Citations

Abstract Osteoporosis is a serious complication of systemic glucocorticoid use. However, while glucocorticoids increase bone resorption in vitro and in vivo, the mechanism(s) of this effect are at present unclear. Recent studies have identified the osteoprotegerin (OPG) ligand (OPG-L) as the final effector of osteoclastogenesis, an action that is opposed by the soluble neutralizing receptor, OPG. Thus, we assessed glucocorticoid regulation of OPG and OPG-L in various human osteoblastic lineage cells using Northern analysis, RT-PCR, and ELISA. Dexamethasone inhibited constitutive OPG messenger RNA (mRNA) steady-state levels by 70–90% in primary (MS) and immortalized stromal cells (hMS), primary trabecular osteoblasts (hOB), immortalized fetal osteoblasts (hFOB), and osteosarcoma cells (MG-63). In hFOB cells, dexamethasone inhibited constitutive OPG mRNA steady-state levels in a dose- and time-dependent fashion by 90%, and also suppressed cytokine-stimulated OPG mRNA steady-state levels. Dexamethasone-induced inhibition of OPG mRNA levels was not affected by the protein synthesis inhibitor, cycloheximide, and was shown to be due to inhibition of OPG gene transcription using a nuclear run-on assay. Moreover, dexamethasone also dose dependently (10−10m–10−7m) inhibited constitutive OPG protein concentrations in the conditioned medium of hFOB cells from 2.59 ± 0.02 ng/ml (control) to 0.30 ± 0.01 ng/ml (88% inhibition; P < 0.001 by ANOVA). Concurrently, dexamethasone stimulated OPG-L mRNA steady-state levels in MS and hFOB cells by 2- and 4-fold, respectively. Treatment of murine marrow cultures with conditioned medium harvested from dexamethasone-treated MG-63 cells increased tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) activity by 54% (P < 0.005) compared with medium harvested from control-treated cells (in the presence of OPG-L and macrophage colony-stimulating factor). Moreover, dexamethasone (10−8m) promoted osteoclast formation in vitro, as assessed by a 2.5-fold increase of TRAP activity in cell lysates (P < 0.001) and the appearance of TRAP-positive multinucleated cells. Our data are thus consistent with the hypothesis that glucocorticoids promote osteoclastogenesis by inhibiting OPG and concurrently stimulating OPG-L production by osteoblastic lineage cells, thereby enhancing bone resorption.

SummaryBackgroundHighly selective 5‐HT4agonists have been suggested for the treatment of chronic constipation (CC).AimTo assess the effects of highly selective 5‐HT4agonists (prucalopride, velusetrag or naronapride) on patient‐important clinical efficacy outcomes and safety in adults withCC.MethodsWe searched the medical literature in January 2013 usingMEDLINE/Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science/Scopus for randomised, controlled trials of highly selective 5‐HT4agonists in adults withCC, with no minimum duration of therapy (maximum 12 weeks) or date limitations. Data were extracted from intention‐to‐treat analyses, pooled using a random‐effects model, and reported as relative risk (RR), mean differences, or standardised mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI).ResultsMain outcomes included stool frequency, Patient‐Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC‐QOL),PACof symptoms (PAC‐SYM) and adverse events. Thirteen eligible trials were identified: 11 prucalopride, 1 velusetrag, 1 naronapride. Relative to control, treatment with highly selective 5‐HT4agonists was superior for all outcomes: mean ≥3 spontaneous complete bowel movements (SCBM)/week (RR = 1.85; 95%CI1.23–2.79); mean ≥1SCBMover baseline (RR = 1.57; 95%CI1.19, 2.06); ≥1 point improvement inPAC‐QOLandPAC‐SYMscores. The only active comparator trial of prucalopride andPEG3350 suggestedPEG3350 is more efficacious for some end points. Adverse events were more common with highly selective 5‐HT4agonists, but were generally minor; headache was the most frequent. Most trials studied prucalopride.ConclusionDemonstration of efficacy on patient‐important outcomes and a favourable safety profile support the continued use and development of highly selective 5–HT4agonists in the treatment of chronic constipation.

Abstract A Saskatchewan multi-incident family was clinically characterized with Parkinson disease (PD) and Lewy body pathology. PD segregates as an autosomal-dominant trait, which could not be ascribed to any known mutation. DNA from three affected members was subjected to exome sequencing. Genome alignment, variant annotation and comparative analyses were used to identify shared coding mutations. Sanger sequencing was performed within the extended family and ethnically matched controls. Subsequent genotyping was performed in a multi-ethnic case–control series consisting of 2928 patients and 2676 control subjects from Canada, Norway, Taiwan, Tunisia, and the USA. A novel mutation in receptor-mediated endocytosis 8/RME-8 (DNAJC13 p.Asn855Ser) was found to segregate with disease. Screening of cases and controls identified four additional patients with the mutation, of which two had familial parkinsonism. All carriers shared an ancestral DNAJC13 p.Asn855Ser haplotype and claimed Dutch–German–Russian Mennonite heritage. DNAJC13 regulates the dynamics of clathrin coats on early endosomes. Cellular analysis shows that the mutation confers a toxic gain-of-function and impairs endosomal transport. DNAJC13 immunoreactivity was also noted within Lewy body inclusions. In late-onset disease which is most reminiscent of idiopathic PD subtle deficits in endosomal receptor-sorting/recycling are highlighted by the discovery of pathogenic mutations VPS35, LRRK2 and now DNAJC13. With this latest discovery, and from a neuronal perspective, a temporal and functional ecology is emerging that connects synaptic exo- and endocytosis, vesicular trafficking, endosomal recycling and the endo-lysosomal degradative pathway. Molecular deficits in these processes are genetically linked to the phenotypic spectrum of parkinsonism associated with Lewy body pathology.

Significance Beta-amyloid plaque accumulation, glucose hypometabolism, and neuronal atrophy are hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease. However, the regional ordering of these biomarkers prior to dementia remains untested. In a cohort with Alzheimer’s disease mutations, we performed an integrated whole-brain analysis of three major imaging techniques: amyloid PET, [ 18 F]fluro-deoxyglucose PET, and structural MRI. We found that most gray-matter structures with amyloid plaques later have hypometabolism followed by atrophy. Critically, however, not all regions lose metabolic function, and not all regions atrophy, even when there is significant amyloid deposition. These regional disparities have important implications for clinical trials of disease-modifying therapies.

The American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation (AAO‐HNSF) has published a supplement to this issue featuring the new Clinical Practice Guideline: Bell's Palsy. To assist in implementing the guideline recommendations, this article summarizes the rationale, purpose, and key action statements. The 11 recommendations developed encourage accurate and efficient diagnosis and treatment and, when applicable, facilitate patient follow‐up to address the management of long‐term sequelae or evaluation of new or worsening symptoms not indicative of Bell's palsy. There are myriad treatment options for Bell's palsy; some controversy exists regarding the effectiveness of several of these options, and there are consequent variations in care. In addition, there are numerous diagnostic tests available that are used in the evaluation of patients with Bell's palsy. Many of these tests are of questionable benefit in Bell's palsy. Furthermore, while patients with Bell's palsy enter the health care system with facial paresis/paralysis as a primary complaint, not all patients with facial paresis/paralysis have Bell's palsy. It is a concern that patients with alternative underlying etiologies may be misdiagnosed or have an unnecessary delay in diagnosis. All of these quality concerns provide an important opportunity for improvement in the diagnosis and management of patients with Bell's palsy.

Objective Bell's palsy, named after the Scottish anatomist, Sir Charles Bell, is the most common acute mono‐neuropathy, or disorder affecting a single nerve, and is the most common diagnosis associated with facial nerve weakness/paralysis. Bell's palsy is a rapid unilateral facial nerve paresis (weakness) or paralysis (complete loss of movement) of unknown cause. The condition leads to the partial or complete inability to voluntarily move facial muscles on the affected side of the face. Although typically self‐limited, the facial paresis/paralysis that occurs in Bell's palsy may cause significant temporary oral incompetence and an inability to close the eyelid, leading to potential eye injury. Additional long‐term poor outcomes do occur and can be devastating to the patient. Treatments are generally designed to improve facial function and facilitate recovery. There are myriad treatment options for Bell's palsy, and some controversy exists regarding the effectiveness of several of these options, and there are consequent variations in care. In addition, numerous diagnostic tests available are used in the evaluation of patients with Bell's palsy. Many of these tests are of questionable benefit in Bell's palsy. Furthermore, while patients with Bell's palsy enter the health care system with facial paresis/paralysis as a primary complaint, not all patients with facial paresis/paralysis have Bell's palsy. It is a concern that patients with alternative underlying etiologies may be misdiagnosed or have unnecessary delay in diagnosis. All of these quality concerns provide an important opportunity for improvement in the diagnosis and management of patients with Bell's palsy. Purpose The primary purpose of this guideline is to improve the accuracy of diagnosis for Bell's palsy, to improve the quality of care and outcomes for patients with Bell's palsy, and to decrease harmful variations in the evaluation and management of Bell's palsy. This guideline addresses these needs by encouraging accurate and efficient diagnosis and treatment and, when applicable, facilitating patient follow‐up to address the management of long‐term sequelae or evaluation of new or worsening symptoms not indicative of Bell's palsy. The guideline is intended for all clinicians in any setting who are likely to diagnose and manage patients with Bell's palsy. The target population is inclusive of both adults and children presenting with Bell's palsy. Action Statements The development group made a strong recommendation that (a) clinicians should assess the patient using history and physical examination to exclude identifiable causes of facial paresis or paralysis in patients presenting with acute‐onset unilateral facial paresis or paralysis, (b) clinicians should prescribe oral steroids within 72 hours of symptom onset for Bell's palsy patients 16 years and older, (c) clinicians should not prescribe oral antiviral therapy alone for patients with new‐onset Bell's palsy, and (d) clinicians should implement eye protection for Bell's palsy patients with impaired eye closure. The panel made recommendations that (a) clinicians should not obtain routine laboratory testing in patients with new‐onset Bell's palsy, (b) clinicians should not routinely perform diagnostic imaging for patients with new‐onset Bell's palsy, (c) clinicians should not perform electrodiagnostic testing in Bell's palsy patients with incomplete facial paralysis, and (d) clinicians should reassess or refer to a facial nerve specialist those Bell's palsy patients with (1) new or worsening neurologic findings at any point, (2) ocular symptoms developing at any point, or (3) incomplete facial recovery 3 months after initial symptom onset. The development group provided the following options : (a) clinicians may offer oral antiviral therapy in addition to oral steroids within 72 hours of symptom onset for patients with Bell's palsy, and (b) clinicians may offer electrodiagnostic testing to Bell's palsy patients with complete facial paralysis. The development group offered the following no recommendations : (a) no recommendation can be made regarding surgical decompression for patients with Bell's palsy, (b) no recommendation can be made regarding the effect of acupuncture in patients with Bell's palsy, and (c) no recommendation can be made regarding the effect of physical therapy in patients with Bell's palsy.