ABSTRACT Pediatric radiation therapy presents unique challenges compared to adult treatments, including those of immobilization, potential need for sedation, and the critical importance of accurate, reproducible positioning. Additionally, heightened attention to imaging doses is necessary to minimize long‐term toxicity in survivors. Many of these challenges must be addressed during the process of simulation. This report provides guidelines for pediatric radiotherapy simulation from the Children's Oncology Group. These guidelines cover all anatomic sites and include recommendations for photon and proton therapies, as well as specialized procedures such as stereotactic body radiation therapy, brachytherapy, and total body irradiation. These guidelines are presented as recommendations rather than prescriptive standards as the practice will vary depending on patient age, diagnosis, clinical judgment, and institutional resources.
Evaluation of SrAl2O4:Eu, Dy phosphor for potential applications in thermoluminescent dosimetry
AbstractPurposeTo evaluate the use of commercial‐grade strontium aluminate phosphorescent powder as a thermoluminescent (TL) dosimeter for clinical radiotherapy beams.Materials and MethodCommercially available Eu2+, Dy3+ co‐doped strontium aluminate powder (SrAl2O4:Eu, Dy) was annealed and then irradiated using 20 × 20 cm2 field size, with 6‐MV (PDD10 = 70.7) and 18‐MV (PDD10 = 79.4) photon beams and and 9‐MeV (R50 = 3.6), 15 MeV (R50 = 5.9) and 18‐MeV (R50 = 7.2) electron beams. To calibrate the relationship between the TL readings and the irradiated doses, TL glow curves were acquired for doses up to 600 cGy at all beam energies. For the percentage depth dose (PDD) measurement, the SrAl2O4:Eu, Dy powder was sandwiched by solid water phantoms, with varying thickness of solid water placed above to determine the depth. PDDs were measured at four representative depths and compared against the commissioning depth dose data for each beam energy.ResultsLinear dose response models of doses up to 200 cGy were created for all beam energies. Superlinearity was observed with doses greater than 200 cGy. The PDD measurement acquired experimentally agrees well with the commissioning data of the medical linear accelerator. Trapping parameters such as order of kinetics, activation energy and frequency factor have been obtained via TL glow curve analysis.ConclusionThe linear dose response demonstrates that SrAl2O4:Eu, Dy is a potential TLD dosimeter for both electron beams and photon beams at different beam energies. The PDD measurements further support its potential use in quality assurance and radiation dosimetry.