Citations

Background Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been investigated for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who are not candidates for resective surgery. Because different types of epilepsy involve distinct brain networks, numerous DBS targets have been explored, yet a comprehensive synthesis is lacking. Methods To provide a comprehensive overview of this expanding literature, we conducted a systematic review of studies for DBS in epilepsy, including case series, prospective and retrospective studies. We collected data on surgical targets, individual disease characteristics, outcomes and precise electrode placements. DBS electrode coordinates were gathered into a common template space and related to clinical outcomes. Results We included 124 studies, corresponding to 1210 patients and 20 distinct surgical targets. While the anterior (ANT) and centromedian (CM) nuclei of the thalamus remain the most studied, we also review less commonly used targets that show promise for specific forms of epilepsy and may warrant further investigation. Substantial variability in targeting strategies and electrode placement was observed within each of the target regions. Importantly, significant relationships between stimulation location and outcomes were identified for ANT-DBS and CM-DBS. For ANT-DBS, shorter distance to the mammillothalamic tract junction was associated with greater seizure reduction on both study-level and patient-level analyses (r=−0.55, p<0.001 and r=−0.51, p<0.001, respectively). For CM-DBS, localisation effects may be dependent on the form of epilepsy, with stimulation of the parvocellular CM being associated with better outcomes in generalised epilepsy. Conclusions Our results emphasise the importance of accurate targeting in DBS for epilepsy. Our database and atlas of DBS targets are made publicly available, potentially serving further meta-analytical work. PROSPERO registration number CRD420250649304.

Abstract Introduction: Maintenance of donor lung pressure is recommended to maintain inflation pressures of 12-15 mm Hg. This is particularly important given graft transportation in aircraft, due to the inevitable pressure changes. Case: We describe a case of a donor lung preservation system which maintained proper airway pressure during sudden cabin pressure loss requiring emergent landing. Discussion: The donor lungs were implanted without complication. Post-transplant course was notable for primary graft dysfunction (PGD) grade 1 at 24 hours, grade 2 at 48 hours, and grade 1 at 72 hours. At 3 months post-transplant, the patient has had no respiratory complications and has been noted to be doing well.

Abstract Background Despite advancements in care, pregnant individuals with congenital heart disease (CHD) face disproportionately high risks. Objectives To address these challenges, a national consortium was established to improve maternal outcomes in CHD through multidisciplinary collaboration and patient engagement. Study design As part of a 2.5‐year multi‐phase consortium initiative, an in‐person research summit followed by three virtual focus groups (Project PHASE 3) was conducted with patients, clinicians, researchers, advocates, and policy representatives. Qualitative data were collected, and reflexive thematic analysis was performed to identify shared priorities. Results A total of 48 individuals participated in the in‐person meeting, including 18 patients (83% female; 11% Black/African American, 17% Asian, 11% Hispanic, 61% White) and 30 clinicians/researchers. An additional 19 patients (100% female; 32% rural/non‐urban; 16% Black/African American, 10% Hispanic, 74% White) participated in virtual focus groups. Key priorities identified included improved patient–healthcare provider communication, expanded access to multidisciplinary and adult CHD‐specialized care, and greater inclusion of patient voices in reproductive planning and research. Focus groups underscored racial disparities in care, limited CHD education for patients of color, and the need for culturally tailored resources. Participants emphasized the importance of representative research cohorts, integration of genetic counseling, and dissemination of research in accessible, plain‐language formats. Conclusions Findings demonstrate the value of integrating patient expertise and partnership in shaping cardio‐obstetric research, care models, and education. Addressing maternal health concerns in CHD research requires both structural changes and community‐driven, inclusive research strategies.

Abstract Aims Heart failure (HF) with preserved (HFpEF) and mildly reduced (HFmrEF) ejection fraction are prevalent, yet frequently underdiagnosed syndromes associated with high morbidity and mortality, impaired quality of life, and escalating healthcare expenditures. Although guideline-directed medications like SGLT2 inhibitors have been shown to reduce the risk of hospitalization and cardiovascular death, their use remains limited and substantial residual risk persists. This trial aims to evaluate the safety and performance of a novel left-atrium-to-coronary-sinus shunt (Edwards APTURE transcatheter shunt system) in HFpEF and HFmrEF patients. Methods ALT-FLOW II is a prospective multi-centre, randomized, sham-controlled, double-blinded (patient and assessor) trial. Approximately 100 symptomatic HF patients aged ≥18 years with left ventricular ejection fraction &gt;40% and exercise pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) ≥25 mm Hg with a PCWP to right atrial pressure gradient ≥8 mm Hg will be randomized 1:1 to the APTURE shunt vs sham control. Key exclusion criteria include severe HF, significant valvular disease, and more than mild right ventricular dysfunction. The primary endpoints are the safety of the APTURE device at 30 days and change in workload-corrected PCWP normalized to bodyweight at 6 months. Secondary endpoints include changes in patient-reported outcomes, and hemodynamic and echocardiographic parameters through 5 years. The trial will also explore the impact of the device on short-term cardiac remodelling and intra-cardiac flow patterns using multi-modality imaging. Conclusions The ALT-FLOW II trial will evaluate the safety and performance of the APTURE system in symptomatic HFpEF and HFmrEF patients with elevated left atrial pressure.

Abstract Background Bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid with or without moxifloxacin (BPaL/M) are recommended oral 6-month treatment regimens for multidrug- or rifampin-resistant (MDR/RR) tuberculosis (TB). Since the US rollout of these regimens in 2019, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and partners have identified patients who failed or relapsed on these regimens. Methods Here, we report a case series of US patients with TB treated with BPaL/M-containing regimens, who experienced adverse outcomes during the period 2022‒2024, including drug resistance, relapse, and treatment failure. Results Clinical and public health outcomes were significant for US patients reported. There were 8 patients identified (n = 8). 5 (62.5%) were male, with a median age 57 years, 2 (25%) were previously treated for TB, and 8 (100%) presented with cavitary disease. This included a patient who died from infectious TB with acquired resistance after exposing over 100 healthcare workers, a waitress who was found to have highly infectious TB at the time of her relapse, and a son who contracted Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) with reduced activity to bedaquiline from his mother in a household transmission event. Conclusions These patients highlight consequences, both for the individual and public health, of relapse and treatment failure in real-life operational settings that may not be readily evident in well-controlled and well-resourced clinical trials. Despite the advent of shorter and better tolerated bedaquiline-based regimens, US clinicians continue to face challenges in managing drug-resistant TB. These data support the need for expert management of these patients beyond routine TB care, as well as the need for close monitoring and follow-up months after treatment completion.

Background: There is growing recognition of the importance of patient-reported tolerability in complementing traditional clinician-reported safety evaluation of cancer therapies. Recent regulatory guidance listed the evaluation of overall side effect impact as a core patient-reported outcome in oncology clinical trials. A single item (‘GP5’) that asks about side effect bother is included in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy and has been used to capture overall side effect impact. This paper sought to expand the evidence base for GP5 by examining its association with clinician-reported treatment-emergent adverse events and patient-reported global health. Methods: We examined six commercial cancer clinical trials that collected GP5. The patient population was drawn from the safety population and the analysis focused on the first on-treatment assessment. Clinician-reported adverse events were classified as symptomatic if such adverse events were considered amenable to patient self-reporting (e.g. nausea). Chi-square tests and Pearson’s correlation were used to examine associations. We considered adverse event grade and frequency, both for symptomatic adverse events and any type of adverse events. Global health was measured using the visual analogue scale of the EuroQol-5 Dimensions-3 Levels measure. ‘Moderate-severe’ bother was characterised as scores of 2–4 on a 0–4 point scale for GP5, and ‘severe’ bother was characterised as scores of 3–4. Analyses were conducted separately for each trial. Results: Data from 3,557 patients were included. Across the trials, most (71.7%–94.2%) patients had an adverse event of some kind, but fewer (17.1%–44.4%) had an adverse event of grade 3 or higher. In general, fewer than 50% of patients (20.6%–44.2%) reported moderate-severe bother and 5.8%–17.% reported severe bother. There were consistent, albeit not always statistically significant, associations between GP5 and adverse events, and GP5/global health correlations ranged from −0.17 to −0.41. Discussion: GP5 is associated with both clinician- and patient-reported symptoms, suggesting its validity and usefulness as part of comprehensive tolerability assessment of cancer trials.

Abstract Secondary central nervous system (CNS) large B-cell lymphoma (SCNSL) occurs in the de novo setting, as a CNS-isolated relapse, or synchronous (concomitant CNS and systemic) relapse. SCNSL is a devastating event without therapeutic consensus. Thus, we aimed to evaluate treatment outcomes in an international cohort. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR, estimated using competing-risk models) were reported. Prognostic factors were identified in a 6-month landmark multivariate analysis. Outcomes after thiotepa autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy (CAR-T) delivered at relapse were compared after propensity score matching (PSM). A total of 1139 patients were included in the analysis (de novo: 537; relapsed SCNSL: 602). Two-year PFS estimates were 40.4%, 43.9%, and 16.2% for de novo SCNSL, CNS-isolated relapse, and synchronous relapse, respectively. Patients with CNS-isolated relapse demonstrated low rates of systemic recurrence (24-month CIR, 6%). Thiotepa-ASCT correlated with longer survival in de novo SCNSL (PFS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; P = .005; and OS: HR, 0.62; P = .023) and CNS-isolated relapses (PFS: HR, 0.55; P = .002; and OS: HR, 0.39; P&lt; .0001). ASCT (thiotepa or no thiotepa) also associated with improved survival in synchronous relapses (PFS: HR, 0.57; P = .023; and OS: HR, 0.48; P = .019). Higher survival with thiotepa-ASCT than CAR-T was observed after PSM (PFS: HR, 0.45; P = .005 and OS: HR, 0.41; P = .014). These data support thiotepa-ASCT in eligible patients, particularly de novo disease and CNS-isolated relapses. CNS-isolated relapse was infrequently associated with systemic recurrence, supporting treatment regimens adopted from primary CNS lymphoma.

Abstract Rationale Mucus plugs occur in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but little is known about their size and airway location or whether these mucus plug features change as emphysema worsens. Methods Computed tomographic lung scans from 31 participants with COPD from the SubPopulations and InteRmediate Outcomes In COPD Study (SPIROMICS) cohort were analyzed to quantify mucus plug size and airway location and extent of emphysema. Radiologist annotations of mucus plugs were incorporated in an image processing pipeline to generate size and location information. Emphysema was quantified as the percentage of voxels less than -950 Hounsfield units. Measurements and Main Results The length distribution of 563 annotated mucus plugs varied from 2 to 50 mm. The distribution was multimodal, and an 11-mm length defined short (“stubby,” ≤11 mm) and long (“stringy,” &gt;11 mm) plug phenotypes, with stubby plugs being most common (64%). Mucus plugs localized predominantly to airway generations 6 to 9, and their prevalence was highest in lower lobes. On a lobar basis, the mucus plug number decreased as emphysema percentage increased, whereas average mucus plug volume tended to increase. Conclusion COPD is characterized by mucus plugs of varying size and shape, and emphysematous lung regions may be differentially susceptible to formation of these plugs. The location of mucus plugs in segmental and subsegmental airways in COPD makes them amenable to treatment with inhaled medications or bronchoscopy.

This paper summarizes the presentations and panel discussion provided at Plenary Panel #2 on the first day of the 16 th World Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association (IRPA) jointly organized with the 69th Annual Meeting of the Health Physics Society (HPS) in Orlando/Florida in July 2024. International organizations that play a key role in radiation protection and are close in contact with IRPA by official agreements or even MoU’s (Memorandum of Understanding) presented highlights of their projects in radiation protection as well as results. Topical issues on their current work program as seen in a list of statements, including future efforts, were presented and discussed. The needs of practitioners were stressed for recognition by the representatives of the international organizations to be included in their projects. Requested and presented topics were: • Key challenges for radiation protection practitioners in the next 10 y. • Potential effects of emerging science on radiation protection. • Challenges for implementation of IAEA Safety Standards in low- and middle-income countries. • Challenges in occupational radiation protection. • Broadening the process of optimization. • Impact of emerging technologies on radiation protection. • Ensuring radiation protection workforce for the future.