Jackson, Jamie

Background An increasing number of patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) are pursuing pregnancy with the potential for cardiovascular complications. This study aimed to establish patient‐centered national research and care priorities to improve pregnancy‐related outcomes for individuals with CHD. Methods This mixed‐methods study used a modified Stakeholder Engagement in Question Development methodology to systematically identify patient‐centered priorities. Key activities included consortium engagement (phase 1), patient and provider questionnaires (phase 2), and an in‐person facilitated meeting to explore survey results and follow‐up virtual focus groups (phase 3). Reflexive thematic analysis was used to synthesize short‐ and long‐term research priorities (phase 4). Results Three overarching goals emerged: (1) improving access to specialized CHD, cardio‐obstetrics, and mental health care; (2) improving quality and consistency in clinical care; and (3) increasing patient and community engagement. These goals were then expanded into 5 central themes: (1) communication within the health care setting; (2) community engagement; (3) ancillary clinical support; (4) integration of patient‐reported outcomes; and (5) implementation, education, and knowledge mobilization. Short‐term (1–5‐year) goals included expanded telemedicine use, best practice recommendations for multidisciplinary care coordination, and targeted educational resources. Long‐term (5–10‐year) goals included expansion of adult CHD and cardio‐obstetrics programs, integration of mental health services, and advocacy to improve insurance coverage. Conclusions The consortium provided a national, community‐driven prioritization that highlights actionable pathways to improve pregnancy outcomes for people with CHD. Sustained engagement with patients and community partners is essential to achieving durable improvements across cardio‐obstetric care, education, research, and mental health.

Individuals with congenital heart disease are living well into adulthood, resulting in a growing population at risk for neurocognitive and psychosocial challenges. Numerous studies have described these risks in childhood, but significant gaps remain in our understanding of how those challenges evolve across stages of adulthood and how to optimally integrate neurocognitive and psychosocial care for adults with congenital heart disease. A multidisciplinary group of experts and patient partners assembled in April 2024 in Atlanta, GA, forming 3 working groups: (1) Genetics and Brain Health, (2) Characterizing Neuropsychological and Psychological Outcomes, and (3) Neuropsychological and Psychosocial Interventions. Current knowledge was reviewed, knowledge gaps were identified, and recommendations to address these gaps were formulated. Five critical questions regarding the characterization of neuropsychological and psychological outcomes of adults with congenital heart disease were prioritized for discussion: which neurocognitive and psychosocial domains should be prioritized in research and clinical care, what are the trajectories of neurocognitive and psychosocial functioning over the lifespan, how should neurocognitive and psychosocial screening be deployed, what should neurocognitive and psychosocial assessments include, and how do we make comprehensive neurocognitive and psychosocial care a reality. Although many gaps in knowledge were identified, particularly around characterizing neurocognitive trajectories throughout adulthood, there is substantial evidence of increased risk for poor psychosocial outcomes among adults with with congenital heart disease. Clinical and research advances must progress in tandem to address these risks. Specific recommendations for advancing this field over the next decade are offered.

Abstract Background Despite advancements in care, pregnant individuals with congenital heart disease (CHD) face disproportionately high risks. Objectives To address these challenges, a national consortium was established to improve maternal outcomes in CHD through multidisciplinary collaboration and patient engagement. Study design As part of a 2.5‐year multi‐phase consortium initiative, an in‐person research summit followed by three virtual focus groups (Project PHASE 3) was conducted with patients, clinicians, researchers, advocates, and policy representatives. Qualitative data were collected, and reflexive thematic analysis was performed to identify shared priorities. Results A total of 48 individuals participated in the in‐person meeting, including 18 patients (83% female; 11% Black/African American, 17% Asian, 11% Hispanic, 61% White) and 30 clinicians/researchers. An additional 19 patients (100% female; 32% rural/non‐urban; 16% Black/African American, 10% Hispanic, 74% White) participated in virtual focus groups. Key priorities identified included improved patient–healthcare provider communication, expanded access to multidisciplinary and adult CHD‐specialized care, and greater inclusion of patient voices in reproductive planning and research. Focus groups underscored racial disparities in care, limited CHD education for patients of color, and the need for culturally tailored resources. Participants emphasized the importance of representative research cohorts, integration of genetic counseling, and dissemination of research in accessible, plain‐language formats. Conclusions Findings demonstrate the value of integrating patient expertise and partnership in shaping cardio‐obstetric research, care models, and education. Addressing maternal health concerns in CHD research requires both structural changes and community‐driven, inclusive research strategies.