Soori, Gamini S.

4026 Background: Patients (pts) with locally advanced esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma commonly receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (chemo-RT). Despite this approach the rate of recurrence remains high. Given the difficulties of postoperative therapy, the efficacy of extended neoadjuvant therapy was assessed. Methods: Eligibility criteria included T3-4,N0 – Tany,N(+) disease amenable to radiation and surgery. Pts were randomized to either arm A (docetaxel 60 mg/m2 day 1 , oxaliplatin [Oxal] 85 mg/m2 day 1, and capecitabine 1250 mg/m2/day days 1-14 x 2 cycles [DOC] followed by 5-FU 180 mg/m2/day continuous IV through radiation + Oxal 85 mg/m2 days 1,15,29 + 50.4 Gy radiation (chemo-RT)) or arm B (chemo-RT alone). Randomization was stratified by ECOG PS (0/1 vs 2) and stage (II vs III/IVA). Primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (PCR) rate, defined as no gross or microscopic tumor identified in the surgical specimen. Interim analysis assessed efficacy and futility of the experimental intervention. Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare clinical/pathologic factors between arms. Results: Baseline and stratification factors were well balanced between arms. Of 42 pts included in the interim analysis (86% male; age [median 63, range 38-88], 100% PS 0/1; 71% stage III; 55% esophagus, 40% GEJ; 36% measurable disease), 4 and 1 pts in arms A and B, respectively, did not have surgery due to death (A, 2), progressive disease (A, 1), alternative treatment (A, 1) or adverse event (B, 1). Among 21 arm A pts, 21, 20, and 19 pts started 1st cycle of DOC, 2nd cycle of DOC and chemo-RT, respectively. All arm B pts received chemo-RT. 33% (7/21) of arm A and 48% (10/21) of arm B pts achieved PCR (p=0.53). Among pts undergoing surgery, 94% (16/17) and 100% (20/20) of arm A and B pts had complete resection (p=0.46). 38% and 24% of arm A and B pts experienced at least one grade 4+ adverse event at least possibly related to treatment (p=0.51). Conclusions: Extended neoadjuvant therapy in pts with locally advanced esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma failed to improve the PCR rate. Follow-up in regard to survival and rate of recurrence is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT00938470.

6133 Background: Patient (pt) trial experience may give insight to quality of life (QOL) factors affecting accrual, retention and outcome. While pts are vital to clinical trial success, we know little about their post-trial opinions. This trial examined pt opinion of their trial and treatment decision making (TDM). Methods: Pts enrolled on designated North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) phase II or III treatment trials completed the TDM Control Preferences Scale at baseline and the Was It Worth It (WIWI) satisfaction assessment at the ends of cycle 1 and active protocol treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of pts reporting worthwhile participation. Fisher Exact tests compared pt opinion across subgroups. Results: As of 01/15/2012, 264 pts were enrolled on 25 protocols and treated at 79 sites. 86% of pts were in phase II studies and 89% had stage IV disease. At the end of cycle 1, pts felt the trial was worthwhile (74%), would do it again (85%), and would recommend it to others (82%). 85% of pts reported undiminished QOL and only 7% rated the trial worse than expected. End of treatment responses were similar. Satisfaction rates varied by tumor site (p=0.04). 11% of pts having tumor response rated the trial as not worthwhile, and 66% of pts with progressive disease rated it worthwhile (see table). Pts with concordant preferred and actual TDM roles rated participation higher than pts with discordant TDM roles (see table). Conclusions: Most pts endorsed their clinical trial experience. Contrary to popular beliefs, treatment outcome did not have an overwhelming impact on pt satisfaction, and was just one of many factors such as TDM role discordance. Assessing pt satisfaction will inform future study design that can potentially improve pt accrual and retention. [Table: see text]

1557 Background: Peripheral neuropathy (PN), a common and intrusive side effect of chemotherapy in clinical trials, has been assessed via the clinician-rated common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) and/or patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (Morton, ASCO, 2005). We assessed the relative sensitivity of CTCAE and PRO measures for evaluating interventions for preventing and ameliorating CIPN. Methods: Data from285 patients in two prevention trials (N05C3, N04C7) and 432 patients from three intervention trials (N00C3, N01C3, N06CA) were analyzed separately. CTCAE version 3.0 item for neuropathy was compared to 2 NCCTG numerical analogue CIPN items, 6 EORTC CIPN20 individual items, 2 McGill Pain Questionnaire items, and one Brief Pain Inventory item. The sample size provided over 80% power to detect a true Spearman rank correlation of 0.15 assessed the relationship between CTCAE and PRO measures. Results: Results from both the prevention and treatment trials were similar in terms of the relationship between the CTCAE and PRO measures. No correlation coefficients between the CTCAE and any of the PRO items at baseline were above 0.35, with the majority around 0.2. Higher scores for the numbness items were observed than for the CTCAE in 47% of the patients at baseline and 39% during treatment in the treatment trials. Many patients had severe numbness PRO scores but mild CTCAE scores (12%) at baseline and (8%) during treatment in the treatment trials. Results for the numbness and tingling PRO measures were redundant. The correlations of the CTCAE with pain were weak, all below 0.35 at baseline with differences as much as 29 points on average on a 0-100 transformed scale. Conclusions: The CTCAE and PRO measures of PN measure different constructs. The CTCAE includes both functional and ADL/motor aspects which may or may not be related to the singular constructs of pain, numbness, tingling, or adjectival characteristics of pain assessed by the PRO measures. The two measures cannot be used in place of each other.

3640 Background: Prior economic analysis of a 12-gene assay (Oncotype DX), compared with patterns of care reported in the NCCN database of patients with stage II, T3, DNA mismatch repair proficient (MMR-P) colon cancer, predicted that the assay would save medical costs and improve patient well-being (Hornberger et al. Value Health 2012). This study assessed the validity of those findings with actual adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT) recommendations. Methods: Outcomes and costs were estimated for patients with stage II, T3, MMR-P colon cancer using a Markov model. A study of 141 patients from 17 sites in the Mayo Clinic Cancer Research Consortium collected data on aCT recommended before and after knowledge of the 12-gene assay results (Srivastava et al. abstract). Quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and medical resource use after recurrence were computed using guideline-validated state-transition probability estimation methods. Risk of progression and incidence of adverse events with different aCT regimens were based on published literature. Drug and administration costs for aCT were obtained from 2012 Medicare fee schedules. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate parameter influence on economic impact. Results: After receiving the 12-gene assay results, physician recommendations in favor of aCT decreased 22% (95% CI 11%-32%; McNemar test p<0.001) from 73 (52%) to 42 (30%) patients. Oxaliplatin aCT and 5-FU monotherapy recommendations each declined 11%. Average aCT costs decreased $3,228 for drugs, $750 for administration, and $3,168 for adverse events management. Overall, average total direct medical costs decreased $1,683. The net effect on average patient well-being was a gain of 0.102 QALYs. Total change in medical costs is most influenced by the cost of death due to colon cancer, time-preference discount rate, and the change in aCT recommendations. Savings are expected to persist even if the cost of oxaliplatin dropped by >75% due to generic substitution. Conclusions: The 12-gene assayhas been shown to alter aCT recommendations for patients with stage II, T3, MMR-P colon cancer. This study provides real-world confirmation that these aCT changes reduce direct medical costs and improve patient well-being.

1059 Background: Relapsed TNBC is characterized by its poor prognosis. B is a synthetic DNA minor groove binding non-cross resistant agent that is fully active against DNA-mismatch repair deficient tumor cells. C increases GSH/GST in which enhances the efficacy of B. Methods: Phase II study in pts with mTNBC. C Day 1 followed by B Day 2, repeated every 21 days. Aim: Efficacy of C + B in mTNBC. Primary endpoint: PFS at 3 mo. Secondary endpoints include ORR, duration of response (DOR), 6-mo PFS, OS and AE profile. Tertiary endpoints include assessment of baseline GSH levels, prevalence of BCRA1 mutation and pERK, and correlations with outcome. Results: Closed 3/2012. 48 pts accrued (1 ineligible pt). Median f/u 11.4 mo (6.6-14.8); 2 pts still on treatment. 47 pts evaluable for the PFS endpoint and AEs. 49% received therapy as 3rd-5th line. Median number of cycles = 4 (range 1-15). There are currently 9 confirmed responses (8 PR and 1 CR); DOR = 2.6-14.5 mo. The 3-mo PFS = 51%; 6-mo PFS = 28%; the median TTP is 3.2 mo. AE data: 75% G3/4 hematologic AE: febrile neutropenia 19%. Non-hematologic AEs included G3 (47%) and G4 (15%): G3 fatigue 17%; and no G5 non-heme AE. No correlation of GSH/GST levels with outcome was found. Among 35 pts with evaluable data, no association between BRCA1 expression and outcomes was found. pERK expression was negatively associated with 3-mo PFS, but not 6-mo PFS. Cytoplasmic pERK expression was negatively associated with tumor response (p=0.03). No significant effect of BRCA-1 or pERK expression was found on OS. Conclusions: This trial showed B + C is an active regimen, especially in heavily pretreated mTNBC pts. Correlative data demonstrated a negative association between pERK expression and outcomes. A randomized phase II trial is in development. Clinical trial information: NCT01091454.

9001 Background: Fatigue is one of the most common symptoms in people diagnosed with cancer. Ginseng is a popular herb for treatment of this. It has been termed an “adaptogen”, felt to be able to restore balance to the body; its potential anti-fatigue efficacy is supported by animal data. The purpose of this pilot trial was to evaluate three doses of American Ginseng versus placebo for cancer-related fatigue. Methods: Patients with a life expectancy = 6 months and a history of cancer-related fatigue who had been experiencing fatigue = 1 month were eligible. Exclusion criteria included prior use of ginseng, chronic systemic steroids and brain malignancies. Other etiologies for fatigue, such as pain, were also excluded. Participants were randomized to receive, in a double blind manner, placebo, 750 mg/d, 1,000 mg/d or 2,000 mg/d of American Ginseng in BID dosing for 8 weeks. Endpoints included The Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI), the Vitality Subscale of the SF-36 and several numeric analogue questions of perceived benefit; endpoints were measured at baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks. Area under the curve (AUC) and change from baseline were calculated. Results: Two hundred eighty two patients (69–72 per arm) were enrolled from 10/21/2005 to 07/05/2006. Available 8-week data are provided in the table below; higher numbers are better. There were no statistically significant differences in any grade of toxicity between active and placebo arms, and an equivalent number of patients discontinued the study due to adverse events in each arm. Conclusion: This randomized pilot trial provided data to suggest that American Ginseng doses of 1000–2000 mg/d may be effective for alleviating cancer related fatigue. Therefore, further study of American Ginseng in cancer survivors appears warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose. [Table: see text]

Abstract Abstract 137 Background: FDG-PET/CT after 2–4 cycles of chemotherapy has been shown to be predictive of outcome in patients with aggressive lymphoma. This multicenter NCCTG phase II study was carried out to assess efficacy of ER-CHOP in newly diagnosed DLBCL; functional response as measured by FDG-PET/CT was done after 2 cycles and after 6 cycles of therapy. Methods: Patients received immunochemotherapy on the following schedule: epratuzumab 360 mg/m2, rituximab 375 mg/m2, and standard dose CHOP every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. FDG-PET/CT was done after 2 cycles and again after 6 cycles of therapy. All PET scans were centrally reviewed by an expert in nuclear medicine who was blinded to the outcome of the patients. Results: 107 patients were accrued from Feb 2006 to Aug 2007. 27 patients were ineligible resulting in 80 eligible patients. Baseline patient characteristics for the eligible patients included median age 60 (range 21–82); 56% were male. 80% had advanced stage; 73% had an elevated LDH. Performance score was 0–1 in 71 pts and 2–3 in 9 pts. IPI was 0–1 in 18 pts (23%), 2 in 22 pts (28%), 3 in 29 pts (36%) and 4–5 in 11 pts (14%). PET scans were available on 76 patients (95%); 3 patients completed treatment but scans were unavailable and 1 died prior to cycle 2 PET. The PET CR rate after 2 cycles was 79%. The PET CR rate after 6 cycles was 90%. Using an intent to treat (ITT) analysis, 67 patients (87%) achieved PET CR of which 61 (79%) also completed all 6 cycles of treatment. Based on interim PET after 2 cycles, the EFS at 24 months (EFS24) was 73% for the PET negative patients vs 60% for the PET positive patients (p=0.25); OS at 24 months (OS24) was 83% vs 73% for the PET negative and positive pts, respectively (p=0.17). In comparison, EFS24 for patients with a negative PET after 6 cycles was 80% vs 57% for those with a positive PET (p=0.11); OS24 was 92% vs 57%, respectively (p=0.01). In intent to treat (ITT) analysis, patients that achieved a functional CR had improved overall survival (OS24 = 84%) and event free survival (EFS24 = 74%) compared to patients that failed to achieve a functional CR (OS24 = 50%, EFS24 = 40%, p=0.01 and p=0.006 respectively). Conclusions: ER-CHOP every 21 days × 6 cycles results in a functional CR rate of 87%. Early PET scan during therapy does not significantly predict outcome. Achievement of PET negativity by completion of therapy is associated with a good outcome Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.