Omuro, Antonio

Abstract BACKGROUND Mouse double minute 2 (MDM2) inhibits the tumor suppressor protein 53 (p53). Brigimadlin, a potent oral MDM2-p53 antagonist, restores wild-type (wt) p53 function and has shown early efficacy in patients with solid tumors. Glioblastoma (GBM) is an area of unmet need with 5-year survival at <10%. In p53 wt GBM patient-derived xenograft models, brigimadlin promotes tumor cell apoptosis and extends survival in combination with radiotherapy (RT). METHODS NCT05376800 is a Phase 0/Ia non-randomized, open-label, single-arm trial that aims to measure brigimadlin concentration in brain tumor tissue in patients with histologically or radiologically newly diagnosed GBM eligible for resection (Phase 0), and determine the maximum tolerated dose of brigimadlin plus RT in patients with TP53 wt, IDH wt, MGMT promoter unmethylated GBM (Phase Ia). In Phase 0, patients received one brigimadlin dose (30 mg or 45 mg) ~12-24 hours before resection. Phase 0 primary endpoints are the measured total concentration and the calculated unbound concentration of brigimadlin in brain tissue homogenate from non-contrast enhancing (NCE) and contrast enhancing (CE) regions. The predefined threshold for trial continuation is 0.5 nmol/L (corresponding to IC50 in GBM cell lines) unbound brigimadlin in CE samples in ≥50% of patients. Brigimadlin concentration was measured using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and corrected for amount of brigimadlin in residual blood. Unbound concentration was calculated using an in vitro estimate of unbound fraction (fu): 0.654% (rat brain slice). fu in human plasma was 0.22%. Ratio of unbound concentration in brain versus plasma (Kp,uu) was calculated. Biomarker testing was performed. RESULTS Data are available for 11 patients (brigimadlin 30 mg: n=6; 45 mg: n=5). In the 30 mg group, median total brigimadlin concentration in NCE samples was 267 nmol/L (4 samples, range 86-316 nmol/L) and 332 nmol/L (6 samples, range 272-952 nmol/L) in CE samples. In the 45 mg group, median total brigimadlin concentration in NCE samples was 197 nmol/L (5 samples, range 140-347 nmol/L) and 603 nmol/L (5 samples, range 441-905 nmol/L) in CE samples. Unbound concentration exceeded the 0.5 nmol/L threshold in most cases. Post-brigimadlin, an increase in selected p53 target gene expression was observed in CE versus NCE tissue. CONCLUSION Unbound brigimadlin concentrations in CE regions in all patients receiving the low dose of 30 mg brigimadlin exceeded the 0.5 nmol/L threshold. Kp,uu in most patients was close to 1 in CE regions. Biomarker data support target engagement in brain tissue. Our findings support continued investigation of brigimadlin in GBM. Recruitment is ongoing. Updated data will be presented.The trial is funded by Boehringer Ingelheim.

2017 Background: MDM2 inhibits tumor suppressor p53. Brigimadlin, a potent MDM2–p53 antagonist, restores wild-type (wt) p53 function and has shown early efficacy in pts with solid tumors (LoRusso et al Cancer Disc 2023). GBM is an area of unmet need with 5-year survival <10%. In p53 wt GBM pt-derived xenograft models, brigimadlin promotes tumor cell apoptosis and extends survival in combination with RT. Methods: NCT05376800 is a Ph 0/Ia open-label, single-arm trial that aims to measure brigimadlin concentration in brain tumor tissue in pts with histologically or radiologically newly diagnosed GBM eligible for resection (Ph 0) and determine the maximum tolerated dose of brigimadlin plus RT in pts with TP53wt, IDH wt, MGMT promoter unmethylated GBM (Ph Ia). In Ph 0, pts received one brigimadlin dose (30 mg or 45 mg) ~12–24 h before resection. Ph 0 primary endpoints are the measured total concentration and the calculated unbound concentration of brigimadlin in brain tissue homogenate from non-contrast enhancing (NCE) and contrast enhancing (CE) regions. The predefined threshold for trial continuation is 0.5 nmol/L (corresponding to IC50 in GBM cell lines) unbound brigimadlin in CE samples in ≥50% of pts. Brigimadlin concentration was measured using LC/MS and corrected for amount of brigimadlin in residual blood. Unbound concentration was calculated using an in vitro estimate of unbound fraction (fu): 0.654% (rat brain slice). fu in human plasma was 0.22%. Kp,uu (ratio of unbound concentration in brain vs plasma) was calculated. Biomarker testing was performed. Results: Data are available for 11 pts (brigimadlin 30 mg: n=6; 45 mg: n=5). In the 30 mg group, median total brigimadlin concentration in NCE samples was 267 nmol/L (4 samples, range 86–316 nmol/L) and 332 nmol/L (6 samples, range 272–952 nmol/L) in CE samples. In the 45 mg group, median total brigimadlin concentration in NCE samples was 197 nmol/L (5 samples, range 140–347 nmol/L) and 603 nmol/L (5 samples, range 441–905 nmol/L) in CE samples. Unbound concentration exceeded the 0.5 nmol/L threshold in most cases (Table). Post-brigimadlin, an increase in selected p53 target gene expression was observed in CE vs NCE tissue. Conclusions: Unbound brigimadlin concentrations in CE regions in all pts receiving the low dose of 30 mg brigimadlin exceeded the 0.5 nmol/L threshold. Kp,uu in most patients was close to 1 in CE regions. Biomarker data support target engagement in brain tissue. Our findings support continued investigation of brigimadlin in GBM. Recruitment is ongoing. Updated data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT05376800 . [Table: see text]

Background: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare and aggressive form of NHL isolated to the central nervous system or vitreoretinal space. Despite high initial rates of responses to available therapies, most PCNLS relapse in two years, presenting a very poor prognosis. Combination with novel therapies may overcome resistance (Guidetti 2023a). Upregulation of the B-cell receptor (BCR/NF-κB) and toll-like receptor (TLR)/NF-κB) signaling axis have been identified as key pathways in the pathogenesis of PCNSL. MYD88 L265P, a widely expressed somatic mutation in more than 70% of PCNSL patients, activates NF-κB signaling through stimulation of BTK and IRAK4. Emavusertib (CA-4948) is a novel, potent oral inhibitor of interleukin 1 receptor-associated kinase 4 (IRAK4), with additional inhibitory activity against FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) and CDC-like kinases (CLK1/2/4). Targeted inhibition of IRAK4 with emavusertib in PCNSL xenografts indicated sufficient blood brain barrier penetration of emavusertib, target inhibition, and antitumor activity (von Roemeling 2022). Further preclinical studies have demonstrated that emavusertib synergizes with ibrutinib and can re-sensitize and overcome resistance to BTK inhibitors (Guidetti 2023a and 2023b). Initial clinical data have reported responses in BTK-resistant PCNSL and good tolerance of the combination (Iqbal 2022; Grommes 2023). Study Design: This is an ongoing multi-center, open-label trial (NCT03328078) in adult patients with hematologic malignancies to evaluate the safety, PK, and anti-cancer activity of oral administration of emavusertib alone or in combination with ibrutinib. Part Bis an open trial expansion cohort with BTKi relapsed or refractory PCNSL. About 20 evaluable PCNSL patients will be enrolled globally. Patients will receive oral CA-4948 at 100 or 200 mg BID in combination with ibrutinib at 560 mg QD in 28-day cycles until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint is expanded safety/tolerability; secondary endpoints include ORR, DOR, PFS, OS, and pharmacokinetics. Key inclusion criteria for this expansion cohort: pathologically confirmed diagnosis of PCNSL with evidence of disease progression, measurable disease, relapsed or refractory with no more than 3 lines of prior anti-PCNSL therapy (including BTKi), and absence of residual Grade ≥2 toxicity from prior therapy. Key exclusion criteria: intraocular PCNSL without brain lesion or CSF involvement or significant co-morbidity. Key clinical assessments include brain imaging, CSF- and ocular examinations.

Abstract BACKGROUND Preclinical studies have demonstrated that IDH1-mutant (IDHmt) gliomas harbor a BRCAness phenotype with a defect in homologous recombination that confers PARP inhibitor sensitivity. METHODS The phase II component of ABTC 1801 examined the efficacy of the combination of pamiparib (BeiGene BGB-290) with low dose metronomic temozolomide in recurrent IDHmt grade 2 and 3 gliomas. In this two-stage design, Arm A enrolled patients who had failed two lines and Arm B a single line of alkylator therapy. Pamiparib and temozolomide doses based on phase I results was 60 mg BID and 20 mg daily. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS 39 patients (Arm A 15, Arm B 24) enrolled in the phase II. Median age was 45 (range: 25-69), 56% male, and median KPS 90. 72% of tumors were MGMT methylated. There were no confirmed responses in Arm A and one in Arm B; neither arm met the threshold for additional accrual. One-third of subjects discontinued treatment for reasons other than progressive disease. Estimated median PFS was 5.8 months in Arm A and 11.3 months in Arm B. Seven subjects (Arm A 3, Arm B 4) developed DLT during treatment. Grade 3+ toxicity was principally hematologic; 9 patients had grade 3 anemia, 7 grade 3 and 3 grade 4 neutropenia, and 3 grade 3 thrombocytopenia. In enhancing and non-enhancing tumors from 8 surgical arm patients, median unbound drug tumor/plasma ratios were 0.98 and 0.92, respectively; and median unbound pamiparib tumor concentrations were 209 and 188 nmol/L (or nmol/kg), respectively, which were &gt;20-fold the in vitro IC50 for PARP inhibition. CONCLUSIONS While pamiparib appeared to achieve sufficient pharmacologically active concentrations in both enhancing and non-enhancing tumors, combination with temozolomide did not produce a meaningful ORR in IDHmt recurrent gliomas. Cumulative hematologic toxicity was substantial.

Abstract Background Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) have a poor prognosis and limited effective treatment options. Bevacizumab has been approved for treatment of recurrent GBM, but there is questionable survival benefit. Based on preclinical and early clinical data indicating that CD105 upregulation may represent a mechanism of resistance to bevacizumab, we hypothesized that combining bevacizumab with the anti-CD105 antibody TRC105 may improve efficacy in recurrent GBM. Methods Phase I dose-escalation/comparative randomized phase II trial in patients with GBM. During phase I, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of TRC105 in combination with bevacizumab was determined. In phase II, patients were randomized 1:1 to TRC105 and bevacizumab or bevacizumab monotherapy. Patients received TRC105 (10 mg/kg) weekly and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg) every 2 weeks. Efficacy, as assessed by progression-free survival (PFS), was the primary endpoint; safety, quality of life, and correlative outcomes were also evaluated. Results In total, 15 patients were enrolled in phase I and 101 in phase II; 52 patients were randomized to TRC105 with bevacizumab and 49 to bevacizumab monotherapy. The MTD was determined to be 10 mg/kg TRC105 weekly plus bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. An increased occurrence of grade ≥3 adverse events was seen in the combination arm, including higher incidences of anemia. Median PFS was similar in both treatment arms: 2.9 months for combination versus 3.2 months for bevacizumab monotherapy (HR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.75–1.78, P = .51). Quality of life scores were similar for both treatment arms. Conclusions TRC105 in combination with bevacizumab was well tolerated in patients with recurrent GBM, but no difference in efficacy was observed compared to bevacizumab monotherapy.

Abstract Abstract 3655 Background Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive lymphoma with devastating prognosis. High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) in combination with HD-cytarabine builds the backbone of current treatments. Elderly patients constitute 45% of cases, exhibit poor outcome and frequent iatrogenic toxicity. However, research efforts to optimize therapy in this subgroup have been neglected. On this background, we conducted a systematic review (SR) and individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA) to provide comprehensive evidence-based management strategy for elderly patients with PCNSL. Patients and Methods SR: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE without language restriction. Eligibility criteria were prospective/retrospective observational studies or randomized trials (RCT) (all N>=10) that exclusively focused on first-line therapy/outcomes in immunocompetent PCNSL patients ≥60 years. Eligible studies were evaluated for methodological quality and reporting of the following baseline characteristics: Age, performance status (PS), involvement of deep brain structures (IDB), serum LDH at baseline, cerebro-spinal fluid (CSF) protein concentration elevation, neurotoxicity (as reported), specific co-morbidity indices, and functional status. For the IPDMA, investigators of eligible studies were asked to provide individual patient data. Minimal eligibility criteria: Age at baseline, details about first-line therapy, and follow-up information. If no data were available, studies were included in the SR, but not in the IPDMA. To maximize statistical power and generalizability, published/unpublished data from other international collaborators were included. Impact of different first-line treatments on overall survival (OS) was investigated using time dependent mixed effects multivariable Cox regression models (age and PS as fixed effects, study/database as random effect). Results SR: We identified 13 eligible studies including 583 patients in total, median age 68–76, published from 1996–2011. Design of studies: prospective (3 multicenter [1 RCT]; 2 single center), retrospective (4 multicenter and single-center, respectively). Accrual of the RCT was recently finished, but publication is pending. From published studies, information about age and therapy was given throughout, for clinical performance in 77%, for LDH and CSF protein in 15%, and IDB in 38%. Functional status was reported in only one study. From the identified 13 studies, 261 individual patient data were available for our IPDMA and pooled with 408 patients from other databases; altogether 669 patients diagnosed from 1977–2011. Preliminary results IPDMA: 50% were male, median age 68 (60–70 [N=431], 70–80 [N=211], >80 [N=22]); median KPS was 60% (10–100%). Therapy regimens widely varied. Overall response to first-line treatment was 65% (45% CR, 19% PR). After a median follow-up of 23 months (1–171), 44% were still alive, with a 3-year OS of 32% [95%CI, 29–37%]. Grouping by time of diagnosis revealed improvement for patients diagnosed after 1997 (N=462) (P<0.001). In multivariate analysis, MTX-based poly-chemotherapy (CT) (N=474) was associated with improved OS (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.69, 95% CI 0.52–0.91) compared to non-MTX regimens (N=195); this was consistent among patients who received consolidating WBRT (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01–0.66) and those who did not (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.23–0.89). In patients who received any MTX-based poly-CT, addition of CHOP-like components (N=90) was not associated with improved OS (HR 0.98, 95% 0.65–1.48). Although any WBRT showed an overall trend for superior OS, it was associated with a 4-fold risk increase for neurotoxicity (Odds Ratio 4.21, 95% CI 2.23–8.21). Further results of treatment patterns and explorative comparisons will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion This international meta-analysis revealed widely varying treatment approaches and demonstrates that prognosis for elderly PCNSL patients is still poor. However, improvement over the last decades was observed. MTX-based poly-CT was associated with better outcome compared to non-MTX containing approaches. The addition of CHOP-like regimens to HD-MTX did not improve outcome. WBRT was associated with better outcome, but also clearly increased risk of neurotoxicity. Prospective trials designed ad hoc for elderly PCNSL patients are promptly needed. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2023 Background: TRC105 is a humanized antibody targeting CD105 (endoglin), a member of the TGFβ receptor superfamily. CD105 is expressed in glioma stem cells and circulating endothelial cells (CECs) in GBM patients (pts), increasing following VEGF inhibition. N1174 was conducted in recurrent bevacizumab (bev) naïve GBM pts to investigate the hypothesis that CD105 blockade+bev can delay development of bev resistance. Methods: After a ph I cohort (15 pts) established the ph II dose of TRC105 as 10 mg/kg IV over 4 hours every 7 days in combination with standard dose bev, the ph II trial used 1:1 randomization with 90% power and 0.10 type I error to detect a 3 month (mo) difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between the two arms. CECs including CD105 positive subsets were measured by flow cytometry at baseline and multiple time points. Results: Based on 101 evaluable ph II pts, there was no significant difference in PFS between TRC105+bev and bev only (2.9 vs 3.2 mo, respectively; HR=1.14, 95% CI 0.73-1.77, p=0.57), or overall survival (10.0 vs 7.4 mo; HR 1.02 95% CI 0.63-1.65, p=0.93). Response rate (complete or partial) was 12.2% (6/49) for TRC105+bev and 11.6% (5/43) for bev only. Overall incidence of grade (gr) 3+ toxicity was higher for TRC105+bev (67.3% vs 32.7%, p<0.001) mainly due to 14 pts with gr 3 anemia in the TRC105+bev arm vs 0 in the bev only pts. Gr 3+ non-heme toxicities were higher in pts receiving TRC105+bev vs bev only (50% vs 30.6%, p=0.07), mainly due to headache (6 vs 1 pts) and hyperglycemia (3 vs 0 pts). CECs remained stable in combination treated pts, suggesting a possible impact of the anti-CD105 blockade, but increased at progression in the bev only arm. There was no association between PFS and initial changes in CEC values, independent of treatment received. Conclusions: TRC105 plus bev did not prolong median PFS vs single agent bev in recurrent GBM pts, although it was associated with a non-significant prolongation of OS. These data and associated correlative analysis of CECs from study pts point against endoglin being a clinically significant factor for the development of bev resistance. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882. Clinical trial information: NCT01648348.