Mamounas, EP

Abstract Background: We have identified two potentially predictive signatures of palbociclib resistance: the RBsig, composed of E2F1/E2F2 dependent genes, which is associated with genetic loss of RB1, and the ratio between the gene expression levels of CCNE1 to RB1 (CCNE1/RB1). Both signatures have been previously analyzed in vitro and in neoadjuvant and metastatic studies with palbociclib. The present analysis aims to explore the role of RBsig and CCNE1/RB1 in the phase III adjuvant PALLAS trial, which randomized patients to palbociclib plus endocrine therapy, versus endocrine therapy alone. Materials and methods: Gene expression data from PALLAS were generated using the HTG EdgeSeq Oncology BM Panel. Of the 87 genes composing RBsig, 46 were available within the EdgeSeq dataset and were used for the analyses; CCNE1 and RB1 were both available. RBsig was calculated as the mean of the Z-score scaled gene expression (log) of the 46 genes; CCNE1/RB1 was computed as the log ratio between the mRNA expression of CCNE1 and RB1. The prognostic/predictive effect of the continuous signatures in terms of invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and overall survival (OS) was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models. Results: HTG data were available from 2,587 of 5,748 patients from the entire PALLAS intention-to-treat (ITT) cohort. As RBsig and CCNE1/RB1 levels are affected by pre-surgical treatments, we limited the analyses to 1612 pre-treatment samples (530 core biopsies and 1082 surgical specimens) (analysis population). Compared with the entire PALLAS ITT cohort, the analysis population was significantly enriched for patients with low clinical risk (41.3% vs 59.4%) who did not receive prior chemotherapy (17.5% vs 55.9%). In keeping with the PALLAS ITT cohort, no significant benefit from the addition of palbociclib was observed in the analysis population. Higher baseline RBsig or CCNE/RB1 values were significantly and independently associated with worse IDFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-2.0; HR 1.22, 95%CI 1.1-1.3, respectively), DRFS (HR 1.94, 95%CI 1.5-2.5; HR 1.26, 95%CI 1.1-1.4, respectively) and OS (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.3-2.4; HR 1.26, 95%CI 1.1-1.4, respectively) in the analysis population. No predictive effect of palbociclib benefit was observed for either signature in the analysis population, nor according to clinical risk or chemotherapy receipt. Interestingly, higher RBsig was strongly prognostic in patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 1.83, 95%CI 1.4-2.3) but not in those who received it (HR 1.01, 95%CI 0.6-1.6) (interaction p=0.02) suggesting a potential predictive role of RBsig for chemotherapy benefit. Conclusions: In the PALLAS trial, higher baseline RBsig or CCNE1/RB1 values are associated with worse prognosis, but are not predictive of benefit from palbociclib in the adjuvant setting. RBsig might be associated with differential benefit from chemotherapy. Further study of these biomarkers may strengthen their role in risk stratification.https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org Citation Format: L. Malorni, D. Hlauschek, E. Mayer, M. Benelli, L. Biganzoli, I. Migliaccio, A. Kermanidis, G. Pfeiler, E. P. Mamounas, A. M. Brufsky, M. Bellet-Ezquerra, K. Clifton, G. Rubovszky, T. Foukakis, M. Goetz, S. Lee, M. Ruiz-Borrego, W. Symmans, K. V. Ballman, F. Liu, J. Machacek-Link, C. Denkert, A. DeMichele, M. Gnant. Prognostic and predictive role of RBsig and CCNE1/RB1 gene-expression signatures for patients with early breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy with or without palbociclib in the PALLAS trial (ABCSG-42, AFT-05, BIG 14-03) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS2-07-13.

512 Background: The joint efficacy analysis of NCCTG N9831 and NSABP B-31 demonstrated improved outcomes with the addition of trastuzumab (H) to doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by paclitaxel (T) in women with surgically removed HER2- positive breast cancer (NEJM 2005). Following this report, patients randomized to AC→T and less than 6 months from completion of chemotherapy were eligible to receive H. We have updated the initial combined results of these two trials. Methods: Primary and secondary efficacy endpoint were disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Cox modeling was performed. Hazard ratios are adjusted for nodal status, tumor size, T schedule, hormone receptor status, and trial (also age for OS). Results: Among the 3,969 women enrolled (ages: 22 to 80yrs), there have been 619 events (H group: 222, non-H: 397). First events were: recurrence (511), contralateral breast disease (18), other second primary cancers (48), and death without recurrence or second primary cancers (42). The median follow-up among the 3,711 women still alive is 2.9 years (range up to 6,4 years). The 4 yr DFS rate and 4 yr OS rate respectively were: 85.9% (95%CI: 84.0–87.8%) and 92.6% (95%CI: 91.2–94.2%) in H group and 73.1% (95%CI: 70.6–75.8%) and 89.4% (95%CI: 87.6–91.2%) in non- H group. Hazard ratio for adjuvant (H/non-H) was 0.49 (P<0.0001; 95%CI: 0.41–0.58) for DFS and 0.63 (P=0.0004; 95%CI: 0.49–0.81) for OS.The rates of a first event per 1,000 women/year during yrs 1–4 were: 26.7, 52.9, 49.6 and 23.2 for H and 42.3, 102.3, 107.6 and 61.5 for non-H. The impact of crossover on clinical outcome will be explored. Conclusions: With an increase in the median follow-up of 11 months and with 225 additional events, the demonstration of substantial improvement in outcomes with the addition of trastuzumab to chemotherapy persist. This improvement continues in spite of some degree of cross-over occurring after the initial results were reported.Updated data regarding crossover outcomes and H duration (as they relate to disease free survival) will be presented. [Table: see text]

Abstract Background: Conventional WBI after lumpectomy for early-stage breast cancer decreases ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), yielding comparable results to mastectomy. Accelerated PBI appears effective in reducing IBTR by treating only the tumor bed area. As the majority of IBTR occur at or in the vicinity of the tumor bed, we hypothesized that PBI would be as effective as WBI in controlling IBTR. The primary aim of NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413 was to determine if PBI provides equivalent local tumor control post lumpectomy compared to WBI in pts with early-stage breast cancer. The equivalency test was based on a 50% margin of increase in the hazard ratio (HR=1.5). Secondary endpoints included: overall survival (OS), recurrence-free interval (RFI), distant disease-free interval (DDFI), and toxicity. Methods: Eligible pts had lumpectomy with histologically-free margins and 0-3 positive axillary nodes. Pts were stratified by stage, menopausal status, hormone receptor status, and intent to receive chemotherapy and then randomized to PBI or WBI. PBI was 10 fractions of 3.4-3.85 Gy, given twice daily with either brachytherapy or 3D external beam radiation. WBI was 50 Gy in 2 Gy fractions given daily with a sequential boost to the surgical cavity. Follow-up was every 6 mos for 5 yrs and then annually. All analyses were by intent-to-treat. Results: From 3-21-05 to 4-16-13, 4216 pts were randomized: 2107 PBI; 2109 WBI. 61% were postmenopausal; 81% were hormone receptor-positive; 29% intended to receive chemotherapy. Stage distribution was: DCIS, 24%; invasive pN0, 65%; invasive pN1, 10%. As of 7-31-18, median follow-up was 10.2 yrs. There were 161 IBTRs as first events: 90 PBI v 71 WBI (HR 1.22; 90%CI 0.94-1.58). Per protocol-defined margin, to declare PBI and WBI equivalent regarding IBTR risk, the 90% CI for the observed HR had to lie entirely between 0.667 and 1.5. The percent of pts IBTR-free at 10 yrs was 95.2% PBI v 95.9% WBI. A statistically significant difference in the 10-yr RFI rate favored WBI (91.9% PBI v 93.4% WBI; HR 1.32; 95%CI 1.04-1.68; p=0.02). No statistically significant differences existed between PBI and WBI in DDFI (HR 1.31; 95%CI 0.91-1.91; p=0.15), OS (HR 1.10; 95%CI 0.90-1.35; p=0.35), or DFS (HR 1.12; 95%CI 0.98-1.29; p=0.11). Grade 3 toxicity was 9.6% PBI v 7.1% WBI, and grade 4-5 toxicity was 0.5% v 0.3%, respectively. Discussion: PBI did not meet the criteria for equivalence to WBI in controlling IBTR based on the upper limit of the hazard ratio confidence interval. However, the absolute difference in 10-yr rate of IBTR was &lt;1% (4.8% PBI v 4.1% WBI). The risk of an RFI event was statistically significantly higher for PBI compared to WBI, but the absolute difference in 10-yr RFI rate was also small (8.1% PBI v 6.6% WBI). DDFI, OS, and DFS were not statistically different for PBI v WBI. Grade 3-5 toxicities, although low, were more common for PBI than WBI. The trial population was heterogeneous, ranging from Stage 0-2 breast cancer, and outcome by risk categories are being analyzed. Support: U10CA180868, -180822, UG1CA189867. Citation Format: Vicini FA, Cecchini RS, White JR, Julian TB, Arthur DW, Rabinovitch RA, Kuske RR, Parda DS, Ganz PA, Scheier MF, Winter KA, Paik S, Kuerer HM, Vallow LA, Pierce LJ, Mamounas EP, Costantino JP, Bear HD, Germaine I, Gustafson G, Grossheim L, Petersen IA, Hudes RS, Curran, Jr. WJ, Wolmark N. Primary results of NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413 (NRG Oncology): A randomized phase III study of conventional whole breast irradiation (WBI) versus partial breast irradiation (PBI) for women with stage 0, I, or II breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-04.

Abstract Background The clinical results of NSABP B-35, phase III trial comparing 1 mg/day A to 20 mg/day tam, each given for 5 years, were reported at ASCO 2015. B-35 demonstrated a statistically significant benefit in breast cancer free interval for women assigned to A, primarily in women &lt;60 years. A secondary endpoint of B-35 was quality of life (QOL) and symptom (SX) outcomes in the two treatment groups. The primary hypotheses of the PRO study were that there would be no differences in QOL between the two treatments, and that patients receiving A would report higher rates of hot flashes compared to patients receiving tam. Other SX comparisons were secondary endpoints. Methods QOL and SX were assessed at baseline (prior to randomization), and every 6 months thereafter for 5 years of treatment and in the following 12 months. QOL was measured with the SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS). SX were measured with selected scales from the BCPT symptom-checklist, and other standardized instruments. Stratification was by age (&lt;60 v ≥60) as in the main trial. Study hypotheses and endpoints were examined by comparing PROs in the two treatment arms using a mixed model for repeated measures analysis with adjustment for the baseline scores, time point and age category, using an intention-to-treat principle and including only patients who completed the baseline and at least one follow-up questionnaire. Patients with protocol events were censored. Only data through 60 months are reported here. The accrual goal for the sub-study was 1,150 consecutive patients. Results Between January 6, 2003 and June 15, 2006, a total of 3,104 patients were entered and randomly assigned to NSABP Protocol B-35. Accrual to the PRO study of B-35 closed on December 28, 2004, at which time 1,275 patients were entered, with 1,193 patients included in this analysis. There were no medical or demographic differences between patients assigned to A or tam in the PRO sub-study, and they reflected the characteristics of the parent trial. Adherence to data collection across the 60 months was 87%. There were no significant differences in QOL outcomes by treatment for the PCS (p=0.16) or the MCS (p=0.38). SX subscales: hot flash scale was greater in tam group and this difference varied over time (p=0.001); musculoskeletal pain was significantly greater in A group for time points 6-24 months (all p&lt;.001); vaginal problems were greater in A group (p=0.03). Hot flash and vaginal problems were significantly worse in women &lt;60 years. Additional SX outcomes (depression, fatigue, sexual function) will be reported at presentation. Conclusion In this large, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing A to tam in patients with DCIS, there was no significant difference in QOL between the two treatments. However, there were important treatment differences in SX outcomes, which should be considered as part of treatment decision-making discussions, along with the clinical breast cancer outcome results. Support: CA-180868, 180822, 189867, 196067, 114732; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP. Citation Format: Ganz PA, Cecchini RS, Julian TB, Margolese RG, Costantino JP, Vallow LA, Albain KS, Whitworth PW, Cianfrocca ME, Brufsky A, Gross HM, Soori GS, Hopkins JO, Fehrenbacher L, Sturtz K, Wozniak TF, Seay TE, Mamounas EP, Wolmark N. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) results, NRG Oncology/NSABP B-35: A clinical trial of anastrozole (A) vs tamoxifen (tam) in postmenopausal patients with DCIS undergoing lumpectomy plus radiotherapy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr S6-04.

Abstract Background: Abnormalities of the PI3kinase/AKT/mTOR signaling network are common in BC. This pathway is associated with resistance to endocrine therapies among HR+ tumors. Everolimus, an mTOR-inhibitor, increases the biological activity of endocrine therapy. S1207 evaluates the role of everolimus in combination with endocrine therapy in the adjuvant setting. Methods: Specific aims/ design: Randomized phase III double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Primary objective is to assess whether the addition of everolimus to standard adjuvant endocrine therapy improves invasive disease-free survival (DFS) among patients with high risk, HR+ BC. Secondary objectives include overall survival, distant recurrence-free survival, safety, adherence and QoL. Patients are randomized to receive standard adjuvant endocrine therapy in combination with one year of everolimus (10 mg PO daily) or placebo. Submission of tissue specimens/blood samples is required for translational studies Eligibility criteria: Patients with histologically confirmed HER2-negative and HR+ invasive BC treated with surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy (if indicated) are eligible if they have: node-negative disease and tumors &gt;2cm and a recurrence score (RS) &gt;25; 1-3 positive nodes and RS &gt;25 or grade 3 in the absence of RS; &gt;4 positive lymph nodes regardless of RS. Patients &gt;1 positive lymph node after completing neoadjuvant chemotherapy are eligible. Statistics/Target accrual:Parallel randomization design with equal allocation to the two treatment groups, the study will randomize 3,500 patients. All analyses are intent-to-treat with the primary analysis conducted 3 years after the last patient is randomized. The study has 90% power (with 2-sided α=0.05) to detect an effective hazard ratio of 0.75 for everolimus versus placebo, corresponding to a gain in DFS of approximately 4.3% at 5 years. All patients will be followed for 10 years. Support: NIH/NCI NCTN Grants CA180888, 180819, 180868, 180821,180822 189867, and in part by Novartis Clinical trial information: NCT01674140. Citation Format: Chavez-MacGregor M, Barlow WE, Pusztai L, Goetz MP, Rastogi P, Ganz PA, Mamounas EP, Paik S, Bandos H, Gralow J, Lew DL, Hortobagyi GN. Phase III randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating the use of adjuvant endocrine therapy +/- one year of everolimus in patients with high-risk, hormone receptor (HR) positive and HER2-negative breast cancer (BC): SWOG/NRG/Alliance S1207 (NCT01674140). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-03-11.

Abstract Background: Preplanned combined analysis of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-31 trial and North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) (Alliance) N9831 Trial compared adjuvant chemotherapy with or without trastuzumab in women with HER2-positive breast cancer. The initial results were reported in 2005 and updated in early 2011 Methods: 4045 patients with HER2-positive operable breast cancer were enrolled to receive doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel with or without trastuzumab in both trials. The definitive analysis for OS will occur when 710 events have been reported. Results: Median time on study is 8 years. The required number of events have occurred for the definitive analysis for OS to be conducted by the end of September 2012. Updated analyses of disease free survival and related subgroups will also be presented. Supported by NCI grants U10-CA-12027, -69651, -37377, -69974, -44066, U24-CA-114732, CA25224; Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Genentech 35–03 Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr S5-5.

Abstract Bisphosphonates reduce the incidence of skeletal-related events (fractures, pain, hypercalcemia) in patients (pts) with bone metastases from breast cancer. By inhibiting osteoclast function and subsequent bone turnover they may inhibit the growth of bone (and other) metastases. Their role in preventing or delaying the development of bone (or other) metastases in pts with early breast cancer is uncertain. Three previous trials of oral clodronate have given mixed results. The largest trial (placebo-controlled) and a smaller open-label trial suggested that oral clodronate benefitted pts with improved bone metastases-free survival (BMFS) and overall survival (OS), but a third open-label study showed no benefit with an apparent detrimental effect on survival. Studies of IV zoledronate in open-label trials in early breast cancer have also shown mixed results: the AZURE trial in pts with node positive breast cancer showed no benefit in disease-free survival (DFS) or OS with a possible effect in pts aged over 60. The ABCSG-12 trial in GnRH (plus tamoxifen or anastrozole) treated women with early breast cancer showed a small DFS benefit for those receiving IV zoledronate but no BMFS or OS benefit. Methods: B-34 is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, phase III clinical trial in pts with stage 1, 2 or 3 breast cancer assessing oral clodronate 1600mg daily for 3 years compared to placebo given alone or in addition to adjuvant chemo- or hormone therapy. Stratification is by age (&lt;50, +50), number of positive nodes (0, 1–3, 4+) and ER/PR status. The primary end-point is DFS. Secondary endpoints are the incidence of skeletal metastases, OS, relapse-free survival, incidence of non-skeletal metastases, and incidence of skeletal morbid events. Results: 3323 patients were accrued — 1662 in Group A and 1661 in Group B. As of March 31, 2011, 54 pts were declared ineligible: 23 in Group A and 31 in Group B. The average time on study is 101.3 months. Patient characteristics were evenly distributed throughout both groups. Approximately 75% of pts in each group had negative axillary lymph nodes and some 78% in each group were ER and/or PR positive. About 64% of pts were age 50 or over. Oral clodronate was generally tolerable, toxicities observed being mainly due to the concomitant systemic chemotherapy. One pt in Group A had a 1 mm area of osteonecrosis on the palatal taurus. Compliance, as expected with trials of oral medications, has been a problem. 1910 pts completed 3 years of therapy. Event rates were slower than anticipated. This final analysis assesses a total of 598 events in the two arms. Conclusions: This trial is the largest placebo-controlled study of an oral bisphosphonate in patients with early breast cancer and will provide further information on the role of bisphosphonates in breast cancer management. Supported for NSABP by NCI U10CA12027, −37377, 69651, 69974; and Bayer Schering Pharma Oy; for ECOG by U10CA021115; for NCCTG by U10CA25224; for SWOG by U10CA38926. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr S2-3.

Abstract Abstract #76 Background: QOL and MH outcomes were integrated into the NSABP B-30 trial as secondary outcomes to the efficacy analyses which are being presented separately. Explicit secondary aims of the NSABP B-30 study were 1) to compare toxicities among the regimens, 2) to compare QOL, and 3) to examine differences in amenorrhea and its relationship to symptoms, QOL, and efficacy. Here we examine the secondary aims of the study as a companion to the efficacy results that are presented separately.&#x2028; Materials and Methods: 5351 pts with cT1-3, N0-1, M0 were enrolled from 3/1/99 to 3/31/2004. 2170 were enrolled on the QOL study, and 2449 were enrolled on the MH study and were randomized to one of three treatment groups: Group 1 [doxorubicin (A) 60 mg/m2 and C 600 mg/m2 q 3 weeks (wks) x 4 followed by docetaxel (T) 100 mg/m2 q 3 wks x 4; Group 2 [A 50 mg/m2 and T 75 mg/m2 q 3 wks x 4]; Group 3 [A 50 mg/m2 T 75 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide (C) 500 mg/m2 q 3 wks x 4]. All patients with ER-positive tumors received hormonal therapy after completing chemotherapy. Preliminary results from Group 1 have been reported previously (Swain, et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2008).&#x2028; Results: The protocol specifies that 800 deaths are required for the definitive analysis of treatment, QOL, and MH outcomes, which are expected to occur by fall 2008. For this final report, results from a comparison of the three arms will be analyzed and presented. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 76.

Abstract Abstract #75 Background: The primary aims of this study were to determine 1) if a concurrent regimen of therapy containing cyclophosphamide compared to a sequential regimen containing cyclophosphamide would prolong disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) and 2) if a regimen without cyclophosphamide was at least as efficacious as the two regimens containing cyclophosphamide. The secondary aims were to compare toxicities among the three regimens and to compare differences in amenorrhea in premenopausal women in each arm and its relationship to outcome.&#x2028; Materials and Methods: 5351 pts with cT1-3, N0-1, M0 were enrolled from 3/1/99 to 3/31/2004. 1783 pts were randomized to Group 1 [doxorubicin (A) 60 mg/m2 and C 600 mg/m2 q 3 weeks (wks) x 4 followed by docetaxel (T) 100 mg/m2 q 3 wks x 4], 1784 pts to Group 2 [A 50 mg/m2 and T 75 mg/m2 q 3 wks x 4], and 1784 to Group 3 [A 50 mg/m2 T 75 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide (C) 500 mg/m2 q 3 wks x 4]. All patients with ER-positive tumors received hormonal therapy after completing chemotherapy. The protocol specifies that 800 deaths are required for the definitive analysis. This is expected to occur by Fall 2008.&#x2028; Results: Mean time on study is currently 79 months. At entry, 46% of pts were &lt; 49 yrs; 54% were &gt; 50 yrs. 82% were white, 10% black, 4% Hispanic. 66% had 1-3 positive nodes, 26% had 4-9, and 8% had 10+. 75% of pts were ER pos. 49% had lumpectomy, 51% mastectomy, and 24% local/regional radiotherapy. Mean tumor size was 2.5 cm. The presentation will include the first results of DFS, OS, and relevant toxicities from the trial. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 75.