Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

143 citation(s) found for "Sutter, J S".

The Jarvik 2000 Left Ventricular Assist Device: Results of the United States Bridge to Transplant Trial
Selzman, Craig H. , Feller, Erika , Walker, Jordan C., Sheridan, Brett C. , Daly, Richard C. , Anyanwu, Ani C., Madigan, Dave, Liu, Ping‐Yu , Frazier, O.H., Jorde, Ulrich P. , Griffith, Bartley P. , Silvestry, Scott

ASAIO Journal | April 14, 2022 | Volume: 69 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 174-182

10.1097/mat.0000000000001750 | PMID 35421002 Get It

The Jarvik 2000 bridge to transplant investigational device exemption study was a multicentered, prospective study of 150 UNOS status I patients implanted with the Jarvik 2000 between 2005 and 2012. During the study period, there were numerous modifications of the system that included converting from pin to cone bearings. Results were analyzed for three cohorts: total (n = 150), pin (n = 128), and cone (n = 22). Baseline demographics included age (52 ± 13), gender (79% male), size (BSA 1.98), and etiology (37% idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy; 43% Ischemic). Seventy percent of patients were either INTERMACS 1 or 2. The primary endpoint—defined as successful transplantation or listing at 180 days (prespecified at 65%; 95% lower CI: 57%)—was successfully achieved for the total cohort (67.3%; 95% CI: 59.5%–74.3%; p = 0.006). In subgroup analysis of the more contemporary, cone-bearing group, the primary endpoint was met in 91% (95% CI: 72%–97.5%; p = 0.001). Compared with pin patients, cone-bearing patients had less hemolysis as well as decreased end-organ dysfunction. Functional and quality of life scores improved after implantation independent type of bearing. In conclusion, despite a particularly sick patient population, the Jarvik 2000 was shown to be effective in supporting the advanced HF patient.
A Glycemia Risk Index (GRI) of Hypoglycemia and Hyperglycemia for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Validated by Clinician Ratings
Klonoff, David C. , Wang, Jing , Rodbard, David , Kohn, Michael A. , Li, Chengdong , Liepmann, Dorian , Kerr, David , Ahn, David , Peters, Anne L. , Umpierrez, Guillermo E. , Xu, Nicole Y. , Nguyen, Kevin T. , Simonson, Gregg D. , Agus, Michael S. D. , Armaiz-Peña, Gustavo , Basu, Ananda , Battelino, Tadej , Yeshiwas, Sewagegn , Bequette, B. Wayne , Blevins, Thomas , Breton, Marc D. , Castle, Jessica R. , Close, Kelly L. , Drincic, Angela, Dungan, Kathleen , Ejskjær, Niels , Espinoza, Juan , Fleming, G. Alexander , Forlenza, Gregory P. , Freckmann, Guido , Galindo, Rodolfo J. , Gómez, Ana María , Gutow, Hanna A. , Hovorka, Roman , Ji, Linong , Joubert, Michaël , Koliwad, Suneil K. , Lal, Rayhan , Lansang, M. Cecilia , Lee, Wei-An , Leelarathna, Lalantha , Lind, Marcus , Mahoney, Katherine , Mankovsky, Boris , Masharani, Umesh , Mathioudakis, Nestoras , Mayorov, Alexander Yur'evich , Messler, Jordan , Mohan, Viswanathan , Nichols, James H. , O’Neal, David N. , Pasquel, Francisco J. , Philis‐Tsimikas, Athena , Phillip, Moshe , Rayman, Gerry , Russell, Steven J. , Spanakis, Elias K. , Waki, Kayo , Wallia, Amisha , Weinberg, Melissa E. , Wolpert, Howard , Zilbermint, Mihail , Kovatchev, Boris , Seley, Jane Jeffrie , Xu, Nicole Y , Nguyen, Kevin T , Simonson, Gregg , Agus, Michael S D , Al-Sofiani, Mohammed E , Armaiz-Pena, Gustavo , Bailey, Timothy S , Basu, Ananda , Battelino, Tadej , Bekele, Sewagegn Yeshiwas , Benhamou, Pierre-Yves , Bequette, B Wayne , Blevins, Thomas , Breton, Marc D , Castle, Jessica R , Chase, James Geoffrey , Chen, Kong , Choudhary, Pratik , Clements, Mark A , Close, Kelly L , Cook, Curtiss B , Doyle, Francis J , Drincic, Angela , Dungan, Kathleen M , Edelman, Steven V , Ejskjaer, Niels , Espinoza, Juan , Fleming, G Alexander , Forlenza, Gregory P , Freckmann, Guido , Galindo, Rodolfo J , Gomez, Ana Maria , Gutow, Hanna A , Heinemann, Lutz , Hirsch, Irl B , Hoang, Thanh D , Hovorka, Roman , Jendle, Johan H , Ji, Linong , Joshi, Shashank R , Joubert, Michael , Koliwad, Suneil K , Lal, Rayhan A , Lansang, M Cecilia , Lee, Wei-An Andy , Leelarathna, Lalantha , Leiter, Lawrence A , Lind, Marcus , Litchman, Michelle L , Mader, Julia K , Mahoney, Katherine M , Mankovsky, Boris , Masharani, Umesh , Mathioudakis, Nestoras N , Mayorov, Alexander , Messler, Jordan , Miller, Joshua D , Mohan, Viswanathan , Nichols, James H , Nørgaard, Kirsten , O'Neal, David N , Pasquel, Francisco J , Philis-Tsimikas, Athena , Pieber, Thomas , Phillip, Moshe , Polonsky, William H , Pop-Busui, Rodica , Rayman, Gerry , Rhee, Eun-Jung , Russell, Steven J , Shah, Viral N , Sherr, Jennifer L , Sode, Koji , Spanakis, Elias K , Wake, Deborah J , Waki, Kayo , Wallia, Amisha , Weinberg, Melissa E , Wolpert, Howard , Wright, Eugene E , Zilbermint, Mihail , Kovatchev, Boris , Kohn, Michael , Umpierrez, Guillermo E. , Peters, Anne L , Ahn, David T , Liepmann, Dorian , Bailey, Timothy S. , Chen, Kong Y. , Choudhary, Pratik , Cook, Curtiss B. , Danne, Thomas , Doyle, Francis J. , Heinemann, Lutz , Hirsch, Irl B. , Leiter, Lawrence A. , Mader, Julia K. , Pop‐Busui, Rodica , Shah, Viral N. , Sode, Koji , Wright, Eugene E.

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology | March 29, 2022 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1226-1242

10.1177/19322968221085273 | PMID 35348391 Get It

Background: A composite metric for the quality of glycemia from continuous glucose monitor (CGM) tracings could be useful for assisting with basic clinical interpretation of CGM data. Methods: We assembled a data set of 14-day CGM tracings from 225 insulin-treated adults with diabetes. Using a balanced incomplete block design, 330 clinicians who were highly experienced with CGM analysis and interpretation ranked the CGM tracings from best to worst quality of glycemia. We used principal component analysis and multiple regressions to develop a model to predict the clinician ranking based on seven standard metrics in an Ambulatory Glucose Profile: very low–glucose and low-glucose hypoglycemia; very high–glucose and high-glucose hyperglycemia; time in range; mean glucose; and coefficient of variation. Results: The analysis showed that clinician rankings depend on two components, one related to hypoglycemia that gives more weight to very low-glucose than to low-glucose and the other related to hyperglycemia that likewise gives greater weight to very high-glucose than to high-glucose. These two components should be calculated and displayed separately, but they can also be combined into a single Glycemia Risk Index (GRI) that corresponds closely to the clinician rankings of the overall quality of glycemia (r = 0.95). The GRI can be displayed graphically on a GRI Grid with the hypoglycemia component on the horizontal axis and the hyperglycemia component on the vertical axis. Diagonal lines divide the graph into five zones (quintiles) corresponding to the best (0th to 20th percentile) to worst (81st to 100th percentile) overall quality of glycemia. The GRI Grid enables users to track sequential changes within an individual over time and compare groups of individuals. Conclusion: The GRI is a single-number summary of the quality of glycemia. Its hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia components provide actionable scores and a graphical display (the GRI Grid) that can be used by clinicians and researchers to determine the glycemic effects of prescribed and investigational treatments.
Impact of lymph node yield at prostatectomy on outcomes in NRG/RTOG 9601.
Chan, Emily , Pugh, Stephanie L. , Simko, Jeff, Feng, Felix Y. , Shipley, William U. , Lukka, Himanshu, Bahary, Jean-Paul , Pisansky, Thomas M. , Zeitzer, Kenneth L. , Lawton, C.A., Balogh, Alexander G., Lovett, R.D., Wong, Anthony , Dess, Robert T. , McGinnis, Scott, Kuettel, Michael, DeMora, Lyudmila, Dess, Robert T , Efstathiou, Jason A. , Rosenthal, Seth A. , McGinnis, Scott, Sandler, Howard M.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 16, 2022 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 6_suppl | Pages: 265-265

10.1200/jco.2022.40.6_suppl.265 Get It

265 Background: A recent study ( Fossati et al, 2018) found that higher lymph node count at radical prostatectomy was associated with improved outcomes in patients treated with salvage radiation for elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after surgery. We sought to validate these results in NRG/RTOG 9601, a randomized controlled trial of men with pT2/T3 disease who underwent either radiation (RT) alone or RT+antiandrogen (bicalutamide) therapy for PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy from 1998-2003. Methods: We reviewed available pathology reports for all patients in NRG/RTOG 9601 to determine the nodal count at radical prostatectomy. Clinical data was as of 11/5/2015, same as the primary endpoint for the trial. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the effect of number of positive lymph nodes, treatment arm (RT alone or RT+bicalutamide), Gleason score, positive margins, and seminal vesicle invasion on the following endpoints: times to local and distant failure and overall and disease specific survival. Results: Out of the 760 patients originally eligible in the trial, 552 (73%, 276 in each arm) had complete data available. Median node count in the entire cohort was 6 (range 0-33, Q1-Q3 3-9). There were no significant differences between treatment arms in terms of patient demographic or clinical characteristics, including total lymph nodes removed in either arm (RT alone vs RT+bicalutamide median 5 vs 6, p = 0.11). There was no significant association between total lymph nodes and overall survival with both arms combined (HR = 1.00, 95% CI:0.97-1.03, p = 0.87) or in the individual arms alone (RT+Casodex: HR = 1.01, 95% CI:0.97-1.05, p = 0.65; RT+Placebo: HR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.94-1.03, p = 0.45). There was also no significant association between total lymph nodes and disease-specific survival with both arms combined (HR = 1.00, 95% CI:0.95-1.04, p = 0.84) and in the arms alone (RT+Casodex: HR = 1.00, 95% CI:0.95-1.05, p = 0.92; RT+Placebo: HR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.92-1.07, p = 0.86). In multivariable analysis performed on the two arms, Gleason score was the only feature associated with worse overall and disease-specific survival, seen only in the RT alone arm. Similar findings were seen when evaluating times to local and distant failure. Conclusions: Lymph node yield in NRG/RTOG 9601 did not show any association with adverse outcomes in the entire cohort, or in either treatment arm alone. The therapeutic benefit of an extensive lymph node dissection in this population remains uncertain. Clinical trial information: NCT00002874.
Optimizing the Diagnosis and Biomarker Testing for Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Multidisciplinary Approach
Cho, May T., Gholami, Sepideh , Gui, Dorina , Tejaswi, Sooraj , Abi‐Jaoudeh, Nadine , Jutric, Zeljka , Samarasena, Jason , Li, Xiaodong , Valerin, Jennifer Brooke, Mercer, Jacob , Dayyani, Farshid , Achilonu, Conrad Chibunna , Fananapazir, Ghaneh , Mercer, Jacob , Dayyani, Farshid , Abi-Jaoudeh, Nadine , Achilonu, Conrad C , Cho, May

Cancers | January 13, 2022 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 392

10.3390/cancers14020392 | PMID 35053557 Get It

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a heterogenous group of malignancies originating in the biliary tree, and associated with poor prognosis. Until recently, treatment options have been limited to surgical resection, liver-directed therapies, and chemotherapy. Identification of actionable genomic alterations with biomarker testing has revolutionized the treatment paradigm for these patients. However, several challenges exist to the seamless adoption of precision medicine in patients with CCA, relating to a lack of awareness of the importance of biomarker testing, hurdles in tissue acquisition, and ineffective collaboration among the multidisciplinary team (MDT). To identify gaps in standard practices and define best practices, multidisciplinary hepatobiliary teams from the University of California (UC) Davis and UC Irvine were convened; discussions of the meeting, including optimal approaches to tissue acquisition for diagnosis and biomarker testing, communication among academic and community healthcare teams, and physician education regarding biomarker testing, are summarized in this review.
A randomized phase 3 trial of interferon-α vs hydroxyurea in polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia
Mascarenhas, John , Kosiorek, Heidi E., Prchal, Josef T. , Rambaldi, Alessandro, Berenzon, Dmitriy, Yacoub, Abdulraheem , Harrison, Claire N., McMullin, Mary Frances , Vannucchi, Alessandro M. , Ewing, Joanne, O'Connell, Casey L., Mead, Adam J. , Winton, Elliott F., Leibowitz, D , Arcasoy, Murat O., Kessler, Craig M., Catchatourian, Rosalind, Rondelli, Damiano, Silver, Richard T., Bacigalupo, Andrea, Nagler, Arnon, Kremyanskaya, Marina, Sandy, Lonette, Salama, Mohamad E., Najfeld, Vesna, Tripodi, Joseph , Farnoud, Noushin , Penson, Alexander , Weinberg, Rona Singer , Barbui, Tiziano , Marchioli, Roberto, Tognoni, Gianni, Rampal, Raajit K., Mesa, Ruben A., Dueck, Amylou C. , Hoffman, Ronald, Rambaldi, Alessandro , Najfeld, Vesna , Kiladjian, Jean-Jacques , Mead, Adam J , Leibowitz, David S , De Stefano, Valerio , Levine, Max F , Arango Ossa, Juan E , McGovern, Erin , Tripodi, Joseph , Farnoud, Noushin , Penson, Alexander V , Weinberg, Rona Singer , Price, Leah , Goldberg, Judith D , Barbui, Tiziano , Dueck, A. C. , Vannucchi, Alessandro M , Mascarenhas, John , Rambaldi, Alessandro , McMullin, Mary Frances , Najfeld, Vesna , Kosiorek, Heidi E., Prchal, Josef T. , Berenzon, Dmitriy, Yacoub, Abdulraheem , Harrison, Claire N., Ewing, Joanne, O'Connell, Casey L., Winton, Elliott F., Arcasoy, Murat O., Kessler, Craig M., Catchatourian, Rosalind, Rondelli, Damiano, Silver, Richard T., Bacigalupo, Andrea, Nagler, Arnon, Kremyanskaya, Marina, Sandy, Lonette, Salama, Mohamad E., Marchioli, Roberto, Tognoni, Gianni, Rampal, Raajit K., Mesa, Ruben A., Hoffman, Ronald

Blood | January 10, 2022 | Volume: 139 | Issue: 19 | Pages: 2931-2941

10.1182/blood.2021012743 | PMID 35007321 Get It

Abstract The goal of therapy for patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV) is to reduce thrombotic events by normalizing blood counts. Hydroxyurea (HU) and interferon-α (IFN-α) are the most frequently used cytoreductive options for patients with ET and PV at high risk for vascular complications. Myeloproliferative Disorders Research Consortium 112 was an investigator-initiated, phase 3 trial comparing HU to pegylated IFN-α (PEG) in treatment-naïve, high-risk patients with ET/PV. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate at 12 months. A total of 168 patients were treated for a median of 81.0 weeks. CR for HU was 37% and 35% for PEG (P = .80) at 12 months. At 24 to 36 months, CR was 20% to 17% for HU and 29% to 33% for PEG. PEG led to a greater reduction in JAK2V617F at 24 months, but histopathologic responses were more frequent with HU. Thrombotic events and disease progression were infrequent in both arms, whereas grade 3/4 adverse events were more frequent with PEG (46% vs 28%). At 12 months of treatment, there was no significant difference in CR rates between HU and PEG. This study indicates that PEG and HU are both effective treatments for PV and ET. With longer treatment, PEG was more effective in normalizing blood counts and reducing driver mutation burden, whereas HU produced more histopathologic responses. Despite these differences, both agents did not differ in limiting thrombotic events and disease progression in high-risk patients with ET/PV. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01259856.
Learning curves in robot-assisted spine surgery: a systematic review and proposal of application to residency curricula
Pennington, Zach, Judy, Brendan F., Zakaria, Hesham M., Lakomkin, Nikita, Mikula, Anthony L., Elder, Benjamin D., Theodore, Nicholas, Pennington, Zach , Pennington, Zach , Judy, Brendan F., Zakaria, Hesham M., Lakomkin, Nikita, Mikula, Anthony L., Elder, Benjamin D., Theodore, Nicholas

Neurosurgical Focus | January 1, 2022 | Volume: 52 | Issue: 1 | Pages: E3

10.3171/2021.10.focus21496 | PMID 34973673 Get It

OBJECTIVE Spine robots have seen increased utilization over the past half decade with the introduction of multiple new systems. Market research expects this expansion to continue over the next half decade at an annual rate of 20%. However, because of the novelty of these devices, there is limited literature on their learning curves and how they should be integrated into residency curricula. With the present review, the authors aimed to address these two points. METHODS A systematic review of the published English-language literature on PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted to identify studies describing the learning curve in spine robotics. Included articles described clinical results in patients using one of the following endpoints: operative time, screw placement time, fluoroscopy usage, and instrumentation accuracy. Systems examined included the Mazor series, the ExcelsiusGPS, and the TiRobot. Learning curves were reported in a qualitative synthesis, given as the mean improvement in the endpoint per case performed or screw placed where possible. All studies were level IV case series with a high risk of reporting bias. RESULTS Of 1579 unique articles, 97 underwent full-text review and 21 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria; 62 articles were excluded for not presenting primary data for one of the above-described endpoints. Of the 21 articles, 18 noted the presence of a learning curve in spine robots, which ranged from 3 to 30 cases or 15 to 62 screws. Only 12 articles performed regressions of one of the endpoints (most commonly operative time) as a function of screws placed or cases performed. Among these, increasing experience was associated with a 0.24- to 4.6-minute decrease in operative time per case performed. All but one series described the experience of attending surgeons, not residents. CONCLUSIONS Most studies of learning curves with spine robots have found them to be present, with the most common threshold being 20 to 30 cases performed. Unfortunately, all available evidence is level IV data, limited to case series. Given the ability of residency to allow trainees to safely perform these cases under the supervision of experienced senior surgeons, it is argued that a curriculum should be developed for senior-level residents specializing in spine comprising a minimum of 30 performed cases.
Topical Cannabinoids for Treating Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy: A Case Series
D’Andre, Stacy D. , McAllister, Sean D. , Nagi, Jasdeepa, Ruiz-Macias, Eduardo, Loprinzi, Charles L. , D'Andre, Stacy , Giridhar, Karthik V.

Integrative Cancer Therapies | November 29, 2021 | Volume: 20 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1177/15347354211061739 | PMID 34841942 Get It

Background Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy is a common and often severe side effect from many chemotherapeutic agents, with limited treatment options. There is no literature on the use of topical cannabinoids for chemotherapy-induced neuropathy. Case Presentations The current manuscript presents a case series of patients presenting in oncology clinics at Sutter Health, CA and Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN from April 2019 to December 2020 with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy who used topical creams containing the cannabinoids delta-nine-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and/or cannabidiol (CBD). Conclusions This case series suggests that topical cannabinoids may be helpful for patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. This paper also discusses the potential mechanisms of action by which topical cannabinoids might alleviate established CIPN symptoms. A randomized placebo-controlled trial using a standardized product is planned to study the actual efficacy of such treatment.
NCOG-12. COGNITIVE FUNCTION (CF) & QUALITY OF LIFE (QOL) IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH PROCARBAZINE, CCNU, & VINCRISTINE (PCV) + RADIOTHERAPY (RT) VS. RT FOR ANAPLASTIC OLIGODENDROGLIOMA (AO) ON NRG RTOG TRIAL 9402
Won, Minhee , Cairncross, J. Gregory , Buckner, Jan C. , Fink, Karen, Bahary, Jean-Paul , Hartford, Alan C. , Souhami, Luís, Nguyen, Timothy K., Cescon, Terrence P., Pu, Anthony T. , Roa, Wilson , Polley, M.Y., Donovan, Laura, IWAMOTO, FABIO MASSAITI , Mishra, Mark V. , Barani, Igor J. , Huang, Jiayi , Mehta, Minesh P.

Neuro-Oncology | November 18, 2021 | Volume: 23 | Issue: Supplement_6 | Pages: vi154-vi154

10.1093/neuonc/noab196.603 Get It

Abstract BACKGROUND PCV+RT substantially prolongs survival in AO patients, but long-term CF and QOL implications are unclear. We compared CF and QOL by treatment arm in RTOG 9402 participants and evaluated the impact that baseline characteristics had on CF, QOL, and survival. METHODS CF and QOL were evaluated using the Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) and Brain-Quality of Life (B-QOL) scale at baseline and annually. Scores were analyzed between treatment arms at each time point for patients with ≥ 10 years of follow-up data. Shared parameter models evaluated MMSE and B-QOL scores and survival for all patients. RESULTS 42/148 (28.4%) participants in PCV+RT and 20/143 (14%) in RT alone arms survived ≥ 10 years. 35/42 and 39/42 (PCV+RT) and 18/20 and 17/20 (RT) participants completed baseline B-QOL and MMSE assessments, respectively. B-QOL scores did not differ between treatment groups at any time-point. Among 16 patients (10 PCV+RT, 6 RT) who completed year 10 MMSE evaluations, mean MMSE score at 10 years was higher in the RT arm (29.83 [95% CI 22.1, 30.0] vs. 26.50 [95% CI 29.4, 30.0], P= 0.04). Change in MMSE and B-QOL scores from baseline did not differ significantly between treatment groups at any time. In shared parameter models including all patients with baseline assessments, MMSE and B-QOL scores decreased over time (MMSE P= 0.0189, B-QOL P= 0.0005), but this did not differ by treatment group (MMSE P= 0.5727, B-QOL P= 0.3592). Younger age and higher KPS predicted better scores (MMSE P < 0.0001, P = 0.0002; B-QOL P = 0.0043, P = 0.0007). PCV+RT predicted better survival in both models. CONCLUSIONS PCV+RT improves survival in AO. Shared parameter models show decrease in MMSE and B-QOL over time. However, relative to RT alone, the addition of PCV did not impact change in CF and QOL over time.
Tracking Blood Pressure Control Performance and Process Metrics in 25 US Health Systems: The PCORnet Blood Pressure Control Laboratory
Cooper‐DeHoff, Rhonda M. , Fontil, Valy, Carton, Thomas, Chamberlain, Alanna M. , Todd, Jonathan, O’Brien, Emily C., Shaw, Kathryn M., Smith, Myra, Choi, Sujung, Nilles, Ester K., Ford, Daniel, Tecson, Kristen M. , Dennar, Princess E., Wu, Shenghui, McClay, James C. , Azar, Kristen , Singh, Rajbir, Modrow, Madelaine Faulkner, Shay, Christina M., Wozniak, Gregory, Pletcher, Mark J. , Nilles, Ester Kim , Modrow, Madelaine Faulkner , Ahmad, Faraz , McClay, James , Azar, Kristen , Rakotz, Michael , Pletcher, Mark J , Chamberlain, Alanna M , Faulkner Modrow, Madelaine , Cooper‐DeHoff, Rhonda M. , Fontil, Valy, Carton, Thomas, Todd, Jonathan, O’Brien, Emily C., Shaw, Kathryn M., Smith, Myra, Choi, Sujung, Ford, Daniel, Tecson, Kristen M. , Dennar, Princess E., Wu, Shenghui, Singh, Rajbir, Shay, Christina M., Wozniak, Gregory

Journal of the American Heart Association | October 6, 2021 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 21 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/jaha.121.022224 | PMID 34612048 Get It

Background The National Patient‐Centered Clinical Research Network Blood Pressure Control Laboratory Surveillance System was established to identify opportunities for blood pressure (BP) control improvement and to provide a mechanism for tracking improvement longitudinally. Methods and Results We conducted a serial cross‐sectional study with queries against standardized electronic health record data in the National Patient‐Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet) common data model returned by 25 participating US health systems. Queries produced BP control metrics for adults with well‐documented hypertension and a recent encounter at the health system for a series of 1‐year measurement periods for each quarter of available data from January 2017 to March 2020. Aggregate weighted results are presented overall and by race and ethnicity. The most recent measurement period includes data from 1 737 995 patients, and 11 956 509 patient‐years were included in the trend analysis. Overall, 15% were Black, 52% women, and 28% had diabetes. BP control (<140/90 mm Hg) was observed in 62% (range, 44%–74%) but varied by race and ethnicity, with the lowest BP control among Black patients at 57% (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66–0.94). A new class of antihypertensive medication (medication intensification) was prescribed in just 12% (range, 0.6%–25%) of patient visits where BP was uncontrolled. However, when medication intensification occurred, there was a large decrease in systolic BP (≈15 mm Hg; range, 5–18 mm Hg). Conclusions Major opportunities exist for improving BP control and reducing disparities, especially through consistent medication intensification when BP is uncontrolled. These data demonstrate substantial room for improvement and opportunities to close health equity gaps.