Toussi, Amir

Objective To report open‐label phase data from a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT), after previous data from that study showed improved penile length and erectile function among post‐prostatectomy men treated with Restorex penile traction therapy (RxPTT). Materials and Methods An RCT (NCT05244486) was performed to evaluate RxPTT vs no treatment (Tx) for 5 months, which was followed by a 3‐month open‐label phase. Men were stratified based on as‐treated data: Group 1 = No Tx; Group 2 = No Tx → Tx; Group 3 = Tx → No Tx; Group 4 = Tx. Assessments included stretched penile length and standardized (International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF]) and non‐standardized questionnaires. Results A total of 82 men were enrolled (mean age 58.6 years) with 9‐month data available in 45 of the men. Baseline characteristics were similar among the cohorts. Comparing Group 1 and Group 4 (respectively), notable differences included: IIEF Erectile Function domain (IIEF‐EF) score (−8 vs −0.5; P = 0.16), penile length (−0.1 vs +1.7 cm; P < 0.01), intracavernosal injection use (86% vs 14%; P < 0.01), Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) Question 2 (50% vs 100%; P < 0.01), SEP Question 3 (33% vs 100%; P < 0.01). Men who crossed over to Tx (Group 2) failed to achieve equivalent improvements in length (+0.5 cm) or sexual function (IIEF‐EF score −6) compared to men treated early (Groups 3 and 4). Those who crossed over to no treatment after initial treatment (Group 3) experienced preserved length (+1.8 cm), and erectile function (IIEF‐EF score +0) despite therapy discontinuation. Conclusions Use of RxPTT beginning 1 month post‐prostatectomy results in improved penile length and erectile function, with benefits maintained after discontinuing therapy. If confirmed, these results represent the first postoperative therapy shown in a RCT to improve erectile function post‐prostatectomy. External validation is warranted.

ABSTRACT Background Penile length loss and erectile dysfunction (ED) are common post-prostatectomy. Recent results from a randomized, controlled study (RCT) of RestoreX penile traction therapy (RxPTT) demonstrated preserved erectile function and penile length improvements in men post-prostatectomy. Objective To report outcomes of the open label phase (6-9 month time point) of the previously noted RCT comparing efficacy of RxPTT to control in men post-prostatectomy. Methods A randomized, controlled trial (NCT03500419) has been completed of 82 men post-prostatectomy. Men were randomized 1-month post-prostatectomy to no therapy (control, n=27) or RxPTT (n=55) for 5 months. Participants then entered an open label phase for 3 months. Assessments included stretched penile length (corona), standardized (International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF]), and non-standardized questionnaires. Comparisons were performed of men who utilized traction at least 15 minutes daily for both phases to men who were originally control and continued with no treatment (as-treated analysis). Analyses were also performed of men who crossed over from control to &gt;15 min daily (crossover to treatment) and those who were originally in the treatment group and continued with &gt;15 min daily use during the open label phase (ongoing treatment). Results Of the 82 men enrolled (mean age 58.6), 55 had 6-month, and 42 had 9-month data available to review. Baseline characteristics (IIEF scores, penile length) were similar between cohorts. In the as-treated analysis (no treatment n=7, RxPTT x 8 months n=12, respectively), differences were as noted: IIEF-EFD (-8 vs -0.5, p=0.19), IIEF-OFD (-3 vs -2, p=0.86), IIEF-SD (-1 vs 0.5, p=0.09), IIEF-ISD (-3 vs -0.5, p=0.31), IIEF-OSD (-2 vs 0, p=0.29), penile length (-0.1 vs +1.8 cm, p&lt;0.01), PDE5 use (86% vs 75%, p=0.57), intracavernosal injection use (86% vs 17%, p&lt;0.01). Comparing men who did not use therapy at any time (n=7) to those who crossed over to RxPTT during the open label phase (n=8) demonstrated the following results: IIEF-EFD (-8 vs -6, p=0.49), IIEF-OFD (-3 vs -1, p=0.90), IIEF-SD (-1 vs 0, p=0.55), IIEF-ISD (-3 vs -1, p=0.45), IIEF-OSD (-2 vs -1, p=0.51), penile length (-0.1 vs +0.69 cm, p=0.39). Men who crossed over from RxPTT to no treatment (n=10) had relatively preserved improvements compared to those who continued with RxPTT during the open label phase (n=12) compared to baseline, respectively: IIEF-EFD (0 vs -0.5, p=0.95), IIEF-OFD (-3.5 vs -2, p=0.97), IIEF-SD (0 vs 0.5, p=0.18), IIEF-ISD (0 vs -0.5, p=0.87), IIEF-OSD (0 vs 0, p=0.66), penile length (+1.8 vs +1.8, p=0.99). Conclusions Although sample size and statistical power are limited, results from the open label phase confirm earlier findings of preserved sexual function and penile length in men treated with RxPTT compared to controls. Men who crossed over from controls to treatment experience benefits, although not as significant as those who were treated beginning at 1 month post-prostatectomy. Men who stopped therapy after 6 months demonstrated stable improvements from baseline, suggesting a preserved effect of RxPTT even after discontinuing use. If validated with external series, these findings would represent a significant advancement in the prevention of sexual dysfunction post-prostatectomy. Disclosure Work supported by industry: no.

ABSTRACT Introduction Penile length loss and erectile dysfunction (ED) are common post-prostatectomy. Recent results from a randomized, controlled study (RCT) of RestoreX penile traction therapy (RxPTT) demonstrated preserved erectile function and penile length improvements in men post-prostatectomy. Objective To report outcomes of the open label phase (6-9 month time point) of the previously noted RCT comparing efficacy of RxPTT to control in men post-prostatectomy. Methods A randomized, controlled trial (NCT03500419) has been completed of 82 men post-prostatectomy. Men were randomized 1-month post-prostatectomy to no therapy (control, n=27) or RxPTT (n=55) for 5 months. Participants then entered an open label phase for 3 months. Assessments included stretched penile length (corona), standardized (International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF]), and non-standardized questionnaires. Comparisons were performed of men who utilized traction at least 15 minutes daily for both phases to men who were originally control and continued with no treatment (as-treated analysis). Analyses were also performed of men who crossed over from control to &gt;15 min daily (crossover to treatment) and those who were originally in the treatment group and continued with &gt;15 min daily use during the open label phase (ongoing treatment). Results Of the 82 men enrolled (mean age 58.6), 55 had 6-month, and 42 had 9-month data available to review. Baseline characteristics (IIEF scores, penile length) were similar between cohorts. In the as-treated analysis (no treatment n=7, RxPTT x 8 months n=12, respectively), differences were as noted: IIEF-EFD (-8 vs -0.5, p=0.19), IIEF-OFD (-3 vs -2, p=0.86), IIEF-SD (-1 vs 0.5, p=0.09), IIEF-ISD (-3 vs -0.5, p=0.31), IIEF-OSD (-2 vs 0, p=0.29), penile length (-0.1 vs +1.8 cm, p&lt;0.01), PDE5 use (86% vs 75%, p=0.57), intracavernosal injection use (86% vs 17%, p&lt;0.01). Comparing men who did not use therapy at any time (n=7) to those who crossed over to RxPTT during the open label phase (n=8) demonstrated the following results: IIEF-EFD (-8 vs -6, p=0.49), IIEF-OFD (-3 vs -1, p=0.90), IIEF-SD (-1 vs 0, p=0.55), IIEF-ISD (-3 vs -1, p=0.45), IIEF-OSD (-2 vs -1, p=0.51), penile length (-0.1 vs +0.69 cm, p=0.39). Men who crossed over from RxPTT to no treatment (n=10) had relatively preserved improvements compared to those who continued with RxPTT during the open label phase (n=12) compared to baseline, respectively: IIEF-EFD (0 vs -0.5, p=0.95), IIEF-OFD (-3.5 vs -2, p=0.97), IIEF-SD (0 vs 0.5, p=0.18), IIEF-ISD (0 vs -0.5, p=0.87), IIEF-OSD (0 vs 0, p=0.66), penile length (+1.8 vs +1.8, p=0.99). Conclusions Although sample size and statistical power are limited, results from the open label phase confirm earlier findings of preserved sexual function and penile length in men treated with RxPTT compared to controls. Men who crossed over from controls to treatment experience benefits, although not as significant as those who were treated beginning at 1 month post-prostatectomy. Men who stopped therapy after 6 months demonstrated stable improvements from baseline, suggesting a preserved effect of RxPTT even after discontinuing use. If validated with external series, these findings would represent a significant advancement in the prevention of sexual dysfunction post-prostatectomy. Disclosure No

405 Background: The diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is frequently obtained via diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) with biopsy. In a recent meta-analysis of five retrospective series comparing UTUC RNU patients with and without prior diagnostic URS, prior URS was associated with intravesical recurrence of urothelial carcinoma. However, there remains an incomplete understanding of the risks of URS on intravesical recurrence after RNU, and existing studies have not examined the risks of URS without endoscopic biopsy or percutaneous biopsy alone. Here, we query our institutional RNU registry to determine if UTUC diagnostic modality influences post-RNU intravesical recurrence risk. Methods: Years 1995 to 2019 of our institutions RNU registry were queried. Patients with UTUC were divided into four groups: 1) URS with endoscopic biopsy; 2) URS without endoscopic biopsy (visual confirmation alone); 3) percutaneous biopsy without any URS; 4) no URS and no percutaneous biopsy. Exclusion criteria included pure non-urothelial histology, RNU for benign indications, and prior/concomitant cystectomy. The primary outcome was intravesical recurrence of urothelial carcinoma compared across the four groups using Kaplan-Meier log-rank analyses and Cox-proportional hazard modeling (hazard ratio = HR). Results: In a cohort of 878 patients (mean post-RNU follow-up 43 months), 461 (53%) had URS with biopsy, 130 (15%) had URS without biopsy, 229 (26%) had no URS or percutaneous biopsy, and 58 (7%) had percutaneous biopsy alone. The 3-year intravesical recurrence rate was 27%, 22%, 18%, 12% for groups 1-4, respectively. Covariates associated with intravesical recurrence on univariable analysis included age (HR 1.03, p < 0.01), female gender (HR 0.76, p = 0.06), history of bladder cancer (HR 1.39, p = 0.01), current smoker (HR 1.49, p = 0.04), and multifocality (HR 1.34, p = 0.03). After adjusting for these covariates, multivariable analysis found that group 1 (URS with biopsy) was associated with increased intravesical recurrence (HR 1.41, p = 0.03) relative to group 3 (no URS or percutaneous biopsy). Compared to group 1, the hazard ratio for intravesical recurrence was not significantly different for group 2 (HR 1.18, p = 0.45) or group 4 (HR 1.11, p = 0.79). Conclusions: Patients undergoing ureteroscopic biopsy to diagnose UTUC prior to RNU had a higher risk of intravesical recurrence after RNU compared to patients who did not undergo any URS or percutaneous biopsy. This agrees with prior literature and suggests that aggressive ureteroscopic manipulation of UTUC tumors via biopsy may promote shedding of urothelial carcinoma cells capable of seeding the bladder. Our study does support the initiation of a randomized trial to determine if intravesical chemotherapy after ureteroscopic biopsy can reduce intravesical urothelial carcinoma recurrences.

ABSTRACT Background Previous studies of penile traction therapy (PTT) devices have demonstrated limited/no efficacy when combined with intralesional therapies for Peyronie’s disease (PD). Recently, randomized data have demonstrated the efficacy of a novel PTT device, RestoreX, developed in cooperation with the Mayo Clinic, in men with PD. Aim To assess the safety and efficacy of treatment with the RestoreX device plus collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCH) compared with CCH alone and CCH with other PTT devices. Methods A prospective registry has been maintained of all men undergoing CCH injections for PD between March 2014 and January 2019. Assessments were performed at baseline, during each series, and after completion of treatment. Those completing therapy (8 injections or sooner if satisfied) were categorized into group 1 (CCH alone), group 2 (CCH plus any PTT device other than RestoreX), or group 3 (CCH plus RestoreX). Outcomes Changes in penile length, curvature, and subjective perception and the occurrence of adverse events. Results Of 287 men with data on PTT use, 113 had completed therapy with all objective data available and compose the current cohort. Baseline demographic and pathophysiological variables were similar among the 3 groups except penile length and previous PD medications. Following treatment, group 3 demonstrated significantly greater improvements in curvature (mean, 20.3°/31% for group 1, 19.2°/30% for group 2, and 33.8°/49% for group 3), length (-0.7 cm/-4%, -0.4 cm/-2%, and +1.9 cm/+17%, respectively), and subjectively estimated curvature improvement (44%, 32%, and 63% respectively), despite shorter daily PTT use (0.9 vs 1.9 hours/day). Group 3 was more likely than the other groups to experience ≥20°, ≥20%, and ≥50% curvature improvements, ≥1 cm length gain, and ≥20% length improvement. All results were statistically significant for group 3 versus groups 1 and 2, but not between groups 1 and 2, even after controlling for baseline features and isolating a subset of ≥3 hours/day PTT use (group 2). Group 3 was 6.9 times more likely to achieve ≥20° curvature improvement, and 3.5 times more likely to achieve ≥50% curvature improvement, and 10.7 times more likely to experience ≥20% length improvement. Adverse events were similar among the 3 groups. Clinical Implications Use of the RestoreX device enhances mean curvature outcomes by 71% and increases penile length in men with PD receiving CCH therapy. Strengths & Limitations Study strengths include a prospective registry, consistent assessments, the largest single-site series with complete posttreatment outcomes reported to date, the largest PTT series reported to date, and a true-to-life clinical design. Limitations include the nonrandomized methodology and single-site setting. Conclusion The combination of RestoreX and CCH is associated with significantly greater curvature and length improvements compared with CCH alone or CCH with other PTT devices.