Back to Authors

Anderson, S Keith

0000-0003-1542-9726

Mayo Clinic

Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Citations 3

Final report on North Central Cancer Treatment Group N0877 (alliance): A phase II randomized, placebo-controlled trial of chemoradiotherapy with or without dasatinib for glioblastoma
Breen, William G. , Anderson, S. Keith , Brown, Paul D. , Yan, Elizabeth , Kizilbash, Sani H. , Anderson, Daniel M. , Tran, David , Mazurczak, Miroslaw, Geoffroy, Francois J., Leinweber, Clinton, Dixon, Jesse G. , Anderson, S Keith , Yan, Elizabeth S, Kizilbash, Sani, Galanis, Eva, Kizilbash, Sani H , Sarkaria, Jann N. , Galanis, Evanthia , Tran, David D. , Johnson, Derek R. , Laack, Nadia N.

Neuro-Oncology | June 27, 2025 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 2661-2670

10.1093/neuonc/noaf156 Get It

Abstract Background Dasatinib is an oral inhibitor of the Src kinase family, with preclinical data indicating impact on gliomagenesis, tumor invasion, and radiosensitivity. Methods North Central Cancer Treatment Group N0877 is a phase 1 dose escalation and phase II randomized study evaluating the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and efficacy of dasatinib with radiation and temozolomide (TMZ) for glioblastoma. Following identification of the MTD, adult patients with a histologic diagnosis of glioblastoma were randomized 2:1 between dasatinib given with standard concurrent and adjuvant TMZ, versus placebo with standard concurrent and adjuvant TMZ. Radiation dose was 60 Gy in 30 fractions. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, and quality of life. Results Thirteen patients were enrolled in the phase I component and established the MTD and phase II dose of 150 mg given daily. A total of 204 patients were enrolled in the phase II component. OS was not different between arms (median OS 15.6 months for dasatinib compared to 19.3 months for placebo, hazard ratio:1.21 favoring placebo, 95% CI: 0.88–1.65, log-rank P-value: .238). Similarly, PFS was not significantly different between the dasatinib and placebo arms. There was a significant increase in anemia, nausea, and creatinine elevation with dasatinib, but significantly more grade 3 lymphopenia with placebo. Conclusions The addition of dasatinib to standard chemoradiation did not improve outcomes for patients with glioblastoma. Clinical Trial Identifier NCT00869401.
Phase I trial of adjuvant mature autologous dendritic cell/allogeneic tumor lysate vaccines in combination with temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma
Parney, Ian F. , Anderson, S. Keith , Gustafson, Michael P. , Steinmetz, Susan, Peterson, Timothy E., Kroneman, Trynda, Buckner, Jan C. , Solseth, Mary L., Dietz, Allan B. , Kroneman, Trynda N, Raghunathan, Aditya , Buckner, Jan C , Solseth, Mary, Parney, Ian F , Dietz, Allan B , Anderson, S Keith , Steinmetz, Susan, Raghunathan, Aditya , O’Neill, Brian Patrick

Neuro-Oncology Advances | June 24, 2022 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/noajnl/vdac089 Get It

Abstract Background Glioblastoma (GBM) has poor prognosis despite aggressive treatment. Dendritic cell (DC) vaccines are promising, but widespread clinical use has not been achieved, possibly reflecting manufacturing issues of antigen choice and DC potency. We previously optimized vaccine manufacture utilizing allogeneic human GBM tumor cell lysate and potent, mature autologous DCs. Here, we report a phase I study using this optimized DC vaccine in combination with standard therapy. Methods Following surgical resection and radiation with concurrent temozolomide (TMZ), newly diagnosed adult GBM patients received intradermal DC vaccines plus TMZ. Primary endpoints were safety and feasibility. Immune and treatment responses were recorded. Results Twenty-one patients were enrolled in this study. One progressed between leukapheresis and vaccine manufacture. Twenty patients received treatment per protocol. Vaccine doses (≥15) were generated following a single leukapheresis for each patient. No dose-limiting vaccine toxicities were encountered. One patient had symptomatic, histologically proven pseudoprogression. Median progression-free survival was 9.7 months. Median overall survival was 19 months. Overall survival was 25% at 2 years and 10% at 4 years. One patient remains progression-free 5 years after enrollment. Specific CD8 T-cell responses for the tumor-associated antigen gp100 were seen post-vaccination. Patients entered the trial with a leukocyte deficit compared to healthy donors which partly normalized over the course of therapy. Conclusions This vaccine platform is safe and highly feasible in combination with standard therapy for newly diagnosed patients. Imaging, histological, survival, and immunological data suggest a positive biological response to therapy that warrants further investigation.
Phase I/randomized phase II trial of TRC105 plus bevacizumab versus bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: North Central Cancer Treatment Group N1174 (Alliance)
Galanis, Evanthia , Anderson, S. Keith , Twohy, Erin , Butowski, Nicholas , Hormigo, Adı́lia , Schiff, David , Jaeckle, Kurt A. , Kumar, Shaji , Kaufmann, Timothy J. , Geyer, Susan M. , Kumthekar, Priya , Campian, Jian , Buckner, Jan C. , Wen, Patrick Y , Kaufmann, Timothy J , Giannini, Caterina , Buckner, Jan C , Galanis, Evanthia , Anderson, S Keith , Omuro, Antonio , Giannini, Caterina

Neuro-Oncology Advances | April 4, 2022 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/noajnl/vdac041 Get It

Abstract Background Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) have a poor prognosis and limited effective treatment options. Bevacizumab has been approved for treatment of recurrent GBM, but there is questionable survival benefit. Based on preclinical and early clinical data indicating that CD105 upregulation may represent a mechanism of resistance to bevacizumab, we hypothesized that combining bevacizumab with the anti-CD105 antibody TRC105 may improve efficacy in recurrent GBM. Methods Phase I dose-escalation/comparative randomized phase II trial in patients with GBM. During phase I, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of TRC105 in combination with bevacizumab was determined. In phase II, patients were randomized 1:1 to TRC105 and bevacizumab or bevacizumab monotherapy. Patients received TRC105 (10 mg/kg) weekly and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) every 2 weeks. Efficacy, as assessed by progression-free survival (PFS), was the primary endpoint; safety, quality of life, and correlative outcomes were also evaluated. Results In total, 15 patients were enrolled in phase I and 101 in phase II; 52 patients were randomized to TRC105 with bevacizumab and 49 to bevacizumab monotherapy. The MTD was determined to be 10 mg/kg TRC105 weekly plus bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. An increased occurrence of grade ≥3 adverse events was seen in the combination arm, including higher incidences of anemia. Median PFS was similar in both treatment arms: 2.9 months for combination versus 3.2 months for bevacizumab monotherapy (HR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.75–1.78, P = .51). Quality of life scores were similar for both treatment arms. Conclusions TRC105 in combination with bevacizumab was well tolerated in patients with recurrent GBM, but no difference in efficacy was observed compared to bevacizumab monotherapy.