Kolar, Gururaj J.

Background: Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) is becoming an increasingly relevant tool in hospital medicine, but its effective application in inpatient perioperative medicine remains to be determined. Much of the POCUS literature describes its use by anesthesiologists to evaluate cardiac function, volume status, pulmonary findings, and gastric volume. Objective: To identify, evaluate, and synthesize all available literature investigating the use of point-of-care ultrasound and associated clinical outcomes in inpatient perioperative medical management. Patients and Methods: A systematic review was designed using the PRISMA guidelines with sources of literature including Ovid, PubMed, Scopus, and the Web of Science. Literature search was conducted for published works between 1 January 2002 to 8 February 2024. Results: Three hundred sixty-seven abstracts were identified in our search, and, ultimately, 24 studies were included in this review. Most studies were done by anesthesiology evaluating cardiopulmonary and gastric POCUS. Studies supported using POCUS to expedite cardiac examination, promptly diagnose postoperative pulmonary complications, and optimize surgical timing. Conclusions: POCUS is a versatile tool in the perioperative setting; however, few studies were powered to assess clinical outcomes, and even fewer showed conclusive evidence of improved clinical outcomes. Furthermore, only two studies evaluated the use of POCUS specifically by acute care providers; more extensive studies are needed from their perspective as they take on increasing perioperative responsibilities.

SummaryBackgroundHighly selective 5‐HT4agonists have been suggested for the treatment of chronic constipation (CC).AimTo assess the effects of highly selective 5‐HT4agonists (prucalopride, velusetrag or naronapride) on patient‐important clinical efficacy outcomes and safety in adults withCC.MethodsWe searched the medical literature in January 2013 usingMEDLINE/Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science/Scopus for randomised, controlled trials of highly selective 5‐HT4agonists in adults withCC, with no minimum duration of therapy (maximum 12 weeks) or date limitations. Data were extracted from intention‐to‐treat analyses, pooled using a random‐effects model, and reported as relative risk (RR), mean differences, or standardised mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI).ResultsMain outcomes included stool frequency, Patient‐Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC‐QOL),PACof symptoms (PAC‐SYM) and adverse events. Thirteen eligible trials were identified: 11 prucalopride, 1 velusetrag, 1 naronapride. Relative to control, treatment with highly selective 5‐HT4agonists was superior for all outcomes: mean ≥3 spontaneous complete bowel movements (SCBM)/week (RR = 1.85; 95%CI1.23–2.79); mean ≥1SCBMover baseline (RR = 1.57; 95%CI1.19, 2.06); ≥1 point improvement inPAC‐QOLandPAC‐SYMscores. The only active comparator trial of prucalopride andPEG3350 suggestedPEG3350 is more efficacious for some end points. Adverse events were more common with highly selective 5‐HT4agonists, but were generally minor; headache was the most frequent. Most trials studied prucalopride.ConclusionDemonstration of efficacy on patient‐important outcomes and a favourable safety profile support the continued use and development of highly selective 5–HT4agonists in the treatment of chronic constipation.

AbstractBackgroundNausea and vomiting are thought to result from upper gastrointestinal dysfunctions. Our clinical observations led to the hypothesis that colonic motor dysfunction is associated with nausea and vomiting.MethodsWe reviewed electronic medical records (EMR) of 149 patients presenting with complaints of nausea and/or vomiting in a tertiary gastroenterology practice to investigate the association with disorders of colonic motor or evacuation disorders. We extracted demographics, gastric emptying (GEin 149) and colonic transit (CTin 138) of solids, ascending colon emptying half‐time (ACt1/2), rectal evacuation by anorectal manometry (ARM) in 91 and balloon expulsion test (BE) in 55 patients. We estimated the proportions with delayedGEorCT, based on the 5th percentile ofGE(in 319) andCTin 220 healthy volunteers using same method.Key ResultsAmong 11 patients with nausea and/or vomiting with onlyGEmeasured, five had delayed and six normalGE. Among the 149 patients, 77 (52%) patients had evacuation disorders, confirmed by objective tests in 68 patients, and clinical examination in nine patients. In the 138 patients with bothGEandCTmeasured, 106 (76%) had both normalGEandCT, 11 (8%) only delayedGE, 16 (11%) normalGEwith delayedCT, and five (3%) delayedGEandCT. Among 21 patients (15%) with delayedCT, nine had slowACt1/2and 12 evacuation disorder.Conclusions & InferencesIn patients with chronic nausea and/or vomiting in gastroenterology practice, evaluation of colonic motility and rectal evacuation should be considered, since about half the patients have abnormal functions that conceivably contribute to the presenting nausea and/or vomiting.

Genetic variations in metabolism of endocannabinoids and in CNR1 (gene for cannabinoid 1 receptor) are associated with symptom phenotype, colonic transit, and left colon motility in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Our aim was to evaluate associations between two variations in CNR1 genotype (rs806378 and [AAT]n triplets) with symptom phenotype, small bowel and colonic transit, and rectal sensations in 455 patients with IBS and 228 healthy controls. Small bowel and colonic transit were measured by scintigraphy, rectal sensation by isobaric distensions. Associations with genotype were assessed by χ2test (symptom phenotype) and ANCOVA (quantitative traits) based on a dominant genetic model. Significant association of CNR1 rs806378 (but not CNR1 [AAT]n) genotype and symptom phenotype was observed (χ2P = 0.028). There was significant association of CNR1 rs806378 ( P = 0.014; CC vs. CT/TT) with colonic transit in IBS-diarrhea (IBS-D) group; the TT group had the fastest colonic transit at 24 and 48 h. There was significant overall association of CNR1 rs806378 with sensation rating of gas ( P = 0.025), but not pain; the strongest associations for gas ratings were in IBS-D ( P = 0.002) and IBS-alternating ( P = 0.025) subgroups. For CNR1 (AAT)n, gene-by-phenotype interactions were observed for colonic transit at 24 ( P = 0.06) and 48 h ( P = 0.002) and gas ( P = 0.046, highest for IBS-D, P = 0.034), but not pain sensation; the strongest association with transit was in controls, not in IBS. These data support the hypothesis that cannabinoid receptors may play a role in control of colonic transit and sensation in humans and deserve further study as potential mediators or therapeutic targets in lower functional gastrointestinal disorders.