John, Anitha

Background An increasing number of patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) are pursuing pregnancy with the potential for cardiovascular complications. This study aimed to establish patient‐centered national research and care priorities to improve pregnancy‐related outcomes for individuals with CHD. Methods This mixed‐methods study used a modified Stakeholder Engagement in Question Development methodology to systematically identify patient‐centered priorities. Key activities included consortium engagement (phase 1), patient and provider questionnaires (phase 2), and an in‐person facilitated meeting to explore survey results and follow‐up virtual focus groups (phase 3). Reflexive thematic analysis was used to synthesize short‐ and long‐term research priorities (phase 4). Results Three overarching goals emerged: (1) improving access to specialized CHD, cardio‐obstetrics, and mental health care; (2) improving quality and consistency in clinical care; and (3) increasing patient and community engagement. These goals were then expanded into 5 central themes: (1) communication within the health care setting; (2) community engagement; (3) ancillary clinical support; (4) integration of patient‐reported outcomes; and (5) implementation, education, and knowledge mobilization. Short‐term (1–5‐year) goals included expanded telemedicine use, best practice recommendations for multidisciplinary care coordination, and targeted educational resources. Long‐term (5–10‐year) goals included expansion of adult CHD and cardio‐obstetrics programs, integration of mental health services, and advocacy to improve insurance coverage. Conclusions The consortium provided a national, community‐driven prioritization that highlights actionable pathways to improve pregnancy outcomes for people with CHD. Sustained engagement with patients and community partners is essential to achieving durable improvements across cardio‐obstetric care, education, research, and mental health.

Abstract Background Despite advancements in care, pregnant individuals with congenital heart disease (CHD) face disproportionately high risks. Objectives To address these challenges, a national consortium was established to improve maternal outcomes in CHD through multidisciplinary collaboration and patient engagement. Study design As part of a 2.5‐year multi‐phase consortium initiative, an in‐person research summit followed by three virtual focus groups (Project PHASE 3) was conducted with patients, clinicians, researchers, advocates, and policy representatives. Qualitative data were collected, and reflexive thematic analysis was performed to identify shared priorities. Results A total of 48 individuals participated in the in‐person meeting, including 18 patients (83% female; 11% Black/African American, 17% Asian, 11% Hispanic, 61% White) and 30 clinicians/researchers. An additional 19 patients (100% female; 32% rural/non‐urban; 16% Black/African American, 10% Hispanic, 74% White) participated in virtual focus groups. Key priorities identified included improved patient–healthcare provider communication, expanded access to multidisciplinary and adult CHD‐specialized care, and greater inclusion of patient voices in reproductive planning and research. Focus groups underscored racial disparities in care, limited CHD education for patients of color, and the need for culturally tailored resources. Participants emphasized the importance of representative research cohorts, integration of genetic counseling, and dissemination of research in accessible, plain‐language formats. Conclusions Findings demonstrate the value of integrating patient expertise and partnership in shaping cardio‐obstetric research, care models, and education. Addressing maternal health concerns in CHD research requires both structural changes and community‐driven, inclusive research strategies.

Objectives Women with Turner syndrome (TS) are frequently counselled against pregnancy due to lack of data and unclear aortic dissection risk. However, with advances in fertility therapy, more women with TS are contemplating pregnancy. This study compared rates of adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes among: (1) pregnant and non-pregnant women with TS and (2) pregnant women with TS with/without structural heart disease. Methods Retrospective analysis of pregnant and age-matched non-pregnant controls with TS (2005–2017) across 10 CV centres was done. Data were collected at initial evaluation in pregnancy and outcomes were assessed to 6 months postpartum. Adverse CV events were defined as CV death, aortic dissection/rupture and/or aortic intervention. Non-pregnant age-matched controls were followed over the same time period. Results Sixty-eight pregnancies were included (60 women, mean age 33 years, 48% primigravid, 49% fertility therapy, 80% structurally normal heart, 25% XO karyotype). Based on American Society of Reproductive Medicine criteria, 10 pregnancies occurred in women stratified to high-risk category. There were no CV events in the pregnant women or in the non-pregnant women with TS. Obstetric events complicated 12 (18%) pregnancies with 9 (13%) attributed to hypertensive disorder of pregnancy. Fetal events included small for gestational age neonates (18%), preterm delivery (15%) and fetal death (3%). Conclusions This study helps to refine the approach to pregnancy in women with TS. Among women with TS without structural heart disease, pregnancy does not impose an increased risk of CV outcomes. Among women with TS with structural heart disease, the risk of pregnancy is not as prohibitive as previously described but does require ongoing evaluation.