Back to Authors

Squire, Jacqueline

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 3

A Survey-Based Study of Reproductive Health Practices by Immunologists of the Clinical Immunology Society in Patients with Inborn Errors of Immunity
Galant-Swafford, Jessica , Gans, Melissa, Huangpo, Tracy, Han, Sarah, Ward, Brant, Vinh, Donald, Chapdelaine, Hugo, Ackerman, Kevin, Rosenberg, Daniel, Squire, Jacqueline, Hobson, Jessica, Jongco, Art, Ahmed, Aisha, Ale, Hanadys, Kim, Vy, Barmettler, Sara , Piazza, Megan, Pachul, Jessica Willett, Fernandes, Monica, Nguyen, Ashley, Freeman, Catherine , Schutt, Madeline, Raje, Nikita , Bayer, Diana, Gunderman, Lauren, Trujillo, Vivian Hernandez-, Freeman, Alexandra, Gans, Melissa D. , Ward, Brant R. , Vinh, Donald Cuong , Chapdelaine, Hugo , Rosenberg, Daniel L. , Almarzooqi, Farida , Peng, Xiao P. , Ale, Hanadys , Kim, Vy Hong-Diep, Piazza, Megan S. , Gunderman, Lauren M. , Hernandez-Trujillo, Vivian Pilar, Hajjar, Joud

Journal of Human Immunity | May 1, 2026 | Volume: 2 | Issue: CIS2026 | Pages: No page available

10.70962/cis2026abstract.20 Get It

Introduction Individuals with inborn errors of immunity (IEI) are increasingly reaching reproductive age, yet guidance on fertility preservation, genetic counseling, medication adjustments in pregnancy and breastfeeding, monitoring for complications, and multidisciplinary coordination is lacking. This joint effort between two committees of the Clinical Immunology Society (CIS), the Women of the Clinical Immunology Society (WCIS) and the Adult Immune Deficiency Committee (AID) survey aimed to characterize current reproductive care practices for IEI patients. Methods A survey was disseminated to 809 CIS members. The response rate was 6.43% (52 respondents). The 24-item questionnaire addressed management of pregnancy in IEI, medications adjustment, participation in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) care and fertility preservation, and maternal/neonatal outcomes. Results Because survey items were optional, the number of respondents varies by question. Forty-two participants completed core items: 64% (27/42) allergists/immunologists, 71% (30/42) practicing at academic centers, and 48% (20/42) with >50% immunology-focused practices. Most respondents (78%, 41/52) currently or previously cared for pregnant/planning IEI patients. Preconception counseling was common (90%, 37/41), yet only 2% (1/41) have access to a formal reproductive multidisciplinary team. Among clinicians involved in HSCT care, 45% (13/29) referred patients for fertility preservation. More than half, 52% (22/42), observed reduced fertility in IEI patients, and 56% (20/36) observed adverse maternal outcomes. Medication management varied: 61% (24/39) discontinued known teratogenic medications, and 64% (25/39) adjusted dosing during pregnancy. Regarding immunoglobulin replacement therapy, 79% adjusted dosing based on IgG levels and 42% increased dosing by trimester. Conclusions This CIS survey reveals practice variability and notable gaps in reproductive health support for individuals with IEIs. Due to the relatively low response rate, generalizability across providers and practice settings is challenging. However, the results of this survey suggest that although most clinicians provide preconception counseling and manage IgG and immunomodulatory therapy during pregnancy, formal multidisciplinary structures are rare. High rates of reported fertility concerns and maternal complications underscore the need for enhanced collaboration with obstetrics/gynecology and the development of structured, evidence-based, multidisciplinary guidelines for reproductive care in IEI. Tabular data are included as downloadable supplement files.
Prescription Patterns and Outcomes of Topical Antibiotic Irrigations in Difficult-to-Treat Chronic Rhinosinusitis
Valencia-Sanchez, Bastien A., Jabbour, Christopher , Wilson, Penny , Najmi, Natasha N. , Alhalabi, Alaa , Squire, Jacqueline D. , Stokken, Janalee, Donaldson, Angela M. , Stokken, Janalee K. , Valencia, Bastien A. , Valencia‐Sanchez, Bastien A. , Wilson, Prishae , Najmi, Natasha, Squire, Jacqueline, Carlson, Matthew L , Squire, Jacqueline

American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy | January 19, 2026 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 230-238

10.1177/19458924251413671 Get It

Background A substantial proportion of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) remain partly controlled or uncontrolled despite endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and maximal medical therapy. For these difficult-to-treat cases, topical antibiotic irrigations have been proposed as an adjunctive therapy, particularly when delivered via large-volume, low-pressure systems that enhance sinus penetration post-ESS. Evidence on their efficacy and prescribing patterns in this population remains limited. Objective This study aims to evaluate the use and outcomes of topical antibiotic irrigations in patients with difficult-to-treat CRS. Methods A retrospective, multi-site cohort study was conducted across tertiary academic medical centers. Adult patients with persistent CRS symptoms despite bilateral full-house ESS and conventional postoperative medical management were included. Patients with cystic fibrosis or granulomatosis with polyangiitis were excluded. Demographic, clinical, and treatment data were collected. Primary outcomes were infection resolution at 8 weeks and changes in Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) scores. Results Sixty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. Mupirocin (41.8%), tobramycin (23.9%), and gentamicin (17.9%) were the most commonly prescribed agents. After 8 weeks, 62.7% of patients achieved infection clearance. Among 44 patients with SNOT-22 data, scores improved significantly from 34.8 ± 20.2 to 21.8 ± 14.7 ( P < .001). Improvement in SNOT-22 scores was more pronounced in patients who cleared the infection compared to those who did not. Conclusion Large-volume topical antibiotic irrigations were associated with high infection resolution rates and clinically meaningful SNOT-22 improvements in patients with difficult-to-treat CRS. These findings support their potential utility as an adjunctive therapy in select postsurgical patients and warrant further prospective investigation.
An Expert Opinion/Approach: Clinical Presentations, Diagnostic Considerations, and Therapeutic Options for Gastrointestinal Manifestations of Common Variable Immune Deficiency
Squire, Jacqueline D. , Francis, Fadi, Binion, David G. , Cross, Raymond, Squire, Jacqueline, Hashash, Jana G. , Squire, Jacqueline , Farraye, Francis A.

American Journal of Gastroenterology | September 23, 2022 | Volume: 117 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1743-1752

10.14309/ajg.0000000000002027 Get It

Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is the most common symptomatic primary immunodeficiency. It is characterized by impaired B-cell differentiation. Although patients can be diagnosed with CVID anytime during their lifetime, most patients have symptoms for 5–9 years before their diagnosis. The diagnosis of CVID starts with a detailed history focusing on the infectious and noninfectious manifestations of the disease. In patients who are suspected to experience CVID, quantitative immunoglobulins (Ig) should be checked to confirm the diagnosis. IgG should be at least 2 times less than the age-specific SD along with either a low IgA or IgM and with evidence of impaired vaccine response. CVID is usually associated with infectious and/or noninfectious conditions, the latter of which can be inflammatory, autoimmune, lymphoproliferative, or malignant, among other manifestations. Ig therapy has positively affected the disease course of patients with infectious complications but has limited effect on the noninfectious manifestations because the noninfectious complications are related to immune dysregulation involving B cells and T cells rather than primarily due to antibody deficiency. When the gastrointestinal (GI) system is involved, patients with CVID may display signs and symptoms that mimic several GI conditions such as celiac disease, pernicious anemia, or inflammatory bowel diseases. The inflammatory bowel disease–like condition is usually treated with steroids, 5-aminosalicylates, thiopurines, or biologic agents to control the inflammation. In this review, the clinical presentations, diagnostic considerations, and therapeutic options for GI manifestations of CVID will be discussed to facilitate the individualized management of these often-complex patients.