Pierce, L.J.

523 Background: Adjuvant trastuzumab (Herceptin [H]) with chemotherapy improves outcome in HER2+ breast cancer (BC). Preclinical studies suggest H may enhance RT. We herein assess if H given with adjuvant RT increases adverse events (AE) after breast conserving surgery or mastectomy. Methods: N9831 randomized 3505 women with pT1–3N1–2M0, pT2–3N0M0, or pT1cN0M0 (ER/PR negative) HER2+ BC to doxorubicin (A) and cyclophosphamide (C) followed by weekly paclitaxel (T), AC→T→H, or AC→TH→H. Post-lumpectomy breast ± nodal RT was recommended, as was post-mastectomy chest wall + nodal RT (>3 nodes +); internal mammary RT was prohibited. RT started within 5 weeks of completion of T and allowed concurrently with H. 2324 eligible patients were enrolled on study prior to April 25, 2004: 1460 patients receiving RT are available for analysis of RT-associated AEs. Also, 1286 patients on +H arms who completed T (908 +RT and 378 -RT) are available for analysis of clinical cardiac events (CE). Rates of RT-associated AEs were compared across treatment arms, and rates of CE were compared for +RT vs -RT patients within +H arms. All reported p-values are for chi-squared statistics. Results: With a median follow-up of 1.5 years, significant differences among arms in RT-associated AEs were not identified. No significant differences across arms in +RT patients existed in the incidence of skin reaction (p=0.78), pneumonitis (p=0.78), dyspnea (p=0.87), cough (p=0.54), esophageal dysphagia (p=0.26), or neutropenia (p=0.16). There was a significant difference in +RT patients in the incidence of leukopenia (p=0.02) with higher incidence rates in the arms receiving H. RT did not increase the frequency of CE. In the AC→T→H arm, the incidence of CE was 2.2% in +RT patients versus 2.9% in -RT patients. In the AC→TH→H arm, the incidence of CE was 1.5% in +RT patients versus 6.3% in -RT patients. No difference in CE was seen between left- and right-sided RT fields in +RT patients in either +H arm. Conclusion: Concurrent administration of adjuvant RT with H in early stage breast cancer patients is not associated with an increased incidence of acute RT AEs. Further follow-up is required to assess late AEs. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract Background: Conventional WBI after lumpectomy for early-stage breast cancer decreases ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), yielding comparable results to mastectomy. Accelerated PBI appears effective in reducing IBTR by treating only the tumor bed area. As the majority of IBTR occur at or in the vicinity of the tumor bed, we hypothesized that PBI would be as effective as WBI in controlling IBTR. The primary aim of NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413 was to determine if PBI provides equivalent local tumor control post lumpectomy compared to WBI in pts with early-stage breast cancer. The equivalency test was based on a 50% margin of increase in the hazard ratio (HR=1.5). Secondary endpoints included: overall survival (OS), recurrence-free interval (RFI), distant disease-free interval (DDFI), and toxicity. Methods: Eligible pts had lumpectomy with histologically-free margins and 0-3 positive axillary nodes. Pts were stratified by stage, menopausal status, hormone receptor status, and intent to receive chemotherapy and then randomized to PBI or WBI. PBI was 10 fractions of 3.4-3.85 Gy, given twice daily with either brachytherapy or 3D external beam radiation. WBI was 50 Gy in 2 Gy fractions given daily with a sequential boost to the surgical cavity. Follow-up was every 6 mos for 5 yrs and then annually. All analyses were by intent-to-treat. Results: From 3-21-05 to 4-16-13, 4216 pts were randomized: 2107 PBI; 2109 WBI. 61% were postmenopausal; 81% were hormone receptor-positive; 29% intended to receive chemotherapy. Stage distribution was: DCIS, 24%; invasive pN0, 65%; invasive pN1, 10%. As of 7-31-18, median follow-up was 10.2 yrs. There were 161 IBTRs as first events: 90 PBI v 71 WBI (HR 1.22; 90%CI 0.94-1.58). Per protocol-defined margin, to declare PBI and WBI equivalent regarding IBTR risk, the 90% CI for the observed HR had to lie entirely between 0.667 and 1.5. The percent of pts IBTR-free at 10 yrs was 95.2% PBI v 95.9% WBI. A statistically significant difference in the 10-yr RFI rate favored WBI (91.9% PBI v 93.4% WBI; HR 1.32; 95%CI 1.04-1.68; p=0.02). No statistically significant differences existed between PBI and WBI in DDFI (HR 1.31; 95%CI 0.91-1.91; p=0.15), OS (HR 1.10; 95%CI 0.90-1.35; p=0.35), or DFS (HR 1.12; 95%CI 0.98-1.29; p=0.11). Grade 3 toxicity was 9.6% PBI v 7.1% WBI, and grade 4-5 toxicity was 0.5% v 0.3%, respectively. Discussion: PBI did not meet the criteria for equivalence to WBI in controlling IBTR based on the upper limit of the hazard ratio confidence interval. However, the absolute difference in 10-yr rate of IBTR was <1% (4.8% PBI v 4.1% WBI). The risk of an RFI event was statistically significantly higher for PBI compared to WBI, but the absolute difference in 10-yr RFI rate was also small (8.1% PBI v 6.6% WBI). DDFI, OS, and DFS were not statistically different for PBI v WBI. Grade 3-5 toxicities, although low, were more common for PBI than WBI. The trial population was heterogeneous, ranging from Stage 0-2 breast cancer, and outcome by risk categories are being analyzed. Support: U10CA180868, -180822, UG1CA189867. Citation Format: Vicini FA, Cecchini RS, White JR, Julian TB, Arthur DW, Rabinovitch RA, Kuske RR, Parda DS, Ganz PA, Scheier MF, Winter KA, Paik S, Kuerer HM, Vallow LA, Pierce LJ, Mamounas EP, Costantino JP, Bear HD, Germaine I, Gustafson G, Grossheim L, Petersen IA, Hudes RS, Curran, Jr. WJ, Wolmark N. Primary results of NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413 (NRG Oncology): A randomized phase III study of conventional whole breast irradiation (WBI) versus partial breast irradiation (PBI) for women with stage 0, I, or II breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-04.

Abstract Background: Trastuzumab (H) improves disease-free survival (DFS) in patients (pts) with HER2 positive breast cancer (BR Ca) when used with adjuvant chemotherapy. We herein compare the rates of local regional recurrence (LRR) in pts randomized to adjuvant chemotherapy with or without adjuvant H. Methods: The phase 3 randomized trial NCCTG N9831 enrolled 3505 pts with high risk HER2 positive Br Ca to evaluate the effect of adjuvant H on DFS. Pts were randomized to either doxorubicin (A) and cyclophosphamide (C) followed by paclitaxel (T); or AC→TH→H. RT was given concurrently with H after ACT chemotherapy. Pts analyzed underwent lumpectomy (L) + radiotherapy (RT), mastectomy (M) alone, or M+RT. All pts underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy alone and/or axillary dissection. 2816 pts were eligible for competing risk analysis of LRR as a first event (competing risks were distant recurrence, contralateral Br Ca, second primary cancer, or death). Median follow-up is 5.3 years. Results: Primary breast therapy included L+RT 1062 (38%), M 711 (25%), and M+RT 1043 (37%). Axillary dissection was performed in 90% of pts but less frequently with L+RT (83%) compared to M (88%) or M+RT (98%), chi-sq P<0.001. Stage at presentation was I 41%, II 51%, and III 8% with a significant greater proportion of higher stage pts undergoing M+RT, chi-sq P<0.001. Overall the 5-year LRR rate was 4.1% (95% CI 3.5-4.9%) and similar among the treatment groups: L+RT 4.7% (95% CI 3.6-6.1%), M 3.5% (95% CI 2.4-5.1%), and M+RT 2.3% (95% CI 1.6-3.4%). Among pts with a LRR, 66% were local recurrence only, 11% were local-regional, and 23% were regional only. In the L+RT patients with a LRR, the corresponding rates were 74%, 7%, and 19%, respectively. In the M patients with a LRR, the corresponding rates were 40%, 23%, and 37%, respectively. In the M+RT patients with LRR, the rates were 79%, 4%, and 17%, respectively. H is associated with a non-statistically significant reduction in the risk of LRR for pts who receive L+RT or M+RT (Table 1). No such trend was seen in the M alone group but the number of events was low. Table 1. LRR According to Local and Adjuvant Treatment Groups Conclusion: The LRR as the first reported site of failure was low with a median 5. 3 year follow-up. Adjuvant H was associated with a trend of lower LRR in the pts treated with L + RT or M+RT. This observation suggests an additive effect of RT and H on LRR that warrants further investigation. The small number of local-regional events in this one randomized trial supports further investigation of LRR across other adjuvant trastuzumab trials. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-13-02.