Kohler, T

Abstract Background 0.05% Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) is now commonly used as an antiseptic irrigation for inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery. Limited in vitro data suggest compatibility of 0.05% CHG with antibiotic impregnated IPP devices; however, very little clinical research exists to guide use of 0.05% CHG in this population. Aim Assess the relationship of 0.05% CHG and antibiotic impregnated IPP infection in a large multi-institutional cohort. Methods We retrospectively reviewed a multi-institutional cohort of patients who underwent antibiotic impregnated IPP implantation. We identified cases using intraoperative 0.05% CHG and an equal number of consecutive control cases without 0.05% CHG use from each center for comparison. The primary outcome was IPP infection requiring explantation. Patient demographics and surgical variables were analyzed using chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression to identify variables associated with infection. Outcomes The primary outcome was IPP infection requiring device explanation. Results Among 14 participating institutions, 761 cases using an antibiotic impregnated IPP were analyzed. Of these, 348 (45.7%) had 0.05% CHG used during the case. Median follow-up was 4 months (interquartile range 1-12) for the 0.05% CHG group and 8 months (interquartile range 2-21) for the control group. Intraoperative 0.05% CHG utilization was not associated with antibiotic impregnated IPP infection rate (1.9% vs. 2.0%, P = .9). On multivariable analysis, prior IPP infection (OR 6.32, 95% CI 1.32-30.2, P = .021) and prior priapism (OR 10.01, 95% CI 1.18-89.7, P = .039) were associated with increased infection risk. Clinical implications The use of 0.05% CHG irrigation with antibiotic impregnated IPPs was associated with similar infection rates compared to antibiotic irrigation. Strengths and limitations Limitations include the use of a historical comparator cohort which may introduce unknown confounders, practice variation between multiple sites, shorter follow-up in the 0.05% CHG cohort, and the low incidence of IPP infection which may limit statistical power despite a large sample. The major strengths include the large, multi-institutional cohort, and the use of consecutive patients to minimize selection bias. Conclusion 0.05% CHG utilization was not associated with infection rates in antibiotic impregnated IPPs.

Abstract Introduction Glans ischemia and subsequent necrosis is a rare but devastating complication of inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) placement. Differentiating true glans ischemia from severe ecchymosis is often difficult to distinguish, yet it remains paramount given the glans ischemia principle: “when in doubt, take it out.” Objective We present several clinical scenarios and associated postoperative images wherein there was concern for post-IPP glans ischemia based on initial clinical examination. In addition, we review pertinent clinical factors that can be used to help distinguish between greater than “average” glans ecchymosis and true ischemia. Methods We present four cases from 2025 and describe clinical factors likely responsible for increased glans discoloration. Results Traditional risk factors for glans ischemia are constrictive IPP wrap, vasculopathy, use of prolonged large bore catheters, and concomitant surgery (circumcision, distal counter-incision, urethral/neurovascular bundle mobilization). Case 1 was a patient with a history of radiation for prostate malignancy who had notably hypervascular corpora intraoperatively. On postoperative day (POD) #1, the urethral meatus was ecchymotic along with patchy ecchymosis throughout the glans. The Kerlix wrap can be seen around the penile shaft up to the corona. Removing the constrictive wrap and increasing room lighting revealed a well-vascularized glans with spotty ecchymosis likely from passage of the Keith needles during deployment. Case 2 was another patient examined on POD1 after uneventful IPP placement under local anesthesia. Note the similar level of ecchymosis involving the scrotum. Case 3 is another patient examined POD1 from a penoscrotal IPP that required multiple firing attempts with the Keith needle. Again, multifocal areas of patchy ecchymosis are interspersed with areas of normal appearing glans. The patient’s skin color was also similar in appearance to the areas of ecchymosis, requiring careful attention to detail to differentiate. Finally, Case 4 is an image on POD0 after uneventful IPP. The patient required several Keith needle passes because Furlow tool severed suture. Notably, decision was made to leave the penile implant in place in all cases. The penile wrap and/or catheter was removed and lighting was optimized to evaluate for clinical change. No patient reported paresthesia or pain out of proportion to the clinical examination. All glans were warm to the touch. Rates of glans bruising at POD3 for 298 implants performed since 2024 under local anesthesia, with bruising scored 0-4, were as follows: 0: 3.7% 1: 48.7%, 2: 25.5% 3: 21.1% 4: 0.3%. This demonstrates high rates of glans bruising with local anesthesia. We speculate that the increased rate of glans bruising may be attributed to the aggressive nature of the local anesthesia block, which can result in vasodilation and ecchymosis due to needle trauma and increased vascular permeability. Conclusions IPP cylinder deployment requiring multiple Keith needle punctures, constrictive post-op penile wrap, hypervascular corpora, exam/images with poor lighting, extensive bruising in other areas, and IPPs performed under local anesthesia appear may contribute to glans discoloration that mimics ischemia. A detailed physical exam and close clinical monitoring are essential when postoperative glans discoloration is observed. Disclosure No

Abstract Introduction Inflatable Penile Prostheses (IPPs) are a surgical implant used to treat erectile dysfunction in patients who do not respond to clinical treatments. IPP cylinder size often changes with cylinder exchange upon revision, but trends in these changes have not been formally assessed in the existing literature. Objective To analyze patient data for changes in implant size upon first revision. Methods Data included patients who underwent IPP surgical revision at Mayo Clinic Rochester between January 2021 and May 2024. Inclusion criteria specified cylinder exchange upon first revision of the IPP. A total of 48 patients were included in the analysis. A Bayesian regression was used to estimate the posterior probability of an increase in cylinder size upon first revision, after adjusting for patient age, revision service provider, and duration between implant and revision as covariates. Linear regression was used to assess the relationship between the extent of cylinder size increase and duration before revision. Results The median increase in cylinder size is 2 cm for the left cylinder and 1.75 cm for the right cylinder. The median increase for each patient’s average cylinder size is 1.625 cm. The median percentage increase in cylinder size is 9.76% for the left cylinder and 8.11% for the right cylinder. The median percentage increase for each patient’s average cylinder size is 8.13%. Posterior probabilities of increase were significant for the left cylinder, right cylinder, and the average cylinder size (Left PP: 97.53%; Right PP: 98.05%; Average PP: 98.05%). The extent of cylinder size increase is not significantly associated with duration before revision (Left p-value = 0.476; Right p-value = 0.500). Conclusions Patients and surgeons can expect about a 10% increase in cylinder size with their first revision. However, the extent of increase is not significantly associated with the duration between implant date and first revision. Future research efforts should focus on identifying where exactly this additional size is generated and what extent of size increase amounts to a noticeable difference for patients. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Coloplast

Abstract Introduction Proximal perforation in complex penile prosthesis placement is well recognized. If recognized, suture sling repair amongst other techniques is our favored approach. Unrecognized proximal perforation often results in unilateral or bilateral perineal bruising, often with eventual proximal device migration and palpability of the proximal device in the buttock. Objective We present a series of 5 cases in which the suture sling technique was utilized for known proximal perforation, with subsequent need for immediate or delayed revision. Methods We assessed all cases performed at Mayo Clinic since 2018 that resulted in a known suture sling complication amongst 3 high volume implanters. We identified 5 cases in which the suture sling technique required revision surgery. All patients underwent cross sectional imaging for further evaluation. Results Patients were males aged 59 to 89 with erectile dysfunction. There were no consistent factors amongst the 5 cases that may have predicted suture sling complication. The majority of cases were inflatable penile prostheses (4/5), were prosthesis revision cases (3/5), utilized the penoscrotal approach (4/5), were Coloplast devices (4/5), utilized rear tip extenders (3/5), utilized Prolene suture sling (3/5), and returned to OR within 2 days for revision (3/5). The majority of the complications (4/5) involved excessive proximal cylinder length that were palpable on examination of the buttocks or near the rectum (one felt on rectal exam). One case demonstrated improper anchoring of the device not allowing proximal seating and thus S shaped deformity. We noted medial cylinder deviation on all imaging, as corporal perforation was always medial to the true corporal path. Conclusions When performing suture slings, surgeons should be very wary of oversizing. The medial cylinder path and prior surgical capsule may mislead surgeons when choosing appropriate cylinder length. If perforated, we advocate against rear tips and for under sizing in general, as proximal anchoring is reliant upon the suture, not a true corporal boundary. Similarly, the device should be fully inflated and proximally seated on palpation prior to tying down the sling to avoid S deformities. Disclosure No

Abstract Introduction With the growing use of 0.05% Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) as irrigation and dip for inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery, understanding the possible relationship between CHG use and non-infectious complications is imperative. Such information may guide provider decision-making during implant surgery. Objective We therefore sought to determine whether the use of 0.05% Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) during inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery was associated with non-infectious wound complications. Methods We performed a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing IPP surgery from January 2017 to March 2024. The primary outcome was wound complications (ex. rash, wound dehiscence, edema). Secondary outcomes included other non-infectious complications (Table 1). The primary exposure was whether patients received intraoperative CHG either as irrigation or dip. Descriptive comparisons were used to compare CHG and non-CHG cohorts. Univariable logistic regression was utilized to assess if CHG use was associated with any non-infectious complication. Multivariable logistic regression was subsequently performed to assess factors associated with certain non-infectious complications after IPP surgery – controlling for age, body mass index, race, diabetes, and hypertension as covariables. Results Across 2,933 patients, there were 1,573 non-CHG and 1,359 CHG patients. Non-infectious complications occurred in 83 (5%) non-CHG patients and in 65 (5%) CHG patients. Median follow-up was 22 months (IQR 7-59) for non-CHG patients and 8 months (IQR 3-16) for CHG patients. The incidence of wound complications was greater among CHG patients than non-CHG patients (1.0% vs. 0.1%, p<0.01). On univariable logistic regression, CHG use was associated with increased odds of wound complications (OR 7.34, 95% CI 1.65-32.71) but was not associated with any other non-infectious complication (Table 2). On multivariable logistic regression, CHG use remained associated with an increased odds of wound complications (OR 13.86, 95% CI 1.80-106.44). Conclusions Among patients experiencing non-infectious complications after IPP, CHG use during IPP surgery appears to be associated with an increased odds of wound complications. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Coloplast Corporation and Boston Scientific

Abstract Introduction 0.05% Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) has gained popularity as an irrigant and dip for inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery. Prior in vitro data is conflicting on the impact of CHG use with hydrophilic coated devices. Objective We sought to identify possible associations between CHG use and hydrophilic IPP infection rate. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 2,933 patients undergoing IPP implantation across 14 referral centers. Data collection spanned from January 1, 2017 to March 1, 2024. Each surgeon contributed patients who underwent IPP implantation with CHG used as an irrigant and/or dip as well as an equal number of consecutive control patients without CHG use. The primary outcome was IPP explant for postoperative infection. Univariable analysis was used to compare patient demographics, and logistic regression analysis was performed to assess factors associated with infection. Results Hydrophilic devices were implanted in 2,150 patients. Median follow-up for non-CHG patients was 13 months (IQR 18) and four months (IQR 9) for CHG patients. The incidence of infection with intraoperative CHG use was significantly higher compared to those without CHG use (4.6%, 46/1,001 vs. 2.1%, 24/1,148, p<0.001). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, intraoperative CHG use was associated with infection (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.24-3.47, p=0.01). Additional variables associated with infection included immunosuppression, prior IPP infection, prior priapism, and revision surgery (p<0.01, Table). On subgroup analyses, the increased infection risk of CHG was most clear when CHG was used as both irrigation and dip (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.19-3.46, p=0.01) and when CHG was used during revision surgery (OR 3.36, 95% CI 1.15-9.82, p=0.03). Conclusions In a large multi-institutional cohort, intraoperative CHG use was associated with an elevated incidence of hydrophilic IPP infection. Providers may take these findings into consideration when performing IPP surgery with hydrophilic devices, especially during revision surgery. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Coloplast Corporation and Boston Scientific

Abstract Introduction While previous research has explored overall satisfaction following IPP surgery, the specific relationship between final implant length and perceived satisfaction in both patients and their partners remains underexplored. Objective We aim to evaluate the association between IPP cylinder length and postoperative satisfaction in both patients and their sexual partners, and to determine whether perceived adequacy of length restoration correlates with overall sexual and psychosocial outcomes. Methods We initiated a registry of patients undergoing surgery for placement of a PP. After consent, perioperative study assessments and follow-ups were conducted. After surgery, patients were directed to fulfill a survey at 6 months and 12 months. Patients who fulfilled both items were included in the analysis. Results A total of 237 patients had a PP placement and completed the first survey and 158 the 12-month survey. The median IPP length was 22 cm (20-23). At 6 months, .189 patients (79.7%) reported moderate to high satisfaction, and this positive response was sustained at 12-months (n=132; 83.5%). At 6 months, 178 patients (75.1%) reported moderate to high partner’ satisfaction, and this positive response was sustained at 12-months (n=129; 81.6%). A regression analysis at 6 months showed a correlation of r=0.148 (p=0.029) and r=0.027 (p=0.743) at 12 months, implying that while significant statistically, it is not strongly related, and other factors are likely contributing to the response. Partner satisfaction showed a correlation of r=0.184 (p=0.008) at 6 months and r=0.032 (p=0.702) at 12 months, again showing no causal relationship between length of the IPP device with perceived satisfaction. A secondary analysis was performed in patients who had prostatectomy and were using vacuum devices before IPP placement (n=51). Of these, 12 (5.1%) reported decreased penile size during pre-op counseling. The median IPP length was 22 cm (19.5-23) and 21 cm (19.6-22) among patients who reported a decrease in size before IPP placement (p=0.574). There was no correlation between this statement and IPP length (p=0.572), nor satisfaction levels in both patients r=0.180 (p=0.221) and partners r=0.015 (p=0.921) at 6 months or 12 months r=0.060 (p=0.701) & r=0.078 (p=0.636). Conclusions IPP length showed a significant correlation but a weak association with patient and partner satisfaction. Our findings underscore the need for a multimodal approach when looking for patient and partner satisfaction and not only to perceived cosmesis. Comprehensive preoperative counseling should address these multidimensional aspects to better align expectations and outcomes. Disclosure Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: Coloplast Clarification: Industry funding only - investigator initiated and executed study

Abstract Introduction The opioid epidemic has encouraged increased efforts to minimize postoperative opioid use, particularly in urologic procedures. While short-acting local anesthetics are often used in inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) placement, their effects diminish quickly, potentially leading to higher opioid requirements. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB), a long-acting local anesthetic, may reduce opioid requirements, but its cost and limited prospective data in IPP patients warrant further investigation. Objective To compare the efficacy of long-acting liposomal bupivacaine with short-acting ropivacaine in reducing postoperative pain and opioid consumption following inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) placement. Methods This randomized controlled trial enrolled adult males undergoing primary IPP placement via a penoscrotal approach. Participants were randomized to receive either LB (20 mL Exparel + 20 mL bupivacaine 0.25%) or ropivacaine (40 mL of 0.5%) as part of a standardized multimodal analgesia protocol. All patients received acetaminophen, gabapentin, and meloxicam perioperatively, with oxycodone prescribed as needed postoperatively (figure 1). The primary outcome was postoperative opioid consumption measured in oral morphine equivalents (OME). Secondary outcomes included pain and anxiety scores assessed on postoperative days (POD) 3, 7, and 14 using visual analog scales. Results Only 13 patients completed the study due to difficulties in recruitment (9 in the long-acting group, 4 in the short-acting group). The long-acting group demonstrated consistently lower opioid consumption at all follow-up points. On POD 3, the median cumulative OME was 7.5 vs. 41.25 in the short-acting group. By POD 14, cumulative OME was 15.0 vs. 93.75. (Figure 2) Pain scores followed a similar pattern, with the long-acting group reporting lower median scores on POD 3 (4 vs. 6) and POD 7 (4 vs. 6). Anxiety scores were also lower in the long-acting group throughout the follow-up. Use of non-opioid analgesics was similar across both groups. Conclusions Despite a limited sample size, this trial showed consistent trends favoring LB over ropivacaine for reducing opioid use and pain following IPP placement. These findings suggest potential clinical benefit but require validation in larger, multicenter studies. The trial also illustrates the difficulty of conducting randomized studies when institutional practices strongly favor one approach. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Endo pharmaceuticals.

Abstract Background Concerns exist regarding inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) placement after transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter (TC-AUS) surgery due to potential risk of damaging the AUS cuff during corporal dilation and device placement. Aim To evaluate perioperative complications, infections, revision rates, and device longevity in patients undergoing IPP placement following prior TC-AUS surgery. Methods We present a case series of men who underwent IPP surgery with an existing TC-AUS in place. A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who underwent TC-AUS placement at a single tertiary institution between 2015 and 2025. Patients who subsequently received IPP surgery were identified. Standard IPP techniques were used with additional precautions to protect the AUS, including use of electrocautery instead of sharp dissection and contralateral reservoir placement. Demographics, operative details, complications, infections, revision events, and device survival were collected through review of operative notes and patient records. Outcomes Primary outcomes included intra-operative difficulties, perioperative complications, infection and erosion rates, and revision or failure rates for both the TC-AUS and IPP devices. Results Among 757 TC-AUS placements, 17 patients subsequently underwent IPP surgery. Seven patients (41%) had a history of pelvic irradiation. The median operative time for IPP placement was 83 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 68-87), and median follow-up was 31.5 months (IQR 11.2-40.6). All reservoirs were positioned contralateral to the AUS reservoir. A 12 Fr catheter was left postoperatively in 10 patients (59%) for <24 hours. Proximal corporal dilation was noted to be challenging in 3 patients (18%) but dilation was completed without cuff injury or corporal perforation. One patient (6%) had TC-AUS cuff erosion 9.5 months after IPP surgery; one patient (6%) experienced TC-AUS device infection 11.5 months after IPP surgery when his AUD pump eroded through the scrotum. Four patients (24%) developed AUS mechanical failure due to cuff leak at a median of 31.9 months after IPP placement (39.9 months post-AUS). Clinical implications IPP implantation following TC-AUS can be performed safely using careful surgical technique, though vigilance for later AUS mechanical failure is warranted. Strengths and limitations This study represents one of the largest single-institution series evaluating IPP after TC-AUS and includes detailed operative and follow-up data. However, its retrospective design, small cohort size, and limited follow-up duration restrict generalizability. Conclusion IPP placement after TC-AUS appears safe, with low infection and erosion rates, though AUS cuff leaks may occur more frequently than when either device is implanted alone.

Abstract Introduction Penile prosthesis (PP) implantation is associated with high patient satisfaction in patients with medically refractory erectile dysfunction (ED). There remains a paucity in the literature regarding the temporal evolution of patient following PP surgery. Objective We sought to evaluate mechanical-associated outcomes in our Penile prosthesis (PP) cohort. Methods We analyzed our prospective penile registry that includes patient-completed surveys regarding device outcomes administered at 6 and 12-months after PP placement. We specifically examined the questions: “Have you had another [prosthesis] surgery since your first operation?”; and, “Does the device ever inflate or deflate on its own, if Yes how bothersome is this for you on a scale of 1-10 (1- very bothersome, 10 no bother)?”. Chart review was performed to identify pertinent variables including reservoir location (retropubic vs submuscular) and need for prosthesis revision for survey respondents. Results A total of 304 patients were enrolled in the registry. Of these, 101 completed the 6-month assessment and 79 completed the 1-year survey. The vast majority of PP were Coloplast (91.4%) utilizing the “classic” pump. Mean chart review follow up was approximately 3 years. One device was explanted for implant infection. No additional operations were reported for mechanical failure. Auto-inflation (AI) was reported in 38 patients at 6 months and 21 patients at 12 months. AI was most common in patients with submuscular reservoir placement (75.9% of those who reported AI at 6 months and 50% at 12 months respectively). The relative risk of developing AI was doubled in patients with a submuscular reservoir [2.2 (1.05-3.44); p < 0.001)]. Degree of bother had a reported median of 5 (3.75-9) at 6 months and became less bothersome after 12-months year with a reported median of 7 (5-9) (p = 0.230) [Fig. 1]. Conclusions Early Penile prosthesis mechanical failure requiring revision surgery did not occur in our cohort but patient-reported auto-inflation was identified more frequently than previously reported. Further study is warranted, but patients may benefit from pre-operative counseling regarding the incidence of auto-inflation. Disclosure Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: Coloplast. Clarification: Industry funding only - investigator initiated and executed study.