Alom, Manaf

ABSTRACT Introduction Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a known precursor and sequelae to diagnosed cardiovascular disease (CVD). ED AUA guidelines recommend evaluating standard CV risk factors including serum lipids and penile doppler to help stratify CV risk, but few patients are referred for further evaluation. Plasma ceramides are metabolic byproducts that are novel predictors of adverse cardiovascular events resulting from unstable atherosclerotic plaque. CVD risk conferred by ceramide levels has been shown to be independent of conventional risk factors such as LDL and hsCRP levels. Thus, Plasma MI-Heart Ceramide is a new test that useful for evaluating shorter term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in the next 1 to 5 years. Objective We sought to evaluate the utility of ceramide levels in ED patients Methods We initiated ceramide testing in all patients with ED in late 2019 (in addition to lipids and Hgba1c). We queried our electronic medical record for ceramide levels and men with a diagnosis of ED. Ceramide levels stratified patients in normal, moderate, high, and very high risk. Twenty eight patients additionally had penile duplex ultrasound (DUS). Left and right peak systolic velocity values were averaged and a value of <25 cm/s was defined as penile arterial insufficiency. Results 245 men with ED and ceramide levels were analyzed. 44% (n=107) were normal, 42% (n=103) were moderate risk, 12% (n=29) were high risk and 2% (n=6) were very high risk. As result of their ceramide and office evaluation, 42% (15/35) of high/very high risk patients were referred for cardiac evaluation. Comparing ceramide scores in men with penile arterial insufficiency (16.7 cm/sec) vs patients without (43.2 cm/sec), we found no significant difference (p=1). Similarly, when comparing DUS results between ceramide risk categories, we found no significant differences (p=1). Conclusions One in 7 men presenting to an ED clinic had a high or very high ceramide risk. DUS results did not correlate with ceramide risk. Patients undergoing DUS (even without arterial insufficiency) may benefit from additional ceramide testing and possible cardiac referral. Further study is warranted to optimize utility of ceramide in men with ED and potentially decrease peri-procedural IPP cardiac morbidity. Disclosure No

Abstract Background A randomized, controlled clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of RestoreX traction therapy in men with Peyronie’s disease (PD) has been completed, with the 3-month results previously reported. The present study presents outcomes from the open-label and follow-up phases of the original trial. Aim To report 6-month (open-label phase) and 9-month (follow-up phase) outcomes from a randomized, controlled trial (NCT03389854). Methods A randomized controlled trial was performed from 2017 to 2019 in 110 all-comer men with PD. Men were randomized 3:1 to RestoreX (PTT) or no therapy (control) for 3 months, followed by 3-month open-label and follow-up phases. Key outcomes included adverse events (AEs), changes in penile curvature and length, erectile function, and standardized and nonstandardized assessments of PD. Outcomes The primary outcomes are safety, penile length, penile curvature, Peyronie’s Disease Questionnaire, International Index of Erectile Function, and satisfaction. Results 6-month (n = 64) and 9-month (n = 63) outcomes were reported, with a mean duration of PTT use of 31.1 minutes. No significant AEs were reported, with temporary erythema and discomfort being most common and resolving within minutes. On intent-to-treat analysis, control-to-PTT men experienced significant length (1.7–2.0 cm) and curvature improvements (18–20%). PTT-to-PTT men also achieved additional length (0.6–0.8 cm) without further curvature improvements. An as-treated analysis of PTT use ≥15 minute/day demonstrated 2.0- to 2.3-cm length gains (largest of any PTT to date) and 18–21% curve improvement. All sexual function domains of the International Index of Erectile Function and Peyronie’s Disease Questionnaire were significantly improved (except orgasmic domain). 95% of men treated for 6 months experienced length gains (mean 2.0–2.2 cm), and 61% had curve improvements (16.8–21.4° [32.8–35.8%]). RestoreX was preferred 3–4:1 over all other PD treatments, and 100% preferred it over other PTT devices. Clinical Implications Use of RestoreX 30 minutes daily results in significant length and curve improvements in PD men without significant AEs. Strengths & Limitations Strengths include largest randomized study of PTT, blinded assessments, and inclusion of all-comers with few restrictions; limitations include sample size that precludes comparisons between treatment cohorts and lack of long-duration (>3–9 hours) treatment arm. Conclusion PTT with RestoreX results in significant improvements in length, curve, and subjective and objective measures of sexual function without significant AEs. RestoreX PTT represents a safe, conservative, low-cost option for managing men with PD.

AbstractBackgroundThe clinical course in metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) can be complicated when patients have disease progression after prior treatment with second generation hormone therapy (second HT), such as enzalutamide or abiraterone. Currently, limited data exist regarding the optimal choice of chemotherapy for mCRPC after failing second generation hormone therapy. We sought to evaluate three common chemotherapy regimens in this setting.MethodsWe retrospectively identified 150 mCRPC patients with disease progression on enzalutamide or abiraterone. Of these 150 patients, 92 patients were chemo‐naïve while 58 patients had previously received docetaxel chemotherapy before being started on second HT. After failing second HT, 90 patients were assigned for docetaxel‐alone (group A), 33 patients received carboplatin plus docetaxel (group B), while 27 patients received cabazitaxel‐alone (Group C). A favorable response was defined by more than or equal to 50% reduction in prostate‐specific antigen from the baseline level after a complete course of chemotherapy. Survival outcomes were assessed for 30‐month overall survival.ResultsPatients in group (B) were 2.6 times as likely to have a favorable response compared to patients in group (A) (OR = 2.625, 95%CI: 1.15‐5.99) and almost three times compared to patients in group (C) (OR = 2.975, 95%CI: 1.04–8.54) (P = .0442). 30‐month overall survival was 70.7%, 38.9% and 30.3% for group (B), (A), and (C), respectively (P = .008). We report a Hazard Ratio of 3.1 (95% CI, 1.31‐7.35; P = .0037) between patients in group (A) versus those in group (B) and a Hazard Ratio of 4.18 (95% CI, 1.58‐11.06; P = .0037) between patients in group (C) compared to those in group (B)ConclusionThis data demonstrates improved response and overall survival in treatment‐refractory mCRPC with a chemotherapy regimen of docetaxel plus carboplatin when compared to docetaxel alone or cabazitaxel alone. Further investigations are required.

e17540 Background: The clinical course in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) can be complicated when patients have disease progression after treatment with 2nd generation hormone therapy (2nd-HT), such as enzalutamide or abiraterone. Currently, limited data exist regarding the optimal choice of chemotherapy for mCRPC after failing 2nd-HT. We sought to evaluate three common chemotherapy regimens in this setting. Methods: We retrospectively identified 150 patients with mCRPC with disease progression on enzalutamide or abiraterone. 92 patients were chemo-naïve, while 58 patients had previously received docetaxel chemotherapy prior to 2nd-HT. After failing 2nd-HT, 90 patients received docetaxel-alone (group A), 33 patients received carboplatin plus docetaxel (group B), while 27 patients received cabazitaxel-alone (Group C). Favorable response was defined by ≥50% reduction in PSA level from baseline after a complete course of chemotherapy. Survival outcome was assessed for 30-month overall survival. Results: Mean (SD) age was 71.2 (8.28), 69.5(8.38) and 67.2 (8.36) for group (A), (B) and (C), respectively. Mean (SD) pre-chemotherapy PSA was 63.8 (138.18), 58.5 (118.15) and 53.7 (88.15) for group (A), (B) and (C), respectively. Mean (SD) Gleason score was 7.9 (1.1), 8.4 (0.88) and 8.1 (1.06) for group (A), (B) and (C), respectively. Patients in group (B) were 2.6 times more likely to have a favorable response compared to group (A) (OR = 2.625, 95%CI: 1.15 - 5.99) and almost 3 times compared to patients in group (C) (OR = 2.975, 95%CI: 1.04 – 8.54) (p-value = 0.0442). We report a Hazard Ratio (HR) of 3.1 (95% CI 1.31-7.35; p = 0.0037) between patients in group (A) versus group (B), and a HR of 4.18 (95% CI 1.58-11.06; p = 0.0037) between patients in group (C) versus group (B). Thirty-month overall survival was 70.7%, 38.9%, and 30.3% for group (B), (A), and (C) respectively (p-value = 0.008). Conclusions: Our data demonstrate improved response and cancer-specific survival in patients with treatment-refractory mCRPC on docetaxel plus carboplatin compared to docetaxel or cabazitaxel alone. Selection bias is inherent in any retrospective study; however, our finding suggests that clinicians may consider docetaxel plus carboplatin in mCRPC patients who fail 2nd-HT. Further prospective studies are warranted.

Abstract Background Climacturia is an under-reported complication of definitive therapy for prostate cancer (PCa) - that is, radical prostatectomy (RP) and/or radiation therapy (RT). Aim We sought to identify the prevalence and predictors of climacturia and associated patient/partner bother in patients with and without prior PCa treatment. Methods We analyzed a database of patients who presented to our Men's Health clinic and filled out a questionnaire related to sexual function and pertinent medical histories. The prevalence of climacturia and associated patient/partner bother in patients with/without prior RP/RT was calculated. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were performed to identify predictors associated with climacturia and patient/partner bother. Outcomes The primary outcomes were the prevalence and predictors of climacturia and associated patient/partner bother in patients with/without history of definitive PCa treatment. Results Among 1,117 patients able to achieve orgasm, 192 patients (17%) had prior history of definitive therapy for PCa (RP alone = 139 [72%]; RT alone = 22 [11%]; RP + RT = 31 [16%]). Climacturia was reported by 39%, 14%, 52%, and 2.4% of patients with history of RP alone, RT alone, RP + RT, and neither RP nor RT, respectively (P < .05 between all groups). 33 to 45 percent of patients with climacturia noted significant patient/partner bother. Factors significantly associated with climacturia were prior RP, prior RT, history of other prostate surgery, and erectile dysfunction, although erectile dysfunction was not significant on multivariable analysis. Significant reduction in climacturia prevalence was noted for patients who were ≥1 year out from RP, compared with patients who were <1 year out. Among patients with prior RP/RT, stress urinary incontinence was associated with increased risk of climacturia, whereas diabetes was associated with decreased risk. No factors were associated with patient/partner bother. Among patients with prior RP, nerve-sparing technique did not predict presence of climacturia but was associated with reduced patient/partner bother. Clinical translation Given significant prevalence of climacturia and associated patient/partner bother, patients should be counseled on the risk of climacturia before undergoing RP/RT. Strengths and limitations Strengths include the large study population and the focus on both RP and RT. Limitations include the facts that this is a single-institution study that primarily relies on patients’ subjective reporting and that the study population may not represent the general population. Conclusions Climacturia affects a significant proportion of patients with history of RP/RT for PCa, and many patients and their partners find this bothersome.

ABSTRACT Background Previous studies of penile traction therapy (PTT) devices have demonstrated limited/no efficacy when combined with intralesional therapies for Peyronie’s disease (PD). Recently, randomized data have demonstrated the efficacy of a novel PTT device, RestoreX, developed in cooperation with the Mayo Clinic, in men with PD. Aim To assess the safety and efficacy of treatment with the RestoreX device plus collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCH) compared with CCH alone and CCH with other PTT devices. Methods A prospective registry has been maintained of all men undergoing CCH injections for PD between March 2014 and January 2019. Assessments were performed at baseline, during each series, and after completion of treatment. Those completing therapy (8 injections or sooner if satisfied) were categorized into group 1 (CCH alone), group 2 (CCH plus any PTT device other than RestoreX), or group 3 (CCH plus RestoreX). Outcomes Changes in penile length, curvature, and subjective perception and the occurrence of adverse events. Results Of 287 men with data on PTT use, 113 had completed therapy with all objective data available and compose the current cohort. Baseline demographic and pathophysiological variables were similar among the 3 groups except penile length and previous PD medications. Following treatment, group 3 demonstrated significantly greater improvements in curvature (mean, 20.3°/31% for group 1, 19.2°/30% for group 2, and 33.8°/49% for group 3), length (-0.7 cm/-4%, -0.4 cm/-2%, and +1.9 cm/+17%, respectively), and subjectively estimated curvature improvement (44%, 32%, and 63% respectively), despite shorter daily PTT use (0.9 vs 1.9 hours/day). Group 3 was more likely than the other groups to experience ≥20°, ≥20%, and ≥50% curvature improvements, ≥1 cm length gain, and ≥20% length improvement. All results were statistically significant for group 3 versus groups 1 and 2, but not between groups 1 and 2, even after controlling for baseline features and isolating a subset of ≥3 hours/day PTT use (group 2). Group 3 was 6.9 times more likely to achieve ≥20° curvature improvement, and 3.5 times more likely to achieve ≥50% curvature improvement, and 10.7 times more likely to experience ≥20% length improvement. Adverse events were similar among the 3 groups. Clinical Implications Use of the RestoreX device enhances mean curvature outcomes by 71% and increases penile length in men with PD receiving CCH therapy. Strengths & Limitations Study strengths include a prospective registry, consistent assessments, the largest single-site series with complete posttreatment outcomes reported to date, the largest PTT series reported to date, and a true-to-life clinical design. Limitations include the nonrandomized methodology and single-site setting. Conclusion The combination of RestoreX and CCH is associated with significantly greater curvature and length improvements compared with CCH alone or CCH with other PTT devices.

Objectives To investigate the impact of implementing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography fusion technology on biopsy and prostate cancer (PCa) detection rates in men presenting with clinical suspicion for PCa in the clinical practice setting. Patients and Methods We performed a review of 1 808 consecutive men referred for elevated prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) level between 2011 and 2014. The study population was divided into two groups based on whether MRI was used as a risk stratification tool. Univariable and multivariable analyses of biopsy rates and overall and clinically significant PCa detection rates between groups were performed. Results The MRI and PSA‐only groups consisted of 1 020 and 788 patients, respectively. A total of 465 patients (45.6%) in the MRI group and 442 (56.1%) in the PSA‐only group underwent biopsy, corresponding to an 18.7% decrease in the proportion of patients receiving biopsy in the MRI group ( P < 0.001). Overall PCa (56.8% vs 40.7%; P < 0.001) and clinically significant PCa detection (47.3% vs 31.0%; P < 0.001) was significantly higher in the MRI vs the PSA‐only group. In logistic regression analyses, the odds of overall PCa detection (odds ratio [OR] 1.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29–2.35; P < 0.001) and clinically significant PCa detection (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.48–2.80; P < 0.001) were higher in the MRI than in the PSA‐only group after adjusting for clinically relevant PCa variables. Conclusion Among men presenting with clinical suspicion for PCa, addition of MRI increases detection of clinically significant cancers while reducing prostate biopsy rates when implemented in a clinical practice setting.