Bajic, Petar

Abstract Background To date, no scoring system has adequately defined clinical efficacy of erectile dysfunction (ED) therapies when evaluating differences between cohorts or in meta-analytic studies. Aim To outline the minimal criteria required for any therapy to be considered clinically effective in the treatment of ED. Methods An analytic review was performed of standardized ED questionnaires, with a particular emphasis placed on the International Index of Erectile Function, Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EFD), and the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) concept. The data were used to create a societal position statement and recommendations on best practices within clinical trials to determine treatment efficacy. Outcomes The SMSNA provided 6 key statements and recommendations to suggest best practices and define minimal thresholds for improvements required for an ED therapy to be considered clinically effective. Results The IIEF-EFD currently represents the preferred standardized questionnaire to evaluate for changes in erectile function post-treatment and is the only questionnaire adequate to assess primary outcomes. To claim efficacy, investigational treatments must demonstrate MCID between cohorts (eg, 2-, 5-, or 7-point median improvements between groups among mild, moderate, or severe ED cohorts) in prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, and adequately powered studies. In studies employing mixed-severity ED populations, a method of calculating an adjusted MCID was proposed based on statistical weighting principles. Similarly, a novel method for analyzing differences between cohorts in meta-analytic studies was presented to incorporate the concept of MCID. Based on these principles, the SMSNA would not support efficacy of a therapy based on statistical significance in a meta-analytic study alone. Similarly, studies claiming efficacy utilizing responder approaches (ie, statistically higher percentage of men achieving MCID between cohorts) would not be acceptable unless the median difference between groups on the IIEF-EFD achieved MCID. Clinical Implications The current position statement provides important, evidence-based data and scientific principles to help define what may be considered as an effective therapy in the treatment of ED. This framework provides a basis that decision-makers, clinicians, and patients may use to help differentiate clinically effective therapies. Strengths & Limitations The published literature is limited by a lack of validated instruments and data defining MCID for ED therapies between cohorts and with meta-analytic studies. The current position statement provides important guidance on these areas of ambiguity pending further, definitive data. Conclusion The current position statement provides detailed guidance on key criteria required to conclude efficacy of therapies used to treat ED.

Abstract Background 0.05% Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) is now commonly used as an antiseptic irrigation for inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery. Limited in vitro data suggest compatibility of 0.05% CHG with antibiotic impregnated IPP devices; however, very little clinical research exists to guide use of 0.05% CHG in this population. Aim Assess the relationship of 0.05% CHG and antibiotic impregnated IPP infection in a large multi-institutional cohort. Methods We retrospectively reviewed a multi-institutional cohort of patients who underwent antibiotic impregnated IPP implantation. We identified cases using intraoperative 0.05% CHG and an equal number of consecutive control cases without 0.05% CHG use from each center for comparison. The primary outcome was IPP infection requiring explantation. Patient demographics and surgical variables were analyzed using chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression to identify variables associated with infection. Outcomes The primary outcome was IPP infection requiring device explanation. Results Among 14 participating institutions, 761 cases using an antibiotic impregnated IPP were analyzed. Of these, 348 (45.7%) had 0.05% CHG used during the case. Median follow-up was 4 months (interquartile range 1-12) for the 0.05% CHG group and 8 months (interquartile range 2-21) for the control group. Intraoperative 0.05% CHG utilization was not associated with antibiotic impregnated IPP infection rate (1.9% vs. 2.0%, P = .9). On multivariable analysis, prior IPP infection (OR 6.32, 95% CI 1.32-30.2, P = .021) and prior priapism (OR 10.01, 95% CI 1.18-89.7, P = .039) were associated with increased infection risk. Clinical implications The use of 0.05% CHG irrigation with antibiotic impregnated IPPs was associated with similar infection rates compared to antibiotic irrigation. Strengths and limitations Limitations include the use of a historical comparator cohort which may introduce unknown confounders, practice variation between multiple sites, shorter follow-up in the 0.05% CHG cohort, and the low incidence of IPP infection which may limit statistical power despite a large sample. The major strengths include the large, multi-institutional cohort, and the use of consecutive patients to minimize selection bias. Conclusion 0.05% CHG utilization was not associated with infection rates in antibiotic impregnated IPPs.

ABSTRACT Introduction Penile prosthesis (PP) implantation with concurrent straightening maneuvers is the gold standard surgical therapy for men with Peyronie's Disease (PD) and concurrent medication-refractory ED. Satisfaction rates exceed 80-90% in modern series. PD is characterized by other bothersome effects on penile morphology (i.e. penile shortening) that also negatively impact patient satisfaction with PP. We hypothesized that men with both PD+ED would report lower overall satisfaction with PP implantation compared to those with ED alone. Objective To compare patient outcomes in a cohort of patients undergoing PP implantation for ED with and without concurrent PD. Methods We identified all patients who underwent PP implantation by a single surgeon between May 2012 and August 2019 (n=354). A retrospective chart review was performed to evaluate pertinent clinical demographics and surgical outcomes. A survey was mailed to all patients in July 2019. This included validated ED questionnaires (IIEF, EDITS, and QOLSP) and clinician-derived questions to evaluate subjective outcomes. Survey results were compared between those patients with and without a history of PD, using two-sample student t- and chi-squared tests (p-value < 0.05 considered significant). Results 79 patients completed the survey (response rate 22%), including 38 (48%) with PD+ED. Mean survey follow-up duration was 45.5 (SD 19.5) months. There was no significant difference in patient demographics amongst those patients who did and did not respond to the survey. Amongst survey respondents, the mean preoperative IIEF-EF score was significantly higher for patients with PD+ED (10.2; SD 9.1) compared to those with ED alone (3.9; SD 5.0, p=0.003). Respondents with a history of both PD+ED were also less likely to have previously used oral therapy and intracavernosal injection to treat ED prior to PP implantation (p<0.009). For those respondents with PD+ED, mean preoperative curvature was 59O (SD 43). Adjunctive straightening maneuvers at the time of PP implantation included manual modeling (87%), plication (5%), and incision/grafting (50%). Overall, device infection occurred in 4/79 patients (5%), and mechanical malfunction occurred in 3/79 (4%). 87% of all survey respondents felt their ED was “very much” or “much” improved. 80% stated they would recommend PP to a friend. 60% reported postoperative penile length loss, but only 35% were “dissatisfied” with current length and only 20% were dissatisfied with penile girth. In those with PD+ED, 91% were satisfied with the degree of penile straightening. There was no significant difference in patient-reported outcomes pertaining to length, girth, and overall satisfaction between those with and without PD. The mean follow-up IIEF-EF was 27.4 (SD 5.7), mean EDITS was 18 (SD 8), and mean QOLSP was 55 (SD 15). Once again, there was no significant difference in these outcomes based on the presence of PD. Conclusions PP results in high rates of patient satisfaction. The presence of concurrent PD, even amongst those requiring adjunctive maneuvers, does not appear to significantly impact patient outcomes. While there are inherent limitations to a survey-based study including reporter bias, these results support the use of PP and concurrent straightening as an excellent treatment option for men with PD and ED. Disclosure Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: This project was funded by an investigator-initiated grant from Coloplast Corporation. Clarification: Industry funding only - investigator initiated and executed study Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Coloplast Corporation (Dr. Laurence Levine - consultant); Boston Scientific (Dr. Laurence Levine - Consultant)

ABSTRACTBackgroundDespite an increasing number of publications on Peyronie’s disease (PD), evidence-based clinical decision-making remains challenging due to the small number of well-designed clinical trials.AimTo perform a critical analysis of reporting quality in PD systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analyses (MA).MethodsStudy protocol registration was performed on the Open Science Framework platform. In January 2021, a systematic electronic search of the Medline/PubMed, Embase, Ovid, Scopus, Joanne Briggs Institute, and Cochrane databases was performed. Search terms included “Peyronie’s disease” and “systematic review OR meta-analysis OR meta-analysis.” Eligibility criteria were English-language, relevance to PD and specification of “systematic review” or “meta-analysis” in the title or abstract. Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine levels of evidence were used to classify original studies reviewed within each publication. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBIS tool. Data were tabulated and reported as means with standard deviation, median with interquartile range and t-testing as appropriate. Strength of association between variables was calculated using Pearson correlation coefficient. Statistical analyses were performed on RStudio (version 1.4.1106).OutcomesOutcomes included review type, level of evidence, authorship, journal, publication date, “A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews” (AMSTAR-2) score and “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses” (PRISMA) score.ResultsFrom 1974 to 2021, 340 articles were identified. After review, 17 full length articles were included. Thirteen were SR, 2 MA and 2 was combined. Significant heterogeneity was seen in evidence level of included studies. There was median 54% adherence to AMSTAR-2 criteria and 74% adherence to PRISMA criteria. Overall AMSTAR-2 confidence rating was Critically Low in 11 of 17 studies. Correlation analysis revealed very high positive association between AMSTAR 2 and PRISMA adherence (+0.95). ROBIS revealed “High” concern regarding methods used to collect data and appraise 12/17 studies (71%), and “High” concern regarding synthesis and findings in 8 of 17 studies (47%).Clinical ImplicationsMany SR include markedly heterogenous levels of evidence and fail to meet accepted methodological criteria for reporting.Strengths and LimitationsMain strengths include extensive literature review and analysis of standardized study reporting. One limitation is that aggregate scoring of AMSTAR-2 and PRISMA is not intended as primary method of quality assessment; however effect was minimized by reporting critical domains, overall quality assessments and specifics on globally poorly reported domains.ConclusionMore high quality randomized controlled PD trials are necessary; SR and MA should focus on these studies alone.

Abstract Background Peyronie’s disease (PD) is characterized by penile pain, deformity, and sexual dysfunction, often resulting in an impaired sexual experience and significant psychological bother for the patient. However, there are limited data on the impact of PD on female sexual partners (FSPs). Aim To compare the psychosexual experience of men with PD and their FSPs. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all prospectively enrolled men and their FSPs who presented for initial PD evaluation to our sexual health clinic from July 2018 to February 2020. All men completed a PD-specific survey and the PD questionnaire (PDQ). If the patient was accompanied by an FSP during initial evaluation, she completed the PDQ for Female Sexual Partners and Female Sexual Function Index. We further queried our database that included information on patient demographics and clinical characteristics. Outcomes The main outcome of this study is retrospective comparison of responses with the PDQ and PDQ for Female Sexual Partners. Results Data were available for 44 men with PD (median age, 56 years; interquartile range, 49–63) and their FSPs (median age, 54 years; interquartile range, 50–61). The majority of men presented in the chronic phase (35 of 44, 79.5%), and median objective composite curvature was 75° (interquartile range, 50–90°). Owing to PD, female and male partners reported similar difficulty with vaginal intercourse (VI) (74.3% vs 81.5%, P = .555), decreased frequency of VI (70.6% vs 85.2%, P = .228), and at least moderate discomfort/pain with VI (48.6% vs 33.3%, P = .232). FSPs were “very” or “extremely” bothered by the appearance of their partner’s erect penis less often than male partners (20.0% vs 59.3%, P < .001). FSPs were “very” or “extremely” bothered by their partner’s PD during VI less often than men with PD (32.3% vs 65.2%, P = .017). Few FSPs (22.9%) had “severe” or “very severe” concern with damaging their partner’s penis during VI. Clinical Implications The sexual experience for men with PD and their FSPs differs, thus emphasizing the importance of active engagement of both men with PD and FSP during initial PD evaluation. Strengths and Limitations This initial study draws data from a single, high-volume men’s health clinic with a limited sample size. Survey responses may have been shared by patients with PD and their FSPs. Conclusion PD impacts the sexual experience for both men and FSPs. A similarly large proportion of men with PD and FSP noted decreased frequency of and difficulty with vaginal intercourse. Yet, FSPs were less bothered by the appearance of the erect penis and the deformity during VI compared with men.

AbstractPeyronie’s disease is a common yet poorly understood condition characterized by penile pain, curvature, sexual dysfunction and psychological bother. Peyronie’s disease represents a penile wound healing disorder, and is thought to arise from exuberant scarring in response to penile trauma in genetically predisposed men. In the absence of active treatment, the majority of men experience stable or worsening symptoms, with few reporting spontaneous resolution in penile curvature or other deformity. In contrast, penile pain improves or resolves in the majority of men. Treatment options vary based on symptom severity and stability. Several oral therapies are commonly prescribed, although to date there are no strong data to support any oral agents as monotherapy for Peyronie’s disease. Other options including penile traction therapy and intralesional injections result in modest improvements for many patients, particularly when used early after symptom onset. Penile straightening through approaches, such as penile plication and plaque incision or partial excision and grafting, represent the most rapid and reliable approach to correct penile curvature once the symptoms have stabilized. Side‐effects vary based on the type of surgery carried out, and include penile shortening, sensation changes and erectile dysfunction in the minority of men. In patients with drug refractory erectile dysfunction and Peyronie’s disease, placement of a penile prosthesis will address both issues, and is associated with high levels of patient satisfaction. The current review provides a practical approach to the modern evaluation and management of patients presenting with Peyronie’s disease.

Abstract Background A subset of patients with Peyronie's disease (PD) treated with collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) experience persistent bother and some require surgery. Aim We characterize patients experiencing persistent bother after CCH treatment and identify associations and predictors of surgical intervention/outcomes. Methods We retrospectively identified patients with PD from October 2014 to October 2019 and identified those presenting with persistent bother after CCH treatment by other urologists. Intracavernosal injection and penile Doppler ultrasonography were performed, and subsequent interventions/outcomes were recorded. Baseline characteristics were compared with Student t-test and chi-square test. Predictors of surgical intervention and complications were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Outcomes The primary outcome was surgery after CCH treatment. Secondary outcomes included worsened erectile function, sensory deficits, and penile length change. Results Of 573, 67 (11.7%) patients with PD had undergone prior CCH treatment with median 6 injections (range 2–24). Mean post-CCH PD Questionnaire bother score was 10.1 (SD: 3.1), and total International Index of Erectile Function-5 was 15.3 (SD: 8.7). Mean PD duration was 27.8 (SD: 35.7) months, with a mean composite curvature (MCC) of 69.0° (SD: 33.8) measured after injection. Of 67, 44 (65.7%) patients had MCC >60°. Of 67, 52 (77.6%) patients had indent, narrowing, or hourglass and 26 (38.8%) had hinge effect (buckling of the erect penis with axial pressure) on examination. Calcification was identified in 26 of 67 (38.8%) patients, with grade 3 calcifications comprising 6 of 23 (26.1%) patients. Of 67, 33 (49.3%) patients underwent surgery, with 20 (60.1%) undergoing partial plaque excision and grafting with/without tunica albuginea plication, 6 (18.2%) undergoing tunica albuginea plication alone, and 7 (21.2%) undergoing penile prosthesis with plaque incision and grafting. Surgical patients had greater mean curvature (82.6 vs 55.4, P = .001) and were more likely to have hinge (54.5% vs 20.6%, P = .005). On multivariable analysis, MCC ≥60° predicted patient’s decision for surgery (odds ratio: 2.99, P < .01, 95% confidence interval: 1.62–4.35). There were no associations between surgical complications and number of injections or CCH-associated adverse events. Clinical Implications Patients presenting with persistent bother after CCH treatment often have narrowing and calcifications (despite calcifications being a contraindication to CCH treatment), and those who have hinge or severe curvature are more likely to undergo surgery with low rates of complications. Strengths/Limitations This study's generalizability is limited by selection bias, but useful data are provided for patient counseling. Conclusion Patients with persistent bother after CCH treatment had high rates of indentation/narrowing, plaque calcifications, and MCC >60° at completion of CCH treatment. Surgical intervention is more common with hinge and is safe and feasible in these patients, with low rates of complications. These findings suggest possible negative prognostic factors for CCH treatment, which merit further investigation.