Citations

Abstract BACKGROUND Lynch syndrome is caused by pathogenic germline variants in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, predisposing individuals to malignancies, including glioblastoma (GBM). MMR-deficient tumors are resistant to monofunctional alkylators such as temozolomide but not to bifunctional alkylators such as the nitrosourea lomustine. Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) pembrolizumab represents another treatment option, which is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of mismatch repair deficient cancers. METHODS We present a patient with multifocal GBM and Lynch syndrome who experienced rapid progression following standard-of-care chemoradiation, followed by durable responses to lomustine and then to pembrolizumab. RESULTS A 58-year-old man with Lynch syndrome (MSH2 mutation) and prior history of colon cancer presented with seizures. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain identified right frontal and left parietal masses. Right frontal tumor was resected; pathology was consistent with GBM, IDH wildtype, MGMT-unmethylated. Both lesions were treated with radiation therapy (60 Gy, 30 fractions) with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. After two cycles of adjuvant temozolomide, his left parietal tumor progressed and was subtotally resected, followed by four cycles of lomustine (stopped due to myelotoxicity). He remained progression-free for 15 months. Surveillance MRI identified new enhancement involving the left frontal lobe, left periventricular white matter, and right internal auditory canal, concerning for leptomeningeal dissemination. MRI spine identified no additional lesions. Cerebrospinal fluid cytology was negative for tumor cells on two occasions. Patient was treated with pembrolizumab. He remains on treatment with stable disease four months after ICI initiation and 31 months after GBM diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS Patients with MMR-deficient GBM resist standard chemoradiation. Alternatives such as nitrosourea or ICI therapy may achieve durable responses. While data is insufficient to administer these agents as upfront therapy in this specific setting, both should be considered as options for recurrent disease.

Abstract BACKGROUND BRAF pathway alterations are frequent in glial/neuroepithelial tumors. BRAF-targeted therapy with BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) and/or MEK inhibitors (MEKi) has proven efficacy in clinical trials, though mainly enrolling pediatric patients. We sought to investigate real-world data for adult patients with BRAF-pathway mutant glial/neuroepithelial neoplasms treated with BRAFi/MEKi. METHODS Adults with BRAF-pathway mutated glial/neuroepithelial neoplasms treated with BRAFi/MEKi were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS Five patients (n=4 female, median age at diagnosis 36) were identified (tumor types: glioblastoma n=1, high-grade astrocytoma with epithelioid features n=1, low-grade neuroepithelial tumor n=1, pilocytic astrocytoma n=1, pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma n=1). Four had BRAF V600E and one had NF1 p.S2687Cfs*5 mutant tumors. Prior to targeted therapy initiation, patients underwent a median 2.4 treatments including surgery (n=4), radiation therapy (n=4), chemotherapy (temozolomide n=4; carboplatin/vincristine n=1). BRAF-targeted therapies included dabrafenib/trametinib (n=4), binimetinib/encorafenib (n=2), binimetinib (n=2). One NF1-mutant glioblastoma received binimetinib followed by binimetinib/bevacizumab. Median BRAFi/MEKi treatment was 15.2 months (range: 6-36 months). Toxicities included leukopenia (n=3), peripheral edema (n=1), reduced ejection fraction (n=1), skin rash (n=5), transaminitis (n=1) with all patients requiring dose reductions and 3 cases requiring discontinuation. Among patients where BRAFi/MEKi was discontinued due to toxicity, 2 received other treatments at progression, then switched to a different BRAFi/MEKi combination, which they tolerated (duration 6-10months). Best radiographic response was partial response, noted in 3 patients treated with dabrafenib/trametinib. Four patients remain alive and continue BRAFi/MEKi. CONCLUSIONS In this cohort of heavily-pretreated patients with glial/neuroepithelial neoplasms, BRAF-targeted therapy was associated with durable responses. Interestingly, two patients who were unable to tolerate one combination of BRAFi/MEKi were able to tolerate a different combination with sustained response. Our findings support ongoing use of BRAF targeted therapy for CNS tumors. Optimal timing and duration of treatment requires further prospective evaluation in adult patients.

Abstract Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease is caused by pathogenic variants in the VHL gene. Abnormal function of VHL protein leads to accumulation of HIF-α and the engagement of hypoxia-sensitive genes with oncogenic effects. VHL is associated with tumors in multiple organs. Belzutifan is an oral selective inhibitor of hypoxia-inducible factor 2 alpha. Belzutifan was approved in 2021 as a targeted therapy for VHL-associated CNS hemangioblastomas, renal cell carcinomas, and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Here, we report on our institutional clinical experience with belzutifan for VHL-associated CNS hemangioblastomas. From October 2021 to May 2024, thirteen adults (9 female, 4 male, median age 40) were treated. Median duration of therapy was 24 months. Seven had a partial radiographic response after median of 3 months; one patient had a partial response; 1 patient had progressive disease on belzutifan. Four patients have been taking belzutifan for less than 3 months, and do not have follow-up imaging to assess response. The most common adverse effect was fatigue (7 patients). Four patients experienced anemia and 2 experienced hypoxia. Three patients discontinued belzutifan due to adverse effects. One patient had to take multiple medication pauses, due to seizure and kidney injury, but resumed treatment with dose reduction. Nine patients remain on therapy. Based on this data, belzutifan is often well-tolerated and associated with durable radiographic responses. Toxicity profile among our patients was similar to that encountered in the clinical trial leading to approval of the agent. These findings provide real-world data supporting continued use of belzutifan in this patient population, with an awareness of potential adverse reactions. Future studies should assess continued radiographic response, sex differences, and effects after long-term use.

Abstract BACKGROUND Pituitary adenomas are often effectively managed with medical therapy, surgery, and radiation therapy. However, up to 15% of pituitary neoplasms exhibit rapid growth, invasive behavior, or, rarely, metastasize despite optimal standard treatments. Temozolomide is associated with a survival benefit for patients with these aggressive pituitary tumors. METHODS We present a case series of 8 patients with an aggressive pituitary tumor (APT) or pituitary carcinoma (PC) treated with temozolomide. RESULTS Eight patients (3 female, median age at diagnosis 44) with APT (n=6) or PC (n=2) were treated. A variety of pituitary tumor types were represented (1 prolactinoma, 5 corticotroph adenomas, 1 gonadotroph adenoma, 1 thyrotropinoma). Prior to temozolomide initiation, patients underwent a median 5 treatments including medical management (n=4), surgery (n=7), radiation therapy (n=7). Temozolomide was started at median 3.5 recurrence. Median treatment duration was 6 cycles (n=6, 150-200 mg/m2 days 1-5, 28-day cycles; n=1, 75 mg/m2, days 1-21, 28-day cycles). Seven patients experienced progression after temozolomide treatment, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4 months. One patient remains on treatment, progression-free at 5 months. MGMT methylation status was assessed for 3 tumors. Among 2 patients with MGMT promoter methylated tumors, PFS was 4 months for one patient, the other remains on treatment. For one patient with MGMT promoter unmethylated corticotroph adenoma, PFS was 9 months. No ≥ grade 4 toxicities were noted. Most common toxicities were nausea (n=5), thrombocytopenia (n=3), and fatigue (n=2). CONCLUSION In this group of heavily pretreated patients, temozolomide monotherapy was well-tolerated and associated with median PFS of 4 months. Interestingly, PC patients had longer PFS at 9 months and 24 months. Our findings support use of single-agent temozolomide chemotherapy for patients with APT/PC, but further prospective analysis is needed to identify patients more likely to benefit from treatment and optimal timing of chemotherapy initiation.

PURPOSE The nodal burden of patients with residual isolated tumor cells (ITCs) in the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) (ypN0i+) is unknown, and axillary management is not standardized. We investigated rates of additional positive lymph nodes (LNs) at axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and oncologic outcomes in patients with ypN0i+ treated with and without ALND. METHODS The Oncoplastic Breast Consortium-05/ICARO cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06464341 ) retrospectively analyzed data from patients with stage I to III breast cancer with ITCs in SLNs after NAC from 62 centers in 18 countries. The primary end point was the 3-year rate of any axillary recurrence. The rate of any invasive recurrence was the secondary end point. RESULTS In total, 583 patients were included, of whom 182 (31%) had completion ALND and 401 (69%) did not. The median age was 48 years. Most patients (74%) were clinically node-positive at diagnosis and 41% had hormone receptor–positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative tumors. The mean number of SLNs with ITCs was 1.2. Patients treated with ALND were more likely to present with cN2/3 disease (17% v 7%, P < .001), have ITCs detected on frozen section (62% v 8%, P < .001), have lymphovascular invasion (38% v 24%, P < .001), and receive adjuvant chest wall (89% v 78%, P = .024) and nodal radiation (82% v 75%, P = .038). Additional positive nodes were found at ALND in 30% of patients, but only 5% had macrometastases. The 3-year rates of any axillary and any invasive recurrence were 2% (95% CI, 0.95 to 3.6) and 11% (95% CI, 8 to 14), respectively, with no statistical difference by type of axillary surgery. CONCLUSION The nodal burden in patients with ypN0(i+) was low, and axillary recurrence after ALND omission was rare in patients selected for this approach. These results do not support routine ALND in all patients with ypN0(i+).

Abstract 3D printing, also known as additive manufacturing, holds immense potential for rapid prototyping and customized production of functional health‐related devices. With advancements in polymer chemistry and biomedical engineering, polymeric biomaterials have become integral to 3D‐printed biomedical applications. However, there still exists a bottleneck in the compatibility of polymeric biomaterials with different 3D printing methods, as well as intrinsic challenges such as limited printing resolution and rates. Therefore, this review aims to introduce the current state‐of‐the‐art in 3D‐printed functional polymeric health‐related devices. It begins with an overview of the landscape of 3D printing techniques, followed by an examination of commonly used polymeric biomaterials. Subsequently, examples of 3D‐printed biomedical devices are provided and classified into categories such as biosensors, bioactuators, soft robotics, energy storage systems, self‐powered devices, and data science in bioplotting. The emphasis is on exploring the current capabilities of 3D printing in manufacturing polymeric biomaterials into desired geometries that facilitate device functionality and studying the reasons for material choice. Finally, an outlook with challenges and possible improvements in the near future is presented, projecting the contribution of general 3D printing and polymeric biomaterials in the field of healthcare.

Background Despite advances in cancer care and detection, >65% of patients with squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (HNSCC) will develop recurrent and/or metastatic disease. The prognosis for these patients is poor with a 5-year overall survival of 39%. Recent treatment advances in immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint inhibitors like pembrolizumab and nivolumab, have resulted in clinical benefit in a subset of patients. There is a critical clinical need to identify patients who benefit from these antiprogrammed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods Here, we report findings from a multicenter observational study, PREDicting immunotherapy efficacy from Analysis of Pre-treatment Tumor biopsies (PREDAPT), conducted across 17 US healthcare systems. PREDAPT aimed to validate OncoPrism-HNSCC, a clinical biomarker assay predictive of disease control in patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC treated with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors as a single agent (monotherapy) and in combination with chemotherapy (chemo-immunotherapy). The test used RNA-sequencing data and machine learning models to score each patient and place them into groups of low, medium, or high. Results The OncoPrism-HNSCC prediction significantly correlated with disease control in both the monotherapy cohort (n=62, p=0.004) and the chemo-immunotherapy cohort (n=50, p=0.01). OncoPrism-HNSCC also significantly predicted progression-free survival in both cohorts (p=0.015 and p=0.037, respectively). OncoPrism-HNSCC had more than threefold higher specificity than programmed death-ligand 1 combined positive score and nearly fourfold higher sensitivity than tumor mutational burden for predicting disease control. Conclusions Here, we demonstrate the clinical validity of the OncoPrism-HNSCC assay in identifying patients with disease control in response to anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors. Trial registration number NCT04510129.

BACKGROUND Despite an overall poor prognosis, about 15% of patients with advanced-stage tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) survive 10 or more years after standard treatment. METHODS We evaluated the tumor microenvironment of this exceptional, understudied group using a large international cohort enriched for long-term survivors (LTS; 10+ years; n = 374) compared with mid-term (MTS; 5–7.99 years; n = 433) and short-term survivors (STS; 2–4.99 years; n = 416). Primary tumor samples were immunostained and scored for intraepithelial and intrastromal densities of 10 immune-cell subsets (including T cells, B cells, plasma cells, myeloid cells, PD-1 + cells, and PD-L1 + cells) and epithelial content. RESULTS Positive associations with LTS compared with STS were seen for 9 of 10 immune-cell subsets. In particular, the combination of intraepithelial CD8 + T cells and intrastromal B cells showed near 5-fold increased odds of LTS compared with STS. All of these associations were stronger in tumors with high epithelial content and/or the C4/Differentiated molecular subtype, despite immune-cell densities generally being higher in tumors with low epithelial content and/or the C2/Immunoreactive molecular subtype. CONCLUSION The tumor microenvironment of HGSC LTS is distinguished by the intersection of T and B cell coinfiltration, high epithelial content, and C4/differentiated molecular subtype, features which may inspire new approaches to immunotherapy. FUNDING Ovarian Cancer Research Program (OCRP) of the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program (CDMRP), U.S. Department of Defense (DOD); American Cancer Society; BC Cancer Foundation; Canada’s Networks of Centres of Excellence; Canadian Cancer Society; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Cancer Councils of New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia, and Tasmania, Cancer Foundation of Western Australia; Cancer Institute NSW; Cancer Research UK; Deutsche Forschungsgesellschaft; ELAN Funds of the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg; Fred C. and Katherine B. Andersen Foundation; Genome BC; German Cancer Research Center; German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Programme of Clinical Biomedical Research; Instituto de Salud Carlos III; Mayo Foundation; Minnesota Ovarian Cancer Alliance; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Medical Research Council (MRC); National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC); Ovarian Cancer Australia; Peter MacCallum Foundation; Sydney West Translational Cancer Research Centre; Terry Fox Research Institute; The Eve Appeal (The Oak Foundation); UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centres at the University of Cambridge; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; U.S. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health; VGH & UBC Hospital Foundation; Victorian Cancer Agency.