AbstractAimThere is increasing adoption of nonoperative management of rectal cancer; however, the extent to which trainees are proficient in nonoperative management is unclear. The aim of this work was to describe the exposure of recent colorectal resident graduates to nonoperative management, their comfort level in assessing clinical responses and their comfort in performing rectal cancer surgeries.MethodThis was an online survey of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education‐certified colorectal surgery residency graduates of training programmes in 2020, 2021 and 2022 utilizing their respective WhatsApp class chat groups. Data on resident comfort in assessing complete or near complete clinical response as part of nonoperative management, adoption in practice and perceived effects on rectal cancer operative experience were collected.ResultsForty five graduates responded, with 83.3% exposed to nonoperative management in training. Eighty five per cent utilize nonoperative management in their own practices and 37.1% felt it had a negative impact on preparing them for rectal cancer surgeries. While 82.4% felt comfortable assessing a complete clinical response, only 61.8% felt comfortable assessing a near complete response. Residents who perceived a positive effect on their training felt more comfortable assessing a complete or near complete response.ConclusionMost recent graduates were exposed to nonoperative management in training and utilize it in practice, although many did not feel comfortable assessing a near complete response. A significant portion felt it had a negative impact on their experience and quantity of rectal cancer surgeries. This suggests a need to improve colorectal resident education in nonoperative management of rectal cancer while simultaneously preserving surgical experience for trainees.
Characteristics of Early-Onset vs Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer
Objective: To determine the disease-free survival (DFS) and recurrence after the treatment of patients with rectal cancer with open (OPEN) or laparoscopic (LAP) resection. Background: This randomized clinical trial (ACOSOG [Alliance] Z6051), performed between 2008 and 2013, compared LAP and OPEN resection of stage II/III rectal cancer, within 12 cm of the anal verge (T1-3, N0-2, M0) in patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The rectum and mesorectum were resected using open instruments for rectal dissection (included hybrid hand-assisted laparoscopic) or with laparoscopic instruments under pneumoperitoneum. The 2-year DFS and recurrence were secondary endpoints of Z6051. Methods: The DFS and recurrence were not powered, and are being assessed for superiority. Recurrence was determined at 3, 6, 9, 12, and every 6 months thereafter, using carcinoembryonic antigen, physical examination, computed tomography, and colonoscopy. In all, 486 patients were randomized to LAP (243) or OPEN (243), with 462 eligible for analysis (LAP = 240 and OPEN = 222). Median follow-up is 47.9 months. Results: The 2-year DFS was LAP 79.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 74.4–84.9) and OPEN 83.2% (95% CI 78.3–88.3). Local and regional recurrence was 4.6% LAP and 4.5% OPEN. Distant recurrence was 14.6% LAP and 16.7% OPEN. Disease-free survival was impacted by unsuccessful resection (hazard ratio [HR] 1.87, 95% CI 1.21–2.91): composite of incomplete specimen (HR 1.65, 95% CI 0.85–3.18); positive circumferential resection margins (HR 2.31, 95% CI 1.40–3.79); positive distal margin (HR 2.53, 95% CI 1.30–3.77). Conclusion: Laparoscopic assisted resection of rectal cancer was not found to be significantly different to OPEN resection of rectal cancer based on the outcomes of DFS and recurrence.
Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes
Abstract Covalent linkage of an antitumour antibody specific for a tumour cell surface antigen to an antilymphocyte antibody specific for the T lymphocyte receptor complex produces a heteroconjugated antibody that can activate and redirect cytotoxic T lymphocytes to lyse tumour cells. The ability of an antilymphocyte-antitumour heteroconjugate (500A2 × 96.5) to direct the lysis of murine melanoma cells by cultured murine lymphocytes was tested in vitro using a 4-h chromium release assay and in vivo with a tumour neutralization assay. In vitro, the addition of heteroconjugated antibody significantly increased tumour lysis by murine C3H/HeN lymphocytes (median specific lysis 82.7 per cent with lymphocytes plus heteroconjugate versus 9.5 per cent for lymphocytes alone, P < 0.001). In vivo, treatment with heteroconjugated antibody plus lymphocytes significantly reduced the development of pulmonary metastases after intravenous tumour administration (median number of pulmonary metastases 28.5 for combined treatment versus 250 for heteroconjugate or lymphocytes alone, P < 0.001).