Juvet, Tristan

Objectives: To identify correlates of survival and perioperative outcomes of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients undergoing open (ORNU), laparoscopic (LRNU), and robotic (RRNU) radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study that included non-metastatic UTUC patients who underwent RNU between 1990–2020. Multiple imputation by chained equations was used to impute missing data. Patients were divided into three groups based on their surgical treatment and were adjusted by 1:1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Survival outcomes per group were estimated for recurrence-free survival (RFS), bladder recurrence-free survival (BRFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Perioperative outcomes: Intraoperative blood loss, hospital length of stay (LOS), and overall (OPC) and major postoperative complications (MPCs; defined as Clavien–Dindo > 3) were assessed between groups. Results: Of the 2434 patients included, 756 remained after PSM with 252 in each group. The three groups had similar baseline clinicopathological characteristics. The median follow-up was 32 months. Kaplan–Meier and log-rank tests demonstrated similar RFS, CSS, and OS between groups. BRFS was found to be superior with ORNU. Using multivariable regression analyses, LRNU and RRNU were independently associated with worse BRFS (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.22–2.28, p = 0.001 and HR 1.73, 95%CI 1.22–2.47, p = 0.002, respectively). LRNU and RRNU were associated with a significantly shorter LOS (beta −1.1, 95% CI −2.2–0.02, p = 0.047 and beta −6.1, 95% CI −7.2–5.0, p < 0.001, respectively) and fewer MPCs (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.31–0.79, p = 0.003 and OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.16–0.46, p < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: In this large international cohort, we demonstrated similar RFS, CSS, and OS among ORNU, LRNU, and RRNU. However, LRNU and RRNU were associated with significantly worse BRFS, but a shorter LOS and fewer MPCs.

Background: Measuring quality of care indicators is important for clinicians and decision making in health care to improve patient outcomes. Objective: The primary objective was to identify quality of care indicators for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and to validate these in an international cohort treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The secondary objective was to assess the factors associated with failure to validate the pentafecta. Design: We performed a retrospective multicenter study of patients treated with RNU for EAU high-risk (HR) UTUC. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Five quality indicators were consensually approved, including a negative surgical margin, a complete bladder-cuff resection, the absence of hematological complications, the absence of major complications, and the absence of a 12-month postoperative recurrence. After multiple imputations and propensity-score matching, log-rank tests and a Cox regression were used to assess the survival outcomes. Logistic regression analyses assessed predictors for pentafecta failure. Results: Among the 1718 included patients, 844 (49%) achieved the pentafecta. The median follow-up was 31 months. Patients who achieved the pentafecta had superior 5-year overall- (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) compared to those who did not (68.7 vs. 50.1% and 79.8 vs. 62.7%, respectively, all p < 0.001). On multivariable analyses, achieving the pentafecta was associated with improved recurrence-free survival (RFS), CSS, and OS. No preoperative clinical factors predicted a failure to validate the pentafecta. Conclusions: Establishing quality indicators for UTUC may help define prognosis and improve patient care. We propose a pentafecta quality criteria in RNU patients. Approximately half of the patients evaluated herein reached this endpoint, which in turn was independently associated with survival outcomes. Extended validation is needed.

405 Background: The diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is frequently obtained via diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) with biopsy. In a recent meta-analysis of five retrospective series comparing UTUC RNU patients with and without prior diagnostic URS, prior URS was associated with intravesical recurrence of urothelial carcinoma. However, there remains an incomplete understanding of the risks of URS on intravesical recurrence after RNU, and existing studies have not examined the risks of URS without endoscopic biopsy or percutaneous biopsy alone. Here, we query our institutional RNU registry to determine if UTUC diagnostic modality influences post-RNU intravesical recurrence risk. Methods: Years 1995 to 2019 of our institutions RNU registry were queried. Patients with UTUC were divided into four groups: 1) URS with endoscopic biopsy; 2) URS without endoscopic biopsy (visual confirmation alone); 3) percutaneous biopsy without any URS; 4) no URS and no percutaneous biopsy. Exclusion criteria included pure non-urothelial histology, RNU for benign indications, and prior/concomitant cystectomy. The primary outcome was intravesical recurrence of urothelial carcinoma compared across the four groups using Kaplan-Meier log-rank analyses and Cox-proportional hazard modeling (hazard ratio = HR). Results: In a cohort of 878 patients (mean post-RNU follow-up 43 months), 461 (53%) had URS with biopsy, 130 (15%) had URS without biopsy, 229 (26%) had no URS or percutaneous biopsy, and 58 (7%) had percutaneous biopsy alone. The 3-year intravesical recurrence rate was 27%, 22%, 18%, 12% for groups 1-4, respectively. Covariates associated with intravesical recurrence on univariable analysis included age (HR 1.03, p < 0.01), female gender (HR 0.76, p = 0.06), history of bladder cancer (HR 1.39, p = 0.01), current smoker (HR 1.49, p = 0.04), and multifocality (HR 1.34, p = 0.03). After adjusting for these covariates, multivariable analysis found that group 1 (URS with biopsy) was associated with increased intravesical recurrence (HR 1.41, p = 0.03) relative to group 3 (no URS or percutaneous biopsy). Compared to group 1, the hazard ratio for intravesical recurrence was not significantly different for group 2 (HR 1.18, p = 0.45) or group 4 (HR 1.11, p = 0.79). Conclusions: Patients undergoing ureteroscopic biopsy to diagnose UTUC prior to RNU had a higher risk of intravesical recurrence after RNU compared to patients who did not undergo any URS or percutaneous biopsy. This agrees with prior literature and suggests that aggressive ureteroscopic manipulation of UTUC tumors via biopsy may promote shedding of urothelial carcinoma cells capable of seeding the bladder. Our study does support the initiation of a randomized trial to determine if intravesical chemotherapy after ureteroscopic biopsy can reduce intravesical urothelial carcinoma recurrences.

TPS380 Background: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is the most common surgical treatment for prostate cancer (PC). Yet even with nerve-sparing RP (NS-RP), a significant proportion of men experience transient or permanent erectile dysfunction (ED) partially due to intraoperative neurovascular bundle (NVB) damage from thermal or mechanical trauma. Studies have shown that platelet released growth factors counteract trauma and facilitate healing. We evaluate the use of platelet rich plasma (PRP) to facilitate early nerve healing and decrease ED after NS-RP. Methods: A prospective, open label, 20 subject human trial evaluating intraoperative topical NVB PRP application was approved by the IRB and FDA under an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE 16915) for the investigational use of an approved blood separation device. Men aged 50-60 with newly diagnosed, localized PC and normal preoperative sexual and urinary function, defined as a Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) score of >19 and an answer of “none” on question 5 of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) are eligible. Intraoperatively, a 10ml PRP product is created from a 180 mL sample of the patient’s whole blood using the Angel Concentrated Platelet Rich Plasma System (Cytomedix, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD USA). PRP is applied via mechanical transfer to the NVB after completion of the vesicourethral anastomosis. The primary endpoint is the safety and tolerability of PRP on the NVB after NS-RP. Secondary endpoints include feasibility of intraoperative PRP application and longitudinal assessment of erectile function and urinary continence by questionnaire administration at 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months after NS-RP. Clinical trial information: NCT02957149.