Casey, Dana L

ABSTRACT Pediatric radiation therapy presents unique challenges compared to adult treatments, including those of immobilization, potential need for sedation, and the critical importance of accurate, reproducible positioning. Additionally, heightened attention to imaging doses is necessary to minimize long‐term toxicity in survivors. Many of these challenges must be addressed during the process of simulation. This report provides guidelines for pediatric radiotherapy simulation from the Children's Oncology Group. These guidelines cover all anatomic sites and include recommendations for photon and proton therapies, as well as specialized procedures such as stereotactic body radiation therapy, brachytherapy, and total body irradiation. These guidelines are presented as recommendations rather than prescriptive standards as the practice will vary depending on patient age, diagnosis, clinical judgment, and institutional resources.

Summary Outcomes for high‐risk paediatric classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) improved with the addition of brentuximab vedotin (Bv) to doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide, prednisone and cyclophosphamide (AVEPC) chemotherapy. We evaluated the prognostic implications of distant extra‐nodal sites contributing to stage IV disease. On AHOD1331 (NCT02166463), patients aged 2–21 years with high‐risk cHL (stage IIB with bulk/IIIB/IVA/IVB) were randomized to 5 cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine, etoposide, prednisone and cyclophosphamide (ABVE‐PC) versus Bv‐AVEPC. Patients with stage IV disease, determined by protocol‐defined and centrally reviewed Positron Emission Tomography ‐ Computed Tomography (PET‐CT), were identified. Baseline characteristics and progression‐free survival (PFS) were compared by pattern of stage IV involvement (lung, bone, bone marrow, multiple sites and others). A total of 340 patients (median age 15 years) with stage IV disease were included. Of these patients, 173 (51%) received ABVE‐PC and 167 (49%) Bv‐AVEPC. PFS was highest with lung‐only involvement (4‐year PFS 88.6%) and lowest with bone marrow‐only involvement (4‐year PFS 71.9%). Compared to ABVE‐PC, Bv‐AVEPC improved PFS among all stage IV patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53, 90% confidence interval (CI) 0.33–0.85) and in the lung‐only and bone‐only subgroups. However, no PFS benefit was observed in those with bone marrow‐only involvement. Among paediatric patients with stage IV cHL, Bv‐AVEPC improved PFS across most patterns of stage IV disease, except in those with bone marrow involvement. These results will guide efforts to improve outcomes among children with stage IV cHL.

ABSTRACTAccurate staging of nodal involvement in pediatric sarcoma patients is important to determine correct systemic and local therapy, with the goal to reduce subsequent recurrences. However, differences in lymph node staging strategies, definitions, and treatment protocols between the Children's Oncology Group (COG), European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG), and the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe (CWS) complicate comparisons. In this article, we aim to establish internationally recognized recommendations for lymph node assessment and treatment of children and adolescents diagnosed with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) and non‐rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS) according to the Consensus Conference Standard Operating Procedure methodology.

Accurate staging of nodal involvement in pediatric sarcoma patients is important to determine correct systemic and local therapy, with the goal to reduce subsequent recurrences. However, differences in lymph node staging strategies, definitions, and treatment protocols between the Children’s Oncology Group (COG), European Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG), and the Cooperative Weichteil Sarkom Studiengruppe (CWS), complicate comparisons. In this article we try to establish internationally recognized recommendations for lymph node assessment and treatment of children and adolescents diagnosed with RMS and NRSTS according to the Consensus Conference Standard Operating Procedure methodology.

Background Most children with intermediate‐risk rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) have gross disease (group III) at the initiation of chemotherapy. Delayed primary excision (DPE) after induction chemotherapy allows for a reduction in adjuvant radiation dose, but with the risk of potential surgical morbidity. The objectives of this study were to compare outcomes in children with group III RMS who did and did not undergo DPE and to assess surgical morbidity. Methods The study included 369 patients who had clinical group III RMS at sites amenable to DPE from intermediate‐risk Children's Oncology Group studies D9803 (encouraged DPE) and ARST0531 (discouraged DPE). Results The primary tumor site was bladder/prostate (136 patients; 37%), extremity (97 patients; 26%), trunk (24 patients; 7%), retroperitoneum (91 patients; 25%), or intrathoracic/perineum/perianal (21 patients; 6%). In total, 112 patients (53.9%) underwent DPE in D9803, and 26 patients (16.2%) underwent DPE in ARST0531 ( P < .001), with loss of vital organ or function in 30 of 138 patients (22%). DPE allowed for a reduced radiation dose in 110 of 135 patients (81%; 51% were reduced to 36 Gy, and 30% were reduced to 42 Gy). Patients who underwent DPE had improved unadjusted overall survival ( P = .013). In adjusted regression analysis, the risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI 0.43‐1.16) was similar for patients who did and did not undergo DPE and was improved for the subset of patients who had tumors of the trunk and retroperitoneum (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.20‐0.97). Conclusions Children with group III RMS have equivalent or improved outcomes with DPE and can receive a decreased radiation dose for definitive local control. The choice of local control modality should weigh the potential morbidity of surgery versus that of higher dose irradiation.

Background The objective of this study was to evaluate local control for patients with intermediate‐risk rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) treated on Children's Oncology Group (COG) protocol ARST0531. Methods This study analyzed 424 patients with intermediate‐risk RMS. Patients were randomized to chemotherapy with either vincristine, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide (VAC) or VAC alternating with vincristine and irinotecan. With the goal of improving local control, radiation therapy (RT) was delivered early at week 4 and was concurrent with irinotecan in the experimental arm. Individualized local control plans for children 24 months old or younger were allowed. Local failure on ARST0531 was compared with local failure on the preceding COG intermediate‐risk study, D9803. Results For patients with group I/II alveolar RMS (n = 55), the 5‐year cumulative incidence of local failure was 13.4%; for group III alveolar RMS (n = 141), it was 20.2%; and for group III embryonal RMS (n = 228), it was 27.9% ( P = .03). Among patients with group III disease, local failure did not differ by histology, site, nodal status, RT modality, or treatment arm. Local failure was worse for a tumor size >5 cm (32.3% vs 16.7%; P = .001). Among patients with group III embryonal RMS, local failure was higher on ARST0531 than D9803 (27.9% vs 19.4%; P = .03). After the exclusion of patients 24 months old or younger or patients who did not receive radiation, local failure remained significantly increased on ARST0531 ( P = .02). After adjustments for clinical prognostic factors, event‐free survival and overall survival were worse on ARST0531 ( P = .004 and P = .05, respectively). Conclusions Despite interventions designed to enhance local control, local control was inferior on ARST0531 in comparison with D9803. The reason for this is unclear, but it could be the reduced cyclophosphamide dose on ARST0531.