Leiter, Lawrence A

Key Points Inclisiran for LDL cholesterol reduction was analyzed post hoc in patients with CKD. Mean percentage LDL cholesterol reduction from baseline was around 50% regardless of eGFR in phase 3 trials. Inclisiran showed sustained and effective LDL cholesterol–lowering in patients across various levels of eGFR values, without new safety findings. Background Lowering LDL cholesterol reduces the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in patients with CKD. The efficacy and safety of inclisiran versus placebo in patients without and with CKD were investigated in a post hoc pooled analysis of three phase 3 trials (ORION-9, ORION-10, and ORION-11). Methods Patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or its risk equivalent, and elevated LDL cholesterol were randomized 1:1 to subcutaneous inclisiran or placebo on days 1 and 90 and every 6 months thereafter for 540 days. Patients were stratified based on baseline eGFR (by CKD Epidemiology Collaboration equation): ≥90, 60 to <90, 45 to <60, and 15 to <45 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 . Coprimary end points were percentage change in LDL cholesterol at day 510 and time-adjusted percentage change after day 90 and through day 540. Safety was also evaluated. Results Of 3660 patients, 1610 (44%) had eGFR ≥90, 1608 (44%) 60 to <90, 300 (8%) 45 to <60, and 142 (4%) 15 to <45 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 . The mean (95% confidence interval) placebo-corrected percentage changes in LDL cholesterol from baseline at day 510 in patients with eGFR ≥90, 60 to <90, 45 to <60, and 15 to <45 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 were −49.9% (−53.2 to −46.6), −51.2% (−54.4 to −48.0), −54.7% (−62.5 to −47.0), and −44.7% (−57.6 to −31.8), respectively ( P < 0.001); the corresponding mean (95% confidence interval) time-adjusted placebo-corrected percentage changes in LDL cholesterol from baseline after day 90 through day 540 were −48.4% (−50.8 to −46.1), −51.8% (−54.2 to −49.4), −55.6% (−61.0 to −50.2), and −50.4% (−59.3 to −41.5; each P < 0.001). Significant decreases in total cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, non-HDL cholesterol, and lipoprotein(a) occurred in all eGFR groups. Inclisiran was well tolerated without new safety findings. Conclusions Inclisiran demonstrated sustained and effective LDL cholesterol reduction in patients with or at risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, regardless of baseline eGFR as low as 15 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , without new safety findings. Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov, ORION-9 (NCT03397121), ORION-10 (NCT03399370), and ORION-11 (NCT03400800).

Abstract Aims To evaluate whether the effect of inclisiran to lower LDL-C varied by background lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). Methods and results In ORION-10 and ORION-11 Phase 3 trials, patients (N = 3178) with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or ASCVD risk equivalents were randomized 1:1 to receive inclisiran or placebo on Day 1, Day 90, and 6-monthly thereafter. In this pooled post hoc analysis, patients were stratified by baseline combination therapy [statin plus ezetimibe (n = 214; 6.7%)], monotherapy [statin (n = 2711; 85.3%) or ezetimibe (n = 54; 1.7%)], or neither LLT [none (n = 199; 6.3%)] into therapy groups with/without other LLT. Stratification by baseline statin intensity was also performed (N = 3155). Relative and absolute changes in LDL-C were assessed. Mean (±SD) baseline LDL-C was 2.7 mmol/L (±1.0), 2.6 mmol/L (±0.9), 3.7 mmol/L (±1.7), and 4.1 mmol/L (±1.5) among patients receiving combination, statin, ezetimibe, or neither LLT, respectively. In these categories, mean (95% confidence interval) time-adjusted, placebo-corrected percentage change in LDL-C after Day 90 to Day 540 with inclisiran were −57.0% (−63.8, −50.1), −51.5.% (−53.4, −49.7), −50.5.% (−59.6, −41.5), and −43.1% (−48.7, −37.6); corresponding absolute changes were −1.5 mmol/L (−1.7, −1.3), −1.3 mmol/L (−1.4, −1.3), −1.7 mmol/L (−2.0, −1.4), and −1.7 mmol/L (−1.9, −1.5). Conclusion Sustained and effective LDL-C lowering with inclisiran was observed irrespective of background LLT treatment. Inclisiran was overall well tolerated with all background LLT treatments, consistent with its established safety profile.

Abstract Aims To conduct a pooled analysis of Phase 3 trials investigating the efficacy and safety of inclisiran across glycaemic and body mass index (BMI) strata. Materials and Methods Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive 300 mg inclisiran sodium or placebo twice yearly, after initial and 3‐month doses up to 18 months, with background oral lipid‐lowering therapy. Analyses were stratified by glycaemic status (normoglycaemia, prediabetes, and diabetes) or BMI (<25, ≥25 to <30, ≥30 to <35, and ≥35 kg/m 2 ). Co‐primary endpoints were percentage and time‐adjusted percentage change in low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol from baseline. Safety was also assessed. Results Baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment arms and across strata. Percent LDL cholesterol change (placebo‐corrected) with inclisiran from baseline to Day 510 ranged from −47.6% to −51.9% and from −48.8% to −54.4% across glycaemic/BMI strata, respectively. Similarly, time‐adjusted percentage changes after Day 90 and up to Day 540 ranged from −46.8% to −52.0% and from −48.6% to −53.3% across glycaemic/BMI strata, respectively. Inclisiran led to significant reductions in proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 and other atherogenic lipids and lipoproteins versus placebo across the glycaemic/BMI strata. The proportions of individuals achieving LDL cholesterol thresholds of <1.8 mmol/L and <1.4 mmol/L with inclisiran increased with increasing glycaemic and BMI strata. Across the glycaemic/BMI strata, a higher proportion of individuals had mild/moderate treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) at the injection site with inclisiran (2.8%–7.7%) versus placebo (0.2%–2.1%). Conclusion Inclisiran provided substantial and sustained LDL cholesterol lowering across glycaemic/BMI strata, with a modest excess of transient mild‐to‐moderate TEAEs at the injection site.

Abstract Aims Data describing the long-term efficacy and tolerability of inclisiran are limited. This was explored in ORION-8, an open-label extension of preceding Phase 2 and Phase 3 placebo-controlled and open-label extension trials. Methods and results Following completion of the parent trial, adult patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), ASCVD risk equivalent, or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia received open-label inclisiran twice yearly (after initial and 3-month doses) until Day 990, followed by an end-of-study visit at Day 1080 or ≥ 90 days after the last dose. The study endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving pre-specified low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals [ASCVD: &lt; 1.8 mmol/L (&lt; 70 mg/dL); ASCVD risk equivalent: &lt; 2.6 mmol/L (&lt; 100 mg/dL)], percentage and absolute changes in LDL-C at end-of-study, and safety of inclisiran. Of 3274 patients, 2446 (74.7%) were followed until end-of-study. Mean age was 64.9 ± 9.9 years, 82.7% (n = 2709) had ASCVD, and mean baseline LDL-C was 2.9 ± 1.2 mmol/L. Mean cumulative exposure to inclisiran (including parent trials) was 3.7 years; maximum exposure was 6.8 years. With inclisiran, 78.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 76.8, 80.0] of patients achieved pre-specified LDL-C goals and mean percentage change in LDL-C was −49.4% (95% CI: −50.4, −48.3). No attenuation of LDL-C lowering over time was observed. Treatment-emergent adverse events at injection site (all mild/moderate) occurred in 5.9% of the patients. Inclisiran-associated anti-drug antibodies were infrequent (5.5%) and had no impact on the efficacy or safety of inclisiran. No new safety signals were identified. Conclusion In the largest and longest follow-up to date with &gt;12 000 patient-years exposure, inclisiran demonstrated consistent and effective LDL-C lowering with a favourable long-term safety and tolerability profile. Trial Registration number ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03814187

Background: A composite metric for the quality of glycemia from continuous glucose monitor (CGM) tracings could be useful for assisting with basic clinical interpretation of CGM data. Methods: We assembled a data set of 14-day CGM tracings from 225 insulin-treated adults with diabetes. Using a balanced incomplete block design, 330 clinicians who were highly experienced with CGM analysis and interpretation ranked the CGM tracings from best to worst quality of glycemia. We used principal component analysis and multiple regressions to develop a model to predict the clinician ranking based on seven standard metrics in an Ambulatory Glucose Profile: very low–glucose and low-glucose hypoglycemia; very high–glucose and high-glucose hyperglycemia; time in range; mean glucose; and coefficient of variation. Results: The analysis showed that clinician rankings depend on two components, one related to hypoglycemia that gives more weight to very low-glucose than to low-glucose and the other related to hyperglycemia that likewise gives greater weight to very high-glucose than to high-glucose. These two components should be calculated and displayed separately, but they can also be combined into a single Glycemia Risk Index (GRI) that corresponds closely to the clinician rankings of the overall quality of glycemia (r = 0.95). The GRI can be displayed graphically on a GRI Grid with the hypoglycemia component on the horizontal axis and the hyperglycemia component on the vertical axis. Diagonal lines divide the graph into five zones (quintiles) corresponding to the best (0th to 20th percentile) to worst (81st to 100th percentile) overall quality of glycemia. The GRI Grid enables users to track sequential changes within an individual over time and compare groups of individuals. Conclusion: The GRI is a single-number summary of the quality of glycemia. Its hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia components provide actionable scores and a graphical display (the GRI Grid) that can be used by clinicians and researchers to determine the glycemic effects of prescribed and investigational treatments.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of inclisiran by diabetes status. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS ORION-1 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02597127) randomized 501 subjects with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or ASCVD risk equivalents and high LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), despite maximally tolerated LDL-C–lowering therapies, to one or two doses of placebo or inclisiran. Levels of lipids and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) at baseline and day 180 were compared. RESULTS Inclisiran was associated with marked declines in LDL-C (median −28% to −52%, P &lt; 0.0001 and −28% to −55%, P &lt; 0.005 for all doses in the without- and with-diabetes groups, respectively) and PCSK9. The inclisiran-treated groups also had lower apolipoprotein B, non-HDL cholesterol, and lipoprotein(a) but higher HDL cholesterol. Inclisiran had an adverse profile similar to that of placebo, and adverse events were proportionally balanced in the baseline with- and without-diabetes groups. CONCLUSIONS PCSK9-targeted siRNA-driven strategies may provide a novel therapeutic option for managing dyslipidemia in the presence and absence of diabetes.