Martenson, James A.

4515 Background: INT0116 (SWOG 9008) was a prospectively randomized phase III trial of postoperative adjuvant therapy utilizing 5-FU/leucovorin plus external beam radiation in 582 eligible cases of resected stage IB-IV(M0) stomach and gastroesophageal junction cancers. Initial results (NEJM 345: 725, 2001) showed both overall and disease free survivals improved by chemoradiation. Methods:We now report INT0116 results with >10years median follow-up. Exploratory subset outcomes are also reported. Results: INT0116 continues to show benefit for chemoradiation with hazard ratios (HR) for survival (HR=1.32, p=.004) and disease free survival (HR=1.51, p<.001) favoring chemoradiation. Subset analyses were performed for sex, race, T and N stage, D-level of surgical resection, tumor location (proximal or other), histology (intestinal or diffuse) and Maruyama index. Chemoradiation benefited all subsets with the exceptions of women and diffuse histology. In women the HR for therapy was 1.0(0.68–1.45). The HR for therapy in diffuse histology cases was 0.97(0.62–1.40). Interaction between these factors is suggested as women were significantly more likely to have diffuse histology than men (56% versus 33%). A multivariate analysis of sex and histology did not detect an effect of sex once histology was included. These data suggest that sex may not be an independent variable for lack of response to chemoradiation but that diffuse histology may be. Long term toxicities were examined. Thirty-five second tumors occurred in 31 cases. Twenty-two occurred in chemoradiation cases and 9 in surgery only cases. Second tumors represented a spectrum of types of neoplasms commonly occurring in this age group (median age 60 years). Excessive numbers of tumors known to be caused by radiation and/or chemotherapy were not noted. More tumors may have occurred in the treated patients since their death rates were less than surgery only cases. Conclusions: With >10 years median follow-up, survival remains improved in stage IB-IV (M0) gastric cancer cases treated with post-operative chemoradiaiton. All subsets benefit from this treatment with the exception of cases with diffuse histology. Women may be more likely to have diffuse histology gastric cancers. No increases in late toxic effects were noted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) post-autologous stem cell transplantation is an independent predictor for survival in Hodgkin’s Disease (HD). Lymphopenia at diagnosis is associated with worse prognosis in patients with newly diagnosed HD. The role of ALC recovery during standard chemotherapy for HD is unknown. We analyzed all patients managed for HD at the Mayo Clinic from 1986 to 2003. Of the 141 consecutive patients, two patients were excluded due to missing ALC data. Of the 139 patients, 63 patients were females and 76 males. The median age of patients at diagnosis was 31 years (range 6–75 years). 118 (85%) patients presented with nodular sclerosis HD, 10 (7%) with mixed cellularity, 2 (1%) with lymphocyte predominance, 1(1%) with lymphocyte depletion, 4 (3%) with lymphocyte predominant (nodular variant), and 4 (3%) unclassified. Frontline chemotherapy included ABVD (N = 79), MOPP-ABV (N = 47), COPP-ABV (N = 8), BEACOPP (N = 3), and Stanford V (N =2). The median number of cycles was 6 (range: 2–10). The median follow-up for the cohort was 62 months (range: 4–221 months). The ALC recovery was analyzed during the first 4 cycles as 90% of the patients received at least 4 cycles of therapy. Patients with an ALC ≥ 1.3 x 109/l at any time point within the first four cycles of chemotherapy (N = 93) demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared to patients with an ALC &lt; 1.3 x 109/L at all time points within the first four cycles of chemotherapy (N =46) (10 years OS and PFS: 91% vs 51%, p &lt; 0.0001; 85% vs 52%, p &lt; 0.0001, respectively). Both groups were balanced for the Hasenclever Index: albumin &lt; 4g/dl (p = 0.1), hemoglobin &lt; 10.5 g/dl (p = 0.46), male gender (p =0.21), age ≥ 45 years (p = 0.06), stage IV disease (p = 0.68), leukocytosis ≥ 15 x 109/L (p = 0.58), and lymphopenia &lt; 600 cell/ml (p = 0.211). Multivariate analysis demonstrated ALC recovery to be independent predictor of OS and PFS when compared to the Hasenclever index. These data suggest a critical role of lymphocyte (immune) recovery during standard chemotherapy in HD.

8506 Background: A randomized study (Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 54:195–202, 2002) demonstrated a beneficial effect for octreotide in the treatment of diarrhea in patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy. This North Central Cancer Treatment Group study was undertaken to determine the effectiveness of depot octreotide in the prevention of diarrhea during pelvic radiation therapy. Methods: Patients receiving pelvic radiation therapy, with a planned minimum dose of 45 Gy at 1.70–2.1 Gy per day, were eligible for this study. The study was designed for a Wilcoxon test, with 112 evaluable patients, to have 85% power to detect a further one grade decrease in diarrhea over and above that experienced by patients treated with placebo. Between June 13, 2002 and October 28, 2005, 120 evaluable patients were randomly allocated, in double blind fashion, to receive octreotide (62 patients) or placebo (58 patients), prior to the fourth radiation therapy fraction. Octreotide dosing: Octreotide, 100 micrograms subcutaneously on day 1 followed by depot octreotide, 20 milligrams intramuscularly on days 2 and 29. Results: Grade 0, 1, 2 and 3 diarrhea was observed in 17%, 32%, 26% and 26% of patients treated with octreotide and 18%, 34%, 22%, and 26% of patients treated with placebo (P=0.86). Grade 0, 1, 2 and 3 tenesmus was observed in 55%, 30%, 11% and 4% of patients treated with octreotide and 76%, 16%, 4%, and 4% of patients treated with placebo (P=0.04). No other statistically significant differences in toxicity were observed. Conclusions: Octreotide, as administered in this study, did not decrease diarrhea during pelvic radiation therapy. [Table: see text]

e14711 Background: Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy has been historically limited to single agent 5FU in stage II/III rectal cancer pts. This phase III trial evaluated differences between pts treated with adjuvant FOLFOX versus FOLFIRI versus FU alone in stage II/III rectal cancer. Methods: Eligibility: resectable (T3-4 N0,Tany N1-3) adenocarcinoma rectum ≤12cm from anal verge. Pts had the option to receive FU with pre or postoperative XRT (50.4Gy). Preoperative FU/XRT pts were randomized to adjuvant FOLFIRI (arm A), FOLFOX (arm B), FU/LV(arm C). Postoperative FU/XRT pts were randomized to adjuvant FOLFIRI (arm D), FOLFOX (arm E), FU/LV (arm F). Pts received 8 cycles. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included toxicity, sphincter preservation and patterns of failure. Results: 225pts out of planned 3150 were enrolled (10/03 to 10/05). Data Monitoring Committee closed E3201 when the GI Intergroup developed an alternative trial with bevacizumab (E5204). 179 pts were randomized; (A:28, B:25, C:30, D:31, E:33, F:32). There was increased grade 3/4 toxicity, mainly diarrhea,in postoperative FU/XRT arms (D:39%), (E:28%), (F:48%). Twenty-two (12%) pts did not receive adjuvant therapy. At a median follow up of 7.4yrs, the five-year recurrence free rate was 69%. Median OS was 8.3 yrs. There was no statistical difference in OS between all randomized groups. Five-year OS in arms (A:B:C:D:E:F) were (73%, 83%, 83%, 73%, 78%, 73%) respectively. Conclusions: FOLFOX can be safely administered to rectal cancer pts following chemo radiation. Given limitations of early trial closure and small sample size, there was no difference in OS between pts who received FU alone, oxaliplatin based or irinotecan based adjuvant therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT00068692.

e16572 Background: The Bowel Function Questionnaire (BFQ) has been used in clinical trials to document patient-reported symptoms following pelvic radiation therapy (RT). This study evaluated the importance patients placed on the symptoms included in the BFQ as measured by a Content Validity Questionnaire (CVQ). Methods: Patients treated with pelvic RT assessed symptoms and importance at baseline, after completion of RT (4 weeks), and 12 and 24 months. BFQ measured quality of life (QOL) and symptoms of: nocturnal bowel movements, incontinence, greater than one bowel movement in 30 minutes, need for protective clothing, inability to differentiate stool and gas, liquid bowel movements, urgency, cramping, and bleeding. Bowel movement frequency was also assessed. Symptoms were rated via the CVQ as “not very important,” “moderately unimportant,” “neutral,” “moderately important,” or “very important." Summary statistics were compiled. Fisher Exact, Chi-Square and Wilcoxon methodology compared BFQ and CVQ results. Results: 125 patients participated. All symptoms were rated as moderately important or very important by most patients.Measures of bowel function of greatest importance (moderately or very important) at baseline were ability to control bowel movements (94%), not having to wear protective clothing (90%), and not having rectal bleeding (93%). In general, patients gave similar ratings of symptom importance at all time points in the study and ratings were independent of whether the symptom was experienced. With the exception of the need for protective clothing, the presence of a symptom at 4 weeks was associated with significantly worse QOL (p-values < 0.001 to 0.005). Conclusions: The BFQ has excellent content validity. Patients rated most symptoms measured by the BFQ as moderately important or very important, indicating the BFQ is an appropriate tool for symptom assessment during and after pelvic RT. With the exception of the need for protective clothing, the presence of every symptom measured by the BFQ was associated with worse QOL. These criteria make them appropriate targets for future research to mitigate radiation-related bowel dysfunction.

3526 Background: In the US pts with stage II/III rectal cancer routinely receive pre or postoperative RT/FU. To date, in addition to chemoradiation, standard adjuvant chemotherapy has been limited to single agent FU. Improved survival with irinotecan and oxaliplatin in pts with metastatic colorectal cancer led to exploration of combination chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting in pts with rectal cancer. Methods: Pts on E3201 (T3–4 Nany M0, T1- 2 N + M0) had the option to receive FU with either pre- or postoperative RT (50.4 Gy). Pts were randomized to postoperative chemotherapy: FU (500mg/m2) + LV (500mg/m2) weekly x 6/8 wks x 3 cycles or irinotecan (FOLFIRI) (180mg/m2) vs oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) (85mg/m2) both administered with LV (400 mg/m2) FU (400mg/m2 bolus) + continuous FU (2.4 gm/m2/46 hours) q 2 wks x 8 cycles. Results: 225 pts of 3150 planned were recruited. 178 pts were randomized and 126 pts submitted treatment completion forms (accrual period 10/03–4/05). The Data Monitoring Committee closed E3201 when the GI Intergroup developed an alternative trial with bevacizumab (E5204). Toxicity information is reported for 93% of pts (165/178) ( Table ). There were no significant differences in toxicity between those pts treated with pre- vs postoperative RT/FU, although, for the subset of pts who received adjuvant FOLFIRI after postoperative RT/FU, there was a trend towards more diarrhea. Conclusion: FOLFOX as rectal adjuvant therapy is a common platform for new clinical trials, although there have been limited toxicity data reported. E3201 provides important comparative toxicity information demonstrating that FOLFOX can be safely administered to rectal cancer pts following chemoradiation. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

4006 Background: Lymph node (LN) metastasis is associated with decreased survival in rectal cancer. It has been suggested that at least 14 LN be evaluated for adequate staging. However, a large percentage of patients have fewer than the recommended number of LN examined. We hypothesized that LN ratio would be predictive of overall survival in rectal cancer. Methods: Data was analyzed from Intergroup 0114, a mature trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation in T3/4 and/or LN positive rectal cancer. Survival was the same for all arms allowing the entire group to be considered as one. The primary endpoint evaluated was overall survival. A proportional hazards model was used to determine the relative prognostic impact of LN ratio compared to number of LN examined, number of positive LN, number of negative LN and AJCC nodal stage. LN ratio was defined as the number of positive LN divided by the total number of LN examined. Four groups were analyzed based on proportion of positive LN: =0.25, >0.25–0.50, >0.50–0.75 and >0.75. Results: 1,648 patients were evaluable. There were 251 T1/2, 1,251 T3 and 146 T4 tumors. 513 patients were N0, 743 N1 and 392 N2. Median number of LN was 9. LN ratio was predictive of 5-year overall survival with rates of 0.71, 0.56, 0.50 and 0.43 respectively when analyzed by quartile (p<0.0001). LN ratio remained significant when overall survival was analyzed by number of LN examined and grouped into <10, <15 and >15 nodes evaluated (p<0.0001 for all). LN ratio also predicted overall survival in N1 (p=0.04) and N2 (p=0.0002) disease. When comparing LN ratio (χ2=79.5, p<0.0001) to number of LN examined (χ2=4.7, p=0.03), number of positive LN (χ2=38, p<0.0001), number of negative LN (χ2=32, p<0.0001) and AJCC nodal stage (χ2=55.5, p<0.0001), LN ratio appears to be the strongest predictor of overall survival. Conclusion: LN ratio predicts overall survival in patients with resected rectal cancer. Importantly, this is true in patients who have had a small number of LN evaluated, in addition to those with a large number of LN examined. LN ratio also appears to be a stronger predictor of overall survival than other described LN prognostic factors. LN ratio may be a useful variable to stratify outcome in patients with node-positive rectal cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abstract Abstract 1580 Background: Extranodal Marginal Zone Lymphomas of Mucosa Associated Lymphoid Tissue (MALT) account for approximately 5% of all non-Hodgkin Lymphoma cases. Specific MALT lymphomas are characterized by distinct clinical features, treatment strategies, and outcome, depending on site of the disease. While previous reports have described clinical course and treatment of gastric and pulmonary MALT lymphomas, a paucity of data exist describing primary parotid MALT lymphoma. This is a single institution experience. Methods: Patients with primary parotid MALT lymphoma were identified from the Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Database since 1986. This database includes all consenting patients with lymphoma seen at Mayo Clinic Rochester. Clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes were collected. Pathology was reviewed by a lymphoma pathologist; WHO criteria were used for diagnosis. PFS and OS were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model was used to asses the impact of variables on PFS and OS. Results: Seventy-six consecutive patients with primary parotid MALT lymphoma were evaluated and treated at Mayo Clinic from 1986 to 2010. The median age at diagnosis was 60 years (18–90). 58 (76%) were female. 42 (55.3%) patients had a history of Sjögren's Disease and 51 (67.1%) had a history of autoimmune disorders. 52 (68.4%), 4 (5.3%), and18 (23.7%) had stage I, II, and IV disease, respectively. 2 cases did not have complete staging information. 6 (7.8%) and 2 (2.6 %) had bone marrow and lung involvement, respectively. No patients had GI tract, liver, or CNS involvement. Median estimated OS (overall survival) was 18.3 years and median PFS (progression free survival) was 7.9 years. ALC<0.96 (p=0.0162) were associated with shorter survival. Age, ECOG performance score, stage, LDH, and history of Sjögren's disease were not prognostic for overall survival. The treatment approach and PFS are outlined in the table. For stage I disease, outcomes were excellent with local therapy. The median estimated PFS was 7.9 years with 72% of patients undergoing surgery surviving at 8 years. Patients receiving radiotherapy had an estimated median PFS of 15.7 years and median OS of 18.3 years. In contrast, patients being observed had a median PFS of 5.5 years. The use of systemic therapy with chemotherapy, immunotherapy or in combination was associated with a median PFS of 7.4 years. Summary: Primary parotid MALT lymphoma is strongly associated with Sjögren's disease. This lymphoma is usually limited to the parotid and associated with a favorable prognosis. For limited disease, local treatment with radiation or surgery appears to be an effective treatment options. For extensive disease, both immunotherapy and chemotherapy are efficacious treatments. Further prospective studies and long-term follow up are needed to determine the optimal treatment approaches and efficacy of chemotherapy/immunotherapy regimens. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 1525 Background: Nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin Lymphoma (NLPHL) is a more indolent form of Hodgkin Lymphoma that is usually associated with favorable outcomes. However, a number of reports have shown a tendency of transformation to more aggressive types of lymphoma, typically diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Long-term data on the incidence and outcomes of transformed NLPHL is lacking in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate incidence, risk factors and outcomes of DLBCL transformation in NLPHL in a cohort of patients followed at a single institution. Methods: The actively maintained Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Database includes all consenting consecutive patients with lymphoma seen at Mayo Clinic Rochester. This was used to retrospectively identify patients with NLPHL. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. Pathology was reviewed by a hematopathologist and all transformations were histologically confirmed by WHO criteria. The clinical characteristics, therapy and outcomes of patients with NLPHL and DLBCL transformation were analyzed. The chi-square test was used to compare variables. Risk of progression was calculated using a person-year approach. Survival and freedom from transformation were estimated and compared using the Kaplan Meier method and log rank tests, respectively. Results: Between 1970 and 2010, 222 consecutive adult patients with NLPHL were identified. The median follow-up was 20 years. Of these, 17 (7.7%) developed a transformation to DLBCL during the course of the disease (Figure 1). The median time to transformation was 35 (6–248) months. Of these 17 patients, 13 (76.5%) were male, 11 (64.7%) had stage I/II and 6 (35.3%) had stage III/IV NLPHL. Transformation was the first relapse in most patients (12 patients, 70.6%) while five patients (29.4%) developed one or more relapses of NLPHL before transformation. Prior therapies for NLPHL were as follows: radiation therapy in 5 (29.4%), chemotherapy in 5 (29.4%) and combined chemotherapy and radiation in 6 (35.3%) patients. The median age at transformation was 45 years (30–87). Most patients (10 patients, 58.8%) presented with signs (palpable lymph nodes) or “B” symptoms. Eight patients (47.1%) had stage III/IV disease at the time of transformation. The most commonly used regimens for treatment of DLBCL were R-CHOP or CHOP (9 patients, 52.9%). Platinum based therapy was administered in 4 (23.5%) patients. Five patients (29.4%) required more than one line of therapy, and autologous stem cell transplant was utilized in two (11.7%) patients. Based on the observed 17 transformations during 2304 patient-years of follow-up, the rate of transformation was 0.74 per 100 patient-years. The five-year overall survival (OS) of patients with transformed disease (calculated from time of transformation) was 76.4%. The most common cause of death was lymphoma (75%). Following treatment for transformation, 5 patients (29.4%) relapsed. The OS in transformed patients was independent of prior therapies, and transformation did not adversely affect overall survival in our cohort (median survival of in 129 months in transformed versus 120 in non-transformed patients, P=0.33). In a univariate analysis of prior therapies, use of radiation therapy was associated with a significant delay in time to transformation (P= 0.0035) (Table 1, figure 2). Conclusions: The risk of transformation in NLPHL is 0.74% per year in this large single institution case series of NLPHL, and appears to be lower than that observed in follicular and other types of low grade lymphoma. The outcomes of patients with transformation were significantly better than reported in other types of transformed lymphoma and did not adversely affect OS. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background: Autologous stem cell transplantation is an integral part of myeloma therapy for patients who are able to undergo the treatment. While high dose melphalan has remained the typical conditioning regimen for ASCT in MM, recently there have been efforts to enhance the conditioning therapy by adding newer drugs to melphalan. Addition of bortezomib as well as carfilzomib have been attempted in phase 2 trials. Previous studies have shown that the combination of melphalan and total body irradiation (TBI) is an effective conditioning regimen. Pre-clinical studies have shown that bortezomib can sensitize MM cells to radiation, and based on this finding, we designed a clinical trial to examine the feasibility of combining low dose TBI with a combination of melphalan and bortezomib. Patients and Methods: The primary goal of the phase 1 study was to determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of bortezomib that can be added to high dose melphalan and low dose TBI as part of conditioning chemotherapy in patients undergoing an ASCT for MM. The secondary goals were to examine the toxicities associated with addition of bortezomib to high dose melphalan and TBI in patients with MM and to determine the progression free rate at 1 and 2 years. Patients eligible to receive full dose melphalan conditioning regimen for ASCT were included as long as they had no more than 2 prior regimens and had not received a prior transplant. An accelerated design that was later converted to a standard 3+3 cohort design was used for dose escalation. Three patients were treated at a given dose level combination and observed for at least 36 days to assess toxicity. Melphalan 80 mg/m2 was given days -4, -3, with bortezomib at increasing doses given on day -5, -2 along with TBI of 200 cGY given on the same days of bortezomib, timed after bortezomib administration. Stem cells were infused day 0. Results: Eleven patients were enrolled; 6 were males, and the median age was 60 years. Median time from diagnosis was 5.4 months (range 3.4-7.0). Four dose levels were explored with increasing doses of bortezomib (0.7 mg/m2 to 1.6 mg/m2). No dose limiting toxicities were observed. The dose levels and the best response after ASCT are as shown in the Table. The overall response rate was 100%, including 7/11 with a CR or sCR. With a median follow-up of 12.5 months, two patients have progressed; median OS was not reached. Toxicity was mostly hematologic, with other AEs being grade 3 or less and attributable to the conditioning therapy. All patients engrafted their counts adequately. Conclusion: The combination of melphalan, bortezomib, and low dose TBI is a safe conditioning regimen in patients with MM with good efficacy. The regimen should be further examined in the phase 2 setting. Table Table. Disclosures Kapoor: Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Kumar:Noxxon: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; AbbVie: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Skyline: Consultancy, Honoraria.