% vs 2.6%) compared to NHW while HL had lower median cell fraction of M2 Mɸ (3.9% vs 4.4%) and higher median cell fraction of CD8+ T cell (0.4% vs 0.2%), all q<0.05. In pBC, HL had higher IFNy score (-0.3 vs -0.34), while AA had lower MPAS (-1.2 vs -0.96), all q<0.05. In lymph node bx, AA had lower median % of M2 Mɸ (3.4% vs 4.4%, q<0.05). No significant differences were seen in the liver bx by race but notably there were lower median cell fractions of CD4+, CD8+, and regulatory T cells (0.0 across NHW, AA, HL) across all race/ethnicities vs. other biopsy sites. By subtype, TNBC primary bx yielded much of the significant changes with AA having lower median cell fraction of M2 Mɸ (2.49% vs 3.04%, q= 0.01) compared to NHW. In primary bx, AA (35.6 m vs 48.5 m, HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.5, p<0.001) and HL (42.4 m vs 48.5 m, HR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.4, p<0.001) had worse median OS versus NHW. In lymph node bx, AA also had worse OS (29.2 m vs 37.2 m, HR 1.2, 95% CI 1-1.5, p=0.03) compared to NHW. In liver bx, there was worse mOS overall but no difference by race (NHW 18.65m, AA 18.79m, HL 20.6m, p =0.73). In HR+/HER2- liver bx AA had worse OS (14.2 m vs 20.9 m, HR 1.3, 95% CI 1-1.7, p=0.03) versus NHW. In HER2+ primary bx, HL had worse OS (43.2m vs 66.9m, HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.6, p=0.009). There was a trend towards worse mOS in TNBC AA patients receiving pembrolizumab (18.42m vs HL 23.69m vs NHW 35.30m; p=0.16) and HER2+ AA patients receiving trastuzumab deruxtecan (AA: 16.06m vs HL: 26.81m vs NHW: not reached; p = 0.05). Conclusions: We found race and biopsy site specific differences in the breast cancer immune microenvironment. AA pts had lower M2 Mɸ in primary and lymph node bx while NHW pts showed higher CD8+ T cell in primary tumors. Liver biopsies exhibited low T cell infiltration across all groups. AA pts had worse mOS in primary and lymph node bx compared to NHW but not in liver bx of which we saw worse mOS in all races. These results highlight the need to consider both race and bx site in treatment decisions. Citation Format: R. Hsu, S. Deshmukh, N. Gyabaah-Kessie, E. Rallos, B. Al-Zubeidy, E. Gonzalez, A. G. Baugh, S. Carrel, M. Li, D. Zavala, A. Martynova, P. Jayachandran, D. Stewart, D. Spicer, S. Wu, J. Xiu, G. W. Sledge Jr., R. L. Mahtani, A. C. Sandoval Leon, S. Gandhi, S. Chumsri, M. Lustberg, M. C. Stern, E. T. Roussos Torres. Immune microenvironment and survival differences among Hispanic and African American breast cancer cases by biopsy site [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-12-06.

Abstract Background: TheTAILORx trial established that adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) is non-inferiorto chemotherapy plus ET (CET) in T1-2N0 HR+/HER2-negative early breast cancer(EBC) with an Oncotype DX (ODX) 21-gene recurrence score (RS) of 11-25, RS 0-10is associated with low distant recurrence (DR) rates with ET alone, and RS26-100 is associated with higher DR rates despite CET. Although ODX isprognostic for 10-year DR, it has limited value for late DR >5 years. Inorder to develop improved DR risk prognostication, we developed multimodal AImodels integrating clinical, molecular, and histopathology features to provideprognostic information for early (<5years), late (>5 years), and overall DR at 15 years using primary tumorsamples and clinical data from volunteers who participated in TAILORx. Methods: DigitizedH&E slides were generated and nucleic acids extracted and sequenced from∼5000 primary tumor samples using Caris MI Tumor Seek-Hybrid, of which 2,808(56%) were used for model training and 5-fold nested cross validation (60/20/20split). Models included single-modality (clinical [C], image [I], molecular [M:ODX genes]), dual-modality (CM, IC), and multimodal (ICM). An expandedmolecular model (M+) model was also derived from expanded molecular inputsderived from whole transcriptome sequencing (WTS) data, including 5 commercialgene signatures (ODX, MammaPrint, Prosigna, EndoPredict, BCI) and 57 high-variancegenes; only EndoPredict, BCI, and ODX gene signatures were retained for model M+.Model-CM+ combined clinical plus expanded molecular features, while ICM/ICM+integrated image, clinical, and (expanded) molecular inputs. Risk scores were dichotomized into high vs. low risk groups usingthresholds chosen to yield risk group proportions closely matching thosedefined by the ODX RS cutoff of 25 for distinguishing high vs. low genomicrisk. Theprimary endpoint was distant recurrence (DR). Prognostic performance wasassessed using truncated concordance index (C-index, 90th percentile of eventtimes), hazard ratios (HRs), and log-rank tests. DNA-level whole exomesequencing (WES) features were also tested but did not provide additionalprognostic information and thus excluded from final models. Results: Theactual ODX continuous RS achieved a C-index of 0.625 for overall DR and 0.743early DR, but no prognostic value for late DR (0.52). Similar results for theC-index were observed for ODX+C for overall DR (0.619), early DR (0.724), andlate DR (0.514). Of all modelsevaluated, model-ICM+ gave the best overall prognostic accuracy for overall DR (C-index0.713; hazard ratio [HR] 3.56 for comparison of high vs. low risk, p<0.001)and late DR (C-index 0.655; HR 2.36, p<0.001), and ranked second for earlyDR (C-index 0.772; HR 6.59, p<0.001) behind the CM+ model (C-index 0.782). Amongsingle-modality models, Model-M+ improved early DR prognostication comparedwith a molecular model including only ODX genes(C-index 0.767 vs 0.744 for M),whereas Model-I was strongest for late DR prognostication (C-index 0.635). Conclusions: Molecularfeatures primarily drove prognostic accuracy for early DR within 5 years,whereas histopathology features strengthened the prognostic accuracy for lateDR after 5 years. Multimodal models captured these complementary signals, withICM+ giving the best overall accuracy for individualized prognostic assessment.Additional validation of the optimized ICM+ model and other models is beingperformed in an intendent validation sample of 2000 TAILORx volunteers, withresults to be presented at the meeting.Supported by the Breast CancerResearch Foundation and the U.S. NIH/NCI U10CA180820 and 5U24CA196172, and theU.S. Postal Service Breast Cancer Stamp Fund. Citation Format: J. A. Sparano, V. Wang, R. J. Gray, D. F. Makower, K. S. Albain, D. F. Hayes, C. E. Geyer, E. C. Dees, M. P. Goetz, J. A. Olson, S. S. Badve, T. J. Saphner, T. J. Whelan, M. Radovich, V. G. Kaklamani, G. W. Sledge. Multimodal artificial intelligence (AI) models integrating image, clinical, and molecular data for predicting early and late breast cancer recurrence in TAILORx [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS1-08.