Pinkhasov, Alexandr

Abstract Introduction While previous research has explored overall satisfaction following IPP surgery, the specific relationship between final implant length and perceived satisfaction in both patients and their partners remains underexplored. Objective We aim to evaluate the association between IPP cylinder length and postoperative satisfaction in both patients and their sexual partners, and to determine whether perceived adequacy of length restoration correlates with overall sexual and psychosocial outcomes. Methods We initiated a registry of patients undergoing surgery for placement of a PP. After consent, perioperative study assessments and follow-ups were conducted. After surgery, patients were directed to fulfill a survey at 6 months and 12 months. Patients who fulfilled both items were included in the analysis. Results A total of 237 patients had a PP placement and completed the first survey and 158 the 12-month survey. The median IPP length was 22 cm (20-23). At 6 months, .189 patients (79.7%) reported moderate to high satisfaction, and this positive response was sustained at 12-months (n=132; 83.5%). At 6 months, 178 patients (75.1%) reported moderate to high partner’ satisfaction, and this positive response was sustained at 12-months (n=129; 81.6%). A regression analysis at 6 months showed a correlation of r=0.148 (p=0.029) and r=0.027 (p=0.743) at 12 months, implying that while significant statistically, it is not strongly related, and other factors are likely contributing to the response. Partner satisfaction showed a correlation of r=0.184 (p=0.008) at 6 months and r=0.032 (p=0.702) at 12 months, again showing no causal relationship between length of the IPP device with perceived satisfaction. A secondary analysis was performed in patients who had prostatectomy and were using vacuum devices before IPP placement (n=51). Of these, 12 (5.1%) reported decreased penile size during pre-op counseling. The median IPP length was 22 cm (19.5-23) and 21 cm (19.6-22) among patients who reported a decrease in size before IPP placement (p=0.574). There was no correlation between this statement and IPP length (p=0.572), nor satisfaction levels in both patients r=0.180 (p=0.221) and partners r=0.015 (p=0.921) at 6 months or 12 months r=0.060 (p=0.701) & r=0.078 (p=0.636). Conclusions IPP length showed a significant correlation but a weak association with patient and partner satisfaction. Our findings underscore the need for a multimodal approach when looking for patient and partner satisfaction and not only to perceived cosmesis. Comprehensive preoperative counseling should address these multidimensional aspects to better align expectations and outcomes. Disclosure Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: Coloplast Clarification: Industry funding only - investigator initiated and executed study

Purpose of review Peyronie's disease characterizes a condition in which there is angular curvature of the penis. We know that the most patients with Peyronie's disease will not have spontaneous resolution of their penile curvature. As such, patients who desire treatment can elect for either surgical or nonsurgical therapy. Herein, we discuss the contemporary nonsurgical management options for Peyronie's disease. Recent findings Nonsurgical management options for Peyronie's disease include oral therapy, intra-lesional injections, and penile traction therapy. At the time of this review, there is essentially no high-level evidence demonstrating any benefit for oral therapy. Penile traction therapy has evolved over the past decade with second-generation devices demonstrating strong efficacy and more convenient treatment regimens. Intra-lesional options include collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCH), verapamil, and interferon alpha-2b. The IMPRESS trial garnered the strongest level of evidence (two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials) to support the safety and efficacy of CCH. Verapamil is an option supported by several urological societies; however, the evidence supporting its efficacy is inconsistent between several notable series and randomized studies. IFN alpha 2b can produce modest improvement in curvature, however, is not available for use in North America. Summary Herein, we will discuss notable advances in nonsurgical management of Peyronie's disease.

Abstract Introduction Penile prosthesis (PP) implantation is associated with high patient satisfaction in patients with medically refractory erectile dysfunction (ED). There remains a paucity in the literature regarding the temporal evolution of patient following PP surgery. Objective We sought to evaluate mechanical-associated outcomes in our Penile prosthesis (PP) cohort. Methods We analyzed our prospective penile registry that includes patient-completed surveys regarding device outcomes administered at 6 and 12-months after PP placement. We specifically examined the questions: “Have you had another [prosthesis] surgery since your first operation?”; and, “Does the device ever inflate or deflate on its own, if Yes how bothersome is this for you on a scale of 1-10 (1- very bothersome, 10 no bother)?”. Chart review was performed to identify pertinent variables including reservoir location (retropubic vs submuscular) and need for prosthesis revision for survey respondents. Results A total of 304 patients were enrolled in the registry. Of these, 101 completed the 6-month assessment and 79 completed the 1-year survey. The vast majority of PP were Coloplast (91.4%) utilizing the “classic” pump. Mean chart review follow up was approximately 3 years. One device was explanted for implant infection. No additional operations were reported for mechanical failure. Auto-inflation (AI) was reported in 38 patients at 6 months and 21 patients at 12 months. AI was most common in patients with submuscular reservoir placement (75.9% of those who reported AI at 6 months and 50% at 12 months respectively). The relative risk of developing AI was doubled in patients with a submuscular reservoir [2.2 (1.05-3.44); p < 0.001)]. Degree of bother had a reported median of 5 (3.75-9) at 6 months and became less bothersome after 12-months year with a reported median of 7 (5-9) (p = 0.230) [Fig. 1]. Conclusions Early Penile prosthesis mechanical failure requiring revision surgery did not occur in our cohort but patient-reported auto-inflation was identified more frequently than previously reported. Further study is warranted, but patients may benefit from pre-operative counseling regarding the incidence of auto-inflation. Disclosure Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: Coloplast. Clarification: Industry funding only - investigator initiated and executed study.

Abstract Introduction Treatment of patients with obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms has various side effects on their quality of sexual life. Objective This study aimed to compare the effects of Rezum and Rezurp (a combination of Rezum for lateral lobes and TURP for the median lobe) on erections, retrograde ejaculation, and subjective orgasm experience in patients with a significant median lobe. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study that includes patients who underwent Rezum and Rezurp between January 2021 and January 2024. Sexual outcomes were assessed at 3 months and a median follow up phone call was 33 months. Patients were queried: Any changes in erections (yes/no) and changes in ejaculation (yes/no). If yes to changes, patients were asked to further define and characterize their responses including specific effect on orgasm. The effect of surgery on sexual outcomes was explored by chi-square analysis with P ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results Sexual outcomes were obtained for 78/89 patients in the Rezurp and 97/107 patients in the Rezum group. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics, including age, prostate volume, and medication regimens, between the two groups, as shown in Table 1. The results indicated that 78% (61/78) and 83% (86/97) of Rezurp and Rezum patients experienced no change in ejaculation. Total ejaculation loss was seen only in two Rezurp patients. Ejaculatory changes between the two groups were not significantly different, with 13.8% and 4.23% worsening for Rezurp and Rezum, respectively (P = 0.08). Changes in erections and orgasm satisfaction were not statistically significant between the two groups (P = 0.76 and 0.54, respectively). Subjective worsening in orgasm quality for Rezurp and Rezum was not different between groups (P = 0.54), with 6.4% and 4.1% worsening, respectively (Table 2). Conclusions Rezurp and Rezum have similar sexual function outcomes. Disclosure No.

Abstract Introduction Concerns exist when inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery is performed following transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter (TC-AUS) due to risk of damaging the AUS cuff during proximal corporal dilation and device placement. Aside from rare case reports, no data exists on outcomes and complications in patients who undergo IPP surgery with existing TC-AUS in place. Objective We aim to describe perioperative complications, infections, revision rates, and device longevity when IPP surgery is performed with existing TC-AUS in place. Methods A retrospective search was conducted to identify all patients who had undergone TC-AUS placement at a single institution from 2015-2023. Patients who had undergone IPP placement following TC-AUS at the same institution were identified. Operative technique for IPP placement was similar to standard IPP surgery with additional care taken to avoid the AUS device and preferential use of electrocautery over sharp dissection. Operatives notes and all patient encounters were reviewed, and data on demographics, operative details, perioperative complications, infections, revision rates, and device longevity were recorded. Results 727 patients underwent TC-AUS placement from 2015-2023. Of these, 13 patients underwent subsequent IPP placement (fig. 1). All patients had history of prostatectomy, and 6 (46%) patients had prior radiation. The median follow-up after IPP was 31.7 months and the time gap between AUS and IPP averaged 18.3 months (range 2.3 to 56.7 months). Average operative time for IPP was 85 minutes (range 53 to 202 minutes). Reservoirs were all placed contralateral to the AUS reservoir to minimize risk of injury to the AUS device. 8 patients had a 12 Fr catheter left post-operatively for less than 24 hours. Proximal dilation was noted to be difficult in 2 patients (15%), both of which were successfully dilated without perforation or damage to the AUS cuff. No infections or erosions occurred. 3 patients (23%) developed mechanical failure at a mean time of 28.7 months following IPP placement (36.5 months after AUS). Cuff leak was identified in 2 patients and the third has yet to undergo revision surgery to determine etiology. Conclusions IPP placement appears safe and effective in men who have previously undergone TC-AUS without increased risk of infection or device erosion. Care should be taken when dilating proximally, though proximal dilation was uneventful in most patients. Mechanical failure rates may be slightly higher compared to patients who have either device alone, and patients should be counseled accordingly. Disclosure No.