Citations

Abstract Aims Routine aspirin use for primary prevention yields modest cardiovascular benefit but increases bleeding risk in average-risk adults. Whether individuals with elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels or high-risk LPA variants derive greater benefit remains uncertain. Methods and results Following Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central for studies of adults without ASCVD, elevated Lp(a) (≥50 mg/dL), high-risk LPA genotypes, or elevated genetic risk scores, comparing aspirin vs. no aspirin use. Random-effects meta-analyses using restricted maximum-likelihood (REML) estimation with Hartung–Knapp–Sidik–Jonkman (HKSJ) adjustment were used to pool hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). In six studies, 6628 participants were included. Pooled random effects showed no significant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) with aspirin (HR = 0.60; 95% CI 0.31–1.17; P = 0.1) or clinical bleeding events (HR = 1.24; 95% CI 0.83–1.87; P = 0.18). Subgroup analyses showed a nonsignificant reduction MACE among elevated Lp(a) (HR = 0.63; 95% CI 0.16 to 2.49; P = 0.284) and statistically significant reduction among LPA rs3798220 carriers (HR = 0.37; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.71; P = 0.003), though this finding was not consistent in the sensitivity analyses. Conclusion Among adults without ASCVD but with elevated Lp(a) or high-risk LPA genotypes, aspirin use did not confer a statistically significant cardiovascular benefit and was associated with numerically higher bleeding risk. The apparent reduction seen in rs3798220 carriers was inconsistent and likely reflects small-sample bias.

Background Psychiatric disorders are increasingly contributing to global disability. Despite advances in conservative management, the prevalence of treatment-resistant cases remains high. Meanwhile, neurosurgery for psychiatric disorders (NPD) remains underused, largely due to strict regulations and historical concerns, particularly those related to neuropsychological side effects (NPSE). Objective To address this issue, we conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to compare NPSE associated with radiofrequency ablative NPD to those observed in neuro-oncological, neurovascular and epilepsy surgeries. Methods PubMed, Embase and LILACS databases were searched in April 2024 for articles published in English/Spanish from 1990 to 2022, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Results A total of 48 articles with 2678 participants were included. The frequency of transient and permanent NPSE in the NPD group ranged from 0.94% to 11.50% and 0.94% to 2.03%, respectively, comparable to the other surgical groups (epilepsy: 0.31–11.70%; vascular: 0.52–22.90%; oncology: 0.94–17.60% for transient NPSE; epilepsy: 0.31–12%; vascular: 0.40–1.96% and oncology: 0.84–1.48% for permanent NPSE). Regarding permanent NPSE, arguably the most critical consideration, the NPD group showed better outcomes in memory, language and social cognition than the epilepsy group, but worse outcomes in executive and perceptual-motor functions. Compared with the vascular group, the NPD group had better executive function but worse complex attention. Finally, the NPD group had fewer permanent deficits than the oncology group in executive function, complex attention and perceptual-motor domains, although language performance was lower. Conclusions Contemporary NPD apparently carries a similar risk of NPSE as other conventional neurosurgical procedures, challenging misconceptions and this unjustified barrier to its broader use.

Abstract Purpose: This multicenter, multi-surgeon retrospective study aimed to identify risk factors for postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak following endonasal resection of craniopharyngioma, while evaluating the "perception gap" through a surgeon survey. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 416 patients who underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETS) for craniopharyngioma from 20 institutions. Factors were compared between patients with and without postoperative CSF leak, and between Early (2007-2015) and Late (2016-2025) Epochs. Complementing the clinical data, a survey of 19 neurosurgeons captured expert perspectives on risk stratification and management strategies. Results: Overall postoperative CSF leak rate was 13.5% (56/416 patients). Univariate analysis identified predominantly cystic tumors (34% vs. 21%, p = 0.034)and intraoperative lumbar drain (LD) use ( p < 0.028) as associated with postoperative CSF leak. BMI ( p = 0.587), prior surgery ( p = 0.576), and tumor size ( p = 0.363) were not significant. In the multivariable analysis, LD use was associated with a higher postoperative CSF leak rate (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.06–3.46; p = 0.030). Between Epochs, nasoseptal flap (NSF) utilization increased from 70.7% to 87.6% ( p <0.001). NSF was protective (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.07–0.92; p = 0.037) in the Early Epoch; no factors were significant in the Late Epoch. The surgeons’ survey identified prior surgery and intraoperative high flow leaks as primary risks; however, their LD protocols diverged from clinical data. Conclusion: Despite increased use of NSF, CSF leak persists. The study highlights a significant divergence between expert perception and clinical data regarding lumbar drains.

Measuring intraperitoneal pressure (IPP) has been proposed as a means to help maintain optimal ultrafiltration and prevent complications such as hernias, peritoneal leaks, and gastroesophageal reflux, which are linked with high IPP levels. The Durand method is a commonly accepted method for measuring IPP; however, it is cumbersome and not routinely used in clinics due to its complexity. Here we report the outcome of a pilot study that evaluated the agreement between IPP measured using an in-line pressure transducer and IPP measured using the Durand method during in-clinic automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) therapy. This was an exploratory, descriptive, early feasibility study conducted among patients with a diagnosis of kidney failure who were on APD therapy. IPP was continuously measured using an investigational device (x-MIP transducer) and at fixed timepoints using the Durand method. The study included 10 patients with a median age of 47.0 years and a median body mass index of 28.1 kg/m 2 . The study population was predominantly female, comprising 70% of the participants. The transducer IPP showed a moderate agreement with manual IPP, as most differences in measurements were within ±3 cmH 2 O. Overall, IPP did not correlate with fill-volume. However, when examined on a per-patient level, six patients showed stronger correlations ( ρ > 0.7) between IPP and fill-volume, while the remaining four patients had weaker correlations ( ρ < 0.5). No safety concerns were identified in the study. In summary, this study indicates that a transducer-based IPP measurement device could serve as an alternative to the Durand method.

Background Reductions in blood pressure (BP) control among patients with hypertension were observed early in the COVID‐19 pandemic. The degree to which BP control may have returned to prepandemic levels is unknown. Methods Individuals aged 18 to 85 years with hypertension from 17 health systems participating in the National Patient‐Centered Clinical Research Network were identified using electronic health record data collected as part of routine care. BP control (percentage of patients whose most recent BP measurement was <140/<90 mm Hg) was estimated in a series of 12‐month rolling measurement periods from 2017 through 2022 (January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017; April 1, 2017 through March 31, 2018; … January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022). Differences in average BP control between 2022 (January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022) and 2019 (January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019) were estimated overall (adjusted for age, sex, and race and ethnicity) and by race and ethnicity (adjusted for age and sex). Results Our sample included 1 193 314 persons with hypertension in 2019 (48.9% aged 65–85 years, 52.9% men, 66.2% non‐Hispanic White) and 1 499 418 individuals in 2022 (50.6% aged 65–85 years, 47.1% men, 62.7% non‐Hispanic White). The weighted average BP control dropped from 65.3% in 2019 to 61.8% in 2020 and then partially recovered to 62.6% in 2022 (adjusted mean difference, −2.6 percentage points [95% CI, −5.0 to −0.2]). Non‐Hispanic Asian individuals experienced the largest temporal drop in BP control, declining from 68.4% in 2019 to 63.9% in 2022. Conclusions BP control was disrupted during the COVID‐19 pandemic and had not fully rebounded to prepandemic levels by the end of 2022. Continued surveillance is needed to determine whether the decline in BP control will persist and will result in future adverse cardiovascular events.

ABSTRACT Metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) represents a key hepatic manifestation of obesity and systemic metabolic dysfunction and is a leading cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. Obesity‐driven mechanisms, including adipose tissue dysfunction, insulin resistance and increased free fatty acid flux to the liver, promote ectopic lipid accumulation and lipotoxic injury. These processes trigger mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum stress, inflammation, immune activation and disturbances in the gut–liver axis, driving disease progression from simple steatosis to metabolic dysfunction–associated steatohepatitis, fibrosis and cirrhosis. MASLD is a highly heterogeneous condition, with differences in fat distribution, body composition and genetic susceptibility giving rise to distinct clinical phenotypes, including lean and non‐lean MASLD, which have important implications for disease risk, progression and therapeutic response. Clinical outcomes are determined primarily by fibrosis stage, which represents the strongest predictor of liver‐related and all‐cause mortality, underscoring the importance of early disease recognition and risk stratification. Therapeutic strategies, therefore, increasingly target upstream metabolic drivers rather than hepatic steatosis alone. Lifestyle interventions remain foundational but are often limited by challenges in long‐term adherence. Pharmacologic therapies, particularly incretin‐based agents such as glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists and dual incretin agonists, as well as bariatric and endoscopic metabolic procedures, have demonstrated substantial metabolic and hepatic benefits. Recognition of disease heterogeneity supports phenotype‐guided approaches that integrate metabolic risk, adiposity, body composition and fibrosis assessment to personalise treatment strategies and improve long‐term outcomes across the MASLD spectrum.

Objective: Quality of life (QOL) is an important consideration in vestibular schwannoma (VS) patients when assessing management options. Understanding sex-based differences in QOL may facilitate patient counseling. Study design: Prospective cohort. Setting: Tertiary academic medical center and Acoustic Neuroma Association. Patients: Sporadic VS patients. Interventions: Observation, microsurgery, or radiation. Main outcome measures: Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life (PANQOL) scores. Results: A total of 481 patients were analyzed. In the observation group, women reported worse anxiety, facial function, and total PANQOL scores at baseline. At follow-up, men declined more in facial function (−5 vs. +3, P =0.01). For microsurgery, women reported worse facial function and balance scores at baseline. At follow-up, men declined more in facial function (−16 vs. −3, P <0.001), balance (−7 vs. +2, P =0.04), energy (−4 vs. +5, P =0.03), and total (−5 vs. +2, P =0.02) PANQOL scores. For radiation, women reported worse anxiety, balance, pain, and total scores at baseline. At follow-up, anxiety improved in women but worsened in men (+5 vs. −6, P =0.008). Sex-based differences exceeding the minimally important difference thresholds established for the PANQOL were observed for the following: anxiety at baseline in the observation group, anxiety and pain at baseline in the radiation group, and change in anxiety from baseline to follow-up in the radiation group. Conclusions: Women had worse anxiety, balance, facial function, pain, and overall QOL at baseline assessed using the PANQOL, whereas men declined more with treatment and observation. The largest difference in PANQOL change between sexes occurred after microsurgery, with men experiencing greater losses in facial function, balance, energy, and total scores.