Kelley, Scott R.

Abstract Background Presacral tumours are rare, heterogeneous lesions. Historical classification systems for presacral tumours have provided a valuable framework, but were based on limited available data. This study aimed to develop a contemporary classification aligned with current tumour entities and clinical practice. Methods A prospectively registered systematic review of surgically managed presacral tumours published from 1975 to 2025 was combined with a retrospective multisite institutional surgical pathology review from 1986 to 2025. Pathological descriptors were extracted, cross-referenced, harmonized to current terminology, and organized through multidisciplinary expert review to obtain a new classification. Results The systematic review identified 5997 records, of which 203 studies met the inclusion criteria and contributed 181 pathological terms after generic and unclassifiable diagnoses were removed. Review of 3606 pathology reports identified 19 additional terms, bringing the total to 200 pathological terms. After harmonization to current terminology and exclusion of non-neoplastic processes, a contemporary classification was developed using biological descriptors: developmental versus acquired origin; tissue lineage (neurogenic, osseous/haematopoietic, soft tissue, or miscellaneous); and tumour behaviour (benign, locally recurrent without metastatic potential, locally recurrent with low metastatic potential, malignant non-sarcoma, or malignant sarcoma). Conclusion The Mayo Clinic classification of presacral tumours updates historical systems by reflecting the broader, more modern spectrum of neoplasms and distinguishing lesions by lineage and biological behaviour. It may improve diagnostic clarity, communication, and selection of appropriate observation, multidisciplinary assessment, and treatment pathways.

AbstractAimThere is increasing adoption of nonoperative management of rectal cancer; however, the extent to which trainees are proficient in nonoperative management is unclear. The aim of this work was to describe the exposure of recent colorectal resident graduates to nonoperative management, their comfort level in assessing clinical responses and their comfort in performing rectal cancer surgeries.MethodThis was an online survey of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education‐certified colorectal surgery residency graduates of training programmes in 2020, 2021 and 2022 utilizing their respective WhatsApp class chat groups. Data on resident comfort in assessing complete or near complete clinical response as part of nonoperative management, adoption in practice and perceived effects on rectal cancer operative experience were collected.ResultsForty five graduates responded, with 83.3% exposed to nonoperative management in training. Eighty five per cent utilize nonoperative management in their own practices and 37.1% felt it had a negative impact on preparing them for rectal cancer surgeries. While 82.4% felt comfortable assessing a complete clinical response, only 61.8% felt comfortable assessing a near complete response. Residents who perceived a positive effect on their training felt more comfortable assessing a complete or near complete response.ConclusionMost recent graduates were exposed to nonoperative management in training and utilize it in practice, although many did not feel comfortable assessing a near complete response. A significant portion felt it had a negative impact on their experience and quantity of rectal cancer surgeries. This suggests a need to improve colorectal resident education in nonoperative management of rectal cancer while simultaneously preserving surgical experience for trainees.

BACKGROUND: There has been a shift in the treatment of fistula-in-ano toward a focus on the preservation of continence while simultaneously eradicating the disease. The utilization of radially emitting diode laser catheters to ablate fistula tracks has been described since 2011, with heterogenous studies publishing success rates ranging from 20% to 89%. OBJECTIVE: Present the authors’ experience managing solitary transsphincteric fistulas of cryptoglandular origin with a radially emitting diode laser. DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized single center trial with 12-month follow-up. SETTINGS: Quaternary referral academic health care center. PATIENTS: Forty-six adults with transsphincteric fistula-in-ano. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent radially emitting diode laser closure of fistula-in-ano. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical healing and fistula recurrence. RESULTS: Forty-six patients with a median age of 48 years (range, 26–85) underwent diode laser closure. Most were men (n = 28; 60%). Twenty-four patients (52%) had previous fistula repairs with a median of 1.5 (range, 1–7) repairs per patient. All were followed for 12 months. Successful closure after 1 laser treatment occurred in 43% of patients. Thirteen of 26 failure cases (50%) were able to undergo a delayed fistulotomy secondary to an anatomic change with the fistula becoming more superficial, moving out of the internal sphincter muscle after laser ablation, all of which healed. No patients experienced new or worsening (preexisting) fecal incontinence. Two patients (8%) continued treatment for abscesses/fistula branching. One patient (3%) experienced migration of the fistula from the base of the left labia to the introitus of the vagina and 1 experienced recurrence and worsening of their disease process with subsequent involvement of the coccyx (previous deep postanal space abscess). LIMITATIONS: Limitations to our study include its nonrandomized prospective nature, single center and surgeon experience, and small patient sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Radially emitting diode laser closure is a continence-preserving option to consider when treating transsphincteric fistula-in-ano. When the procedure fails, it does not fail poorly (open wounds, retracted flaps, incontinence, etc) and can be repeated. Complications can include abscess formation and fistula migration to adjacent anatomic locations (vagina). Even if unsuccessful, after treatment, the fistula can anatomically migrate distally, becoming more superficial and thus providing the opportunity to proceed with a delayed fistulotomy. See Video Abstract. CIERRE DE FÍSTULA ANAL TRANSESFINTÉRICA CON LÁSER DE DIODO DE EMISIÓN RADIAL ANTECEDENTES: Ha habido un cambio en el tratamiento de la fístula anal hacia un enfoque en la preservación de la continencia y al mismo tiempo en la erradicación de la enfermedad. La utilización de catéteres láser de diodo de emisión radial para extirpar los trayectos de las fístulas se describe desde el 2011 y estudios heterogéneos publican tasas de éxito que oscilan entre el 20 y el 89%. OBJETIVO: Presentar nuestra experiencia en el manejo de fístulas transesfinterianas solitarias de origen criptoglandular con láser de diodo de emisión radial. DISEÑO: Ensayo prospectivo, no aleatorizado, unicéntrico, con seguimiento de 12 meses. LUGARES: Centro de salud académico de referencia Cuaternario. PACIENTES: Cuarenta y seis adultos con fístula anal transesfintérica. INTERVENCIONES: Todos se sometieron a cierre de fístula anal con láser de diodo de emisión radial. MEDIDAS PRINCIPALES DEL RESULTADO: Curación clínica y recurrencia de la fístula. RESULTADOS: Cuarenta y seis pacientes con una mediana de edad de 48 años (rango, 26-85) se sometieron a cierre con láser de diodo. La mayoría eran hombres (n=28/60%). Veinticuatro (52%) habían tenido reparaciones previas de fístulas con una mediana de 1,5 (rango, 1-7) reparaciones por paciente. Todos fueron seguidos durante 12 meses. El cierre exitoso después de un tratamiento con láser se produjo en el 43%. Trece de 26 fracasos (50%) pudieron someterse a una fistulotomía tardía debido a un cambio anatómico en el que la fístula se volvió más superficial y salió del músculo del esfínter interno después de la ablación con láser, y todas sanaron. Ningún paciente experimentó incontinencia fecal nueva o que empeoró (preexistente). Dos (8%) continuaron tratamiento por abscesos/ramificación de fístulas. Una (3%) experimentó migración de la fístula desde la base de los labios izquierdos hasta el introito de la vagina y 1 experimentó recurrencia y empeoramiento de su proceso patológico con posterior afectación del cóccix (absceso previo en el espacio postanal profundo). LIMITACIONES: Las limitaciones de nuestro estudio incluyen su naturaleza prospectiva no aleatoria, la experiencia de un solo centro y del cirujano y el tamaño pequeño de la muestra de pacientes. CONCLUSIONES: El cierre con láser de diodo de emisión radial es una opción para preservar la continencia a considerar cuando se trata la fístula en el ano transesfintérica. Cuando el procedimiento fracasa, no fracasa mal (heridas abiertas, colgajos retraídos, incontinencia, etc.), y puede repetirse. Las complicaciones pueden incluir formación de abscesos y migración de fístulas a ubicaciones anatómicas adyacentes (vagina). Incluso si no tiene éxito, después del tratamiento la fístula puede migrar anatómicamente distal volviéndose más superficial y brindando así la oportunidad de proceder con una fistulotomía retrasada. (Traducción—Yesenia Rojas-Khalil)

The aim was to determine whether on-call case volumes differ amongst colorectal surgeons, and what cases are performed on-call in an academic colorectal surgery practice. The on-call schedule for the year 2021 of a colorectal surgery practice was analyzed. Details of the case origin and operative details were collected. Average cases performed per call per surgeon were compared. Ten surgeons were included, and average cases per call ranged from .5 to 1.4 with 1.0 the overall average ( P = .007). Analyzing individual pairs, differences existed between the 2 busiest and the least busy on-call surgeon (both P < .05). Most patients operated on-call were admitted via the emergency department (59%), and the most common operations were exams under anesthesia (39%) and bowel resections (33%). On average, 1 on-call case was performed per day. Surgeon on-call volume was similar aside from the busiest and least busy on-call surgeons.

Background: Primary colorectal sarcomatoid carcinoma is a rare and aggressive malignant neoplasm that displays mixed epithelial and mesenchymal differentiation, with uncertain histogenesis. First described in 1986, there is a paucity of literature related to this condition and there are no evidence-based treatment guidelines. The aim of our study is to present our 30-year experience with primary colorectal sarcomatoid carcinoma. Methods: Retrospective single-center analysis of all patients treated for primary colorectal sarcomatoid carcinoma from 1992 to 2022. The primary outcome was response to treatment strategy and overall survival. Results: A total of six cases met eligibility criteria. Three were male (50%) with a mean age at diagnosis of 59 years (range, 49-72). Four neoplasms were located in the rectum (66%) and two in the colon. Mean tumor size at diagnosis was 4.8 cm (range, 2.8-7.0). Three patients were treated endoscopically and three underwent oncologic surgical resection. Five experienced recurrence and one expired from other comorbidities. The mean survival among those with colonic and rectal sarcomatoid carcinoma was 7 months (range, 3-11) and 39 months (range, 9-60), respectively. Discussion: Primary colorectal sarcomatoid carcinoma is a rare malignant tumor with poor prognosis. Treatment modalities have not been standardized and despite multimodal therapy, disease recurrence and/or metastasis is likely to occur. Further studies are necessary to determine optimal treatment to improve outcomes.

BACKGROUND: There has been concern among colon and rectal surgery residency programs in the United States that IPAA procedures have been decreasing, but evidence is limited. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to evaluate the number of IPAAs performed by colon and rectal surgery residents in the United States and analyze the distribution of these cases on a national level. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTINGS: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Case Log National Data Reports were used to evaluate the number of IPAAs performed by residents from 2005 to 2021. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was used to identify all patients undergoing these procedures from 2005 to 2019. PATIENTS: All IPAA procedures regardless of indication. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the number of IPAAs performed by residents yearly. The secondary outcome was the national distribution of these procedures. RESULTS: Among colon and rectal surgery residents, case log data revealed an increase in mean and total number of IPAAs from 2005 to 2013, followed by a decline in both metrics after 2013. Despite the decrease, the mean number of cases per resident remained fewer than 6 between 2011 and 2021. A weighted national estimate of 48,532 IPAA patients were identified in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. A significant decrease was noted in the number of IPAAs after 2015 that persisted through 2019. There was a significant decrease in rural and urban nonteaching hospitals (from 2.1% to 1.6% and 25.6% to 4.3%, respectively; p < 0.001) and an increase in urbanteaching hospitals (from 72.4% to 94.1%; p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: Nonrandomized retrospective study design. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the recent increase in the percentage of IPAAs performed at urban academic centers, there has been a decrease in cases performed by colon and rectal surgery residents. This can have significant implications for residents who graduate without adequate experience in performing this complex procedure independently, as well as training programs that may face challenges with maintaining accreditation. See Video Abstract. TENDENCIAS Y DISTRIBUCIÓN DE LA ANASTOMOSIS ANAL CON BOLSA ILEAL EN LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS: ¿SE ESTÁ VOLVIENDO MÁS DIFÍCIL DE ENCONTRAR EN LA CAPACITACIÓN DE RESIDENCIA EN CIRUGÍA DE COLON Y RECTO? ANTECEDENTES: Ha habido preocupación entre los programas de capacitación de residencia en cirugía de colon y recto en los Estados Unidos porque los procedimientos de anastomosis anal con bolsa ileal han estado disminuyendo; sin embargo, la evidencia es limitada. OBJETIVO: Evaluar el número de anastomosis anales con bolsa ileal realizadas por residentes de cirugía de colon y recto en los Estados Unidos y examinar la distribución de estos casos a nivel nacional. DISEÑO: Retrospectivo. AJUSTES: Se utilizaron los informes de datos nacionales del registro de casos de educación médica de posgrado del Consejo de Acreditación para examinar el número de anastomosis anales con bolsa ileal realizadas por residentes de 2005 a 2021. Se utilizó la base de datos de muestra nacional de pacientes hospitalizados para identificar a todos los pacientes sometidos a estos procedimientos de 2005 a 2019. PACIENTES: Todos los procedimientos de anastomosis anal con bolsa ileal independientemente de la indicación. MEDIDA DE RESULTADO PRINCIPAL: El resultado primario es el número de anastomosis anales con bolsa ileal realizadas por los residentes anualmente. El resultado secundario es la distribución nacional de estos procedimientos. RESULTADOS: Entre los residentes de cirugía de colon y recto, los datos de los registros de casos revelaron un aumento en el número medio y total de anastomosis anal con bolsa ileal de 2005 a 2013, seguido de una disminución en ambas métricas después de 2013. A pesar de la disminución, el número medio de casos por El residente permaneció >6 entre 2011 y 2021. Se identificó una estimación nacional ponderada de 48 532 pacientes con anastomosis anal con bolsa ileal en la base de datos de la Muestra Nacional de Pacientes Hospitalizados. Se observó una disminución significativa en el número de anastomosis anales con bolsa ileal después de 2015 que persistió hasta 2019. Hubo una disminución significativa en los hospitales no docentes rurales y urbanos (del 2,1% al 1,6% y del 25,6% al 4,3% respectivamente, p < 0,001) y un aumento en los hospitales universitarios urbanos (del 72,4% al 94,1%, p < 0,001). LIMITACIONES: Estudio retrospectivo no aleatorizado. CONCLUSIÓN: A pesar del reciente aumento en el porcentaje de anastomosis anal con bolsa ileal realizadas en centros académicos urbanos, ha habido una disminución en los casos realizados por residentes de cirugía de colon y recto. Esto puede tener implicaciones significativas para los residentes que se gradúan sin la experiencia adecuada en la realización de este complejo procedimiento de forma independiente, así como para los programas de capacitación que pueden enfrentar desafíos para mantener la acreditación. (Traduccion—AI-generated)

BACKGROUND: Primary tumors of the ischiorectal fossa are rare and comprise a wide array of pathologies with varying malignant potential. Because of the low prevalence, there is a paucity of data in the literature. This article presents a case series on the management of ischiorectal fossa tumors. OBJECTIVE: To present experience from 30 years of managing ischiorectal fossa tumors. DESIGN: Retrospective single-center analysis. SETTINGS: A quaternary referral academic health care center. PATIENTS: All patients treated for ischiorectal fossa tumors were included in the study. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent surgical management of their disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Disease recurrence and overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients (53% women) were identified with a median follow-up of 23 months. Twenty-one patients (62%) were diagnosed with benign and 13 (38%) with malignant tumors. All underwent surgical resection. The median tumor size was 8.4 cm. R0 resection was obtained in 28 patients. Twelve patients (35%) developed recurrence (9 after R0 resection) after a median time of 6.5 months. There were no surgical-related mortalities. LIMITATIONS: Limitations to the study include its retrospective nature, single-center experience, and small patient sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Ischiorectal fossa tumors are primarily benign; however, they are associated with high recurrence rates even in the setting of an R0 resection. Treatment should be approached in a multidisciplinary manner, preferably in centers with experience treating these tumors. Close posttreatment surveillance is imperative. See Video Abstract. TUMORES DE LA FOSA ISQUIORRECTAL: EXPERIENCIA DE 30 AÑOS EN UNA SOLA INSTITUCIÓN ANTECEDENTES: Los tumores primarios de la fosa isquiorrectal son raros y comprenden una amplia gama de patologías con potencial maligno variable. Debido a la baja prevalencia, hay escasez de datos en la literatura. Este artículo presenta una serie de casos sobre el tratamiento de los tumores de la fosa isquiorrectal. OBJETIVO: Presentar una experiencia de 30 años en el manejo de tumores de la fosa isquiorrectal. DISEÑO: Análisis retrospectivo de un solo centro. AJUSTES: Un centro de atención médica académico de referencia cuaternaria. PACIENTES: Todos los pacientes tratados por tumores de la fosa isquiorrectal. INTERVENCIONES: Todos los pacientes se sometieron a tratamiento quirúrgico de su enfermedad. PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO: Recurrencia de la enfermedad y supervivencia general. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron un total de 34 pacientes (53% mujeres) con una mediana de seguimiento de 23 meses. Veintiún pacientes (62%) fueron diagnosticados con tumores benignos y 13 (38%) con tumores malignos. Todos fueron sometidos a resección quirúrgica. El tamaño medio del tumor fue de 8,4 cm. La resección R0 se obtuvo en 28 pacientes. Doce (35%) desarrollaron recurrencia (nueve después de la resección R0) con una mediana de tiempo de 6,5 meses. No hubo mortalidades relacionadas con la cirugía. LIMITACIONES: Las limitaciones del estudio incluyen su naturaleza retrospectiva, experiencia en un solo centro y tamaño pequeño de la muestra de pacientes. CONCLUSIONES: Los tumores de la fosa isquiorrectal son principalmente benignos, sin embargo, se asocian con altas tasas de recurrencia incluso en el contexto de una resección R0. El tratamiento debe abordarse de forma multidisciplinaria y preferentemente en centros con experiencia en el tratamiento de estos tumores. Vigilancia cercana posterior al tratamiento es imperativa. (Traducción—Dr. Aurian Garcia Gonzalez)

BACKGROUND: Aggressive angiomyxoma is a very rare mesenchymal tumor most commonly found in the pelvic and perineal regions. Although many are estrogen and progesterone hormone receptor positive, the pathogenesis is unknown. Due to its rarity, there is a paucity of literature relating to this pathology. This article presents a case series on the management of aggressive angiomyxoma of the pelvis. OBJECTIVE: To present a 35-year experience managing aggressive angiomyxoma of the pelvis. DESIGN: This was a retrospective single-system analysis. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a quaternary referral academic health care system. PATIENTS: All patients treated for aggressive angiomyxoma of the pelvis. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent surgical or medical management of their disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were disease recurrence and mortality. Secondary outcomes included risk factors for recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients (94% women) were identified with a median follow-up of 65 months. Thirty patients (94%) underwent operative resection and 2 patients were treated solely with medical management. Fifteen achieved an R0 resection (negative microscopic margins) at the index operation, of which 4 (27%) experienced tumor recurrence. There were no mortalities. No risk factors for disease recurrence were identified. LIMITATIONS: Limitations to our study include its nonrandomized retrospective nature, single health care system experience, and small patient sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive angiomyxoma is a rare, slow-growing tumor with locally invasive features and a high potential for recurrence even after resection with negative margins. Imaging modalities such as CT or MRI should be obtained to aid in diagnosis and surgical planning. Workup should be paired with preoperative biopsy and testing for hormone receptor status, which can increase diagnostic accuracy and guide medical treatment. Close posttreatment surveillance is imperative to detect recurrence. See Video Abstract. ANGIOMIXOMA AGRESIVO DE PELVIS: EXPERIENCIA DE 35 AÑOS ANTECEDENTES: El angiomixoma agresivo es un tumor mesenquimal muy raro que se encuentra más comúnmente en las regiones pélvica y perineal. Aunque muchos son positivos para los receptores hormonales como el estrógeno y la progesterona, la patogénesis es aún desconocida. Debido a su rareza, existe escasa literatura relacionada con esta patología. Este artículo presenta una serie de casos sobre el tratamiento del angiomixoma agresivo de pelvis. OBJETIVO: Presentar una experiencia de 35 años en el manejo del angiomixoma agresivo de pelvis. DISEÑO: Este fue un análisis retrospectivo de sistema único. AJUSTES: Este estudio se llevó a cabo en un sistema de salud académico de referencia de nivel cuaternario. PACIENTES: Todos los pacientes tratados por angiomixoma agresivo de pelvis. INTERVENCIONES: Todos los pacientes se sometieron a tratamiento quirúrgico y/o médico de su enfermedad. PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO: Los resultados primarios fueron la recurrencia de la enfermedad y la mortalidad. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron factores de riesgo de recurrencia. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron un total de 32 pacientes (94% mujeres) con una mediana de seguimiento de 65 meses. Treinta (94%) fueron sometidos a resección quirúrgica y dos fueron tratados únicamente con tratamiento médico. Quince lograron una resección R0 (márgenes microscópicos negativos) en la operación inicial, de los cuales cuatro (27%) experimentaron recurrencia tumoral. No hubo mortalidades. No se identificaron factores de riesgo para la recurrencia de la enfermedad. LIMITACIONES: Las limitaciones de nuestro estudio incluyen su naturaleza retrospectiva no aleatoria, la experiencia de un solo sistema de atención médica y el tamaño pequeño de la muestra de pacientes. CONCLUSIONES: El angiomixoma agresivo es un tumor raro, de crecimiento lento, con características localmente invasivas y un alto potencial de recurrencia incluso después de una resección con márgenes negativos. Se deben obtener modalidades de imágenes como CT y/o MRI para la ayuda diagnóstica y la planificación quirúrgica. El estudio debe combinarse con una biopsia preoperatoria y pruebas del estado de los receptores hormonales, que pueden aumentar la precisión del diagnóstico y guiar el tratamiento médico. Es imperativa una estrecha vigilancia posterior al tratamiento para detectar recurrencia. (Traducción—Dr Osvaldo Gauto)