Chamie, Karim

PURPOSE To compare patient-reported and clinical outcomes between radical cystectomy (RC) and bladder-sparing therapy (BST) in patients with recurrent high-grade non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS This pragmatic, prospective observational cohort study was designed with patients, who selected and prioritized outcomes. Eligible adults were candidates for both RC or BST, had previous induction Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), and received their last treatment within 12 months. The primary outcome was the EORTC-QLQ-C30 physical function scale at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included other EORTC-QLQ-C30 scales, depression, anxiety, bladder cancer–specific quality of life (QOL), financial burden, and cancer-specific outcomes. Targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) was used to calculate average treatment effect (ATE) estimates between arms. Inverse probability weighted risk ratios (wRR) were calculated using quasi-Poisson regression. RESULTS Of 570 participants (mean age 71.4 years; 21% female), 371 selected BST and 199 selected RC. Physical function was significantly worse in the RC arm at 3 months; by 9 months, there was no difference between arms, and at 12 months, physical function did not differ (ATE, 0.9; 95% CI, –0.6 to 2.4; P = .22). RC was associated with better emotional function, generic health-related QOL, and financial burden, and lower depression and anxiety, while BST was associated with better bowel and sexual health. Cancer-specific survival was 99% for BST versus 96% for RC (wRR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.01). RC was associated with a higher risk of adverse events and serious adverse events, including a 90-day mortality rate of 2.5%. CONCLUSION Most patient-prioritized outcomes were similar or better among participants who chose RC compared with BST. These findings support the continued role of RC in managing recurrent high-grade NMIBC.

482 Background: Population-based studies evaluating outcomes exclusively for metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (mUTUC) are sparse and often only capture patients with de novo (synchronous) metastases as opposed to those who progress to metastatic disease (metachronous). We sought to evaluate the outcomes and costs associated with mUTUC and employ a novel methodology to identify both synchronous and metachronous mUTUC patients using claims data. Additionally, we created a guideline-based quality score to improve quality of care in this space. Methods: Using the SEER-Medicare database we identified patients aged 66 years and older diagnosed with mUTUC between 2004 and 2012. Achievement of the following quality criteria was assessed: 1) cancer-specific survival greater than 12 months; 2) receipt of systemic therapy; 3) receipt of hospice/palliative care. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare overall survival between quality scores (0 vs. ≥1) and synchronous vs. metachronous mUTUC. Total healthcare and Medicare Part D out-of-pocket costs within two years of diagnosis were evaluated. Regression analyses were performed to assess characteristics associated with quality criteria and total healthcare costs. Results: Of the 1,223 patients identified, 381 (31.2%) and 842 (68.8%) had synchronous and metachronous mUTUC, respectively. At least one quality criterion was met in 40.2% of patients. Notably, only 54 patients (4.4%) received palliative care services. On multivariable analysis, patients with synchronous mUTUC (OR:0.55, 95%CI:0.41–0.72), and at least 3 comorbidities (OR:0.68, 95%CI:0.47–0.98), were less likely to achieve at least one quality criterion. Patients meeting quality criteria had longer survival compared with patients who did not meet criteria (HR:0.52, 95%CI: 0.46–0.59). Meeting at least one quality criterion was independently associated with increased costs ($94,677, 95%CI: 87702–101652 vs. $63575, 95%CI: 59598–67552) on multivariable regression analysis. Conclusions: Less than half of mUTUC patients met at least one quality criterion. Quality score achievement was associated with longer overall survival at a modest increase in total healthcare spending. These findings not only provide guidance for future study of rare diseases using secondary data, but also highlight inadequacies in the current management of mUTUC.

395 Background: Patients with BCG-unresponsive carcinoma in situ (CIS) are treated with radical cystectomy (RCx) or salvage intravesical chemotherapy (SIC). Recently, the FDA approved pembrolizumab for BCG-unresponsive CIS +/- papillary tumors. Given the costs and toxicities of pembrolizumab, it remains unclear whether its benefits are sufficient to warrant widespread use for BCG-unresponsive CIS. To that end, we conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing pembrolizumab with RCx and SIC (using gemcitabine-docetaxel as the prototypical regimen) for patients with BCG-unresponsive CIS. Methods: A decision-analytic Markov model compared pembrolizumab, SIC (with gemcitabine-docetaxel), and RCx for patients with BCG-unresponsive CIS +/- papillary tumors who are RCx candidates (index patient 1) or are unwilling/unable to undergo RCx (index patient 2). Each treatment option was a Markov node containing distinct variations of the following health states: surveillance, recurrence, progression to MIBC, progression to metastasis, treatment toxicity, and death. Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICERs) were compared using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/Quality-adjusted life year (QALY). The model used a US Medicare perspective with a 5-year time horizon for the base case. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed for all model parameters. Results: For index patient 1, pembrolizumab was not cost-effective vs. RCx (ICER $1,403,008) or SIC (ICER $2,011,923). One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that pembrolizumab only became cost-effective relative to RCx with a > 93% price reduction. Relative to RCx, SIC was cost-effective for time horizons < 5 years and nearly cost-effective at 5 years (ICER $118,324). One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that SIC became cost-effective relative to RCx if its risk of recurrence or metastasis at 2 years was less than 55% or 5.9%, respectively. For index patient 2, pembrolizumab required > 90% price reduction to be cost-effective vs. RCx (ICER $1,073,240). Probabilistic sensitivity analyses revealed that pembrolizumab was unlikely to be cost-effective even at high willingness-to-pay thresholds. Further sensitivity analyses found that no two-way combination of extrapolated values resulted in pembrolizumab being favored over RCx or SIC for either index patient. Conclusions: Based on decision-analytic Markov modeling of treatment options for patients with BCG-unresponsive CIS, pembrolizumab was unlikely to be cost-effective without a > 90% price reduction. While both RCx and SIC were more cost-effective than pembrolizumab, further studies may validate the cost-effectiveness of gemcitabine-docetaxel relative to RCx if the recurrence and metastasis thresholds are met. Overall, our model supports the preferential use of RCx and SIC over pembrolizumab for BCG-unresponsive CIS.