Suarez, Laura

Abstract Background Immigrant women experience disproportionate psychosocial stress driven by acculturation, socioeconomic hardship, discrimination, and transnational responsibilities. Despite evidence supporting culturally tailored stress‑management interventions, limited formative research has examined program preferences across diverse immigrant communities. Methods Using a community‑based participatory research (CBPR) approach, we conducted three language‑concordant focus groups (Somali, Spanish, English; n = 18) and a mixed‑methods survey (n = 88) with immigrant women in southeast Minnesota. Qualitative data were analyzed using constant comparative methods; quantitative data were summarized descriptively. Results Participants described intersecting stressors including caregiving burdens, financial insecurity, immigration‑related fears, bicultural identity strain, and transnational obligations (e.g., “Every day you are being told of problems back at home”). Barriers to discussing stress included stigma, limited culturally concordant care, religious norms discouraging emotional disclosure, and structural constraints such as lack of insurance (e.g., “How are you gonna pay for a therapist if you don't have health insurance?”). Coping strategies varied culturally but consistently emphasized social support, spirituality, and practical stress‑reduction techniques. Survey findings indicated strong preference for education on stress, stigma reduction, culturally and linguistically aligned support groups, and flexible delivery formats (in‑person, hybrid). Conclusions Immigrant women experience multifaceted stress shaped by minority stress processes and structural inequities. Findings highlight the need for culturally responsive, community‑informed stress‑management interventions that integrate education, social support, and flexible delivery modalities. These results directly inform adaptation of a stress‑management program for Somali, Spanish‑, and English‑speaking immigrant women.

Individuals with congenital heart disease are living well into adulthood, resulting in a growing population at risk for neurocognitive and psychosocial challenges. Numerous studies have described these risks in childhood, but significant gaps remain in our understanding of how those challenges evolve across stages of adulthood and how to optimally integrate neurocognitive and psychosocial care for adults with congenital heart disease. A multidisciplinary group of experts and patient partners assembled in April 2024 in Atlanta, GA, forming 3 working groups: (1) Genetics and Brain Health, (2) Characterizing Neuropsychological and Psychological Outcomes, and (3) Neuropsychological and Psychosocial Interventions. Current knowledge was reviewed, knowledge gaps were identified, and recommendations to address these gaps were formulated. Five critical questions regarding the characterization of neuropsychological and psychological outcomes of adults with congenital heart disease were prioritized for discussion: which neurocognitive and psychosocial domains should be prioritized in research and clinical care, what are the trajectories of neurocognitive and psychosocial functioning over the lifespan, how should neurocognitive and psychosocial screening be deployed, what should neurocognitive and psychosocial assessments include, and how do we make comprehensive neurocognitive and psychosocial care a reality. Although many gaps in knowledge were identified, particularly around characterizing neurocognitive trajectories throughout adulthood, there is substantial evidence of increased risk for poor psychosocial outcomes among adults with with congenital heart disease. Clinical and research advances must progress in tandem to address these risks. Specific recommendations for advancing this field over the next decade are offered.