Valerin, Jennifer Brooke

AbstractBackground and ObjectivesThe SARS‐COVID‐19 pandemic significantly limited healthcare access. We sought to evaluate whether California's lockdown in March 2020 affected staging and time to treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We hypothesized that patients diagnosed after the lockdown would have longer time to treatment and higher stage at presentation.MethodsWe retrospectively identified and categorized 1294 patients presenting to five University of California healthcare systems with a new diagnosis of PDAC into “pre‐lockdown” and “post‐lockdown” groups based on timing of pathologic diagnosis.ResultsIn the 12 months pre‐lockdown, 835 patients were diagnosed with PDAC, and 459 patients in the 6 months post‐lockdown. Demographics, staging, and treatment type were similar between eras. There was a decreased male:female ratio post‐ versus pre‐lockdown (0.97 vs. 1.25; p = 0.03). Time from symptom onset to first treatment was significantly increased among females post‐lockdown (p = 0.001). However, overall time from diagnosis to first treatment was shorter in the post‐lockdown era (median 23 vs. 26 days, p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe COVID‐19 lockdown did not significantly delay initial presentation, diagnosis, or treatment of newly diagnosed PDAC patients. Time from diagnosis to first treatment was shorter post‐lockdown. Reduced healthcare utilization for minor complaints and increased telehealth utilization may have contributed.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a heterogenous group of malignancies originating in the biliary tree, and associated with poor prognosis. Until recently, treatment options have been limited to surgical resection, liver-directed therapies, and chemotherapy. Identification of actionable genomic alterations with biomarker testing has revolutionized the treatment paradigm for these patients. However, several challenges exist to the seamless adoption of precision medicine in patients with CCA, relating to a lack of awareness of the importance of biomarker testing, hurdles in tissue acquisition, and ineffective collaboration among the multidisciplinary team (MDT). To identify gaps in standard practices and define best practices, multidisciplinary hepatobiliary teams from the University of California (UC) Davis and UC Irvine were convened; discussions of the meeting, including optimal approaches to tissue acquisition for diagnosis and biomarker testing, communication among academic and community healthcare teams, and physician education regarding biomarker testing, are summarized in this review.