Sasamoto, Naoko

Abstract Background: Ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC) comprise four distinct molecular subtypes based on mRNA expression patterns, with differential survival. Understanding risk factor associations is important to elucidate the etiology of HGSC. We investigated associations between different epidemiologic risk factors and HGSC molecular subtypes. Methods: We pooled data from 11 case–control studies with epidemiologic and tumor gene expression data from custom NanoString CodeSets developed through a collaboration within the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium. The PrOTYPE-validated NanoString-based 55-gene classifier was used to assign HGSC gene expression subtypes. We examined associations between epidemiologic factors and HGSC subtypes in 2,070 cases and 16,633 controls using multivariable-adjusted polytomous regression models. Results: Among the 2,070 HGSC cases, 556 (27%) were classified as C1.MES, 340 (16%) as C5.PRO, 538 (26%) as C2.IMM, and 636 (31%) as C4.DIF. The key factors, including oral contraceptive use, parity, breastfeeding, and family history of ovarian cancer, were similarly associated with all subtypes. Heterogeneity was observed for several factors. Former smoking [OR = 1.25; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.03, 1.51] and genital powder use (OR = 1.42; 95% CI = 1.08, 1.86) were uniquely associated with C2.IMM. History of endometriosis was associated with C5.PRO (OR = 1.46; 95% CI = 0.98, 2.16) and C4.DIF (OR = 1.27; 95% CI = 0.94, 1.71) only. Family history of breast cancer (OR = 1.44; 95% CI = 1.16, 1.78) and current smoking (OR = 1.40; 95% CI = 1.11, 1.76) were associated with C4.DIF only. Conclusions: This study observed heterogeneous associations of epidemiologic and modifiable factors with HGSC molecular subtypes. Impact: The different patterns of associations may provide key information about the etiology of the four subtypes.

BACKGROUND Despite an overall poor prognosis, about 15% of patients with advanced-stage tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) survive 10 or more years after standard treatment. METHODS We evaluated the tumor microenvironment of this exceptional, understudied group using a large international cohort enriched for long-term survivors (LTS; 10+ years; n = 374) compared with mid-term (MTS; 5–7.99 years; n = 433) and short-term survivors (STS; 2–4.99 years; n = 416). Primary tumor samples were immunostained and scored for intraepithelial and intrastromal densities of 10 immune-cell subsets (including T cells, B cells, plasma cells, myeloid cells, PD-1 + cells, and PD-L1 + cells) and epithelial content. RESULTS Positive associations with LTS compared with STS were seen for 9 of 10 immune-cell subsets. In particular, the combination of intraepithelial CD8 + T cells and intrastromal B cells showed near 5-fold increased odds of LTS compared with STS. All of these associations were stronger in tumors with high epithelial content and/or the C4/Differentiated molecular subtype, despite immune-cell densities generally being higher in tumors with low epithelial content and/or the C2/Immunoreactive molecular subtype. CONCLUSION The tumor microenvironment of HGSC LTS is distinguished by the intersection of T and B cell coinfiltration, high epithelial content, and C4/differentiated molecular subtype, features which may inspire new approaches to immunotherapy. FUNDING Ovarian Cancer Research Program (OCRP) of the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program (CDMRP), U.S. Department of Defense (DOD); American Cancer Society; BC Cancer Foundation; Canada’s Networks of Centres of Excellence; Canadian Cancer Society; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Cancer Councils of New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland, South Australia, and Tasmania, Cancer Foundation of Western Australia; Cancer Institute NSW; Cancer Research UK; Deutsche Forschungsgesellschaft; ELAN Funds of the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg; Fred C. and Katherine B. Andersen Foundation; Genome BC; German Cancer Research Center; German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Programme of Clinical Biomedical Research; Instituto de Salud Carlos III; Mayo Foundation; Minnesota Ovarian Cancer Alliance; Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad; Medical Research Council (MRC); National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC); Ovarian Cancer Australia; Peter MacCallum Foundation; Sydney West Translational Cancer Research Centre; Terry Fox Research Institute; The Eve Appeal (The Oak Foundation); UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centres at the University of Cambridge; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; U.S. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health; VGH & UBC Hospital Foundation; Victorian Cancer Agency.

AbstractBackgroundCyclin E1 (CCNE1) is a potential predictive marker and therapeutic target in tubo‐ovarian high‐grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). Smaller studies have revealed unfavorable associations for CCNE1 amplification and CCNE1 overexpression with survival, but to date no large‐scale, histotype‐specific validation has been performed. The hypothesis was that high‐level amplification of CCNE1 and CCNE1 overexpression, as well as a combination of the two, are linked to shorter overall survival in HGSC.MethodsWithin the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium, amplification status and protein level in 3029 HGSC cases and mRNA expression in 2419 samples were investigated.ResultsHigh‐level amplification (>8 copies by chromogenic in situ hybridization) was found in 8.6% of HGSC and overexpression (>60% with at least 5% demonstrating strong intensity by immunohistochemistry) was found in 22.4%. CCNE1 high‐level amplification and overexpression both were linked to shorter overall survival in multivariate survival analysis adjusted for age and stage, with hazard stratification by study (hazard ratio [HR], 1.26; 95% CI, 1.08‐1.47, p = .034, and HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.05‐1.32, p = .015, respectively). This was also true for cases with combined high‐level amplification/overexpression (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.09‐1.47, p = .033). CCNE1 mRNA expression was not associated with overall survival (HR, 1.00 per 1‐SD increase; 95% CI, 0.94‐1.06; p = .58). CCNE1 high‐level amplification is mutually exclusive with the presence of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants and shows an inverse association to RB1 loss.ConclusionThis study provides large‐scale validation that CCNE1 high‐level amplification is associated with shorter survival, supporting its utility as a prognostic biomarker in HGSC.

Abstract Introduction: There is growing evidence to support a modest inverse association between daily aspirin use and ovarian cancer risk. We previously hypothesized that this association may differ by immune cell infiltration. In our prior study evaluating heterogeneity by tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) infiltration, aspirin use was associated with lower risk of ovarian cancer with high protumorigenic M2-type TAM infiltration, but not low M2-type TAM infiltration. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the hypothesis that the association between aspirin use and ovarian cancer risk also differs by infiltration with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Methods: We included cases and matched controls from the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS), NHSII, and New England Case Control Study. Study participants self-reported aspirin use including regular use (≥1 x per week), duration of use, and number of tablets. A gynecologic pathologist (JLH), who was blinded to exposure status, reviewed hematoxylin and eosin stained tumor slides to quantify TILs for all cases (n=547). We used polytomous logistic regression, adjusted for ovarian cancer risk factors, to estimate odds ratios (OR) for aspirin use and ovarian cancer risk by TIL infiltration. Results: Overall, recent aspirin use was associated with lower risk of ovarian cancer compared with no regular aspirin use (OR=0.65, 95%CI=0.47-0.89). Recent aspirin use was associated with a lower risk of ovarian cancer exhibiting TIL infiltration (OR=0.38, 95%CI=0.26-0.56) but not with TIL-negative cancers (OR=1.00, 95%CI=0.71-1.41; p-heterogeneity <0.001). We observed similar results for aspirin duration and tablets. For duration, comparing ≥10 years of aspirin use to <1 year we observed a significantly lower risk of ovarian cancer with TILs (OR=0.47, 95%CI=0.41-0.71; p-trend=0.004), but a nonsignificant reduction for ovarian cancer without TILs (OR=0.86, 95%CI=0.59-1.26; p-trend=0.72; p-heterogeneity=0.03). Comparing ≥6 tablets to <1 tablet per week, there was evidence of a lower risk of ovarian cancer with TILs (OR=0.47, 95%CI=0.30-0.75; p-trend=0.001) but not without TILs (OR=1.02, 95%CI=0.70-1.48; p-trend=0.84; p-heterogeneity=0.003). Conclusions: Our results suggest that prediagnosis aspirin use may be an important modulator of immune cell infiltration in ovarian tumors, supporting an immunogenic mechanism for aspirin in ovarian carcinogenesis. Further work is under way to evaluate nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and to consider which subsets of TAMs and TILs may be driving heterogeneity in the associations between anti-inflammatory drugs and ovarian cancer risk. Citation Format: Mollie E. Barnard, Britton Trabert, Jonathan L. Hecht, Ellen L. Goode, Naoko Sasamoto, Kathryn L. Terry, Shelley S. Tworoger. Aspirin use and ovarian cancer risk by lymphocyte infiltration [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Modernizing Population Sciences in the Digital Age; 2019 Feb 19-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020;29(9 Suppl):Abstract nr A19.