Putney, Ryan M.

Background Grade group 5 (GG5) prostate cancer (PCa) carries a less favorable prognosis after standard-of-care (SOC) therapy, necessitating novel therapeutic approaches. High-dose rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) may modulate immune response in GG5 PCa, particularly in tumors with increased immune content. This study evaluated whether the addition of nivolumab to SOC was associated with improved disease control in patients with high-volume GG5 PCa, including those with oligometastatic disease. Methods In this non-randomized phase II trial, 31 patients with localized or oligometastatic GG5 PCa and >30% positive biopsy cores were evaluated between September 2018 and April 2021. Patients received four doses of nivolumab (240 mg every 2 weeks) beginning 4 weeks prior to HDRBT, alongside ADT, HDRBT, and external beam radiation. The primary endpoint was to evaluate whether the 2-year freedom from biochemical recurrence (FFBR) rate would exceed a prespecified historical control rate of 75%. Results Among the 31 patients, the median follow-up was 38.8 months (IQR 31.0–46.5 months). The addition of nivolumab to SOC RT with ADT was associated with a 2-year FFBR rate of 90.3% (95% CI 74.3% to 98.0%) (median FFBR not reached), exceeding the prespecified historical control rate of 75% (one-sided p value from binomial test=0.024). Definitive and probable nivolumab-related toxicity included 6.3% acute grade 2 and 6.3% acute grade 3 adverse events (AEs), with no grade 4+ AEs observed. A higher Decipher immunosuppression score at diagnosis correlated with early pathologic response (p=0.005) and was independently associated with time to metastatic failure (p=0.044). Conclusions Nivolumab combined with SOC was associated with encouraging FFBR in this high-risk GG5 PCa population and may represent a promising therapeutic intensification strategy. The Decipher immunosuppression score may serve as a predictive biomarker for response. These findings warrant further investigation in randomized trials.

Abstract Background: While cancer immunotherapies have revolutionized treatment, their efficacy remains limited for most patients, highlighting tumors' capacity to evade immune detection. Epigenetic modifications, particularly DNA methylation, play a pivotal role in silencing immune-related pathways, thereby facilitating immune escape. By modulating gene expression, methylation disrupts immune activation, contributing to reduced tumor immunogenicity. This study examines the methylation landscape of co-stimulatory and immune checkpoint genes across various cancers to elucidate how these changes influence immune responses. Methods: Using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we analyzed methylation and gene expression profiles across diverse cancer types. Data from 8,186 solid tumors and 745 adjacent normal tissues were processed via t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) with 247 probes targeting 20 immune-related genes. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to capture methylation variability across 8,931 tumor and normal samples. To explore the effects of methylation on immune gene expression, we analyzed data from 26 epithelial cancer cell lines treated with 5-azacitidine, a demethylating agent, using the GSE57342 dataset. Post-treatment changes in gene expression were assessed, and survival analyses from prior studies were used to explore clinical correlations. Results: We identified distinct methylation patterns in immune synapse genes, differentiating tumors from adjacent normal tissues. Co-stimulatory genes such as CD40 were hypermethylated in tumors, correlating with decreased expression, whereas immune checkpoint genes like PDL1 and HHLA2 were hypomethylated, correlating with increased expression. This inverse relationship between methylation and gene expression underscores the transcriptional regulatory role of DNA methylation. Treatment with 5-azacitidine reversed hypermethylation in co-stimulatory genes, including CD40, potentially enhancing immune recognition. Methylation levels of these genes were also associated with T cell infiltration into the tumor microenvironment and predicted better outcomes in melanoma patients, underscoring their clinical relevance. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that DNA methylation of immune synapse genes contributes to tumor immune evasion by modulating immune gene expression. Targeting these epigenetic alterations represents a promising strategy to restore tumor immunogenicity and improve immunotherapy outcomes, particularly when combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Reversing methylation-driven immune suppression could strengthen the immune response and enhance clinical outcomes for cancer patients. Citation Format: Imene Hamaidi, Anders Berglund, Matthew Mills, Ryan M. Putney, James J. Mulé, Sungjune Kim. DNA methylation of immune synapse genes drives tumor immune evasion [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 4831.

Abstract Introduction Men with African ancestry have the highest incidence and mortality rates of prostate cancer (PCa) worldwide. Methods This study aimed to identify differentially methylated genes between tumor vs. adjacent normal and aggressive vs. indolent PCa in 121 African American patients. Epigenome‐wide DNA methylation patterns in tumor DNA were assessed using the human Illumina Methylation EPIC V1 array. Results Around 5,139 differentially methylated CpG‐sites (q < 0.01, lΔβl > 0.2) were identified when comparing normal vs. tumor, with an overall trend of hypermethylation in prostate tumors. Multiple representative differentially methylated regions (DMRs), including immune‐related genes, such as CD40 , Galectin3 , OX40L , and STING , were detected in prostate tumors when compared to adjacent normal tissues. Based on an epigenetic clock model, we observed that tumors’ total number of stem cell divisions and the stem cell division rate were significantly higher than adjacent normal tissues. Regarding PCa aggressiveness, 2,061 differentially methylated CpG‐sites (q < 0.05, lΔβl > .05) were identified when the grade group (GG)1 was compared with GG4/5. Among these 2,061 CpG sites, 155 probes were consistently significant in more than one comparison. Among these genes, several immune system genes, such as COL18A1 , S100A2 , ITGA4 , HLA‐C , and ADCYAP1 , have previously been linked to tumor progression in PCa. Conclusion Several differentially methylated genes involved in immune‐oncologic pathways associated with disease risk or aggressiveness were identified. In addition, 261 African American‐specific differentially methylated genes related to the risk of PCa were identified. These results can shedlight on potential mechanisms contributing to PCa disparities in the African American Population.