Falkson, CI

Abstract Purpose: Statins may mediate suppression of molecular pathways conferring benefit in cancer. Statins have shown anti-tumor effects in preclinical studies and have been associated with decreased recurrence and improved disease-specific survival. While designed to target cholesterol biosynthesis, statins can also have liver, bone and brain effects. We collected data on statin use in the S0307 adjuvant bisphosphonate trial to test the hypothesis that statin use may decrease risk of recurrence to liver, bone and brain as well as second primary (contralateral) breast cancers, and may act synergistically with bisphosphonates to decrease the risk of recurrence to bone. Patients and Methods: In S0307, 6097 patients diagnosed with Stage I-III breast cancer who had undergone surgery and were receiving adjuvant systemic therapy were randomized to receive zoledronic acid, clodronate, or ibandronate for 3 years. No significant difference was found in disease-free survival (DFS) among the 3 groups, including a sub-analysis of patients > age 55. Statin use was infrequent in younger women in S0307, consequently we analyzed statin use in those > age 55. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine which variables were independently associated with DFS and to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Among women aged ≥ 55 years, 684 (27%) reported taking a statin at baseline and 1,848 did not. Both groups were similar in terms of hormone receptor and HER2 status (p = 0.82). Median age in the statin group was 64.3 versus 61.0 years in the no statin group, mean BMI 31.2 v. 29.5, mean tumor size 2.1cm v. 2.3cm, negative lymph nodes 60% v. 54%, Stage I disease 47% v. 36%, and receipt of chemotherapy 62% v. 71% (all p < 0.01). In the statin group, 122 (17.8%) experienced a DFS event compared to 313 (16.9%) in the no statin group (HR 1.18, CI 0.95-1.46). No difference was observed by statin use in overall recurrence (p=0.28), distant recurrence (p=0.64), or recurrences to the bone (p=0.64), liver (p=0.38) or brain (p=0.65) at initial recurrence. There was no synergy between statin use and specific bisphosphonates. Recurrence and statin useOutcomeGroup 1: On stan at baseline n=684Group 2: No statin at baseline n=1848DFS events122 (17.8%)313 (16.9%)Died without recurrence51 7.5%)97 (5.2%)Recurrence71 (10.4%)216 (11.7%)Contralateral breast cancer9 (1.3%)17 (0.9%)Distant recurrence48 (7%)157 (8.5%)Bone as 1st site of distant recurrence (% distant recurrence)31 (65%)76 (48%)Liver as 1st site of distant recurrence (% distant recurrence)6 (13%)24 (16%)Brain/CNS as 1st site of distant recurrence (% distant recurrence)5 (10%)17 (11%) Conclusions: We found no evidence that statins reduce risk of second primary breast cancers or distant metastases among post-menopausal women with early-stage breast cancer. Despite promising preclinical data, they did not appear to act in synergy with a specific bisphosphonate. Though women in the statin group had less advanced disease at study entry, statin use was not associated with improved DFS. Results are limited by lack of information about type of statin used, adherence, or initiation of statin in control group. Citation Format: Kizub D, Miao J, Stopeck A, Thompson P, Paterson AH, Clemons M, Dees EC, Ingle JN, Falkson CI, Barlow W, Hortobagyi GN, Gralow JR. Statin use, site of recurrence, and survival among post-menopausal women taking bisphosphonates as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer (SWOG S0307) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-17-03.

Abstract Bisphosphonates reduce the incidence of skeletal-related events (fractures, pain, hypercalcemia) in patients (pts) with bone metastases from breast cancer. By inhibiting osteoclast function and subsequent bone turnover they may inhibit the growth of bone (and other) metastases. Their role in preventing or delaying the development of bone (or other) metastases in pts with early breast cancer is uncertain. Three previous trials of oral clodronate have given mixed results. The largest trial (placebo-controlled) and a smaller open-label trial suggested that oral clodronate benefitted pts with improved bone metastases-free survival (BMFS) and overall survival (OS), but a third open-label study showed no benefit with an apparent detrimental effect on survival. Studies of IV zoledronate in open-label trials in early breast cancer have also shown mixed results: the AZURE trial in pts with node positive breast cancer showed no benefit in disease-free survival (DFS) or OS with a possible effect in pts aged over 60. The ABCSG-12 trial in GnRH (plus tamoxifen or anastrozole) treated women with early breast cancer showed a small DFS benefit for those receiving IV zoledronate but no BMFS or OS benefit. Methods: B-34 is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, phase III clinical trial in pts with stage 1, 2 or 3 breast cancer assessing oral clodronate 1600mg daily for 3 years compared to placebo given alone or in addition to adjuvant chemo- or hormone therapy. Stratification is by age (<50, +50), number of positive nodes (0, 1–3, 4+) and ER/PR status. The primary end-point is DFS. Secondary endpoints are the incidence of skeletal metastases, OS, relapse-free survival, incidence of non-skeletal metastases, and incidence of skeletal morbid events. Results: 3323 patients were accrued — 1662 in Group A and 1661 in Group B. As of March 31, 2011, 54 pts were declared ineligible: 23 in Group A and 31 in Group B. The average time on study is 101.3 months. Patient characteristics were evenly distributed throughout both groups. Approximately 75% of pts in each group had negative axillary lymph nodes and some 78% in each group were ER and/or PR positive. About 64% of pts were age 50 or over. Oral clodronate was generally tolerable, toxicities observed being mainly due to the concomitant systemic chemotherapy. One pt in Group A had a 1 mm area of osteonecrosis on the palatal taurus. Compliance, as expected with trials of oral medications, has been a problem. 1910 pts completed 3 years of therapy. Event rates were slower than anticipated. This final analysis assesses a total of 598 events in the two arms. Conclusions: This trial is the largest placebo-controlled study of an oral bisphosphonate in patients with early breast cancer and will provide further information on the role of bisphosphonates in breast cancer management. Supported for NSABP by NCI U10CA12027, −37377, 69651, 69974; and Bayer Schering Pharma Oy; for ECOG by U10CA021115; for NCCTG by U10CA25224; for SWOG by U10CA38926. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr S2-3.

Abstract Background We evaluated the safety and efficacy of L+T in pts with 0–2 prior lines of chemotherapy (CT) for HER2+ MBC. In the context of this phase II trial, we evaluated metabolic response by FDG-PET and explored the relationship between metabolic response and clinical outcomes. Methods: Pts with measurable, HER2+ MBC were eligible. Cohort 1: No prior T, L, or CT +T for MBC, and >1 yr from adjuvant T, if received. Cohort 2: 1–2 prior lines of CT for MBC, including T, or relapse within 1 yr of adjuvant T. Pts received L 1,000 mg QD + T (2 mg/kg weekly or 6 mg/kg Q3W). Staging studies were done with CT or MRI at baseline (BL) and every 2 cycles (1 cycle=4 weeks [wks]). Objective response was assessed by local investigator according to RECIST 1.0. FDG-PET/CT was performed at BL, Wk 1, and Wk 8 per NCI guidelines. Central quality assurance, review, and analysis were performed on FDG-PET studies. Up to 5 target lesions were identified on BL FDG-PET images based on hypermetabolic uptake. Percent change in the summed maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of target lesions was calculated at Wk 1 or Wk 8, compared to BL. Metabolic response was assessed according to EORTC criteria for % change in SUVmax (progressive disease [PD]: ≥25% increase; partial response [PR]: ≥25% decrease; stable disease [SD]: <25% change). Metabolic response at Wk 1 was compared to Wk 8 as well as to clinical outcome, including objective response, clinical benefit, and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: 87 pts were registered to the study. Of these, one pt did not begin protocol therapy and one pt did not have MBC on further testing, and are not included. 81/85 pts had FDG-PET data at Wk 1; 75/85 had data at Wk 8. Metabolic PR at Wk 1 was observed in 28/39 (72%) pts in Cohort 1 and 20/42 (48%) pts in Cohort 2. Metabolic PR at Wk 8 was observed in 27/34 (79%) pts in Cohort 1 and 18/41 (44%) pts in Cohort 2. Wk 1 and Wk 8 metabolic responses were similar. In cohort 1, 18/28 (64%) pts who achieved Wk 1 metabolic PR had clinical benefit by RECIST. Of pts with Wk 1 metabolic SD, 2/9 (22%) had clinical benefit. In cohort 2, 9/20 (45%) pts who achieved Wk 1 metabolic PR had clinical benefit; 5/22 (23%) who achieved Week 1 metabolic SD had clinical benefit. Exploratory analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) showed that pts in Cohort 1 who achieved Wk 1 metabolic PR experienced a median PFS of 9.3 months ([mos]; 95% CI 5.6−22.3); for pts with metabolic SD, median PFS was 1.9 mos (95% CI 0.8−5.5). For pts in Cohort 2, Wk 1 metabolic PR was associated with median PFS of 5.6 mos (95% CI 3.7−7.8), whereas for pts with metabolic SD, median PFS was 3.7 mos (95% CI 1.8−5.5). Conclusions: L+T is associated with a high rate of early and sustained metabolic response by FDG-PET. Exploratory analyses suggest that metabolic PR may be associated with clinical benefit and longer PFS. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-07.