Chuang, Emil

SummaryBackgroundGastroparesis is a chronic gastric motility disorder. Dopamine D2/D3 receptor antagonists metoclopramide and domperidone are current treatment options but are associated with central nervous system and cardiovascular safety concerns, respectively, precluding chronic use. Trazpiroben (TAK‐906), a dopamine D2/D3 receptor antagonist, is under development for chronic treatment of moderate‐to‐severe gastroparesis. Nonclinical data suggest trazpiroben will have D2/D3 receptor antagonism comparable with metoclopramide or domperidone.AimsTo evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (effect on prolactin and gastric function) of twice‐daily trazpiroben (5, 25 and 100 mg) in participants with gastroparesis.MethodsThis phase 2a pilot study evaluated gastric emptying using the gastric emptying breath test, with metoclopramide as an internal control. Gastric accommodation and gastroparesis symptoms were assessed using the nutrient drink test and American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index‐Daily Diary, respectively.ResultsOverall, 51 participants were enrolled. Trazpiroben was well tolerated, demonstrating a favourable safety profile without cardiovascular or central nervous system adverse events. All trazpiroben doses were rapidly absorbed and eliminated (t1/2z 4‐5 hours), and D2/D3 receptor target engagement confirmed by increased serum prolactin (peaking at trazpiroben 25 mg). No effect on gastric emptying was demonstrated with trazpiroben or metoclopramide (P > 0.05), although benefits in volume‐to‐fullness were seen at trazpiroben 5 mg (P > 0.05) and 25 mg (88.5 vs −26.3 mL; P = 0.019), and nonsignificant numerical aggregate symptom score improvements were observed with trazpiroben 25 mg vs placebo (P = 0.182).ConclusionsTrazpiroben was well tolerated with a favourable safety profile, supporting its further development for the treatment of gastroparesis. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03268941.

Background: Alosetron is approved to treat women with severe IBS and diarrhea (IBS-D) who have failed standard therapy. In our study, we aimed to evaluate alosetron efficacy using new US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) endpoints and utilization in clinical practice. Methods: This prospective, open-label, multicenter, observational 12-week study evaluated women with severe IBS-D enrolled in the alosetron prescribing program. The coprimary FDA endpoints were changes from baseline in stool consistency and abdominal pain severity. Responders achieved a 30% decrease compared with baseline in weekly average of the worst abdominal pain in the past 24 h, and a 50% or greater reduction from baseline in the number of days/week with at least one stool of type 6 (mushy) or type 7 (watery) consistency. Secondary endpoints included changes from baseline in stool frequency, fecal urgency and fecal incontinence. Results: Enrolled patients ( n = 192) were primarily White (90.6%), with a mean age of 44.5 years. Patient and physician rating of IBS severity was between moderate and severe (85.9% concordance, Spearman coefficient 0.429, p < 0.0001). Alosetron 0.5 mg twice daily (82.8%) was the most common dosing regimen. A total of 152 alosetron-treated patients completed the study. Of 105 fully evaluable patients, 45% met the FDA composite endpoint responder criteria for ⩾50% of the study period. Improvements in all individual symptoms were statistically significant compared with baseline. There were no serious adverse events, cases of colonic ischemia, or complications of constipation. Conclusion: In a clinical practice setting study, alosetron demonstrated treatment success using a rigorous FDA composite endpoint and also improved multiple other IBS symptoms, including fecal urgency and incontinence in women with severe IBS-D [ ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01257477].

Abstract Abstract #404 Background: The oral HDACi vorinostat (V) sensitizes breast cancer cells to tubulin polymerizing agents and anti-VEGF directed therapies in vitro. We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of V plus paclitaxel (P) and bevacizumab (B) as first-line therapy for MBC.&#x2028; Methods: Eligible patients (pts) with measurable disease, ECOG PS 0 or 1, and no prior chemotherapy for MBC, received P (90mg/m2) on days 1, 8, 15 and B (10mg/kg) on days 1,15 every 28 days, plus V 200 mg (N=3) or 300 mg (N=28) BID orally for 3 days given the day before, day of, and day after each P dose. Response was assessed after every 3 cycles (RECIST). The trial was designed to distinguish between a response rate of &lt; 40% vs. &gt; 60% (alpha=0.10, beta=0.10) using Simon's optimal 2-stage design. At least 12 responses were required in the first 28 evaluable pts in the 1st stage and 21 of 41 in the 2nd stage.&#x2028; Results: There were no dose-limiting toxicities among the first 6 pts treated at the 1st (200 mg BID; N=3) and 2nd (300 mg BID; N=3) dose levels. Among the 26 evaluable pts treated at the recommended phase II dose of 300mg bid in the 1st stage, 14 patients had a partial response (PR-54%; 90% confidence interval [C.I.] 36%-71%), 6 had stable disease (SD) at 3 months and remain on treatment, 2 had SD as the best response with progressive disease (PD) at 11.8 and 15 months, and 4 had PD as their best response. Additionally, 2 of 3 pts treated at the first V dose level had a PR, indicating PR in 16 of 29 overall (55%, 90% C.I 38%-71%). Only 11 of 29 evaluable pts (38%) have progressed after a median followup of 10.5 months (R-2.3-14.9). Two pts had tumor biopsies and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) collected before and 4 hours after the 3rd V dose (300 mg BID) which showed increased acetylation of K69 lysine residue of the chaperone protein Hsp 90, upregulation of Hsp70, and downregulation of AKT by Western Blot, providing evidence of Hsp90 inhibition in tumor and PBMC.&#x2028; &#x2028; Gr 3-4 toxicities included neutropenia (26%), neuropathy (23%), fatigue (16%), thrombosis (10%), vomiting (6%), hypertension (3%), and diarrhea (3%).&#x2028; Conclusions: Our preliminary findings indicate that the HDACi V inhibits Hsp90 and downregulates AKT in breast cancer in vivo, and enhances the effectiveness of P plus B in MBC. Accrual is nearly complete and the final efficacy analysis will be presented. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 404.