Jaikumar, Vinay

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) are increasingly detected and require careful management to prevent rupture. No externally validated score currently predicts procedural risk to guide treatment decisions. We developed and validated 2 predictive scores for complications after endovascular treatment (EVT) or neurosurgical treatment (NT) of UIA using routinely collected clinical and aneurysmal features. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study including patients with UIA treated with EVT or NT across 15 neurovascular centers (2014-2024). Predictive models were built using multivariable logistic regression, with variables derived from Delphi consensus. The primary outcome was a composite safety end point: new neurological deficits, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) worsening (≥1 point or mRS 2-5 within 30 days), or procedural death. Internal validation used bootstrapping, and external validation was performed temporally and institutionally. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and calibration. Final scores, named Morbidity and Mortality Associated Risk in the Treatment of UIAs (MARTA)-EVT and MARTA-NT, were compared with existing models identified through systematic review. RESULTS: Among 2647 patients (1907 EVT and 740 NT), procedural complications occurred in 6.3% (EVT) and 12.8% (NT). Independent predictors included age, baseline mRS, aneurysm location, size, morphology, and procedural factors. MARTA-EVT (AUROC = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.57-0.78) and MARTA-NT (AUROC = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.54-0.77) showed moderate discrimination and good calibration. MARTA-EVT outperformed existing models; MARTA-NT performed similarly to SAFETEA. Predictive models are available open-source: https://martascoreapp.shinyapps.io/martascoreapp/. CONCLUSION: MARTA-EVT and MARTA-NT are validated tools for predicting procedural risks in UIA treatment and may support patient counseling and clinical decision making.

Introduction Post‐market and multicenter studies report low complete occlusion rates (41‐49%) and higher retreatment rates (13%) following WEB deployment, compared to 3.8% with microsurgical clipping. While retreatment after WEB has been shown to be technically feasible, data on final angiographic outcomes remain limited. We performed a retrospective analysis of prospective databases from 14 cerebrovascular centers in the US to compare the safety and efficacy of retreatment versus continued observation for residual and recurrent aneurysms after initial WEB deployment. Materials/Methods Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify baseline characteristics of untreated and residual/recurrent aneurysms that may act as confounders, which then underwent propensity scored matching (PSM). Results Among 211 patients (125 observed, 86 retreated), retreatment was more common in initially ruptured aneurysms (p<0.001), which showed higher recurrence (p=0.036) and sac‐dominant residuals (p=0.004). These were primarily due to WEB compression on follow‐up (p=0.001), rather than incomplete occlusion with an appropriately sized device (p<0.001). Retreatment was associated with significantly higher rates of complete angiographic occlusion at last follow‐up compared to observation alone (p<0.001), a finding that remained consistent across subgroups defined by initial unruptured status, residual type, and recurrence patterns (all p<0.05). Clipping demonstrated higher, though statistically insignificant, rates of complete occlusion; flow diversion and stent‐assisted coil embolization yielded comparable complete occlusion rates at follow‐up. After propensity score matching, retreatment remained significantly associated with higher rates of complete angiographic occlusion (all p<0.05), with comparable outcomes observed between clipping and various endovascular approaches as above. Conclusion Retreatment improved complete occlusion rates; however, no aneurysmal hemorrhages occurred in either group. Further intervention may be unnecessary when the WEB device—whether compressed or intact (BOSS 0/1)—adequately protects the dome. In cases where WEB compression significantly exposes the aneurysm wall, stent‐assisted coiling or flow diversion can be performed safely and successfully, depending on vascular anatomy and surgeon preference. image image