Parikh, Pragnesh

Aortic stenosis is the most common acquired valvular heart disease. Currently, there are no medications approved to slow its progression. We set out to investigate the effect of ACE inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and aldosterone antagonists on the rate of progression of mild aortic stenosis. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 2,613 patients over 45 years old, who had a peak velocity between 1.8 and 3 meters/second on initial echo. Over 8 years of followup, 491 patients were prescribed angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and 130 patients were prescribed aldosterone receptor blockers. Patients prescribed ACE inhibitors/ARBs had a slower rate of progression of aortic stenosis compared to those not prescribed ACE inhibitors/ARBs (2.2 to 2.5 vs. 2.3 to 2.8 meters/second) (Figure 1). Also, patients prescribed aldosterone receptor blockers had a slower rate of progression of aortic stenosis compared to those who were not 2.2 to 2.4 vs. 2.3 to 2.8 meters/second) (Figure 2). Our findings suggest that angiotensin or aldosterone antagonism is associated with slower rate of progression of mild aortic stenosis.

Introduction: The prevalence of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) is steadily increasing. Accordingly, the frequency of CIED extraction has also increased. Occasionally, safe retrieval of all CIED components is not feasabile and lead fragments are left behind. Little is known about the safety and diagnostic accuracy of MRI in patients with retained CIED fragments. Methods: Two hundred consecutive patients were identified as having undergone orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) at our institution between April 2006 and December 2014. Chest x-rays immediately prior to OHT were reviewed for presence of CIED and chest x-rays immediately following OHT were reviewed for retained CIED fragments. MRI performed after OHT in patients with retained CIED fragments were inspected for image quality and procedural safety. The most recent chest x-ray in patients with retained CIED fragments subjected to MRI was reviewed for change in fragment position. Results: One hundred seventy-eight of 200 patients (89%) had CIED prior to OHT. All patients with CIED had surgical device extraction at the time of OHT. Of these, 29 patients (12%) had retained CIED fragments after OHT, the majority of which (23/29) were ICD coil fragments located in the superior vena cava, brachiocephalic or subclavian vein. Ten patients with retained CIED fragments underwent a total of 28 MRI after OHT. No patient safety issues were identified during MRI acquisition, and all MRI images were of diagnostic quality. There were no changes in the position of CIED fragments following MRI. Conclusions: Diagnostic MRI can be safely performed in patients with retained CIED fragments after incomplete device extraction. Adherence of the ICD coil to the vessel wall due to fibrosis has been well described and is a common impediment to complete device extraction. Retrieval of these fragments prior to MRI does not appear warranted given the demonstrated safety and preserved MRI image quality in this population.

Aortic stenosis (AS) requires repeat assessments to optimally time intervention. The utility of laboratory tests to complement clinical and hemodynamic assessments has not been established. We assessed clinical, echocardiographic, and laboratory data in 76 patients with AS or heart valve replacement (HVR), age 77 years, 37% women. Laboratory assessments included von Willebrand factor (VWF) antigen, activity, (Act/Ag, normal > 0.8), VWF multimer distribution (abnormal=loss of highest molecular weight multimers=Mult+), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP, abnormal > 155 pg/ml=BNP+), and platelet function analyzer 100 collagen-ADP closure time (PFA, normal < 121 seconds). Table: Coefficients of correlation, r, and F statistic. Chi-square, and probability. Correlation of BNP to mean gradient in patients with GFR>60 remained poor, r=0.29, while for PFA r = 0.65. Median (IQR) for PFA and BNP for mild, moderate, and severe AS and HVR are shown below. VWF multimers were abnormal in 3/14 mild AS, 6/14 moderate AS, 22/25 severe AS and 4/23 HVR patients. The severity of AS was most strongly associated with VWF multimer abnormality and prolonged PFA closure time, weakly with BNP, and not with VWF Act/Ag. Conclusion: Among various laboratory measures, PFA and VWF multimers are strongly associated with AS severity, and may merit assessment as complementary diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in AS.

Background Aortic valve calcium score is associated with hemodynamic severity of aortic stenosis. Whether this association is present in calcific mitral stenosis remains unknown. Methods and Results This study was a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with mitral stenosis secondary to mitral annular calcification (MAC) undergoing transseptal catheterization. All patients underwent invasive mitral valve assessment via direct left atrial and left ventricular pressure measurement. Computed tomography within 1 year of cardiac catheterization and with adequate visualization of the mitral annulus was included. MAC calcium score quantification by Agatston method was obtained offline using dedicated software (Aquarius, TeraRecon, V.4). Median patient age was 66.9±11.2 years, 47% of patients were women, 50% had coronary artery disease, 40% had atrial fibrillation, 47% had prior cardiac surgery, and 33% had prior chest radiation. Median diastolic mitral valve gradient was 9.4±3.4 mm Hg on echocardiography and 8.5±4 mm Hg invasively. Invasive median mitral valve area using the Gorlin formula was 1.87±0.9 cm 2 . Median MAC calcium score for the cohort was 7280±7937 Hounsfield units. MAC calcium score correlated with the presence of atrial fibrillation ( P =0.02) but was not associated with other comorbidities. There was no correlation between MAC calcium score and mitral valve area ( r =0.07; P =0.6) or mitral valve gradient ( r =−0.03; P =0.8). Conclusions MAC calcium score did not correlate with invasively measured mitral valve gradient and mitral valve area in patients with MAC‐related mitral stenosis, suggesting that calcium score should not be used as a surrogate for invasive hemodynamic parameters.

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is now an approved alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis. As the clinical adoption of TAVR expands, it remains important to identify predictors of mortality after TAVR. We aimed to evaluate the impact of sex differences in aortic valve calcium score (AVCS) on long-term mortality following TAVR in a large patient sample. Methods: We included consecutive patients who successfully underwent TAVR for treatment of severe native aortic valve stenosis from June 2010 to May 2021 across all US Mayo Clinic sites with follow-up through July 2021. AVCS values were obtained from preoperative computed tomography of the chest. Additional clinical data were abstracted from medical records. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox-proportional hazard regression models were employed to evaluate the effect of AVCS on long-term mortality. Results: A total of 2543 patients were evaluated in the final analysis. Forty-one percent were women, median age was 82 years (Q1: 76, Q3: 86), 18.4% received a permanent pacemaker following TAVR, and 88.5% received a balloon expandable valve. We demonstrate an increase in mortality risk with higher AVCS after multivariable adjustment ( P <0.001). When stratified by sex, every 500-unit increase in AVCS was associated with a 7% increase in mortality risk among women (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.02–1.12]) but not in men. Conclusions: We demonstrate a notable sex difference in the association between AVCS and long-term mortality in a large TAVR patient sample. This study highlights the potential value of AVCS in preprocedural risk stratification, specifically among women undergoing TAVR. Additional studies are needed to validate this finding.

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an approved alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement. However, as the clinical indication and adoption of TAVR expands, it remains important to identify predictors of mortality after TAVR. We aimed to study the impact of aortic valve calcium score on long term mortality following TAVR in a large patient population. Methods: We included consecutive patients who successfully underwent TAVR from June 2010 – June 2019 across all Mayo Clinic sites. Patients were followed through February 2021. Aortic valve calcium scores were obtained from preoperative computed tomography angiography of the chest. Additional data was abstracted from medical records. Cox-proportional hazard regression models were employed to evaluate the independent effect of aortic valve calcium score on mortality. Results: A total of 1988 patients were evaluated in the final analysis. Forty-two percent were women, median age was 83 years (Q1: 77, Q3: 87), 16% received a permanent pacemaker following TAVR and 83% received an Edwards Sapien valve. We demonstrate an incremental increase in mortality risk as aortic valve calcium score values increased after adjusting for age, gender, pacemaker implantation, left bundle branch block, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Selected calcium score cut-points with adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) are displayed: 1200 AU (aHR: 1.13, 95% CI 1.06, 1.20); 2000 AU (aHR: 1.22, 95% CI 1.09, 1.35); 3000 AU (aHR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.14, 1.58). Conclusion: This study demonstrates an association between aortic valve calcium score and long-term mortality in a large patient population. This highlights the potential predictive value of the calcium score in preoperative planning and may provide clinicians with an additional measure for risk stratification prior to TAVR.

Introduction: Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure is well established as an alternative to anticoagulation therapy for stroke prophylaxis among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) with relative or absolute contraindications to anticoagulation. Only the Watchman® (BSC) device has FDA approval for this indication. There are no current guidelines on the choice of short term antithrombotic therapy following placement of the Watchman® device. The landmark Watchman® clinical trials utilized warfarin and aspirin in the first 45 days to facilitate endothelialization; however these studies were started prior to direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) becoming widely available. Our main objective was to compare bleeding outcomes with warfarin vs. DOACs following Watchman® device placement. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients who received a Watchman® device at all three Mayo Clinic sites (MN, FL, AZ) between January 2010 and December 2018 with follow up for outcomes at 45 days or 6 weeks following procedure. We conducted bivariate analysis using t-tests and chi-square tests as appropriate. A logistic regression model was constructed to evaluate the effect of anticoagulant choice on bleeding and thromboembolic outcomes. Clinically significant bleeding was defined as bleeding leading to interruption of anticoagulation regimen or requiring transfusion. Results: 232 patients were identified (33% female), mean age in years, CHADS2VASC score and HASBLED scores were 77, 5 and 4 respectively. Overall, 39% were initiated on non-warfarin therapies and 11% had a significant bleeding episode during follow up. There was no difference in clinically significant bleeding events (11% vs. 12%; OR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.32 – 2.65) with short term DOAC use compared to warfarin. Patients who received a Watchman® due to GI bleeding were more likely to have a bleeding event in the first 6 weeks following Watchman® (OR: 4.08, 95% CI: 1.30 – 12.75). Conclusion: This observational study demonstrates no significant difference in bleeding episodes with DOACs compared to warfarin during the first 6 weeks following Watchman® device placement in patients at high risk for bleeding. Larger prospective studies are needed.

Background: Immunocompromised (IC) patients are at greater risk from cardiac surgery. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) may be more preferable for treating severe aortic stenosis (AS), though data regarding outcomes of IC patients are limited. Methods: We reviewed TAVR procedures performed at our institution from 1/2015-12/2019.We defined IC as either active malignancy receiving oncologic treatment or post organ transplant on immunosuppression, HIV, chronic steroid use (>5mg/day), or autoimmune disorder. Survival probability was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method. Cox regression was used to evaluate the association of IC with survival. Results: Of 173 patients who underwent TAVR, 56 (32%) were IC: 30 (54%) had active malignancy undergoing active treatment, 19 (34%) were IC without malignancy, and 7 (13%) had both. Among the 19 IC patients without malignancy, 4 were post organ transplant, 3 were taking chronic steroids, 2 had autoimmune disorder, 1 had HIV, and 10 had ≥2 combination of the above. IC patients, as compared to non-IC patients, had similar baseline demographics and STS risk score (median 4.3 vs. 4.4), respectively. There were 37 deaths (16 IC and 21 non-IC) over a median follow up of 1.4 years (IQR 1.0-2.0 years). 1-year survival after TAVR was 84.5% for IC patients and 89.0% for non-IC patients (log rank p = 0.51). After adjusting for age and sex, an association between IC and survival was observed but not found to be statistically significant (adjusted HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.80-3.00). Conclusions: IC patients undergoing TAVR have similar baseline characteristics as non-IC patients with a trend towards worse survival. Longer term follow-up may help clarify the impact of IC status on survival after TAVR.

A 61-year-old male presented for an annual exam and received a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) which revealed a mobile mass arising from a subaortic membrane. Further investigations with a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) and cardiac computerized tomography angiography (CTA) confirmed the presence of a mobile 9 mm×3 mm mass on a subaortic membrane. Cardiothoracic surgery was performed with an open operation removing the mass and subaortic membrane. Upon visual inspection, the mass was likened to a sea anemone and immunohistochemical staining performed pathologically confirmed the diagnosis of cardiac papillary fibroelastoma. This case represents the first reported example of a cardiac papillary fibroelastoma (PFE) arising from a subaortic membrane. Although PFEs are benign cardiac tumors, proper identification and consideration for excision of these lesions may be indicated to prevent thromboembolic complications.