Pagán, Ricardo J.

Abstract Background: Clostridium ramosum ( C. ramosum ) is an anaerobic gram-positive bacillus of the human intestine and a rare cause of bacteremia. This retrospective cohort study evaluated clinical characteristics and outcomes of a multicenter cohort of adults with C. ramosum bacteremia. Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort included adults (≥ 18 years) with true C. ramosum bacteremia at Mayo Clinic hospitals in Arizona, Florida, Minnesota, and Wisconsin from September 1, 2012, through December 31, 2025. Data were collected through search for C. ramosum in microbiological culture records. Clinical characteristics assessed included immune status, source of bacteremia, presence of sepsis, neutropenic fever, monomicrobial vs. polymicrobial bacteremia, antimicrobial resistance patterns, antimicrobial therapy, length of stay and 30-day all cause mortality. Exploratory odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Results: Among 90 patients with a positive C. ramosum blood culture, 17 were classified as contaminants and 73 comprised the study cohort. Median age was 66.0 years (IQR, 56.0–75.0); 44 (60.3%) were male and 33 (45.2%) were immunocompromised (including 26 with active malignancy, while the remaining 7 were received biologic immunosuppression). The most common infection sources were gastrointestinal (32/73, 43.8%) and central line-related (8/73, 11%). At presentation, 50.7% of patients met criteria for sepsis and 15/73 (20.5%), were in septic shock. Of 73 isolates tested, 31/73 (44.3%) were clindamycin resistant and 9/73 (12.9%) tested intermediate. Anaerobic-active antimicrobial therapy was received by 53/73 (72.6%). Thirty-day mortality was 11/73 (15.1%). Mortality was 30.0% (6/20) with therapy without reliable anaerobic activity and 9.4% (5/53) with anaerobic-active antimicrobial therapy (OR, 4.02; 95% CI, 0.88–19.46; P = 0.060). The median hospital LOS was 8.0 days. Among 30-day survivors, anaerobic active antimicrobial therapy was associated with a shorter median LOS compared to therapy without reliable anaerobic activity (8.5 vs. 12.0 days). Immunocompromised patients had higher odds of monomicrobial C. ramosum bacteremia than immunocompetent patients (OR 3.16, 95% CI 1.19–8.39; p = 0.03). Patients with polymicrobial bacteremia had higher odds of sepsis (OR, 3.89; 95% CI, 1.43–10.55; P = 0.008) and septic shock (OR, 5.66; 95% CI, 1.17–27.36; P = 0.020). Patients with malignancy or neutropenia demonstrated significantly lower odds of presenting in septic shock (p = 0.018; p = 0.029 retrospectively). Microbiological clearance was achieved in 91.3% (42/46) of evaluable cases. Conclusions: This largest reported cohort defines the clinical and microbiological profile of C. ramosum bacteremia. Frequent clindamycin nonsusceptibility is clinically actionable. Several clinical associations found on univariable analysis should be further investigated in larger studies.

Hospital medicine offers diverse career opportunities, yet formal guidance for residents pursuing hospitalist careers is often lacking. To address this gap, the Hospital Internal Medicine Interest Group (HIMIG) was launched at an academic institution in the Southeastern United States to provide structured mentorship and professional development. Residents expressing interest completed an entry survey to identify career goals and areas of focus, informing a longitudinal curriculum that included education, leadership, research, quality improvement, and networking. Seventeen residents (≈25% of the IM residency program) joined HIMIG, and 88% completed the initial survey. Education, leadership, and quality improvement were top interests, while mentorship and career guidance were primary motivators. A post-implementation survey revealed all participants met mentors and felt HIMIG supported their career goals. HIMIG demonstrates a flexible, personalized approach to hospitalist career development that may serve as a model for other programs.

ABSTRACTThis report details a severe complication of phenol neurolysis in a diabetic patient, where phenol induced tissue necrosis can lead to severe cellulitis with ulceration that may prove difficult to treat. It emphasizes the importance of considering comorbidities when selecting phenol neurolysis for treatment of chronic pain.

Introduction The Care Hotel is a virtual hybrid care model for postoperative patients after low-risk procedures which allow recovery in an outpatient environment. This study aimed to analyze if the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA PS) Classification System can be used as a predictive factor for staying at Mayo Clinic’s Care Hotel. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted between July 23, 2020, and June 4, 2021, at Mayo Clinic in Florida, a 306-bed community academic hospital. ASA PS Class and post-procedure care setting (Care Hotel vs inpatient ward) were collected. Patients were classified into two ASA PS groups (ASA PS Classes 1-2 and 3-4). Pearson’s Chi-square test was used to determine if the ASA PS Class and having stayed or not at the Care Hotel were independent and an Odds Ratio (OR) calculated. Results Out of 392 surgical and procedural patients, 272 (69.39%) chose the Care Hotel and 120 (30.61%) chose the inpatient ward. There was a statistically significant association between ASA PS Class and staying at the Care Hotel, P < .01. The OR of preferring to stay at the Care Hotel in patients with ASA PS Class 1-2 vs ASA PC Class 3-4 was 1.91 ( P = .0041, 95% CI: 1.229-2.982) Conclusion Patients with ASA PS Classes 1-2 are almost twice as likely to elect to stay at the Care Hotel compared to those with ASA PS Classes 3-4. This finding may help care teams focus their Care hotel recruitment efforts.

Background Patients with mild to severe chronic systemic disease undergoing low-risk procedures are often hospitalized for observation. The Care Hotel is a novel virtual medicine hybrid model of care that offers patients a comfortable, out of hospital environment where they can receive both in-person and virtual care after a surgery or procedure. This study aimed to analyze if virtual hybrid post-procedure care in a hotel could be both conducted on and accepted by patients, even those with moderate to severe chronic diseases. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted between July 23, 2020 and June 4, 2021 at Mayo Clinic in Florida, a 306-bed community academic hospital. We collected the sex, age, race, ethnicity, acceptance rate, ASA score, and primary procedure of patients using the Care Hotel. Results Out of 392 patients, 272 (69.4%) opted for care in the program. Median patient age was 61.5 years, 59.56% were males, and 86.40% were white. We found that 50.37% had an ASA score of 2 and 43.4% had an ASA score of 3. Ten different surgical specialties were able to utilize the Care Hotel for care in 47 different procedure types. Urology had the most patients (n=70, 25.7%). Post-electrophysiologic procedures were the most common procedures (n=39, 14.3%). Conclusion Our virtual hybrid Care Hotel program was widely accepted by patients and could care for a multitude of post-operative procedures. Additionally, this novel program can care for patients with both mild and severe systemic diseases.

Infiltrative cardiomyopathies include a variety of disorders that lead to myocardial thickening resulting in a constellation of clinical manifestations and eventually heart failure that could be the first clue to reach the diagnosis. Among the more described infiltrative diseases of the heart is amyloid cardiomyopathy. The disease usually presents with subtle, nonspecific symptoms. Herein, we illustrate a case of recurrent syncope as the initial presenting symptom for systemic amyloid with polyneuropathy and cardiomyopathy as a cause of syncope. The article illustrates the role of advanced cardiac imaging in the diagnosis of the disease with a focused literature review. We also highlight the role of early, shared decision-making between patient, family, and medical team in the management of cardiac amyloidosis.