Sia, Irene

Abstract Background Immigrant women experience disproportionate psychosocial stress driven by acculturation, socioeconomic hardship, discrimination, and transnational responsibilities. Despite evidence supporting culturally tailored stress‑management interventions, limited formative research has examined program preferences across diverse immigrant communities. Methods Using a community‑based participatory research (CBPR) approach, we conducted three language‑concordant focus groups (Somali, Spanish, English; n = 18) and a mixed‑methods survey (n = 88) with immigrant women in southeast Minnesota. Qualitative data were analyzed using constant comparative methods; quantitative data were summarized descriptively. Results Participants described intersecting stressors including caregiving burdens, financial insecurity, immigration‑related fears, bicultural identity strain, and transnational obligations (e.g., “Every day you are being told of problems back at home”). Barriers to discussing stress included stigma, limited culturally concordant care, religious norms discouraging emotional disclosure, and structural constraints such as lack of insurance (e.g., “How are you gonna pay for a therapist if you don't have health insurance?”). Coping strategies varied culturally but consistently emphasized social support, spirituality, and practical stress‑reduction techniques. Survey findings indicated strong preference for education on stress, stigma reduction, culturally and linguistically aligned support groups, and flexible delivery formats (in‑person, hybrid). Conclusions Immigrant women experience multifaceted stress shaped by minority stress processes and structural inequities. Findings highlight the need for culturally responsive, community‑informed stress‑management interventions that integrate education, social support, and flexible delivery modalities. These results directly inform adaptation of a stress‑management program for Somali, Spanish‑, and English‑speaking immigrant women.

Abstract Introduction: There is growing focus on community-engaged research (CEnR) in the clinical and translational sciences, supportive policies, environments, and processes within academic medical centers. The purpose of this evaluation was to gather academic and community member perspectives on key actionable strategies for supporting CEnR in an academic medical center. Materials and Methods: We used a sequential mixed method design by first conducting qualitative in-depth interviews with academic leaders, investigators, and staff (total, n = 54) and focus group discussions with community members ( n = 33). Themes from these qualitative data informed the adaptation of an institutional survey that gathered perspectives from a broader group of academic and community members affiliated with the institution ( n = 85). Both qualitative and quantitative data were integrated to inform actionable strategies. Results: Survey findings revealed that the institution was perceived as committed to health equity and CEnR, but institutional respondents expressed more concerns than community members about instrumental support of the work. Interviews and focus groups highlighted the opportunity to better align research efforts with community needs through more robust CEnR infrastructure and through interface with the clinical practice to promote patient access. Academic and community members emphasized the need for authentic, sustained engagement beyond federal mandates, including financial investment, capacity-building, and fostering trust. Leaders acknowledged structural challenges, siloed efforts, and the necessity for stronger coordination to increase integration of community engagement into the institutional mission. Conclusion: Findings suggest that aligning academic leaders, researchers, staff perspectives, and community members is essential to support and promote CEnR at an institutional level.

Purpose To examine the feasibility and acceptability of a social network weight loss intervention delivered by lay health promoters (HPs) to immigrant populations. Design Single-arm, non-randomized, pilot study of a social network weight loss intervention developed by a community-based participatory research partnership and delivered by HPs. Setting Community-based setting in Southeastern Minnesota, United States. Sample Somali and Hispanic immigrants to the United States: 4 social networks of adults (2 Hispanic and 2 Somali) with 39 network participants. Intervention Twelve-week behavioral weight loss intervention delivered by HPs (4 weeks in-person and then 8 weeks virtual). Measures Feasibility was assessed by recruitment and retention rates. Acceptability was assessed by surveys and focus groups with HPs and participants. Behavioral measures included servings of fruits and vegetables, drinking soda, and physical activity. Physiologic measures included weight, blood pressure, glucose, cholesterol, and triglycerides. Analysis Paired t-tests of pre- to post-intervention changes at the end of 12 weeks of treatment. Results Recruitment was feasible and post-intervention was 100%. Participants highly rated the intervention on satisfaction, motivation, and confidence to eat a healthy diet, be physically active, and lose weight. Participants were motivated by group social support and cohesion of their social networks. On average, participants lost weight (91.6 ± 15.9 to 89.7 ± 16.6 kg, P < .0001), lowered their systolic blood pressure (133.9±16.9 to 127.2 ± 15.8 mm Hg; P < .001), lowered their diastolic blood pressure (81 ± 9.5 to 75.8 ± 9.6 mm Hg; P < .0001), had more servings of vegetables per day (1.9 ± 1.2 to 2.6 ± 1.4; P < .001), and increased their physical activity (2690 ± 3231 to 6595 ± 7322 MET-minutes per week; P = .02). Conclusion This pilot study of 2 immigrant communities who participated in a peer-led weight loss social network intervention delivered during the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated high feasibility and acceptability. Participants lost weight, improved their health status, and improved their health behaviors.