Collins, S

ABSTRACT Introduction Covid-19 has helped drive all forms of medicine away from traditional brick and mortar medical interactions. Given the availability of online services to obtain treatments for ED, we developed a website to facilitate patient education, triage and men's health appointment scheduling. Objective We sought to assess characteristics of men who utilized a novel website to treat their ED. Methods We report on 50 patients who ultimately booked and attended appointments (video or in person) for erectile dysfunction. Patients found our website through our institution's main informational ED pages or through youtube links from our men's health video playlist library. Patients create an institutional account and are then asked a series of MD created questions designed to streamline patient triage and complete the majority of chart documentation ahead of the appointment. Patients are then sent videos relevant to their condition and future appointment options. Results 2300 users investigated the ED portion of the website with 1.8% of patients ultimately following through with an appointment. 13% of patients who explored the ED portion of the site created a user account that allows a questionnaire to be taken. 90% of men who began the ED questionnaire completed with a mean time of 11 minutes. 52% of men offered an appointment based on their responses completed the patient scheduling form. 71% of traffic was on mobile devices with 29% on desktop/tablet. Site use by time of day is shown in figure 1. Mean age of patients was 53. 92% of patients had ED that occurred > 6 months. Mean SHIM score was 8.2 (IQR 4-12). 80% of participants had both desire and opportunity for sexual activity, 20% did not meet both criteria and thus SHIM scores were less valid for these men. Of the users 28% had never tried pde5s, 32% had partial success with pde5s, 24% could not tolerate or afford pde5s and 42% had unsatisfactory results with pde5s. PDE5 naïve patients were seen by an internal medicine MD specializing in men's health, 10 were seen by surgeons as they requested IPPs and the rest were seen by a combination of men's health APPS and urology attendings for second line treatments and penile doppler. Interestingly, 66% of men were interested in undergoing penile doppler to better understand the etiology of their ED. Hypertension (40%) and diabetes (22%) were the most common medical comorbidities. 36% of the cohort had a strong family history of cardiac disease. Conclusions Men with ED can be effectively triaged through a website application. Most men with pde5 refractory ED wish to pursue penile doppler. The majority of patients seen had watched educational video material ahead of time, facilitating a more sophisticated and streamlined patient interaction. Disclosure No

ABSTRACT Introduction The significant overlap of risk factors for erectile dysfunction and venous thromboembolism (VTE) may disproportionally increase the risk of VTE in men undergoing inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery. Owing to the absence of available literature, AUA and EAU perioperative VTE guidelines do not address VTE risk with IPP surgery and generally recommend against pharmacologic prophylaxis with outpatient surgery. The Caprini Score is a validated scoring system to estimate VTE risk in the perioperative period. Objective We sought to assess the risk of VTE by calculating Caprini Scores in men undergoing IPP surgery. Methods We retrospectively reviewed and calculated Caprini Scores for patients undergoing IPP surgery at our institution between July 2017 and June 2019. Results 215 patients undergoing IPP surgery were identified with a mean and median Caprini score of 5.96 (SD, 1.63) and 6 (IQR 5,7), respectively. 84% of the cohort was classified as high or highest risk for VTE (Figure 1). This is in part due to our cohort's mean age of 64, mean BMI of 31 and history of prostate cancer treatment as the cause of ED. Prior history of VTE (deep vein thrombosis(DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE)was identified in 17 (8%) patients with 5 (2%) have a history of both DVT and PE. Conclusions Men undergoing IPP surgery are high risk for VTE based on Caprini score assessment. VTE prophylaxis should be considered in men undergoing penile implant surgery. Before widespread application, long-term data is necessary to assess safety and efficacy of VTE prophylaxis in the IPP surgery population. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Senior author consultant for Coloplast

ABSTRACT Introduction Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a known precursor and sequelae to diagnosed cardiovascular disease (CVD). ED AUA guidelines recommend evaluating standard CV risk factors including serum lipids and penile doppler to help stratify CV risk, but few patients are referred for further evaluation. Plasma ceramides are metabolic byproducts that are novel predictors of adverse cardiovascular events resulting from unstable atherosclerotic plaque. CVD risk conferred by ceramide levels has been shown to be independent of conventional risk factors such as LDL and hsCRP levels. Thus, Plasma MI-Heart Ceramide is a new test that useful for evaluating shorter term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in the next 1 to 5 years. Objective We sought to evaluate the utility of ceramide levels in ED patients Methods We initiated ceramide testing in all patients with ED in late 2019 (in addition to lipids and Hgba1c). We queried our electronic medical record for ceramide levels and men with a diagnosis of ED. Ceramide levels stratified patients in normal, moderate, high, and very high risk. Twenty eight patients additionally had penile duplex ultrasound (DUS). Left and right peak systolic velocity values were averaged and a value of <25 cm/s was defined as penile arterial insufficiency. Results 245 men with ED and ceramide levels were analyzed. 44% (n=107) were normal, 42% (n=103) were moderate risk, 12% (n=29) were high risk and 2% (n=6) were very high risk. As result of their ceramide and office evaluation, 42% (15/35) of high/very high risk patients were referred for cardiac evaluation. Comparing ceramide scores in men with penile arterial insufficiency (16.7 cm/sec) vs patients without (43.2 cm/sec), we found no significant difference (p=1). Similarly, when comparing DUS results between ceramide risk categories, we found no significant differences (p=1). Conclusions One in 7 men presenting to an ED clinic had a high or very high ceramide risk. DUS results did not correlate with ceramide risk. Patients undergoing DUS (even without arterial insufficiency) may benefit from additional ceramide testing and possible cardiac referral. Further study is warranted to optimize utility of ceramide in men with ED and potentially decrease peri-procedural IPP cardiac morbidity. Disclosure No