Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

1164 citation(s) found for "Xu, Victoria".

Safety and efficacy of once-weekly carfilzomib (K) dosing in frail patients (pts): A subgroup analysis from the phase 3 A.R.R.O.W. study.
Mateos, María‐Victoria , Kumar, Shaji , Rosenbaum, Cara A. , Huang, Mei , Goldrick, Amanda, Blædel, Julie, Ludwig, Heinz , Dimopoulos, Meletios Α.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 12, 2020 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 8027-8027

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.8027 Get It

8027 Background: A.R.R.O.W. demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) with once-weekly K (70 mg/m2)-dexamethasone (Kd70) vs twice-weekly K (27 mg/m2)-dexamethasone (Kd27) in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) pts, regardless of age. Weekly Kd70 is US-approved for relapsed or refractory MM (1–3 prior therapy lines). For a comprehensive fitness measure, frailty scales were developed incorporating age, comorbidities, and functional status. (Palumbo Blood 2015; Facon Blood 2015). Here we assessed post hoc pt outcomes by frailty status. Methods: PFS and safety were assessed by treatment arm and a frailty algorithm incorporating age, medical history–derived Charlson Comorbidity Index, and ECOG performance status; pts with frailty scores of 0, 1, or ≥2 were classified as fit, intermediate (int), or frail, respectively. PFS was assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method. Safety was assessed in pts who received ≥1 treatment dose. Results: Pt distribution by frailty status was generally balanced between arms (Table). Once-weekly Kd70 vs twice-weekly Kd27 resulted in median PFS for fit, int, and frail pts of 15.7 vs 5.7 (mos; HR 0.53 [95% CI, 0.33–0.86]), 11.1 vs 7.7 mos (HR 0.81 [95% CI, 0.55–1.19]), and 10.3 vs 6.6 mos (HR 0.76 [95% CI, 0.49–1.16]), respectively. Rates of grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of interest were similar between treatment arms across frailty subgroups (Table). In the once-weekly Kd70 subgroups, there was no grade ≥3 peripheral neuropathy (PN); grade ≥3 cardiac failure rates were ≤4%. Conclusions: Once-weekly Kd70 resulted in PFS benefits vs twice-weekly Kd27 with a favorable benefit/risk profile regardless of frailty score as defined. These results support weekly Kd70 as a treatment option for both fit and frail RRMM pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02412878. [Table: see text]
Outcomes of patients with t(11;14) multiple myeloma: An International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) multicenter study.
Durie, Brian G.M. , Goldschmidt, Hartmut , Mateos, María‐Victoria , González, Verónica , Mangiacavalli, Silvia , Min, Chang Ki, Esteves, Graça , Handa, Hiroshi , Rodríguez, Carlos Fernández de Larrea, Delforge, Michel, Kumar, Shaji , Du, Juan , Kım, Kihyun , Merlini, Giampaolo , Min, Chang‐Ki , Dimopoulos, Meletios Α. , Kastritis, Efstathios , Ludwig, Heinz , Escalante, Fernando , Cameron, Chris G , Rajkumar, S. Vincent

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 12, 2020 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 8015-8015

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.8015 Get It

8015 Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogeneous disease with varying survival outcomes depending on the presence of certain genetic abnormalities. Common abnormalities include trisomies, translocations involving chromosome 14, and amplifications or deletions of chromosomes 1, 13, and 17. t(11;14), occurring in approx. 15% of patients (pts) with MM, is considered a standard risk abnormality, but recent data suggest that the prognosis may be inferior to what had been expected. This is of particular relevance as new therapeutic options such as the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax has been shown to be effective in t(11;14) pts. Methods: This was a multicenter study designed and conducted by the IMWG, to identify the outcomes of pts with t(11;14) using a retrospective cohort of pts. Pts with MM diagnosed between 2005 and 2015 with t(11;14) identified on FISH performed within six months (mos) of diagnosis, and with treatment details available and if alive, a minimum of 12 mos of follow up, were enrolled. Results: The current analysis includes 848 pts with a median age of 64.4 years; 60.0% are male. The median follow-up from diagnosis for the entire cohort was 45.7 mos; 84.7% of the pts were alive at the last follow up. ISS stage distribution included: Stage 1 (35.3%), Stage II (38.9%) and stage III (25.8%). The distribution of FISH abnormalities included: del 13q (14.5%), 1q amp (12.1%), del 17p or monosomy 17 (6.1%). Pts received initial therapy with different regimens: IMiD-24.3%, PI-41.0%, both-20.8% and 13.8% had no novel agent. The drug classes by line of therapy are shown in table. An early stem cell transplant (SCT) was used in 40.8% of pts. The median time to next treatment (TTNT) after initial treatment was 15.0 (95% CI: 12.2 to 17.7) mos. The median overall survival from diagnosis for the entire cohort was 82.5 (95% CI: 73.5 to 95.8) mos. Conclusions: This is the first study to examine the outcomes of a large group of myeloma pts with t(11;14) abnormality. Pts receiving a combination if a PI and an IMiD appear to have the best survival outcomes and thse receiving an early SCT appear to have excellent survival with median OS approaching 10 years. Additional pts are being accrued to this study and additional analysis examining the variables affecting response duration and survival will be presented. [Table: see text]
Updated risk stratification model for smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) incorporating the revised IMWG diagnostic criteria.
Mateos, María‐Victoria , González, Verónica , Rodríguez, Carlos Fernández de Larrea, Mangiacavalli, Silvia , Goldschmidt, Hartmut , Kyriakou, Charalampia , Qi, Ming , Ukropec, Jon, Weiss, Brendan M. , Durie, Brian G.M. , Kumar, Shaji , Miguel, Jesús F. San , Dimopoulos, Meletios Α. , Kastritis, Efstathios , Hájek, Roman , Morgan, Gareth J. , Merlini, Giampaolo , Cavo, Michèle , Cameron, Chris G , Rajkumar, S. Vincent

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 12, 2020 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 8000-8000

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.8000 Get It

8000 Background: The diagnostic criteria for MM were revised in 2014, recategorizing ultra-high risk (i.e., 80% at two years) as active myeloma requiring therapy. The removal of patients at the highest risk of progression from the smoldering group requires reassessment of current risk stratification models. Methods: We designed a multicenter, retrospective study of SMM patients to develop a risk stratification model. Patients diagnosed with SMM on/after January 1, 2004 were included if they had no disease progression within 6 months, had baseline data from diagnosis (+/- 3 months), had a follow up of ≥1 year, and did not participate in a therapeutic trial of SMM. Various clinical and laboratory factors were explored to identify factors that predicted progression at 2 years. Univariate Cox regressions were run for each factor. For factors with p-values ≤ 0.25, optimal cut points were identified using Youden’s index. Binary factors were used in stepwise regression to fit multivariable Cox model and significant risk factors were determined (F-test). Results: Overall, 2004 patients were included (ages 26-93, 51% female). Factors independently associated with progression (optimal cutoffs) included: Serum M protein (2 g/dL), involved to uninvolved serum-free light chain ratio (20), and marrow plasma cell % (20%). Patients were stratified using the risk factors: Low- (0 factors), Intermediate- (1), and High-Risk (≥2). Previously used high risk markers such as Bence Jones proteinuria (≥500 mg/24 hours) and severe immunoparesis (50% decrease in uninvolved immunoglobulin levels) were both significant in univariate analysis, but were eliminated on step wise selection. Compared to the low risk group, intermediate- and high-risk groups had significantly higher rate of progression (Table). Within the high-risk group, having all 3 risk factors (n=61) versus 2 did not add to the model, with insufficient separation between 2 and 3 factors. Conclusions: We have developed a risk stratification model for SMM that incorporates revised cutoffs for previously used parameters (20/2/20) that can be universally applied. Additonal analysis are being conducted to develop models that utilize common cytogenetic abnormalities, as well as those without FLC given lack of availability of all tests across the world. [Table: see text]
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Triglyceride and Glucose Index for Insulin Resistance: A Systematic Review
Sánchez‐García, Adriana , Rodríguez‐Gutiérrez, René , Mancillas‐Adame, Leonardo , González‐Nava, Victoria , González-Colmenero, Alejandro Díaz , Solís, Ricardo César , Álvarez‐Villalobos, Neri Alejandro , González‐González, José Gerardo , Diaz Gonzalez-Colmenero, Alejandro , González-González, José Gerardo , Solis-Pacheco, Ricardo Cesar , Álvarez-Villalobos, Neri A , Sánchez-García, Adriana

International Journal of Endocrinology | March 10, 2020 | Volume: 2020 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 1-7

10.1155/2020/4678526 | PMID 32256572 Get It

Introduction . The triglyceride and glucose (TyG) index has been described as a biochemical marker of insulin resistance (IR); however, its diagnostic accuracy remains uncertain. Objective . To summarize the evidence assessing the diagnostic accuracy of the TyG index regarding IR. Methods . A comprehensive search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus was performed without any language restriction. Studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of the TyG index against the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp (HIEC) or any other IR biochemical were assessed independently and in duplicate. Diagnostic accuracy measures (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and likelihood ratios) were extracted independently and in duplicate. The QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias of independent studies. Results . We identified 15 eligible studies with 69,922 participants and an overall quality of low to moderate. The TyG index was evaluated by HIEC and HOMA as reference tests. The highest achieved sensitivity was 96% using HIEC, and the highest specificity was of 99% using HOMA-IR, with a cutoff value of 4.68. AUC values varied from 0.59 to 0.88. Cutoff values for IR were variable between studies, limiting its comparability. Conclusion . In this systematic review, we found moderate-to-low quality evidence about the usefulness of the TyG index as a surrogate biochemical marker of IR. Due to the lack of a standardized IR definition and heterogeneity between studies, further validation and standardized cutoff values are needed to be used in clinical practice.
Screening for clonal hematopoiesis as a predictive marker for development of t-AML following adjuvant therapy for breast cancer (S0012)
Slovak, Marilyn L., Bedell, Victoria , Lew, Danika L., Albain, Kathy S. , Ellis, Georgiana K., Livingston, R., Martino, Silvana , Perez, Edith A. , Sher, D A, Livingston, R. B., Martino, S., Stock, Wendy

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 6, 2020 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 18_suppl | Pages: 11051-11051

10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.11051 Get It

11051 Background: A serious complication associated with breast cancer treatment is the increased risk for development of therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML). To evaluate and possibly identify patients (pts) at high risk for development of t-AML, the Southwest Oncology Group asked whether dose-intensive adjuvant regimens for high risk breast cancer pts induced genetic damage to hematopoietic stem cells (HSC), defined by the emergence of clonal hematopoiesis, an early marker of HSC damage. Methods: 274 pts consented to the clonal hematopoiesis study objective of S0012, a randomized clinical trial of standard doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by weekly paclitaxel (arm 1, 129 pts) vs. weekly doxorubicin and daily oral cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF followed by weekly paclitaxel (arm 2, 145 pts) as neoadjuvant therapy for inflammatory and locally advanced breast cancer. Two different clonality assays were used: the HUMARA (HUMan Androgen Receptor) Assay to estimate the incidence of early genetic damage by clonal proliferation and microsatellite instability (MSI) testing at 5 loci (Bat 26, Bat 40, APC, Mfd, D2S123), common ‘hotspots‘ in t-AML, to screen for loss of heterozygosity or defective DNA mismatch repair mechanisms. Blood samples were evaluated prior to treatment and at 6 and 12 mos post-surgery for emergence of clonal hematopoiesis. Results: Of the 274 pts enrolled, follow-up clonal hematopoiesis samples were available for 195 pts; 96 pts on arm 1 and 99 pts on arm 2. Both HUMARA and MSI results were negative for clonal hematopoiesis in 96% of samples analyzed. In 14 cases, the HUMARA assay suggested that a clonal population was present, but MSI analysis was negative. No cases were HUMARA+/MSI+. With a median follow-up of 19.6 mos, only one pt has developed t-AML 3 yr 5 mos post randomization. Her clonal hematopoiesis test samples at 6 and 12 mos following treatment were negative. Conclusions: Clonal hematopoiesis assays performed within the first year following neoadjuvant therapy and surgery on S0012 failed to identify an emerging clonal HSC population. Longer clinical follow-up will be necessary to define the positive predictive value of detecting clonal hematopoiesis in the 14 HUMARA+/MSI- cases as a harbinger of t-AML. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
The path to a better biomarker: application of a risk management framework for the implementation of PD‐L1 and TILs as immuno‐oncology biomarkers in breast cancer clinical trials and daily practice
González-Ericsson, Paula I. , Stovgaard, Elisabeth Specht , Reisenbichler, Emily , Kos, Zuzana , Carter, Jodi M. , Michiels, Stefan , Quesne, John Le , Lænkholm, Anne‐Vibeke , Adam, Julien , Bartlett, John MS, Rimm, David L. , Quinn, Cecily , Cree, Ian A. , Hida, Akira I. , Haynes, Harry R. , Frahm, Isabel, Acosta‐Haab, Gabriela, Balancin, Marcelo Luiz , Bellolio, Enrique , Yang, Wentao , Kirtani, Pawan , Sugie, Tomoharu , Ehinger, Anna , Castaneda, Carlos, Kok, Marleen , McArthur, Heather L. , Siziopikou, Kalliopi P. , Fineberg, Susan , Gown, Allen M. , Viale, Giuseppe , Schnitt, Stuart J. , Pruneri, Giancarlo , Penault‐Llorca, Frederique, Hewitt, Stephen M. , Thompson, E. Aubrey , Allison, Kimberly H. , Symmans, W. Fraser , Bellizzi, Andrew M. , Brogi, Edi , Moore, David A. , Larsimont, Denis , Dillon, Deborah , Broeckx, Glenn , Bairi, Khalid El , Cimino‐Mathews, Ashley , Adams, Sylvia , Liu, S, Loibl, Sibylle , Chen, I‐Chun , Juco, Jonathan, Blackley, Elizabeth F. , Demaria, Sandra , Leon‐Ferre, Roberto A. , Zardavas, Dimitrios, Emancipator, Kenneth , Ely, Scott , Loi, Sherene , Salgado, Roberto , Group, International Immuno‐Oncology Biomarker Working, Cree, Ian , Haynes, Harry R , Balancin, Marcelo , Ehinger, Anna , Lazar, Alexander J , Broeckx, Glenn , El Bairi, Khalid , Leon-Ferre, Roberto, Gonzalez-Ericsson, Paula I , Bellizzi, Andrew M , Symmans, W Fraser , Loi, Sherene , Pruneri, Giancarlo , Rimm, David , Carter, Jodi , Sua, Luz Fernanda , Nielsen, Torsten O. , Fox, Stephen B. , Bartlett, John MS, Peeters, Dieter J. E. , Dieci, Maria Vittoria , Vincent‐Salomon, Anne , Balko, Justin M. , Badve, Sunil , Penault-Llorca, Frederique Madeleine , Lazar, Alexander J. , Lien, Huang‐Chun , Goetz, Matthew P. , Harbeck, Nadia , Sotiriou, Christos P. , Lakhani, Sunil R. , Denkert, Carsten , Gluz, Oleg , Sanders, Melinda E. , Group, International Immuno‐Oncology Biomarker Working

The Journal of Pathology | March 4, 2020 | Volume: 250 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 667-684

10.1002/path.5406 | PMID 32129476 Get It

AbstractImmune checkpoint inhibitor therapies targeting PD‐1/PD‐L1 are now the standard of care in oncology across several hematologic and solid tumor types, including triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Patients with metastatic or locally advanced TNBC with PD‐L1 expression on immune cells occupying ≥1% of tumor area demonstrated survival benefit with the addition of atezolizumab to nab‐paclitaxel. However, concerns regarding variability between immunohistochemical PD‐L1 assay performance and inter‐reader reproducibility have been raised. High tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have also been associated with response to PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors in patients with breast cancer (BC). TILs can be easily assessed on hematoxylin and eosin–stained slides and have shown reliable inter‐reader reproducibility. As an established prognostic factor in early stage TNBC, TILs are soon anticipated to be reported in daily practice in many pathology laboratories worldwide. Because TILs and PD‐L1 are parts of an immunological spectrum in BC, we propose the systematic implementation of combined PD‐L1 and TIL analyses as a more comprehensive immuno‐oncological biomarker for patient selection for PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibition‐based therapy in patients with BC. Although practical and regulatory considerations differ by jurisdiction, the pathology community has the responsibility to patients to implement assays that lead to optimal patient selection. We propose herewith a risk‐management framework that may help mitigate the risks of suboptimal patient selection for immuno‐therapeutic approaches in clinical trials and daily practice based on combined TILs/PD‐L1 assessment in BC. © 2020 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Monosomic Loss of MIR15A/MIR16-1 Is a Driver of Multiple Myeloma Proliferation and Disease Progression
Chesi, Marta , Garbitt, Victoria M. , Sharik, Meaghen E. , Asmann, Yan W. , Bergsagel, Matteo , Welsh, Seth J. , Meermeier, Erin W. , Kumar, Shaji , Bergsagel, P. Leif , Bergsagel, P. Leif , Riggs, Daniel L. , Meermeier, Erin W , Stein, Caleb K. , Braggio, Esteban

Blood Cancer Discovery | March 3, 2020 | Volume: 1 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 68-81

10.1158/0008-5472.bcd-19-0068 | PMID 32954360 Get It

Abstract The most common genetic abnormality in multiple myeloma is the deletion of chromosome 13, seen in almost half of newly diagnosed patients. Unlike chronic lymphocytic leukemia, where a recurrent minimally deleted region including MIR15A/MIR16-1 has been mapped, the deletions in multiple myeloma predominantly involve the entire chromosome and no specific driver gene has been identified. Additional candidate loci include RB1 and DIS3, but while biallelic deletion of RB1 is associated with disease progression, DIS3 is a common essential gene and complete inactivation is not observed. The Vk*MYC transgenic mouse model of multiple myeloma spontaneously acquires del(14), syntenic to human chromosome 13, and Rb1 complete inactivation, but not Dis3 mutations. Taking advantage of this model, we explored the role in multiple myeloma initiation and progression of two candidate loci on chromosome 13: RB1 and MIR15A/MIR16-1. Monoallelic deletion of Mir15a/Mir16-1, but not Rb1, was sufficient to accelerate the development of monoclonal gammopathy in wild-type mice and the progression of multiple myeloma in Vk*MYC mice, resulting in increased expression of Mir15a/Mir16-1 target genes and plasma cell proliferation, which was similarly observed in patients with multiple myeloma. Significance: In the absence of a defined, minimally deleted region the significance of del(13) in multiple myeloma has remained controversial. Here we show that haploinsufficiency of Mir15a/Mir16-1, but not Rb1, upregulates the cell cycle–regulatory network, inducing monoclonal gammopathy in mice and promoting multiple myeloma progression in both mice and men. See related commentary by Walker, p. 16. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 5
Transcriptome‐wide association study of breast cancer risk by estrogen‐receptor status
Feng, Helian , Gusev, Alexander , Wu, Lang , Abu-Full, Zomoroda, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Andrulis, Irene L. , Antoniou, Antonis C. , Arason, Aðalgeir , Arndt, Volker , Aronson, Kristan J. , Asseryanis, Ella, Auer, Paul L. , Azzollini, Jacopo , Barkardóttir, Rósa B. , Barrowdale, Daniel , Beckmann, Matthias W. , Bermisheva, Marina , Białkowska, Katarzyna , Bogdanova, Natalia , Bojesen, Stig E. , Bolla, Manjeet K. , Borg, Åke , Brauch, Hiltrud , Brenner, Hermann , Brüning, Thomas , Burwinkel, Barbara , Caldés, Trinidad , Canisius, Sander , Campa, Daniele , Carter, Brian D., Castelao, Jose E. , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Christiansen, Hans , Claes, Kathleen , Collaborators, GEMO Study, Collaborators, EMBRACE, Collaborators, GC‐HBOC study, Cox, Angela , Daly, Mary B., Leeneer, Kim De , Dörk, Thilo , Dwek, Miriam , Eccles, Diana M., Ejlertsen, Bent , Engel, Christoph , Fasching, Peter A. , Flyger, Henrik, Friedman, Eitan , Frost, Debra, Gabrielson, Marike , Ganz, Patricia A. , Gapstur, Susan M. , García‐Closas, Montserrat , Gaudet, Mia M. , Glendon, Gord , Goldberg, Mark S. , Goldgar, David E., González‐Neira, Anna , Greene, Mark H. , Guénel, Pascal , Haiman, Christopher A. , Hamann, Ute, Hake, Christopher R., He, Wei , Heyworth, Jane , Hogervorst, Frans B.L., Hooning, Maartje J. , Hoover, Robert N. , Hopper, John L. , Huang, Guanmengqian, Hulick, Peter J. , Humphreys, Keith , Imyanitov, Evgeny N., Investigators, ABCTB, Investigators, HEBON, Investigators, BCFR, Investigators, OCGN, Jakimovska, Milena , Jakubowska, Anna , James, Paul A. , Janavicius, Ramunas, Jankowitz, Rachel C. , John, Esther M. , Johnson, Nichola , Jung, Audrey , Kiiski, Johanna I. , Konstantopoulou, Irene , Kristensen, Vessela N. , Laitman, Yael , Lambrechts, Diether , Leroux, Dominique, Lester, Jenny, Lesueur, Fabienne , Lindor, Noralane M. , Lindström, Sara, Lo, Wing‐Yee, Loud, Jennifer T. , Makalic, Enes , Mannermaa, Arto, Manoochehri, Mehdi, Manoukian, Siranoush , Margolin, Sara , Matricardi, Laura , Maurer, Tabea, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, McGuffog, Lesley, Meindl, Alfons , Menon, Usha , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Kapoor, Pooja M., Montagna, Marco , Moreno, Fernando , Muranen, Taru , Nathanson, Katherine L. , Nevelsteen, Ines, Ņikitina-Zaķe, Liene , Offit, Kenneth, Oláh, Edith , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. , Olsson, Håkan , Osório, Ana , Papp, J., Park‐Simon, Tjoung‐Won , Pedersen, Inge Søkilde , Peixoto, Ana , Peterlongo, Paolo , Peto, Julian , Phillips, Kelly‐Anne , Plaseska‐Karanfilska, Dijana , Poppe, Bruce , Pradhan, Nisha , Prajzendanc, Karolina , Punie, Kevin , Pylkäs, Katri , Rantala, Johanna, Rashid, Muhammad Usman , Rennert, Gad , Romero, Atocha , Saloustros, Emmanouil , Sandler, Dale P. , Santos, Catarina , Sawyer, Elinor J. , Schmutzler, Rita K., Schoemaker, Minouk J. , Scott, Rodney J. , Simard, Jacques , Skytte, Anne‐Bine , Soucy, Penny, Spinelli, John J. , Stone, Jennifer , Tapper, William , Taylor, Jack A. , Teixeira, Manuel R. , Terry, Mary Beth , Teulé, Àlex , Thomassen, Mads , Thöne, Kathrin , Thull, Darcy L. , Tollenaar, Rob A.�E.�M. , Torres, Diana , Vachon, Celine M. , Ouweland, Ans M.W. van den, Vega, Ana , Viel, Alessandra , Vieiro‐Balo, Paula, Wang, Qin , Wappenschmidt, Barbara , Weinberg, Clarice R. , Weitzel, Jeffrey N. , Wendt, Camilla, Winqvist, Robert , Yang, Xiaohong R., Easton, Douglas F. , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Durocher, Francine , Eccles, Diana , Janavičius, Ramūnas , Khaw, Kay‐Tee , Lambrechts, Diether , Lindor, Noralane, Dörk, Thilo , Lambrechts, Diether , Hulick, Peter J , James, Paul , Lesueur, Fabienne , Peterlongo, Paolo , Rennert, Gad , Sandler, Dale P , Teixeira, Manuel R , Eccles, Diana , Menon, Usha , Vega, Ana , Weitzel, Jeffrey N , Claes, Kathleen B M , Azzollini, Jacopo , John, Esther M , Konstantopoulou, Irene , Matricardi, Laura , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I , Arndt, Volker , Jakubowska, Anna , Lambrechts, Diether , Brenner, Hermann , Cox, Angela , Guénel, Pascal , Muranen, Taru A , Romero, Atocha , Saloustros, Emmanouil , Torres, Diana , García-Closas, Montserrat , Makalic, Enes , Michailidou, Kyriaki , Bogdanova, Natalia V , Taylor, Jack A , Nathanson, Katherine L , Arason, Adalgeir , Barrowdale, Daniel , Engel, Christoph , Montagna, Marco , Viel, Alessandra , Simard, Jacques , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Jung, Audrey Y , Gabrielson, Marike , Stone, Jennifer , Pylkäs, Katri , Rashid, Muhammad U , De Leeneer, Kim , Manoukian, Siranoush , Bojesen, Stig E , Schoemaker, Minouk J , Weinberg, Clarice R , Phillips, Kelly-Anne , Terry, Mary Beth , Brauch, Hiltrud , Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana , Sawyer, Elinor J , Paşaniuc, Bogdan , Long, Jirong , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Arun, Banu , Balmañà, Judith , Barnes, Daniel R. , Behrens, Sabine , Benı́tez, Javier , Blanco, Ana , Blomqvist, Carl , Boeckx, Bram , Bonanni, Bernardo , Borg, Åke , Briceño, Ignacio , Broeks, Annegien , Cai, Qiuyin , Caligo, Maria A. , Campbell, Ian , Carter, Jonathan , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Chung, Wendy K. , Clarke, Christine L. , Collaborators, GEMO Study, Collaborators, EMBRACE, Collaborators, GC‐HBOC study, Couch, Fergus J. , Cross, Simon S. , Cybulski, Cezary , Czene, Kamila , Hoya, Miguel de la , Dennis, Joe , Devilee, Peter , Dı́ez, Orland , Domchek, Susan M. , dos‐Santos‐Silva, Isabel , Dunning, Alison M. , Ellberg, Carolina , Eriksson, Mikael , Fletcher, Olivia , Fostira, Florentia , Fritschi, Lin , Garber, Judy E. , García-Sáenz, José Á. , Giles, Graham G. , Godwin, Andrew K. , Goldgar, David E., Gronwald, Jacek , Hall, Per N , Hollestelle, Antoinette , Investigators, ABCTB, Investigators, HEBON, Investigators, BCFR, Investigators, OCGN, Isaacs, Claudine , Vijai, Joseph , Karlan, Beth Y. , Хуснутдинова, Э. К. , Lázaro, Conxi , Leslie, Goska , Lubiński, Jan , Mannermaa, Arto, Martens, John W.M. , Martı́nez, Marı́a Elena , Meindl, Alfons , Kapoor, Pooja M., Miller, Austin , Moserle, Lidia , Mulligan, Anna Marie , Neuhausen, Susan L. , Nevanlinna, Heli , Nielsen, Finn Cilius , Parsons, Michael T. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Presneau, Nadège , Radice, Paolo , Risch, Harvey A. , Robson, Mark E. , Schmidt, Marjanka K. , Schmidt, Daniel F. , Sharma, Priyanka , Shu, Xiao‐Ou , Singer, Christian F. , Southey, Melissa C. , Spurdle, Amanda B. , Swerdlow, Anthony J. , Tischkowitz, Marc D. , Toland, Amanda Ewart , Truong, Thérèse , Tung, Nadine , Vachon, Celine M. , Asperen, Christi J. van , Rensburg, Elizabeth J. van , Yannoukakos, Drakoulis , Ziogas, Argyrios , Milne, Roger L. , Zheng, Wei , Kraft, Peter , Jiang, Xia

Genetic Epidemiology | March 2, 2020 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 442-468

10.1002/gepi.22288 | PMID 32115800 Get It

AbstractPrevious transcriptome‐wide association studies (TWAS) have identified breast cancer risk genes by integrating data from expression quantitative loci and genome‐wide association studies (GWAS), but analyses of breast cancer subtype‐specific associations have been limited. In this study, we conducted a TWAS using gene expression data from GTEx and summary statistics from the hitherto largest GWAS meta‐analysis conducted for breast cancer overall, and by estrogen receptor subtypes (ER+ and ER−). We further compared associations with ER+ and ER− subtypes, using a case‐only TWAS approach. We also conducted multigene conditional analyses in regions with multiple TWAS associations. Two genes, STXBP4 and HIST2H2BA, were specifically associated with ER+ but not with ER– breast cancer. We further identified 30 TWAS‐significant genes associated with overall breast cancer risk, including four that were not identified in previous studies. Conditional analyses identified single independent breast‐cancer gene in three of six regions harboring multiple TWAS‐significant genes. Our study provides new information on breast cancer genetics and biology, particularly about genomic differences between ER+ and ER− breast cancer.
Once‐weekly (70 mg/m 2 ) vs twice‐weekly (56 mg/m 2 ) dosing of carfilzomib in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: A post hoc analysis
Moreau, Philippe , Stewart, Keith, Orlowski, Robert Z. , Yang, Hui , Ma, Haijun , Klippel, Zandra, Zahlten‐Kumeli, Anita, Mezzi, Khalid, Iskander, Karim, Mateos, María‐Victoria , Stewart, Keith A, Orlowski, Robert Z. , Moreau, Philippe , Dimopoulos, Meletios Α. , Siegel, David S. , Facon, Thierry T.F. , Berenson, James R. , Raje, Noopur , Berdeja, Jesús G.

Cancer Medicine | February 28, 2020 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 2989-2996

10.1002/cam4.2945 | PMID 32108443 Get It

Abstract Combination of carfilzomib with dexamethasone (Kd) is approved for use in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), with carfilzomib administered twice weekly at 56 mg/m 2 (Kd56 BIW) or once weekly at 70 mg/m 2 (Kd70 QW). Post hoc cross‐trial comparisons were performed to compare efficacy and safety profiles of Kd70 QW vs Kd56 BIW dosing schedules using data from three trials of patients with RRMM: A.R.R.O.W., CHAMPION‐1, and ENDEAVOR. To select for comparable patient populations, side‐by‐side efficacy and safety comparisons were performed in subgroups of patients with 2‐3 prior lines of therapy who were not refractory to bortezomib. The overall response rate (ORR) was 69.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 61.7‐77.2) for Kd70 QW and 72.4% (95% CI, 65.9‐78.2) for Kd56 BIW. Median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 12.1 months (95% CI, 8.4‐14.3) for Kd70 QW and 14.5 months (95% CI, 10.2—not evaluable) for Kd56 BIW. Frequency of grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) was 67.6% for Kd70 QW and 85.3% for Kd56 BIW. Regression analyses (adjusting for prognostic factors) of all patients in the trials who received Kd70 QW vs Kd56 BIW estimated a PFS hazard ratio of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.69‐1.19; P = .47) and an ORR odds ratio of 1.12 (95% CI, 0.74‐1.69; P = .61). These results suggest that Kd70 QW has a comparable efficacy profile compared with Kd56 BIW and represents a convenient and well‐tolerated treatment for patients with RRMM.
Ovarian and Breast Cancer Risks Associated With Pathogenic Variants in RAD51C and RAD51D
Yang, Xin , Song, Honglin , Leslie, Goska , Engel, Christoph , Hahnen, Eric , Auber, Bernd , Horváth, Judit , Kast, Karin , Niederacher, Dieter , Turnbull, Clare , Houlston, Richard S. , Hanson, Helen , Loveday, Chey , Dolinsky, Jill S. , LaDuca, Holly , Ramus, Susan J. , Menon, Usha , Rosenthal, Adam N. , Jacobs, Ian , Gayther, Simon A. , Dicks, Ed , Aittomäki, Kristiina, Ehrencrona, Hans , Borg, Åke , Kvist, Anders , Rivera, Bárbara , Hansen, Thomas van Overeem , Djursby, Malene , Lee, Andrew , Bowtell, David D.L. , Traficante, Nadia , Gruber, Stephen B., Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Investigators, kConFab, Castéra, Laurent , Janavičius, Ramūnas , Osório, Ana , Vega, Ana , Culver, Julie O. , Easton, Douglas F. , Meindl, Alfons , Schmutzler, Rita K., Antoniou, Antonis C. , Leslie, Goska , Ramus, Susan J , Menon, Usha , Houlston, Richard S , Vega, Ana , Auber, Bernd , Ehrencrona, Hans , Engel, Christoph , Hanson, Helen , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Traficante, Nadia , Bowtell, David D , Hansen, Thomas van Overeem , Nevanlinna, Heli , Pelttari, Liisa M. , Dennis, Joe , Dı́ez, Orland , Balmañà, Judith , Jensen, Allan , Kjær, Susanne K. , Høgdall, Estrid , Garber, Judy E. , Golmard, Lisa , Couch, Fergus J. , Robson, Mark E. , Gronwald, Jacek , Domchek, Susan M. , Hoya, Miguel de la , Foulkes, William D. , Tischkowitz, Marc D. , Meindl, Alfons , Pharoah, Paul D.P.

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | February 25, 2020 | Volume: 112 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1242-1250

10.1093/jnci/djaa030 | PMID 32107557 Get It

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to estimate precise age-specific tubo-ovarian carcinoma (TOC) and breast cancer (BC) risks for carriers of pathogenic variants in RAD51C and RAD51D. Methods We analyzed data from 6178 families, 125 with pathogenic variants in RAD51C, and 6690 families, 60 with pathogenic variants in RAD51D. TOC and BC relative and cumulative risks were estimated using complex segregation analysis to model the cancer inheritance patterns in families while adjusting for the mode of ascertainment of each family. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results Pathogenic variants in both RAD51C and RAD51D were associated with TOC (RAD51C: relative risk [RR] = 7.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.60 to 10.19; P = 5 × 10-40; RAD51D: RR = 7.60, 95% CI = 5.61 to 10.30; P = 5 × 10-39) and BC (RAD51C: RR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.39 to 2.85; P = 1.55 × 10-4; RAD51D: RR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.24 to 2.72; P = .002). For both RAD51C and RAD51D, there was a suggestion that the TOC relative risks increased with age until around age 60 years and decreased thereafter. The estimated cumulative risks of developing TOC to age 80 years were 11% (95% CI = 6% to 21%) for RAD51C and 13% (95% CI = 7% to 23%) for RAD51D pathogenic variant carriers. The estimated cumulative risks of developing BC to 80 years were 21% (95% CI = 15% to 29%) for RAD51C and 20% (95% CI = 14% to 28%) for RAD51D pathogenic variant carriers. Both TOC and BC risks for RAD51C and RAD51D pathogenic variant carriers varied by cancer family history and could be as high as 32–36% for TOC, for carriers with two first-degree relatives diagnosed with TOC, or 44–46% for BC, for carriers with two first-degree relatives diagnosed with BC. Conclusions These estimates will facilitate the genetic counseling of RAD51C and RAD51D pathogenic variant carriers and justify the incorporation of RAD51C and RAD51D into cancer risk prediction models.