Diekmann, Brent

BACKGROUNDDespite targeted antiemetics, data support an unmet need related to the management of delayed nausea and vomiting (NV). Promising pilot data informed this phase III trial evaluating gabapentin for delayed NV from highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC).METHODSParticipants were randomized to receive prophylactic treatment with 20 mg of dexamethasone and a 5HT3 receptor antagonist (RA) on the day of chemotherapy, followed by gabapentin 300 mg twice a day and dexamethasone (dex) or placebo and dex after HEC. Gabapentin/placebo was started the day of chemotherapy and continued through day 5 for the first chemotherapy cycle, whereas dex was titrated down on days 2‐4. The primary end point was complete response (CR), defined as no emesis and no use of rescue medications on days 2‐6, using an NV diary. The percentages of those in each group with a CR were compared by Fisher's exact test.RESULTSFour hundred thirty patients were enrolled in this study. Forty‐seven percent of patients in the gabapentin arm and 41% in the placebo arm had a CR (P = .23). Mean number of emesis episodes was <0.5 daily, and mean nausea severity was < 2 (mild). In both arms, patient satisfaction with NV control was greater than 8 (with 10 being perfectly satisfied). There were no significant differences in unwanted side effects.CONCLUSIONSIn this study, gabapentin did not significantly improve delayed NV. Patients were satisfied with the control of their nausea and vomiting irrespective of arm. The use of a 5HT3 RA and dexamethasone provided good control of nausea and vomiting for most patients. Cancer 2014;120:3575–3583. © 2014 American Cancer Society.

BACKGROUNDThe objective of this study was to explore relations between patient role preferences during the cancer treatment decision‐making process and quality of life (QOL).METHODSOne‐year cancer survivors completed a survey in 2000 as part of a larger survey conducted by the American Cancer Society. The current report was based on survey respondents from Minnesota (response rate, 37.4%). Standardized measures included the Profile of Mood States (scores were converted to have a range, from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating the best mood), the Medical Outcomes Survey 36‐item short‐form health survey (SF‐36) (standardized scores), and the Control Preferences Scale. Patients' actual and preferred role preference distributions and concordance between roles were compared with QOL scores using 2‐sample t test methodology.RESULTSThe actual role of survivors (n = 594) in cancer care was 33% active, 50% collaborative, and 17% passive. Their preferred role was 35% active, 53% collaborative, and 13% passive. Overall, 88% of survivors had concordant preferred and actual roles. Survivors who had concordant roles had higher SF‐36 Physical Component Scale (PCS) scores (P < .01), higher vitality (P = .01), less fatigue (P < .01), less confusion (P = .01), less anger (P = .046), and better overall mood (P = .01). These results were similar among both women and younger individuals (aged <60 years). Survivors who had active actual roles had higher PCS scores (P < .01), less tension (P = .04), and higher vitality (P = .04) than survivors who were either collaborative or passive. No differences existed in QOL scores according to preferred role.CONCLUSIONSSurvivors who experienced discordance between their actual role and their preferred role reported substantial QOL deficits in both physical and emotional domains. These results indicate the need to support patient preferences. Cancer 2013;119:2342–2349. © 2013 American Cancer Society.

Abstract Background: Despite the impressive results of the trastuzumab adjuvant therapy trials, 15% of patients (pts) with HER2 overexpressing or amplified breast cancer developed tumor relapse at 4 years. Lapatinib is a reversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor against ErbB1 and ErbB2. The current study was developed to assess the cardiac safety and feasibility of adding lapatinib to paclitaxel and trastuzumab following doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as part of adjuvant therapy.Methods: A single-arm phase II study of doxorubicin (A, 60 mg/m2 day 1) and cyclophosphamide (C, 600 mg/m2 day 1) [q2w or q3w for 4 cycles]; followed by PTL: paclitaxel (P, 80 mg/m2 weekly), trastuzumab (T, 4 mg/kg loading dose then 2 mg/kg weekly), and lapatinib (L, 1000 mg PO daily which was later amended to 750 mg) [total of 12 weeks of treatment]; followed by T (6 mg/kg day 1, every 3 weeks) and L (1000 mg PO daily) [total of 40 weeks of treatment] was conducted. The primary endpoint was severe symptomatic congestive heart failure (CHF: New York Heart Association Class III or IV with a drop in left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] of at least 10 percentage points to below 50% confirmed by cardiologist) with secondary endpoints of cardiac death and grade 3+ cardiac adverse events (AEs).Results: From April 2007 to October 2008, 109 evaluable pts were enrolled and initiated study treatment. Median age was 51 (range 28-72). Median follow-up is 10.2 months. No pts experienced CHF or cardiac death while on active treatment. One pt had CHF and 1 pt died due to myocardial infarction (MI) after they went off study treatment. The pt with CHF refused further treatment after completing 2 cycles of PTL and had CHF 1.8 months post PTL discontinuation with LVEF of 45% and dyspnea on exertion. The pt with MI went off study treatment due to non-cardiac AEs after completing 2 cycles of PTL and died 2.9 months post PTL discontinuation. Mean LVEF at baseline was 63.6% (N=109, SD=5.7); end of AC was 63.3% (N=104, SD=6.4); end of PTL was 59.9% (N=89, SD=8.3); and cycle 12 was 59.7% (N=66, SD=7.1). Grade 3+ non-hematologic AEs with incidence &gt;5% include diarrhea (N=42, 39% & included both 1000mg & later amended 750mg dosing), fatigue (N=15, 14%), nausea (N=7, 6%), vomiting (N=7, 6%), acne (N=6, 6%), and hypokalemia (N=6, 6%). Pre-treatment cardiac marker data (troponin-T, troponin-I, brain natriuretic peptide, creatine kinase MB isoenzyme) will also be presented.Conclusions: Preliminary data suggest that the inclusion of L does not add to the cardiac profile of T. Data from ALTTO and long-term follow data are needed to confirm the cardiac safety of this regimen. Cardiac marker data are being analyzed in the context of changes in LVEF. We gratefully acknowledge support from the Breast Cancer Research Foundation and GlaxoSmthKline for this study. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 3086.

Purpose Up to 75% of women experience hot flashes, which can negatively impact quality of life. As hot flash physiology is not definitively understood, it cannot be assumed that effective agents represent class effects. Therefore, there is a continued need for rigorous evaluation to identify effective nonhormonal options for hot flash relief. Methods A randomized, double-blind trial evaluated citalopram at target doses of 10, 20, or 30 mg/d versus placebo for 6 weeks. Postmenopausal women with at least 14 bothersome hot flashes per week recorded hot flashes for 7 days before starting treatment and were then titrated to their target doses. The primary end point was the change from baseline to 6 weeks in hot flash score. Results Two hundred fifty-four women were randomly assigned onto this study. Data for hot flash scores and frequencies showed significant improvement in hot flashes with citalopram over placebo, with no significant differences among doses. Reductions in mean hot flash scores were 2.0 (23%), 7.0 (49%), 7.7 (50%), and 10.7 (55%) for placebo and 10, 20, and 30 mg of citalopram, respectively (P ≤ .002). Improvement in secondary outcomes, such as the Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale, was statistically superior in the 20-mg arm. Citalopram was well-tolerated, with no significant negative adverse effects. Conclusion Citalopram is an effective, well-tolerated agent in managing hot flashes. There does not appear to be a significant dose response above 10 mg/d, but broader helpful effects of the agent appear to be more evident at 20 mg/d.

Purpose Nonhormonal treatment options have been investigated as treatments for hot flashes, a major clinical problem in many women. Starting in 2000, a series of 10 individual double-blind placebo-controlled studies has evaluated newer antidepressants and gabapentin for treating hot flashes. This current project was developed to conduct an individual patient pooled analysis of the data from these published clinical trials. Patients and Methods Individual patient data were collected from the various study investigators who published their study results between 2000 and 2007. Between-study heterogeneity for study characteristics and patient populations was tested via χ2 tests before a pooled analysis. The primary end point, the change in hot flash activity from baseline to week 4, for each agent was calculated via both weighted and unweighted approaches, using the size of the study as the weight. Basic summary statistics were produced for hot flash score and frequency using the following three statistics: raw change, percent reduction, and whether or not a 50% reduction was achieved. Results This study included seven trials of newer antidepressants and three trials of gabapentin. The optimal doses (defined by individual study results) of the newer antidepressants paroxetine, venlafaxine, fluoxetine, and sertraline decreased hot flash scores by 41%, 33%, 13%, and 3% to 18% compared with the corresponding placebo arms, respectively. The three gabapentin trials decreased hot flashes by 35% to 38% compared with the corresponding placebo arms. Conclusion Some newer antidepressants and gabapentin, within 4 weeks of therapy initiation, decrease hot flashes more than placebo.