Hamandi, Ali

Multi-listing (ML) increases the odds of transplantation compared with single-center listing. However, not all patients have equivalent access to ML. The recent allocation policy change prioritized distance from the donor hospital in an attempt to decrease geographic disparities. This study assessed access to liver transplant (LT) given ML practices before and after the acuity circles policy change. United Network for Organ Sharing data were queried for LTs between January 1, 2016, and November 1, 2024. Patients were grouped by listing at one versus multiple centers and by acuity circle era (ACE). Cohort characteristics and comparisons were described using chi-square and Wilcoxon rank tests. Multivariable logistic regressions and propensity score match (PSM) were performed to assess associations between ML and LT. The final cohort consisted of 105,030 patients; 4084 (3.9%) were multi-listed. Racial/ethnic minority groups, less educated, and publicly insured candidates were less often multi-listed. ML was positively associated with LT in all analyses (overall: OR=1.180, p <0.001; PSM: OR=1.164, p =0.001; pre-ACE: OR=1.127, p =0.015; post-ACE: OR=1.218, p <0.001). Education, race/ethnicity, and insurance type were also associated with LT across all analyses. ML patients were more often transplanted at their primary center with a significant increase in primary center LT post-ACE (53.4% vs. 63.4%, p <0.001). ML and LT had a positive correlation. There was a negative association between minority groups and ML as well as LT. Although acuity circles decreased geographic disparities, they did not change ML accessibility across candidates.

Abstract Introduction Inflatable Penile Prostheses (IPPs) are a surgical implant used to treat erectile dysfunction in patients who do not respond to clinical treatments. IPP cylinder size often changes with cylinder exchange upon revision, but trends in these changes have not been formally assessed in the existing literature. Objective To analyze patient data for changes in implant size upon first revision. Methods Data included patients who underwent IPP surgical revision at Mayo Clinic Rochester between January 2021 and May 2024. Inclusion criteria specified cylinder exchange upon first revision of the IPP. A total of 48 patients were included in the analysis. A Bayesian regression was used to estimate the posterior probability of an increase in cylinder size upon first revision, after adjusting for patient age, revision service provider, and duration between implant and revision as covariates. Linear regression was used to assess the relationship between the extent of cylinder size increase and duration before revision. Results The median increase in cylinder size is 2 cm for the left cylinder and 1.75 cm for the right cylinder. The median increase for each patient’s average cylinder size is 1.625 cm. The median percentage increase in cylinder size is 9.76% for the left cylinder and 8.11% for the right cylinder. The median percentage increase for each patient’s average cylinder size is 8.13%. Posterior probabilities of increase were significant for the left cylinder, right cylinder, and the average cylinder size (Left PP: 97.53%; Right PP: 98.05%; Average PP: 98.05%). The extent of cylinder size increase is not significantly associated with duration before revision (Left p-value = 0.476; Right p-value = 0.500). Conclusions Patients and surgeons can expect about a 10% increase in cylinder size with their first revision. However, the extent of increase is not significantly associated with the duration between implant date and first revision. Future research efforts should focus on identifying where exactly this additional size is generated and what extent of size increase amounts to a noticeable difference for patients. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Coloplast