Back to Authors

Anderson, SJ

Mayo Clinic

University of Pittsburgh

Citations 3

Abstract PS5-08-20: A phase III trial evaluating De-escalation of Breast Radiation (DEBRA) following breast-conserving surgery of stage 1, HR+, HER2-, RS ≤18 breast cancer: NRG-BR007
White, J. R., Cecchini, R. S., Harris, E. E., Mamounas, E. P., Bazan, J. G., Stover, D. G., Ganz, P. A., Jagsi, R., Anderson, S. J., Théberge, Valérie, El-Tamer, M. B., Zellars, R. C., Shumway, D. A., Chen, G., Julian, T. B., Wolmark, N., Cecchini, Reena S. , Bazan, J.G., Ganz, PA, Anderson, SJ, Bergom, Carmen , El-Tamer, Mahmoud Bahij , Zellars, Richard C. , Shumway, D., Julian, TB

Clinical Cancer Research | February 17, 2026 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: PS5-08-20-PS5-08-20

10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps5-08-20 Get It

Abstract Background: Approximately 50% of newly diagnosed invasive breast cancers are stage 1, with the majority being ER/PR-positive, HER2-negative. Genomic assays such as the Oncotype DX® have identified patients (pts) with reduced risk of distant metastasis and without benefit from chemotherapy added to endocrine therapy (ET), freeing them from excess toxicity. Genomic assays are also recognized as prognostic for in-breast recurrence (IBR) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and could similarly allow de-escalation of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). Reducing overtreatment is of interest to pts, providers, and payers. Methods: We hypothesize that BCS alone is non-inferior to BCS plus RT for IBR and breast preservation in women intending ET for stage 1 invasive breast cancer (ER and/or PR-positive, HER2-negative with an Oncotype DX Recurrence Score [RS] of ≤18). Stratification is by age (<60; ≥60), tumor size (≤1 cm; >1-2cm), and RS (≤11, >11-18/MammaPrint Low). Pts are randomized post-BCS to Arm 1 with breast RT using standard methods (moderate or ultra hypo- or conventional-fractionated whole breast RT with/without boost, or APBI) with ≥5 yrs of ET (tamoxifen or AI) or Arm 2 with ≥5 yrs of ET (tamoxifen or AI) alone. The specific regimen of ET in both arms is at the treating physician’s discretion. Eligible pts are stage 1: pT1 (≤2 cm), pN0, age ≥50 to <70 yrs, s/p BCS with negative margins (no ink on tumor), s/p axillary nodal staging (SNB or ALND), ER and/or PR-positive (ASCO/CAP), HER2-negative (ASCO/CAP), and Oncotype DX RS ≤18 (diagnostic core biopsy or resected specimen). A “low risk” MammaPrint is permissible if completed as part of usual care prior to screening. Primary endpoint is IBR (invasive breast cancer or DCIS). Secondary endpoints are breast conservation rate, invasive in-breast recurrence, relapse-free interval, distant disease-free survival, overall survival, patient-reported breast pain, patient-reported worry about recurrence, and adherence to ET. We assume a clinically acceptable difference in IBR of 4% at 10 yrs to judge omission of RT as non-inferior (10-yr event-free survival for RT group is 95.6% v 91.6% for the omission-of-RT group). BR007 is powered to detect non-inferiority with 80% power and a one-sided α=0.025, assuming that there would be a ramp-up in accrual in the first two years (leveling off in Yrs 3-5); 1,670 pts (835 per arm) are required for randomization. Conservative loss to follow-up is 1%/yr. Some T1a pts screened may have Oncotype DX scores >18, making them ineligible for the study. In the accrual process, 1,714 pts will be required to register to ensure that our final randomized cohort is 1,670 pts. As of July 9, 2025, 1,490 pts have been screened and 1,349 randomly assigned. NCT #: NCT04852887 Support: U10 CA180868, -180822, U24 CA196067, UG1 CA189867 Citation Format: J. R. White, R. S. Cecchini, E. E. Harris, E. P. Mamounas, J. G. Bazan, D. G. Stover, P. A. Ganz, R. Jagsi, S. J. Anderson, C. Bergom, V. Théberge, M. B. El-Tamer, R. C. Zellars, D. A. Shumway, G. Chen, T. B. Julian, N. Wolmark. A phase III trial evaluating De-escalation of Breast Radiation (DEBRA) following breast-conserving surgery of stage 1, HR+, HER2-, RS ≤18 breast cancer: NRG-BR007 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-08-20.
Clinicopathological characteristics of subsequent breast cancers in patients with benign breast disease
Santana-Dávila, Rafael , Visscher, Daniel W., Vachon, Celine M. , Frost, Marlene H., Anderson, SJ, Hartmann, Lynn C. , Vachon, Celine M. , Vierkant, Robert A. , Degnim, Amy C.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | August 25, 2020 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 1061-1061

10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.1061 Get It

1061 Background: Benign breast disease (BBD) is a significant risk factor for breast cancer (BC); however little is known about the aggressiveness of the BCs these patients develop. Shared features between select atypias and low-grade DCIS have led some to speculate that a history of BBD portends the development of well-differentiated BCs. Methods: The Mayo BBD cohort includes 9,376 women who had benign breast biopsies from 1967–1991. Data on BC events were obtained from medical records and questionnaires. Tissue from the BCs was reviewed by a single breast pathologist (DWV). Results: Our cohort included 6,244 patients with nonproliferative disease (NP), 2,801 women with proliferative disease without atypia (PDWA), and 331 with atypical hyperplasias (AH). With a median of 18 years of follow-up, 799 patients with BBD have developed breast cancer, 416 initially had NP, 313 had PDWA, and 70 AH. BC tissue was available for 703 of the women. The cancers were invasive ductal in 76.1% (n = 535), invasive lobular in 9.4% (n = 66), and DCIS alone in 14.5% (n = 102) patients. Grade is currently available for 500 women, and is well differentiated in 29.4% (n = 150), moderately differentiated in 42.7% (n = 218) and poorly differentiated in 27.8% (n = 142). In 537 cases the malignant tissue had a concurrent benign component consisting of NP in 24% (n = 129), PDWA in 25.1% (n = 135), and AH in 50.8% (n = 273). In regards to tumor size, 69.6% had T1 tumors, 24.9% T2 tumors, and 5.5% T3 disease. Metastasis to lymph nodes occurred in 25% of patients. Median time to BC was 12.3 years and did not differ across the different benign entities. Breast cancer developed within 5 years from the initial BBD in 163 women (20%). In this group, tumor size was greater (p = 0.02), and there were more poorly differentiated tumors (p = 0.006) than in those who later developed BC. Conclusions: In the BCs that have developed in our BBD cohort, we do not see a preponderance of well-differentiated, good-risk BCs. Patients diagnosed within 5 years of BBD appear to have BCs with more aggressive features. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
S2-3: NSABP Protocol B-34: A Clinical Trial Comparing Adjuvant Clodronate vs. Placebo in Early Stage Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Systemic Chemotherapy and/or Tamoxifen or No Therapy – Final Analysis.
Paterson, AHG, Anderson, SJ, Lembersky, BC, Falkson, CI, King, K., Weir, L., Dakhil, Shaker R. , Lad, Thomas E. , Báez-Díaz, Luis , Gralow, JR, Robidoux, A., Perez, EA, Zheng, Ping , Geyer, CE, Swain, SM, Costantino, J. P., Mamounas, EP, Lembersky, Barry C., Fehrenbacher, Louis , Brufsky, Adam , Wolmark, Norman

Cancer Research | June 27, 2012 | Volume: 71 | Issue: 24_Supplement | Pages: S2-3-S2-3

10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs11-s2-3 Get It

Abstract Bisphosphonates reduce the incidence of skeletal-related events (fractures, pain, hypercalcemia) in patients (pts) with bone metastases from breast cancer. By inhibiting osteoclast function and subsequent bone turnover they may inhibit the growth of bone (and other) metastases. Their role in preventing or delaying the development of bone (or other) metastases in pts with early breast cancer is uncertain. Three previous trials of oral clodronate have given mixed results. The largest trial (placebo-controlled) and a smaller open-label trial suggested that oral clodronate benefitted pts with improved bone metastases-free survival (BMFS) and overall survival (OS), but a third open-label study showed no benefit with an apparent detrimental effect on survival. Studies of IV zoledronate in open-label trials in early breast cancer have also shown mixed results: the AZURE trial in pts with node positive breast cancer showed no benefit in disease-free survival (DFS) or OS with a possible effect in pts aged over 60. The ABCSG-12 trial in GnRH (plus tamoxifen or anastrozole) treated women with early breast cancer showed a small DFS benefit for those receiving IV zoledronate but no BMFS or OS benefit. Methods: B-34 is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, phase III clinical trial in pts with stage 1, 2 or 3 breast cancer assessing oral clodronate 1600mg daily for 3 years compared to placebo given alone or in addition to adjuvant chemo- or hormone therapy. Stratification is by age (<50, +50), number of positive nodes (0, 1–3, 4+) and ER/PR status. The primary end-point is DFS. Secondary endpoints are the incidence of skeletal metastases, OS, relapse-free survival, incidence of non-skeletal metastases, and incidence of skeletal morbid events. Results: 3323 patients were accrued — 1662 in Group A and 1661 in Group B. As of March 31, 2011, 54 pts were declared ineligible: 23 in Group A and 31 in Group B. The average time on study is 101.3 months. Patient characteristics were evenly distributed throughout both groups. Approximately 75% of pts in each group had negative axillary lymph nodes and some 78% in each group were ER and/or PR positive. About 64% of pts were age 50 or over. Oral clodronate was generally tolerable, toxicities observed being mainly due to the concomitant systemic chemotherapy. One pt in Group A had a 1 mm area of osteonecrosis on the palatal taurus. Compliance, as expected with trials of oral medications, has been a problem. 1910 pts completed 3 years of therapy. Event rates were slower than anticipated. This final analysis assesses a total of 598 events in the two arms. Conclusions: This trial is the largest placebo-controlled study of an oral bisphosphonate in patients with early breast cancer and will provide further information on the role of bisphosphonates in breast cancer management. Supported for NSABP by NCI U10CA12027, −37377, 69651, 69974; and Bayer Schering Pharma Oy; for ECOG by U10CA021115; for NCCTG by U10CA25224; for SWOG by U10CA38926. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr S2-3.