Mazurczak, Miroslaw

Abstract Background Dasatinib is an oral inhibitor of the Src kinase family, with preclinical data indicating impact on gliomagenesis, tumor invasion, and radiosensitivity. Methods North Central Cancer Treatment Group N0877 is a phase 1 dose escalation and phase II randomized study evaluating the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and efficacy of dasatinib with radiation and temozolomide (TMZ) for glioblastoma. Following identification of the MTD, adult patients with a histologic diagnosis of glioblastoma were randomized 2:1 between dasatinib given with standard concurrent and adjuvant TMZ, versus placebo with standard concurrent and adjuvant TMZ. Radiation dose was 60 Gy in 30 fractions. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, and quality of life. Results Thirteen patients were enrolled in the phase I component and established the MTD and phase II dose of 150 mg given daily. A total of 204 patients were enrolled in the phase II component. OS was not different between arms (median OS 15.6 months for dasatinib compared to 19.3 months for placebo, hazard ratio:1.21 favoring placebo, 95% CI: 0.88–1.65, log-rank P-value: .238). Similarly, PFS was not significantly different between the dasatinib and placebo arms. There was a significant increase in anemia, nausea, and creatinine elevation with dasatinib, but significantly more grade 3 lymphopenia with placebo. Conclusions The addition of dasatinib to standard chemoradiation did not improve outcomes for patients with glioblastoma. Clinical Trial Identifier NCT00869401.

9532 Background: Chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) continues to be a substantial problem for many cancer patients (pts). Pursuant to promising appearing pilot data, the current study evaluated the use of vitamin E for the prevention of CIPN. Methods: A phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study was conducted in pts undergoing therapy with neurotoxic chemotherapy, utilizing twice daily dosing of vitamin E (400mg)/placebo. The primary endpoint was the incidence of grade 2+ sensory neuropathy (SN) toxicity (CTCAE v 3.0) in each treatment arm, analyzed by Chi-square testing. Major eligibility criteria included: planned curative intent adjuvant chemotherapy with neurotoxic chemotherapy, ≥ 18 years of age, ECOG PS of ≤2, no existing peripheral neuropathy or coronary artery disease, no prior treatment with neurotoxic chemotherapy, and no concurrent treatment with neuropathic or opioid pain medication. Planned sample size was 100 patients per arm, to provide 80% power to detect a difference in incidence of grade 2+ SN toxicity from 25% in the placebo group to 10% in the vitamin E group. Results: Two-hundred seven pts were enrolled between 12/01/2006 and 12/14/2007. Cytotoxic agents included taxanes (109), cisplatin (8), carboplatin (2), oxaliplatin (50) or combination (20). Eleven pts canceled prior to starting treatment and there were 7 ineligible pts on study. Thus there were 189 evaluable pts included in the current analysis. In this analysis, there was no difference in the incidence of grade 2+ SN between the 2 arms (vitamin E- 34% [95% CI- 25.0–44.8%] placebo- 29% [20.1–39.4%]; P=0.43). There, likewise, were no significant differences between treatment arms for time to onset of neuropathy (P= 0.72), for chemotherapy dose reductions due to neuropathy (P= 0.21) or patient questionnaire reported neuropathy symptoms. The treatment was well tolerated overall. Conclusions: Vitamin E did not appear to reduce the incidence of sensory neuropathy in the studied group of patients receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy but it appeared to be well tolerated. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

9513 Background: The need for more research in N/V control is exemplified by agents that are costly, interfere with cytochrome P450 metabolism, and inadequately address delayed N/V. Based on pilot data, there was justification for evaluating whether gabapentin could improve the prevention of delayed N/V from highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). Methods: Patients (pts) about to receive HEC were randomized to prophylactic treatment with 20 mg of dexamethasone (dex) and a 5HT3 receptor antagonist (RA) on the day of chemotherapy, followed by either gabapentin (gaba) 300 mg BID and dex or placebo (plac) and dex. Gaba/plac was started the evening of the day of chemotherapy and continued through day 5 of the first chemotherapy cycle. Dex was given at 8 mg BID days 2-3, then 4 mg BID for day 4, in both arms. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR), defined as no emesis and no rescue medications day 2-6, using a nausea and vomiting diary. The percent of CR were compared in each group by Fisher’s exact test. Secondary outcomes included the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE), satisfaction, and a side effect questionnaire. Results: 430 pts were enrolled in this study between 5/2009 and 2/2011. 47% of pts in the gaba arm and 41% in the plac arm had a CR (p=.23). At some time during days 2-6, 30% in the gaba and plac arms experienced emesis, and 45% and 53% in the gaba and plac arms, respectively, took rescue medication. Mean diary nausea scores over days 2-6 ranged from 0.9 – 1.2 (gaba arm) and 1.0-1.3 (plac arm)(7 = the worst); mean number of diary emetic episodes ranged from 0.1 -0.3 (gaba arm) and 0.1-0.2 (plac arm). The FLIE was not significantly different between arms. Mean vomiting satisfaction was 9.1 in both arms and for nausea was 8.3 for gaba, 8.1 for plac (10= totally satisfied). There were no significant differences in toxicities by CTCAE provider grading or by self-report. Conclusions: In this study, gaba did not improve delayed N/V. Overall, there was little emesis and nausea severity was low. Patients were satisfied with the control of their N/V, irrespective of arm. The use of standard prophylactic guidelines that include a 5HT3RA and dex provided good control of N/V for most patients. Clinical trial information: NCT00880191.

3640 Background: Prior economic analysis of a 12-gene assay (Oncotype DX), compared with patterns of care reported in the NCCN database of patients with stage II, T3, DNA mismatch repair proficient (MMR-P) colon cancer, predicted that the assay would save medical costs and improve patient well-being (Hornberger et al. Value Health 2012). This study assessed the validity of those findings with actual adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT) recommendations. Methods: Outcomes and costs were estimated for patients with stage II, T3, MMR-P colon cancer using a Markov model. A study of 141 patients from 17 sites in the Mayo Clinic Cancer Research Consortium collected data on aCT recommended before and after knowledge of the 12-gene assay results (Srivastava et al. abstract). Quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and medical resource use after recurrence were computed using guideline-validated state-transition probability estimation methods. Risk of progression and incidence of adverse events with different aCT regimens were based on published literature. Drug and administration costs for aCT were obtained from 2012 Medicare fee schedules. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate parameter influence on economic impact. Results: After receiving the 12-gene assay results, physician recommendations in favor of aCT decreased 22% (95% CI 11%-32%; McNemar test p<0.001) from 73 (52%) to 42 (30%) patients. Oxaliplatin aCT and 5-FU monotherapy recommendations each declined 11%. Average aCT costs decreased $3,228 for drugs, $750 for administration, and $3,168 for adverse events management. Overall, average total direct medical costs decreased $1,683. The net effect on average patient well-being was a gain of 0.102 QALYs. Total change in medical costs is most influenced by the cost of death due to colon cancer, time-preference discount rate, and the change in aCT recommendations. Savings are expected to persist even if the cost of oxaliplatin dropped by >75% due to generic substitution. Conclusions: The 12-gene assayhas been shown to alter aCT recommendations for patients with stage II, T3, MMR-P colon cancer. This study provides real-world confirmation that these aCT changes reduce direct medical costs and improve patient well-being.

453 Background: A 12-gene assay (Oncotype DX Colon Cancer) has been clinically validated as a predictor of recurrence risk in stage 2 colon cancer patients following surgery. We conducted the first prospective study to characterize the impact of Recurrence Score results on medical oncologists’ recommendations regarding adjuvant chemotherapy in T3, Mismatch Repair-proficient (MMR-P) stage 2 colon cancer patients. Methods: Consecutive patients with resected stage 2A colon cancer who were candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy were consented and enrolled by 105 medical oncologists from 17 sites in the Mayo Clinic Cancer Research Consortium. Each patient’s tumor specimen was assessed by the Recurrence Score test (quantitative RT-PCR) and MMR (IHC). Prior to and after receiving these results, physicians completed surveys indicating their planned treatments given hypothetical or known MMR results, recorded as Observation (Obs), 5FU-based chemotherapy (5FU), or 5FU + Oxaliplatin (Oxal). Change in treatment recommendation intensity from baseline to follow-up was defined as: increased if change from Obs to 5FU +/- Oxal or from 5FU to 5FU+Oxal, decreased if change from 5FU + Oxal to 5FU or Obs, or from 5FU to Obs, or no change. Results: 187 of 221 patients enrolled were evaluable including 141 who were MMR-P (avg age 63, 65% ECOG PS 0, med tumor size 5 cm, 11% high grade, 91% with 12+ nodes examined). In the primary analysis treatment recommendations changed for 63 (45%) of 141 MMR-P patients, with intensity decreasing for 47 (33%) and increasing for 16 (11%). Recommendations for chemotherapy (5-FU +/- Oxal) decreased from 73 (52%) patients pre-assay to 42 (30%) post-assay. Increased treatment intensity was more likely at higher Recurrence Score values and decreased intensity at lower Recurrence Score values (p=0.011), and any change was more likely when MMR status was unknown at baseline (p = 0.041). Conclusions: In this prospective study, quantitative recurrence risk information provided by the Recurrence Score test was associated with treatment recommendation changes for 45% of T3 MMR-P stage II colon cancer patients. Use of the 12-gene assay may lead to overall reductions in chemotherapy.

391 Background: Prior economic analysis of a 12-gene assay (Oncotype DX), compared with patterns of care reported in the NCCN database of patients with stage II, T3, DNA mismatch repair proficient (MMR-P) colon cancer, predicted that the assay would save medical costs and improve patient well-being (Hornberger et al., Value Health, 2012). This study assessed the validity of those findings with actual adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT) recommendations. Methods: Outcomes and costs were estimated for patients with stage II, T3, MMR-P colon cancer using a Markov model. A study of 141 patients from 17 sites in the Mayo Clinic Cancer Research Consortium collected data on aCT recommended before and after knowledge of the 12-gene assay results (Srivastava et al. abstract). Quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and medical resource use after recurrence were computed using guideline-validated state-transition probability estimation methods. Risk of progression and incidence of adverse events with different aCT regimens were based on published literature. Drug and administration costs for aCT were obtained from 2012 Medicare fee schedules. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate parameter influence on economic impact. Results: After receiving the 12-gene assay results, physician recommendations in favor of aCT decreased 22% (95% CI 11%-32%; McNemar test p<0.001) from 73 (52%) to 42 (30%) patients. Oxaliplatin aCT and 5-FU monotherapy recommendations each declined 11%. Average aCT costs decreased $5,738 for drugs, $668 for administration, and $3,268 for adverse events management. Overall, average total direct medical costs decreased $4,203. The net effect on average patient well-being was a gain of 0.083 QALYs. Total medical costs are most influenced by change in aCT recommendations, 5-FU monotherapy efficacy, and oxaliplatin drug acquisition cost. Savings are expected to persist even if the cost of oxaliplatin dropped by >75% due to generic substitution. Conclusions: The 12-gene assayhas been shown to alter aCT recommendations for patients with stage II, T3, MMR-P colon cancer. This study provides real-world confirmation that these changes in aCT reduce direct medical costs and improve patient well-being.

BACKGROUNDDespite targeted antiemetics, data support an unmet need related to the management of delayed nausea and vomiting (NV). Promising pilot data informed this phase III trial evaluating gabapentin for delayed NV from highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC).METHODSParticipants were randomized to receive prophylactic treatment with 20 mg of dexamethasone and a 5HT3 receptor antagonist (RA) on the day of chemotherapy, followed by gabapentin 300 mg twice a day and dexamethasone (dex) or placebo and dex after HEC. Gabapentin/placebo was started the day of chemotherapy and continued through day 5 for the first chemotherapy cycle, whereas dex was titrated down on days 2‐4. The primary end point was complete response (CR), defined as no emesis and no use of rescue medications on days 2‐6, using an NV diary. The percentages of those in each group with a CR were compared by Fisher's exact test.RESULTSFour hundred thirty patients were enrolled in this study. Forty‐seven percent of patients in the gabapentin arm and 41% in the placebo arm had a CR (P = .23). Mean number of emesis episodes was <0.5 daily, and mean nausea severity was < 2 (mild). In both arms, patient satisfaction with NV control was greater than 8 (with 10 being perfectly satisfied). There were no significant differences in unwanted side effects.CONCLUSIONSIn this study, gabapentin did not significantly improve delayed NV. Patients were satisfied with the control of their nausea and vomiting irrespective of arm. The use of a 5HT3 RA and dexamethasone provided good control of nausea and vomiting for most patients. Cancer 2014;120:3575–3583. © 2014 American Cancer Society.

Purpose Painful oral mucositis (OM) is a significant toxicity during radiotherapy for head and neck cancers. The aim of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was to test the efficacy of doxepin hydrochloride in the reduction of radiotherapy-induced OM pain. Patients and Methods In all, 155 patients were randomly allocated to a doxepin oral rinse or a placebo for the treatment of radiotherapy-related OM pain. Patients received a single dose of doxepin or placebo on day 1 and then crossed over to receive the opposite agent on a subsequent day. Pain questionnaires were administered at baseline and at 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, and 240 minutes. Patients were then given the option to continue doxepin. The primary end point was pain reduction as measured by the area under the curve (AUC) of the pain scale using data from day 1. Results Primary end point analysis revealed that the AUC for mouth and throat pain reduction was greater for doxepin (−9.1) than for placebo (−4.7; P < .001). Crossover analysis of patients completing both phases confirmed that patients experienced greater mouth and throat pain reduction with doxepin (intrapatient changes of 4.1 for doxepin-placebo arm and −2.8 for placebo-doxepin arm; P < .001). Doxepin was associated with more stinging or burning, unpleasant taste, and greater drowsiness than the placebo rinse. More patients receiving doxepin expressed a desire to continue treatment than did patients with placebo after completion of each of the randomized phases of the study. Conclusion A doxepin rinse diminishes OM pain. Further studies are warranted to determine its role in the management of OM.

Abstract Purpose. The Oncotype DX colon cancer assay is a clinically validated predictor of recurrence risk in stage II colon cancer patients. This prospective study evaluated the impact of recurrence score (RS) results on physician recommendations regarding adjuvant chemotherapy in T3, mismatch repair-proficient (MMR-P) stage II colon cancer patients. Patients and Methods. Stage IIA colon cancer patients were enrolled in 17 centers. Patient tumor specimens were assessed by the RS test (quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction) and mismatch repair (immunohistochemistry). For each patient, the physician's recommended postoperative treatment plan of observation, fluoropyrimidine monotherapy, or combination therapy with oxaliplatin was recorded before and after the RS and mismatch repair results were provided. Results. Of 221 enrolled patients, 141 patients had T3 MMR-P tumors and were eligible for the primary analysis. Treatment recommendations changed for 63 (45%; 95% confidence interval: 36%–53%) of these 141 T3 MMR-P patients, with intensity decreasing for 47 (33%) and increasing for 16 (11%). Recommendations for chemotherapy decreased from 73 patients (52%) to 42 (30%), following review of RS results by physician and patient. Increased treatment intensity was more often observed at higher RS values, and decreased intensity was observed at lower values (p = .011). Conclusion. Compared with traditional clinicopathological assessment, incorporation of the RS result into clinical decision making was associated with treatment recommendation changes for 45% of T3 MMR-P stage II colon cancer patients in this prospective multicenter study. Use of the RS assay may lead to overall reduction in adjuvant chemotherapy use in this subgroup of stage II colon cancer patients.