Citations

The total number of total hip arthroplasties performed each year is expected to increase significantly over the coming decades. As a result, an increasing number of young patients are undergoing total hip arthroplasty while similarly, a growing subset of active elderly patients desire to return to sports or high-impact activity after surgery. Patients are typically provided restrictions and activities to avoid following surgery. For these patients, there is no clear consensus or guidelines regarding whether they should limit their activity level postoperatively and in particular, if returning to high-impact exercise increases their risk of complications and subsequent revision surgery. This article will discuss the most common complications after total hip arthroplasty and whether patients who return to sports or a high-impact activity after surgery may be more predisposed to these complications in comparison to their more sedentary peers.

OBJECTIVE This study examines the recovery rates of patients who experience postoperative dysphagia within 1 month following cervical spine surgery. METHODS Data from a prospectively maintained multi-institutional quality registry were retrospectively analyzed. Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) questionnaire scores were collected at baseline and 1, 3, and 12 months postoperatively, with total scores ≥ 3 indicating dysphagia. Patients were grouped by whether they reported baseline dysphagia to assess the impact of baseline dysphagia on recovery. Recovery was defined as resolution of postoperative dysphagia and not reporting the condition at any follow-up time point. Patients were excluded from the recovery model if they did not report dysphagia within 1 month of surgery. Recovery to baseline was defined as reporting a postoperative EAT-10 score equal to or less than the baseline score at subsequent time points. Patients were excluded from the recovery-to-baseline model if they did not report EAT-10 scores within 1 month of surgery that were worse than their baseline score. Survival curves were generated for both models. RESULTS Of the 2003 patients in the registry, 627 met inclusion criteria for the recovery curve and 714 for the recovery-to-baseline curve. Of the patients without baseline dysphagia, 498 developed new postoperative dysphagia within 1 month, with cumulative recovery probabilities of 39.5% by 3 months and 59.1% by 12 months after cervical spine surgery. Furthermore, of the patients without baseline dysphagia, 73.5% (175/238) who reported no dysphagia at 3 months and 32.5% (68/209) who reported no dysphagia at 12 months experienced long-term recovery. Eighty patients with baseline dysphagia reported worse EAT-10 scores within 1 month, with cumulative probabilities of improvement to baseline or below of 37.7% by 3 months and 54.1% by 12 months. Patients with baseline dysphagia were significantly less likely to recover than patients without baseline dysphagia (hazard ratio [HR] 0.37, 95% CI 0.26–0.53; p < 0.001) but significantly more likely to recover to baseline (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.05–2.00; p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS Patients who develop postoperative dysphagia within 1 month of cervical spine surgery generally see symptomatic improvement over time. This analysis may aid in clinical decision-making when informing patients about the risk of developing postoperative dysphagia and the recovery rate of this surgical complication.

Abstract Introduction Distinct temperature patterns have long been recognized to correlate with fevers of differing etiologies. While the use of wearable sensors for high-frequency temperature monitoring (HFTM) on a near minute-by-minute basis has been shown to detect fevers earlier than standard-of-care nursing vital sign assessments in hospitalized patients, leveraging these high-resolution datasets to computationally identify unique digital signatures for real-time diagnosis of underlying fever etiology has not been widely explored. Diagnostic uncertainty is common in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT), with only 20–30% of febrile neutropenic episodes being microbiologically documented. We hypothesized that unique temperature patterns extracted from HFTM data collected during episodes of febrile neutropenia could be used to develop a supervised machine learning classifier capable of accurately predicting underlying fever etiology in HCT patients. Methods We analyzed 68 clinically independent fever episodes recorded in HCT patients (n=90) outfitted with an FDA-cleared wireless temperature sensor (TempTraq®, BlueSpark Technologies) that measured axillary temperature every 2 minutes throughout hospitalization. Time-series features were extracted from temperature traces spanning 1 hour before to 3 hours after fever onset and used to train a suite of machine-learning models to distinguish engraftment fevers from other fever etiologies. Model training and evaluation were performed using repeated stratified 5-fold patient-level cross-validation, yielding 100 train-test evaluations. Results Among all classification models, the logistic regression classifier provided the best overall performance and interpretability, achieving 94% specificity (95% CI, 0.84–1.0) for identifying engraftment fevers with a mean AUROC of 0.88 ± 0.10. Feature importance analysis demonstrated that both clinical variables and HFTM-derived temperature dynamics contributed to model performance, with a strong reliance on time-series features captured within the first 4 hours of fever onset. Conclusion Our study provides a demonstration that continuous temperature data collected from patients outfitted with wearable sensors can be leveraged not only for early fever detection but also for machine learning–based diagnosis of fever etiology. These findings suggest that dynamic temperature patterns contain clinically meaningful physiologic information that with further studies could support real-time diagnostic decision-making and guide safe de-escalation of empiric antibiotics during febrile neutropenia in patients undergoing intensive cancer therapy.

ABSTRACT Pediatric radiation therapy presents unique challenges compared to adult treatments, including those of immobilization, potential need for sedation, and the critical importance of accurate, reproducible positioning. Additionally, heightened attention to imaging doses is necessary to minimize long‐term toxicity in survivors. Many of these challenges must be addressed during the process of simulation. This report provides guidelines for pediatric radiotherapy simulation from the Children's Oncology Group. These guidelines cover all anatomic sites and include recommendations for photon and proton therapies, as well as specialized procedures such as stereotactic body radiation therapy, brachytherapy, and total body irradiation. These guidelines are presented as recommendations rather than prescriptive standards as the practice will vary depending on patient age, diagnosis, clinical judgment, and institutional resources.

Hospital medicine offers diverse career opportunities, yet formal guidance for residents pursuing hospitalist careers is often lacking. To address this gap, the Hospital Internal Medicine Interest Group (HIMIG) was launched at an academic institution in the Southeastern United States to provide structured mentorship and professional development. Residents expressing interest completed an entry survey to identify career goals and areas of focus, informing a longitudinal curriculum that included education, leadership, research, quality improvement, and networking. Seventeen residents (≈25% of the IM residency program) joined HIMIG, and 88% completed the initial survey. Education, leadership, and quality improvement were top interests, while mentorship and career guidance were primary motivators. A post-implementation survey revealed all participants met mentors and felt HIMIG supported their career goals. HIMIG demonstrates a flexible, personalized approach to hospitalist career development that may serve as a model for other programs.

Although structured reporting of adverse events related to medical therapies is a critical aspect of clinical trials, the current practice fails to capture postoperative complications accurately or systematically, which precludes our ability to fully assess the impact of the risks of surgical interventions on oncologic outcomes. The incorporation of standardized, procedure‐specific definitions and severity classifications for postoperative complications into adverse event reporting in trials conducted through the National Clinical Trials Network is proposed.

Background The management of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) is challenging, with 2 main options being conservative and surgical management. Orthobiologic therapies come to bridge the gap between these 2 options; however, inconsistencies in indication, composition, and heterogeneous evidence limit clinical decision-making. To address these challenges, 3 International Congress Meetings on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle were convened in Pittsburgh, USA (2017), Dublin, Ireland (2019), and New York, USA (2025) to establish agreement on the role of conservative management and injectable orthobiologic strategies in the treatment of OLT. Methods Seventy-five multidisciplinary experts from over 25 countries and 1 territory participated in a structured Delphi-based consensus process. Blinded surveys, structured questionnaires, and in-person discussions were used to develop and refine statements, supported by literature review and graded evidence (A1–E). Consensus strength was defined as consensus (51%-74%), strong consensus (75%-99%), or unanimous (100%) Results In total, 29 consensus statements were achieved across the 3 meetings. Strong agreement was reached regarding indications and expected outcomes of conservative management, including the role of immobilization and appropriate timing for surgical intervention. Orthobiologic injections, including platelet-rich plasma, concentrated bone marrow aspirate, and hyaluronic acid, were considered appropriate in select patients with persistent symptoms, although no superiority was demonstrated among formulations, preparation methods, or injection strategies. When used as adjuncts to surgical procedures, orthobiologics may improve radiological outcomes, with limited evidence for improvement in clinical outcomes. Technical considerations, including preferred harvest sites and a lack of standardized preparation protocols, were identified, along with key principles for patient counseling Conclusion These international consensus statements establish a standardized framework for the conservative management and use of injectable orthobiologic therapies in OLT. By clarifying indications, technical considerations, and current limitations, this work aims to improve consistency in clinical practice, guide treatment decision-making, and inform future research.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study proposes and assesses the validity of postoperative dysphagia severity categories based on patients' Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) scores and quality-of-life patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) collected before and after cervical spine surgery. METHODS: A prospectively collected multi-institutional quality registry including 2003 patients was retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized based on EAT-10 score severities, with thresholds determined by existing literature and significant differences in PROMs: none (0-2), mild (3-4), moderate (5-15), and severe (16-40). Correlations between EAT-10 severity and established PROMs were assessed at baseline, 3-, and 12-month follow-ups. The Dunn test using Bonferroni adjustment was used to identify differences in PROMs between EAT-10 severities. Multivariate linear regression assessed how EAT-10 severity affects PROMs at baseline, 3-, and 12-month follow-ups. RESULTS: Among 1659 patients with 3-month EAT-10 data, there were 1183 no, 149 mild, 245 moderate, and 82 severe dysphagia patients. Neck Disability Index and EuroQol 5-Dimension scores were significantly different between none vs mild ( P < .001; P = .001), mild vs moderate ( P < .001; P < .001), and moderate vs severe ( P = .035; P = .024) at 3 months. Among 1405 patients with 12-month EAT-10 data, there were 1044 no, 100 mild, 194 moderate, and 67 severe dysphagia patients. Neck Disability Index scores were significantly different between none vs mild ( P < .001) and moderate vs severe ( P = .004) but not for mild vs moderate ( P > .9) at 12 months. EuroQol 5-Dimension scores were significantly different between none vs mild ( P = .004) and mild vs moderate ( P = .005) but not for moderate vs severe ( P = .08). In multivariate regression, EAT-10 severity categories independently predicted worse PROMs at all time points. CONCLUSION: We propose none (0-2), mild (3-4), moderate (5-15), and severe (16-40) dysphagia categories based on EAT-10 scores. Evidence from univariate and multivariate analyses strengthens the validity of our proposed EAT-10 severity categories, providing statistical justification for their incorporation into clinical practice.

Abstract Background Presacral tumours are rare, heterogeneous lesions. Historical classification systems for presacral tumours have provided a valuable framework, but were based on limited available data. This study aimed to develop a contemporary classification aligned with current tumour entities and clinical practice. Methods A prospectively registered systematic review of surgically managed presacral tumours published from 1975 to 2025 was combined with a retrospective multisite institutional surgical pathology review from 1986 to 2025. Pathological descriptors were extracted, cross-referenced, harmonized to current terminology, and organized through multidisciplinary expert review to obtain a new classification. Results The systematic review identified 5997 records, of which 203 studies met the inclusion criteria and contributed 181 pathological terms after generic and unclassifiable diagnoses were removed. Review of 3606 pathology reports identified 19 additional terms, bringing the total to 200 pathological terms. After harmonization to current terminology and exclusion of non-neoplastic processes, a contemporary classification was developed using biological descriptors: developmental versus acquired origin; tissue lineage (neurogenic, osseous/haematopoietic, soft tissue, or miscellaneous); and tumour behaviour (benign, locally recurrent without metastatic potential, locally recurrent with low metastatic potential, malignant non-sarcoma, or malignant sarcoma). Conclusion The Mayo Clinic classification of presacral tumours updates historical systems by reflecting the broader, more modern spectrum of neoplasms and distinguishing lesions by lineage and biological behaviour. It may improve diagnostic clarity, communication, and selection of appropriate observation, multidisciplinary assessment, and treatment pathways.