Yang, D

Abstract Introduction The opioid epidemic has encouraged increased efforts to minimize postoperative opioid use, particularly in urologic procedures. While short-acting local anesthetics are often used in inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) placement, their effects diminish quickly, potentially leading to higher opioid requirements. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB), a long-acting local anesthetic, may reduce opioid requirements, but its cost and limited prospective data in IPP patients warrant further investigation. Objective To compare the efficacy of long-acting liposomal bupivacaine with short-acting ropivacaine in reducing postoperative pain and opioid consumption following inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) placement. Methods This randomized controlled trial enrolled adult males undergoing primary IPP placement via a penoscrotal approach. Participants were randomized to receive either LB (20 mL Exparel + 20 mL bupivacaine 0.25%) or ropivacaine (40 mL of 0.5%) as part of a standardized multimodal analgesia protocol. All patients received acetaminophen, gabapentin, and meloxicam perioperatively, with oxycodone prescribed as needed postoperatively (figure 1). The primary outcome was postoperative opioid consumption measured in oral morphine equivalents (OME). Secondary outcomes included pain and anxiety scores assessed on postoperative days (POD) 3, 7, and 14 using visual analog scales. Results Only 13 patients completed the study due to difficulties in recruitment (9 in the long-acting group, 4 in the short-acting group). The long-acting group demonstrated consistently lower opioid consumption at all follow-up points. On POD 3, the median cumulative OME was 7.5 vs. 41.25 in the short-acting group. By POD 14, cumulative OME was 15.0 vs. 93.75. (Figure 2) Pain scores followed a similar pattern, with the long-acting group reporting lower median scores on POD 3 (4 vs. 6) and POD 7 (4 vs. 6). Anxiety scores were also lower in the long-acting group throughout the follow-up. Use of non-opioid analgesics was similar across both groups. Conclusions Despite a limited sample size, this trial showed consistent trends favoring LB over ropivacaine for reducing opioid use and pain following IPP placement. These findings suggest potential clinical benefit but require validation in larger, multicenter studies. The trial also illustrates the difficulty of conducting randomized studies when institutional practices strongly favor one approach. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Endo pharmaceuticals.