Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

215 citation(s) found for "Xu, Vivian".

Pulmonary Embolism Reporting and Data System (PE-RADS™) v2026 for the Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism on CT and MR Angiography
Koweek, Lynne , Agarwal, Prachi , Brosnahan, Shari B. , Bishay, Vivian, Cronin, Paul, François, Christopher J. , Giri, Jay, Litmanovich, Diana , Leung, Ann N. , Koweek, Lynne , François, Christopher , Litmanovich, Diana E , Leung, Ann , Zimmerman, Stefan L , Bhalla, Sanjeev , Bishay, Vivian Lee, Cronin, Paul, Giri, Jay , West, Frances Mae

Radiology | July 21, 2026 | Volume: 320 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1148/radiol.252721 | PMID 42478953 Get It

The Pulmonary Embolism Reporting and Data System (PE-RADS) provides a standardized framework for reporting acute pulmonary embolism at CT and MR angiography to guide treatment considerations based on clot location and right heart imaging features.
Plasma Phosphorylated Tau 217 in Participants at Risk for Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy
Miner, A, Zetterberg, Henrik, Blennow, Kaj, Groh, Jenna R., Singh, Alpana, Dieckhoff, Kari, Tripodis, Yorghos, Adler, Charles H., Balcer, Laura J. , Bernick, C L, Peskind, Elaine, Asken, Breton M., Tanner, Jeremy A., Rabinovici, Gil D., Banks, Sarah J., Barr, William B., Wethe, Jennifer V., Cantu, Robert C., Dodick, David W., Mez, Jesse, Palmisano, J, Martin, Brett, Stein, Thor D., McKee, Ann C., Cummings, Jeffrey L., Shenton, Martha E., Reiman, E Bieto, Rc, Stern, Ashton, Nicholas J., Alosco, Michael L., Chen, Kewei, Protas, Hillary, Su, Yi, Boker, Connie, Au, Rhoda, Farrer, Lindsay, Helm, Robert, Kowall, Neil, Mercier, Gustavo, Otis, James, Weller, Jason, Bragg, Tahlia, Simkin, Irene, Trujillo-Rodriguez, Diana, Amerongen, Suzan van , Andino, Alondra, Conneely, Shannon, Diamond, Courtney, Fagle, Tessa, Haller, Olivia, Hunt, Tennyson, Gullotti, Nicole, Kossow, Bailey, Kugelmass, Carrie, Mariani, Megan, Mayville, Brian, McLaughlin, Kathleen, Nanna, Mary, DiPopolo, Marty, Platt, Taylor, Rice, Fiona, Sestak, Madison, McClean, Michael, Annis, Douglas, Chaisson, Christine, Dixon, Diane, Finney, Carolyn, Gallagher, Kerrin, Hartlage, Kaitlin , Lu, Jun, Ojo, E O, Pine, Brittany, Ramachandran, Janani, Baucom, Zachary, Tuz‐Zahra, Fatima , Yhang, Eukyung , Bouix, Sylvain, Fitzsimmons, Jennifer, Lin, Alexander P., Koerte, Inga K., Pasternak, Ofer, Arciniega, Hector , Billah, Tashrif , Bonke, Elena, Breedlove, Katherine M. , Carrington, Holly, Coello, Eduardo , Coleman, Michael J., John, Omar , Jung, Leonard, Liao, Huijun, Loy, Maria, Rizzoni, Elizabeth, Schulz, V. D., Silva, Annelise, Vessey, Brynn, Wiegand, Tim L.T, Miller, Jason, Ritter, Aaron , Sabbagh, Marwan, Cruz, Raelynn de la, Durant, Jan, Golceker, Morgan, Harmon, Nicolette, Kaylegian, Jaeson, Long, Rachelle, Nance, Christine, Sandoval, Priscilla, Staples, Miranda, Clark, Emma F., Serrano, Andrew, Geda, Yonas, Duffy, Amy, Falk, Bryce, Howard, Marci, Montague, Michelle , Osgood, Thomas, Babcock, Debra, Bellgowan, Patrick, GOLDBERG, JUDITH, Joseph, Binu , Kirov, Ivan, Lui, Yvonne, Marmar, Charles, Wisniewski, T R, Al-Kharafi, Alhassan, George, Allan, Hasanaj, Lisena, Martin, Sammie, Riley, Edward, Runge, William, Serrano, Liliana , Iliff, Jeffrey, Li, Gail, Janssen, D, Meabon, James, Piantino, Juan, Schindler, Abigail, Thomas, Ronald, Colasurdo, Elizabeth , Shofer, Jane, Marcus, Daniel S., Gurney, Jenny , Greenwald, Richard, Johnson, Keith A., Singh, Alpana , Singh, Alpana , Miner, Annalise E., Zetterberg, Henrik , Blennow, Kaj , Groh, Jenna R. , Singh, Alpana, Tripodis, Yorghos , Adler, Charles H. , Bernick, Charles , Peskind, Elaine R. , Asken, Breton M. , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Banks, Sarah J. , Barr, William , Wethe, Jennifer V. , Cantu, Robert C. , Dodick, David W. , Mez, Jesse , Stein, Thor D. , McKee, Ann C. , Cummings, Jeffrey L. , Shenton, Martha E. , Reiman, Eric M. , Ashton, Nicholas J. , Alosco, Michael L. , Protas, Hillary , Au, Rhoda, Weller, Jason , Trujillo‐Rodriguez, Diana , Fagle, Tessa, Mariani, Megan, McLaughlin, Kathleen , Pulukuri, Surya Vamsi , Sestak, Madison, McClean, Michael D , Annis, Douglas, Finney, Carolyn, Lu, Jun, Pine, Brittany, Ramachandran, Janani , Baucom, Zachary, Bouix, Sylvain , Koerte, Inga K , Pasternak, Ofer , Bonke, Elena M. , Carrington, Holly , Coleman, Michael J. , Liao, Huijun, Schulz, Vivian, Wiegand, Tim L. T. , II, Robert W. Turner , Marek, Kenneth , Geda, Yonas E. , Howard, Marci, Montague, Michelle, Babcock, Debra, Bellgowan, Patrick S.F. , Kirov, Ivan, George, Allan, Meabon, James S. , Piantino, Juan , Thomas, Ronald G. , Colasurdo, Elizabeth A. , Shofer, Jane, Marcus, Daniel S., Johnson, Keith A.

JAMA Network Open | July 13, 2026 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 7 | Pages: e2622966

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.22966 | PMID 42440317 Get It

Importance In vivo biomarkers for detecting neuropathologies from repetitive head impacts (RHI), including chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), are needed. Objective To evaluate the utility of plasma phosphorylated tau 217 (p-tau217), assess its performance as a beta-amyloid (Aβ) biomarker in participants with RHI exposure at risk for CTE, and explore concordance with CTE neuropathology in a postmortem subsample. Design, Setting, and Participants This longitudinal, multicenter, case-control study used data from the Diagnostics, Imaging, and Genetics Network for the Objective Study and Evaluation of CTE (DIAGNOSE CTE) Research Project, collected from September 2016 to October 2023. Participants were former American football players (case participants) and asymptomatic men unexposed to RHI (control participants). A subsample had available neuropathologic data. Exposures RHI, traumatic encephalopathy syndrome (TES) diagnoses, and levels of CTE certainty. Main Outcomes and Measures Plasma p-tau217 (classified as positive [≥0.63 pg/mL], intermediate [0.40-0.62 pg/mL], and negative [<0.40 pg/mL]), Aβ–positron emission tomography (PET; 18 F-florbetapir; with Aβ-positive defined as a standardized uptake value ratio [SUVR] ≥1.10), and tau-PET ( 18 F-flortaucipir). TES diagnoses were assigned by multidisciplinary consensus conference. Analyses of postmortem brains controlled for age, race, and APOE ε4 status. Results Among 231 participants (mean [SD] age, 57.75 [8.25] years), 177 were former football players (117 professional and 60 college) and 54 were unexposed participants. Former football players had higher baseline mean (SD) p-tau217 concentrations than unexposed participants (0.35 [0.26] pg/mL vs 0.27 [0.14] pg/mL; P = .008), although this was driven by a higher proportion of Aβ-PET–positive participants among former players. Plasma p-tau217 increased over time across the sample (B = 0.207 [95% CI, 0.117-0.298]; P < .001), with no significant time × exposure group interactions. Among football players, p-tau217 showed no time × group interactions with TES diagnosis, TES-CTE certainty, or RHI metrics. Higher p-tau217 concentration correlated with higher global Aβ-PET SUVR (B = 0.058 [95% CI, 0.053-3.501; P = .01), with a few discordant cases (5 participants were p-tau217–negative and Aβ-PET–positive; 7 participants were p-tau217–positive and Aβ-PET–negative). P-tau217 had similar areas under the curve for projecting Aβ-PET positivity as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) p-tau181/Aβ42 and CSF Aβ40/42 measures (p-tau217: AUC, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.80-0.96]; CSF p-tau181/Aβ42: AUC, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.79-1.00]; CSF Aβ40/42: AUC, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.72-0.98]). Among 9 brain donors, 6 had CTE (stages II-IV; none with Alzheimer disease). Seven had negative or intermediate p-tau217, concordant with Aβ-PET. Two p-tau217 outliers with stage III CTE had normal concentrations upon additional testing. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this study suggest that plasma p-tau217 concentration is unlikely to be useful for the detection of CTE, but it does show utility for ruling out Aβ pathology in participants at risk for CTE.
Development of a Core Outcome Domain Set for Facial Aging
Dirr, McKenzie A. , Ahmed, Areeba, Schlessinger, Daniel I., Lazaro-Camp, Vanessa, Smith, SJ, Gullapalli, Thanvi, Dragovic, Doroteja, Chang, Joycie, Zhang, Elizabeth, Alam, Murad, Group, Facial Aging Core Outcome Domain Set Study, Anvery, Noor , Kang, Bianca Y. , Wong, Clarissa, Iyengar, Sanjana, Yanes, Arianna F. , Cotseones, Jill, Ashchyan, Hovik J. , Patel, P. M., Sheikh, Umar A., Franklin, Matthew , Hanna, Courtney, Chiren, Sarah G., Schmitt, J, Furlan, Karina C., Alexiades, Macrene, Alhusayen, Raed, Alster, Tina S. , Beer, Kenneth, Bertucci, Vince , Bloom, Jason D. , Briceño, César A., Bucay, Vivian, Butterwick, Kimberly J., Hugues, Cartier, Casabona, Gabriela, Connolly, Karen , Cox, Sue Ellen , Darmanescu, Monica, Boulle, Koenraad De , Desai, Shraddha, Donofrio, Lisa, Dover, Jeffrey S., Draelos, Zoe, Eisen, Daniel B. , El-Domyati, Moetaz, El-Garem, Yehia, Fischer, John, Fitzgerald, Rebecca, GALADARI, Hassan, Gladstone, Hayes B., Goldman, Mitchel P., Goodman, Greg J., Hanke, C. William , Humphrey, Shannon, Ibrahim, Sherrif F., Jagdeo, Jared, Karen, Julie, Kauvar, Arielle, Ag, Kibbi, KIM, JENNY, Lacerda, D T D, Lask, G, Lopez, Grace M., Lupo, Mary P. , Mariwalla, Kavita , Matarasso, Seth, Mekokishvili, L, Narins, Rhoda S., Ogilvie, P, Orringer, Jeffrey S. , Osaki, Tammy H. , Ozog, David, Pacheco, Theresa, Polder, Kristel, Rossi, Anthony M, Sadick, Neil, Saedi, Nazanin, Schlessinger, Joel, Sharad, Jaishree , Shenoy, SuchitraM, Sinclair, Rd, Solish, Nowell, Piansay‐Soriano, Miriam Emily , Sulyman, Omotara , Szeimies, Rolf‐Markus , Tanzi, Elizabeth L., Taub, Amy Forman , Taylor, Mark B., Thomas, J. Regan, Torezan, Luis, Tosti, Antonella, Touma, Dany, Almeida, Ada Regina Trindade de , Vedamurthy, Maya , Viana, Giovanni, Waldman, Abigail, Weinkle, Susan, Weiss, Robert, Poon, Emily, Cartee, Todd V. , Sobanko, Joseph F. , Eisen, Daniel B. , Ahmed, Areeba , Schlessinger, Daniel Isaac , Lazaro-Camp, Vanessa J, Christensen, Rachel E. , Ibrahim, Sarah A. , Cotseones, J.K., Umar, Sheikh Ahmad , Furlan, Karina Colossi , Alexiades, Macrene , Alhusayen, Raed , Beer, Kenneth Robert, Briceño, César Augusto , Bucay, Vivian , Casabona, Gabriela , Cotofana, Sebastian , Desai, Shraddha , Dover, Jeffrey S. , Draelos, Zoe Diana , Eisen, Daniel B., El-Domyati, Moetaz M. , El-Garem, Yehia, Fitzgerald, Rebecca, Friedmann, Daniel P. , Galadari, Hassan , Gladstone, Hayes B., Goldman, Mitchel P. , Goodman, Greg , Green, Jeremy B. , Halachmi, Shlomit , Humphrey, Shannon , Jagdeo, Jared R. , Jiang, Shang I. Brian , Kauvar, Arielle N.B. , Kibbi, Abdul‐Ghani , Kim, John V. S., LASK, GARY P., Matarasso, Seth L., Narins, Rhoda S., Ogilvie, Patricia , Osaki, Tammy H. , Pacheco, Theresa , Polder, Kristel D., Saedi, Nazanin, Shenoy, Manjunath , Sinclair, Rod, Solish, Nowell , Torezan, Luís , Tosti, Antonellá , Waldman, Abigail , Weiss, Robert, Maher, Ian A. , Kirkham, Jamie J

JAMA Dermatology | June 17, 2026 | Volume: 162 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 829

10.1001/jamadermatol.2026.1697 | PMID 42307924 Get It

Importance Currently, there are no standardized outcome domains or measures in clinical trials for facial aging. Heterogeneity in outcome domains and measurement instruments across clinical trials creates difficulty in directly comparing interventions, determining superior therapies, and developing high-quality meta-analyses. Objective To develop a core outcome set (COS) of essential domains to be reported in clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of interventions for facial aging. Evidence Review PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL were searched from September 2005 to September 2015. An updated search of the same databases was performed from September 2015 to February 2026. Studies were included if (1) they were randomized clinical trial or controlled clinical trial in design, (2) they assessed the efficacy or safety of an intervention for facial aging, (3) they were published in English, and (4) they involved human participants. Complementary sources, including patient interviews, were used to capture further relevant outcomes. Two rounds of Delphi surveys, followed by consensus meetings, were used to identify outcome domains considered most important by both patient and physician stakeholders. Findings The final COS consists of 6 outcome domains: (1) overall convenience of treatment; (2) time to return to normal work and social activity; (3) overall assessment of focused area of treatment (at the point in time when treatment is expected to provide peak benefit); (4) duration of treatment effect; (5) severity of persistent local or systemic adverse events, including pigmentary change, skin texture change, delayed healing, scarring, and serious adverse events; and (6) patient satisfaction with treatment. Conclusions and Relevance The 6 outcome domains identified through a Delphi consensus are recommended for reporting in future facial aging trials to ensure that outcomes that matter most to patients and clinicians are measured and that results are comparable across interventions.
Dose-dependent white matter changes associated with repetitive head impacts in former American football players
Arciniega, Hector , Wickham, Alana, Szekely, Brian, Kim, Nicholas, Cho, Kang I, Carrington, Holly, Knyazhanskaya, Evdokiya , John, Omar , Jung, Leonard , Breedlove, Katherine M. , Mirmajlesi, Anya S, Stearns, Jared, Rushmore, R Jarrett, Daneshvar, Daniel H, Wiegand, Tim L T, Billah, Tashrif , Pasternak, Ofer, Cetin-Karayumak, Suheyla, Rathi, Yogesh, Coleman, Michael J, Bernick, Charles, Balcer, Laura J, Im, Brian , Datta, Shae , Alosco, Michael L. , Lin, Alexander P, Cummings, Jeffrey L, Reiman, Eric M, Stern, Robert A, Shenton, Martha E, Bouix, Sylvain, Su, Yi, Chen, Kewei, Protas, Hillary, Boker, Connie, Au, Rhoda, Cantu, Robert C, Farrer, Lindsay, Helm, Robert, Katz, Douglas I, Kowall, Neil, Mez, Jesse, Mercier, Gustavo, Otis, James, Weller, Jason, Simkin, Irene, Andino, Alondra, Conneely, Shannon, Diamond, Courtney, Fagle, Tessa, Haller, Olivia, Hunt, Tennyson, Gullotti, Nicole, Mariani, Megan, Mayville, Brian, McLaughlin, Kathleen, Nanna, Mary, Platt, Taylor, Rice, Fiona, Sestak, Madison, McClean, Michael, Tripodis, Yorghos, Annis, Douglas, Chaisson, Christine, Dixon, Diane, Finney, Carolyn, Gallagher, Kerrin, Hartlage, Kaitlin , Lu, Jun, Martin, Brett, Ojo, Emmanuel, Palmisano, Joseph N, Pine, Brittany, Ramachandran, Janani, Fitzsimmons, Jennifer, Arcinieago, Hector, Bonke, Elena, Coello, Eduardo , Jung, Leonhard, Liao, Huijun, Loy, Maria, Rizzoni, Elizabeth, Schultz, Vivian , Silva, Annelise, Vessey, Brynn, Banks, Sarah, Miller, Jason, Ritter, Aaron , Sabbagh, Marwan, Cruz, Raelynn de la, Durant, Jan, Golceker, Morgan, Harmon, Nicolette, Kaylegian, Kaeson, Long, Rachelle, Nance, Christin, Sandoval, Priscilla, Serrano, Andrew, Dodick, David W, Geda, Yonas, Wethe, Jennifer V, Falk, Bryce, Duffy, Amy, Howard, Marci, Montague, Michelle , Osgood, Thomas, Babcock, Debra, Bellgowan, Patrick, Balcer, Laura, Barr, William, GOLDBERG, JUDITH, Wisniewski, Thomas, Kirov, Ivan, Lui, Yvonne, Marmar, Charles, Hasanaj, Lisena, Serrano, Liliana , Al-Kharafi, Alhassan, George, Allan, Martin, Sammie, Riley, Edward, Runge, William, Peskind, Elaine R. , Colasurdo, Elizabeth , Marcus, Daniel S, Gurney, Jenny , Greenwald, Richard, Johnson, Keith A, Wethe, Jennifer V. , Wiegand, Tim L. T. , Jung, Leonard B , Breedlove, Katherine , Stearns, Jared , Adler, C H , Alosco, Michael L , Koerte, Inga K , Wethe, Jennifer V , Arciniega, Hector , Kim, Nicholas , Carrington, Holly , Rushmore, R. Jarrett , Daneshvar, Daniel H. , Pasternak, Ofer , Karayumak, Suheyla Cetin , Rathi, Yogesh , Coleman, Michael J. , Adler, Charles H. , Bernick, Charles , Balcer, Laura J. , Reiman, Eric M. , Shenton, Martha E. , Bouix, Sylvain , Protas, Hillary , Cantu, Robert C. , Katz, Douglas I. , Mez, Jesse , Weller, Jason , Fagle, Tessa, Mariani, Megan, McLaughlin, Kathleen , Pulukuri, Surya Vamsi , Sestak, Madison, McClean, Michael D , Tripodis, Yorghos , Annis, Douglas, Finney, Carolyn, Palmisano, Joseph , Pine, Brittany, Ramachandran, Janani , Bonke, Elena M. , Liao, Huijun, II, Robert W. Turner , Marek, Kenneth , Dodick, David W. , Geda, Yonas E. , Howard, Marci, Montague, Michelle, Babcock, Debra, Bellgowan, Patrick S.F. , Barr, William , Kirov, Ivan, George, Allan, Colasurdo, Elizabeth A. , Marcus, Daniel S., Johnson, Keith A.

Brain Communications | May 29, 2026 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/braincomms/fcag195 | PMID 42293319 Get It

Abstract Repetitive head impacts sustained during American football have been associated with neuropathological changes such as white matter shear injuries. However, the impact of specific factors, such as age of first exposure and cumulative head impact burden, on white matter integrity remains unclear. This study investigated in vivo white matter microstructural changes using diffusion tensor imaging and tract-based spatial statistics in 165 male former American football players (mean age 57.3 years, range 45–74) and 52 unexposed asymptomatic male controls (mean age 59.4 years, range 45–74) in the DIAGNOSE CTE Research Project. Compared to controls, former football players exhibited significantly higher fractional anisotropy (FA) in 1.97% of the white matter skeleton (1552 voxels; Cohen’s d = 0.587) and higher tissue-corrected FA (FAt) in 1.48% of the white matter skeleton (1004 voxels; Cohen’s d = 0.616). No significant differences were observed for mean diffusivity, axial diffusivity, radial diffusivity, or free water between football players and controls. Among football players, there were no significant differences in the white matter microstructure between players diagnosed with traumatic encephalopathy syndrome and those without the diagnosis. Lower FA was significantly associated with older age (P < 0.00001) and an earlier age of first exposure to tackle football (P < 0.01), while lower FAt was associated with greater cumulative head impact burden, specifically higher linear acceleration (P < 0.04) and rotational force (P < 0.02). This study highlights the influential role of exposure factors on white matter microstructure in former American football players, as well as the utility of diffusion tensor imaging to aid in characterizing the long-term effects of repetitive head impacts in contact sport athletes.
An Evaluation of Pediatric Dermatology Fellowship Websites: Content Analysis and Perspectives of Fellows and Program Directors
Huang, Cathleen , Iloabuchi, Vivian C. , Breinholt, Jacob, Starghill, Micah, Todd, Austin, Witt, Bryan, Pollock, Jordan R. , Chen, Joyce, Davis, Dawn Marie R. , Pollock, Jordan Riley , Starghill, Micah , Breinholt, Jacob , Witt, Bryan

Pediatric Dermatology | May 26, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1111/pde.70271 | PMID 42186695 Get It

ABSTRACT Background/Objectives Prospective applicants for pediatric dermatology fellowships often use program websites as a source of information. This study evaluated the content of pediatric dermatology fellowship websites to identify potential areas of improvement including website accessibility and information found on websites. In addition, this study also surveyed current pediatric dermatology fellows and program directors (PDs) to determine priorities in website content across different stakeholders. Methods Using the Society for Pediatric Dermatology's (SPD) list of fellowship programs, two independent evaluators assessed the same 40 total programs, with 29 of the same websites included for analysis, against 27 criteria across four domains. In addition, an electronic survey was disseminated via the SPD's mailing list to current pediatric dermatology fellows and fellowship PDs. Results On average between both evaluators, of the 29 included fellowship websites, 9 educational criteria were included 47.8% of the time across the websites, compared to 46.0% of 10 recruitment criteria, 30.7% of 5 social criteria, and 31.6% of 3 other criteria. Fellows were significantly more likely than PDs to consider several website components as highly valuable. Conclusions These findings reveal variable and incomplete content across pediatric dermatology fellowship websites, as well as differing expectations for fellowship websites between pediatric dermatology fellowship applicants and PDs, which may help provide suggestions to optimize future website development to enhance applicant engagement.
Consensus recommendations for CAR T-cell administration in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a modified Delphi study
Muffly, Lori , Frey, Noelle V. , Roloff, Gregory W. , Park, Jae H, Advani, Anjali S. , Bachanová, Veronika , Cassaday, Ryan D. , Daunov, Michael , Dykes, Kaitlyn C. , Gatell, Vivian Irizarry , Jamy, Omer , Kota, Vamsi, Kumaran, Muthu, O’Dwyer, Kristen M. , Oliai, Caspian , Schwartz, Marc S., Solh, Melhem M., Stock, Wendy, Tsai, Stephanie B., Ulrickson, Matthew L., Vasu, Sumithira, Leonard, Jessica T., Aldoss, Ibrahim, Dholaria, Bhagirathbhai R , Advani, Anjali S , Cassaday, Ryan D , Daunov, Michael , Dykes, Kaitlyn C , Grunwald, Michael , Hilal, Talal , Hill, LaQuisa C , Jamy, Omer , Lin, Chenyu , Logan, Aaron C , Luskin, Marlise R , O'Dwyer, Kristin , Oliai, Caspian H , Oluwole, Olalekan O , Sasine, Joshua , Wang, Eunice S. , Strickland, Stephen Anthony , Leonard, Jessica T , Shah, Bijal , Bachanova, Veronika , Muffly, Lori , Frey, Noelle V , Roloff, Gregory W , Dholaria, Bhagirathbhai , Grunwald, Michael R. , Hilal, Talal , Hill, LaQuisa C. , Kota, Vamsi , Oluwole, Olalekan O. , Sasine, Joshua , Solh, Melhem , Stock, Wendy , Tsai, Dr. Stephanie B., Ulrickson, Matthew L. , Vasu, Sumithira , Yalniz, Fevzi , Shah, Bijal , Aldoss, Ibrahim

Blood | May 19, 2026 | Volume: 148 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 657-668

10.1182/blood.2026033559 | PMID 42154904 Get It

Abstract The use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is increasing for adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), with 3 CD19 CAR T-cell products commercially available. Several key clinical questions related to best practices for CAR T-cell administration in this population exist, and limited prospective randomized trials have been conducted to fill these knowledge gaps. Thus, to help guide clinical practice, we conducted a modified Delphi study to develop and validate consensus recommendations on the administration of commercially available CAR T-cell therapy for adults with B-ALL. Consensus panelists (n = 9) included principal investigators (PIs) from Real World Outcomes Collaborative of CAR T-Cell Therapy in Adult ALL (ROCCA) consortium sites and were selected based on expertise and CAR T-cell center volume. Final panel consensus recommendations were distributed for rating by the remaining PIs from ROCCA consortium sites, which served as the validation group (n = 27). Consensus topics included patient selection, bridging and pre–CAR T-cell leukemia staging, lymphodepletion, and CAR T-cell treatment setting, specific toxicity prevention and management, post–CAR T-cell response assessment and disease monitoring, and the role of consolidation and/or maintenance therapies after CAR T-cell therapy. Initially, 58 recommendation statements were evaluated for consensus. After 2 panel meetings, a total of 34 statements achieved consensus rating among the expert panel. After rating by the validation group, all but 1 recommendation statement continued to meet consensus, for a total of 33 consensus recommendation statements on the administration of CAR T-cell therapy in adult B-ALL.
Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis from a rheumatologic perspective
Diaz‐Menindez, Maximiliano , VERGARA, ALEJANDRO DIAZ ARUMIR, Shing, Vivian, Harvey, Carolyn Mead, Martinez, Ana C. Zamora, Nagaraja, Vivek, Diaz Arumir Vergara, Alejandro, Mead Harvey, Carolyn, Zamora Martinez, Ana C, Harvey, Carolyn Mead, Zamora, Ana, Nagaraja, Vivek

Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease | May 6, 2026 | Volume: 20 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/17534666261445202 | PMID 42089452 Get It

Background: Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) is a rare interstitial lung disease (ILD) associated with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). Its clinical characteristics and outcomes in SARDs remain poorly defined. Objectives: To describe demographics, imaging patterns, and outcomes in SARD-associated PPFE. Methods: Patients diagnosed with PPFE and SARDs at Mayo Clinic (2000-2024) were included. PPFE diagnosis was confirmed by high-resolution computed tomography, and SARD diagnoses were established by rheumatologists. Results: Fifteen of 62 patients with PPFE had SARDs with majority having systemic sclerosis (SSc)(n= 7, 46%). Median age at PPFE diagnosis was 57.2 years; 80% were female; 40% were ever-smokers; 40% required supplemental oxygen; 5 had pulmonary hypertension. Coexisting ILD patterns included UIP (26.7%) and NSIP (20%). Coexisting ILD patterns included usual interstitial pneumonia (26.7%) and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (20%). Three patients died, including two with SSc. Conclusion: Systemic sclerosis was the most frequently observed SARD among patients with PPFE, and may coexist with other ILD patterns; recognition may inform risk stratification, multidisciplinary evaluation, and longitudinal follow-up.
Phase II trial of combination radiation, hormone, and immunotherapy in grade group 5 prostate cancer
Bryant, John Michael, Sandoval, Maria, Putney, Ryan, Trivedi, Purvish , Katende, Esther N. , Fink, Angelina, Naqvi, Syeda Mahrukh, Kim, Youngchul, Yin, Vivian, Zhang, Jingsong, Park, J Y, Serna, Amparo, Lam, Nghi, Pow-Sang, J., Poch, Michael, Li, Roger, Manley, Brandon J, Naghavi, Arash, Torres-Roca, Javier, Grass, G Daniel, Kim, S, Latifi, Kujtim, Hunt, Dylan, Johnstone, Peter, Dhillon, Jasreman, Rodriguez, Paulo C, Jain, Rohit, Fernandez, Daniel C. , Yamoah, Kosj , Bryant, John Michael, Sandoval, Maria L., Putney, Ryan M. , Zhang, Jingsong , Serna, Amparo , Lam, Nghi B. , Poch, Michael , Manley, Brandon J, Naghavi, A.O. , Grass, G. Daniel , Latifi, Kujtim , Dhillon, Jasreman

Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer | May 4, 2026 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 5 | Pages: e013906

10.1136/jitc-2025-013906 | PMID 42082271 Get It

Background Grade group 5 (GG5) prostate cancer (PCa) carries a less favorable prognosis after standard-of-care (SOC) therapy, necessitating novel therapeutic approaches. High-dose rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) may modulate immune response in GG5 PCa, particularly in tumors with increased immune content. This study evaluated whether the addition of nivolumab to SOC was associated with improved disease control in patients with high-volume GG5 PCa, including those with oligometastatic disease. Methods In this non-randomized phase II trial, 31 patients with localized or oligometastatic GG5 PCa and >30% positive biopsy cores were evaluated between September 2018 and April 2021. Patients received four doses of nivolumab (240 mg every 2 weeks) beginning 4 weeks prior to HDRBT, alongside ADT, HDRBT, and external beam radiation. The primary endpoint was to evaluate whether the 2-year freedom from biochemical recurrence (FFBR) rate would exceed a prespecified historical control rate of 75%. Results Among the 31 patients, the median follow-up was 38.8 months (IQR 31.0–46.5 months). The addition of nivolumab to SOC RT with ADT was associated with a 2-year FFBR rate of 90.3% (95% CI 74.3% to 98.0%) (median FFBR not reached), exceeding the prespecified historical control rate of 75% (one-sided p value from binomial test=0.024). Definitive and probable nivolumab-related toxicity included 6.3% acute grade 2 and 6.3% acute grade 3 adverse events (AEs), with no grade 4+ AEs observed. A higher Decipher immunosuppression score at diagnosis correlated with early pathologic response (p=0.005) and was independently associated with time to metastatic failure (p=0.044). Conclusions Nivolumab combined with SOC was associated with encouraging FFBR in this high-risk GG5 PCa population and may represent a promising therapeutic intensification strategy. The Decipher immunosuppression score may serve as a predictive biomarker for response. These findings warrant further investigation in randomized trials.
A Survey-Based Study of Reproductive Health Practices by Immunologists of the Clinical Immunology Society in Patients with Inborn Errors of Immunity
Galant-Swafford, Jessica , Gans, Melissa, Huangpo, Tracy, Han, Sarah, Ward, Brant, Vinh, Donald, Chapdelaine, Hugo, Ackerman, Kevin, Rosenberg, Daniel, Squire, Jacqueline, Hobson, Jessica, Jongco, Art, Ahmed, Aisha, Ale, Hanadys, Kim, Vy, Barmettler, Sara , Piazza, Megan, Pachul, Jessica Willett, Fernandes, Monica, Nguyen, Ashley, Freeman, Catherine , Schutt, Madeline, Raje, Nikita , Bayer, Diana, Gunderman, Lauren, Trujillo, Vivian Hernandez-, Freeman, Alexandra, Gans, Melissa D. , Ward, Brant R. , Vinh, Donald Cuong , Chapdelaine, Hugo , Rosenberg, Daniel L. , Almarzooqi, Farida , Peng, Xiao P. , Ale, Hanadys , Kim, Vy Hong-Diep, Piazza, Megan S. , Gunderman, Lauren M. , Hernandez-Trujillo, Vivian Pilar, Hajjar, Joud

Journal of Human Immunity | May 1, 2026 | Volume: 2 | Issue: CIS2026 | Pages: No page available

10.70962/cis2026abstract.20 Get It

Introduction Individuals with inborn errors of immunity (IEI) are increasingly reaching reproductive age, yet guidance on fertility preservation, genetic counseling, medication adjustments in pregnancy and breastfeeding, monitoring for complications, and multidisciplinary coordination is lacking. This joint effort between two committees of the Clinical Immunology Society (CIS), the Women of the Clinical Immunology Society (WCIS) and the Adult Immune Deficiency Committee (AID) survey aimed to characterize current reproductive care practices for IEI patients. Methods A survey was disseminated to 809 CIS members. The response rate was 6.43% (52 respondents). The 24-item questionnaire addressed management of pregnancy in IEI, medications adjustment, participation in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) care and fertility preservation, and maternal/neonatal outcomes. Results Because survey items were optional, the number of respondents varies by question. Forty-two participants completed core items: 64% (27/42) allergists/immunologists, 71% (30/42) practicing at academic centers, and 48% (20/42) with >50% immunology-focused practices. Most respondents (78%, 41/52) currently or previously cared for pregnant/planning IEI patients. Preconception counseling was common (90%, 37/41), yet only 2% (1/41) have access to a formal reproductive multidisciplinary team. Among clinicians involved in HSCT care, 45% (13/29) referred patients for fertility preservation. More than half, 52% (22/42), observed reduced fertility in IEI patients, and 56% (20/36) observed adverse maternal outcomes. Medication management varied: 61% (24/39) discontinued known teratogenic medications, and 64% (25/39) adjusted dosing during pregnancy. Regarding immunoglobulin replacement therapy, 79% adjusted dosing based on IgG levels and 42% increased dosing by trimester. Conclusions This CIS survey reveals practice variability and notable gaps in reproductive health support for individuals with IEIs. Due to the relatively low response rate, generalizability across providers and practice settings is challenging. However, the results of this survey suggest that although most clinicians provide preconception counseling and manage IgG and immunomodulatory therapy during pregnancy, formal multidisciplinary structures are rare. High rates of reported fertility concerns and maternal complications underscore the need for enhanced collaboration with obstetrics/gynecology and the development of structured, evidence-based, multidisciplinary guidelines for reproductive care in IEI. Tabular data are included as downloadable supplement files.
At‐home visual acuity in children using a custom iPhone application compared with standardized in‐office visual acuity testing
Roberts, Tawna L. , Bothun, Erick D. , Zhu, Yufeng, Henderson, Robert J. , Boyle, Nicole M, Leske, David A. , Wernimont, Suzanne M., Marino, Carrie E, Manh, Vivian M. , Youngerman, Jillian M, Qayum, Jennifer N, Srinivasan, Gayathri , Titelbaum, Jenna R. , Crouch, Eric R. , Colburn, Jeffrey, Esposito, Christina , Zeto, V Lori, Connolly, Katie, Bhakta, Rita M, Lorenzana, Ingryd J., McDowell, Paula, Beaulieu, Wesley T, Kraker, Raymond T, Holmes, Jonathan M, Pineles, Stacy L., Weise, Katherine K., Cotter, Susan A, Group, Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator, Beaulieu, Wesley T , Kraker, Raymond T , Hatt, Sarah R. , Raghuram, Aparna , McDowell, Paula S., Kraker, Raymond T. , Holmes, Jonathan M. , Cotter, Susan A.

Optometry and Vision Science | May 1, 2026 | Volume: 103 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/ovs2.70040 | PMID 42062237 Get It

ABSTRACT Purpose To validate a custom smartphone application for at‐home visual acuity (VA) measurement in children. Methods A total of 452 children aged 3–17.5 years participated. Certified examiners measured in‐office test–retest VA (logMAR) using gold‐standard Amblyopia Treatment Study HOTV (3‐to‐6‐year‐olds, younger cohort) or electronic Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (7‐to‐17.5‐year‐olds, older cohort) protocols at 3–4.5 m and app‐based VA at 1.5 m. Caregivers measured at‐home app‐based VA at 1.5 m. Results Comparing at‐home app‐based with gold‐standard VA, in eyes 20/40 or better, 95% (143/151) and 93% (91/98) of the younger and older cohorts were within 2 lines, respectively (mean differences: younger = −0.03, older = −0.04; 95% limits‐of‐agreement half‐width (LOA): younger = ±0.26, older = ±0.22). In eyes 20/50 or worse, 66% (42/64) and 75% (76/101) of the younger and older cohorts were within 2 lines, respectively (mean differences: younger = 0.11, older = 0.13, LOA: younger = ±0.50, older = ±0.51). Comparing in‐office app‐based VA with gold‐standard VA, in eyes 20/40 or better, 98% (160/164) and 94% (99/105) of the younger and older cohorts were within 2 lines, respectively (mean differences: younger = −0.03, older = −0.03; LOA: younger = ±0.22; older = ±0.24). In eyes 20/50 or worse, 85% (60/71) and 91% (101/111) of the younger and older cohorts were within 2 lines, respectively (mean differences: younger = 0.04; older = 0.04; LOA: younger = ±0.39; older = ±0.24). For gold‐standard test–retest, in eyes 20/40 or better, 99% (163/164) and 99% (104/105) of the younger and older cohorts had retest within 2 lines, respectively (mean differences: younger = 0.00; older = 0.01; LOA: younger = ±0.17; older = ±0.11). For 20/50 or worse, 92% (66/72) and 100% (111/111) in the younger and older cohorts were within 2 lines, respectively (mean differences: younger = 0.01; older = 0.02; LOA: younger = ±0.35; older = ±0.15). Conclusions Our app demonstrated good concordance with the gold standard at home and in the office for eyes with VA of 20/40 or better. However, concordance decreased considerably for eyes with VA 20/50 or worse, particularly at home.