Tentis, E

Abstract Introduction Penile duplex Doppler ultrasound (PDDU) is an important test to diagnose and guide treatment recommendations for peyronie’s Disease and erectile dysfunction. When patients do not achieve optimal rigidity during their evaluation we may be underestimating their degree of curvature and erection response which can impact treatment recommendations. Objective To evaluate specific examination conditions that may negatively impact the patient experience in men undergoing PDDU. Methods We developed a survey to evaluate patient experience during PDDU. Specific questions addressed preferences regarding the type of clinician performing the examination (physician versus advanced practice provider), provider gender, and specific modifiable conditions about the examination room. The survey was administered to thirty-five consecutive patients at a single academic practice. Patients were asked to complete portions of the survey before and after the examination to limit bias. Results 113 patients completed the survey. Prior to starting the testing, 48% of patients (n=54) had no provider preference, whereas 43% (n=49) preferred a physician as the performing clinician. 70% of patients (n=79) had no provider gender preference. All patients received at least a single dose of intracavernosal erectogenic medication at the start of their assessment. After completing PDDU, 40% of patients (n=45) reported that room conditions negatively impacted their ability achieve an adequate erectile response in the clinic. As shown in Figure 1, bright fluorescent overhead lighting (29%) and hallway noise (21%) were the most frequent contributing factors. When asked about opportunities to improve future patient experience, 38% (n=43) recommended dimming the room lights, 31% (n=35) would enjoy a warm blanket, and 36% (n=41) would favor gentle music or background sounds. 32% (n=36) felt that using call button, as opposed to routine staff checks to verify erectile response, would be desirable. Despite these preferences, the mean overall patient experience on a scale of 0-10 (0=poor, 10=excellent) was high at 9.3 (SD 1.2). Conclusions Despite high patient-reported satisfaction, we found that patients undergoing PDDU for PD and ED reported a preference towards (i) softer/dimmer lights, (ii) sound machine to drown out hallway noise, (iii) aa warm blanket, (iv) a call system to alert staff of a satisfactory erectile response. Further investigations are necessary to determine whether these simple modifications can improve the patient experience and exam efficiency. Disclosure No

Abstract Introduction Independently performed procedures by well-trained advanced practice providers (APP) facilitate access to specialized care. We sought to compare outcomes between physicians and APPs with intralesional collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH). Objective Compare outcomes of CCH injections based on injection provider. Outcomes included curvature improvement and adverse events. Methods Men receiving CCH between 2014-2021 at our institution by four physicians and four APPs were included in an IRB-approved database. CCH was delivered as a series of 8 injections per protocol. Patient demographics, procedural-related adverse events, and curvature changes were recorded. The “APP-ratio” is defined as percentage of total injections administered by an APP per patient. Results After excluding patients who did not complete the entire CCH course or return for final assessment, 150/406 patients were analyzed. Mean baseline penile curvature was 66.2° (SD 23). Mean absolute and percent improvements in curvature were 21.7° (SD 18) and 33% (SD 27). The mean APP ratio was 69%, and 133 patients (89%) had at least 25% of their injections performed by an APP. There was no significant difference (p=0.65, p=0.39) in absolute or relative curvature improvement based on the APP-ratio [Figure 1]. There was also no difference in adverse events (pain, swelling, and hematoma). Conclusions In our high-volume CCH practice, APPs achieve the same outcomes and safety compared to physicians. Greater training efforts expand access to care for patients with PD. Disclosure No

ABSTRACT Introduction Covid-19 has helped drive all forms of medicine away from traditional brick and mortar medical interactions. Given the availability of online services to obtain treatments for ED, we developed a website to facilitate patient education, triage and men's health appointment scheduling. Objective We sought to assess characteristics of men who utilized a novel website to treat their ED. Methods We report on 50 patients who ultimately booked and attended appointments (video or in person) for erectile dysfunction. Patients found our website through our institution's main informational ED pages or through youtube links from our men's health video playlist library. Patients create an institutional account and are then asked a series of MD created questions designed to streamline patient triage and complete the majority of chart documentation ahead of the appointment. Patients are then sent videos relevant to their condition and future appointment options. Results 2300 users investigated the ED portion of the website with 1.8% of patients ultimately following through with an appointment. 13% of patients who explored the ED portion of the site created a user account that allows a questionnaire to be taken. 90% of men who began the ED questionnaire completed with a mean time of 11 minutes. 52% of men offered an appointment based on their responses completed the patient scheduling form. 71% of traffic was on mobile devices with 29% on desktop/tablet. Site use by time of day is shown in figure 1. Mean age of patients was 53. 92% of patients had ED that occurred > 6 months. Mean SHIM score was 8.2 (IQR 4-12). 80% of participants had both desire and opportunity for sexual activity, 20% did not meet both criteria and thus SHIM scores were less valid for these men. Of the users 28% had never tried pde5s, 32% had partial success with pde5s, 24% could not tolerate or afford pde5s and 42% had unsatisfactory results with pde5s. PDE5 naïve patients were seen by an internal medicine MD specializing in men's health, 10 were seen by surgeons as they requested IPPs and the rest were seen by a combination of men's health APPS and urology attendings for second line treatments and penile doppler. Interestingly, 66% of men were interested in undergoing penile doppler to better understand the etiology of their ED. Hypertension (40%) and diabetes (22%) were the most common medical comorbidities. 36% of the cohort had a strong family history of cardiac disease. Conclusions Men with ED can be effectively triaged through a website application. Most men with pde5 refractory ED wish to pursue penile doppler. The majority of patients seen had watched educational video material ahead of time, facilitating a more sophisticated and streamlined patient interaction. Disclosure No